|
|
|
|
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
6 |
|
|
Generalizing the Equivalence Principle by
Mitchell
Mark Fergerson wrote in message news:B1Fjd.49081$G15.20728@fed1read03...
Mitchell wrote:
The equivalence principle must be generalized. A...
|
|
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
17 |
|
|
Meaning of "weight" in general relativity by
Jack Sarfatti
On Nov 7, 2004, at 7:42 PM, wrote:
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
This is much ado about trivia. What can you explain that is worth
explaining? Nothing. You...
|
|
1 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
12 |
|
|
Definition of A Field by
RP
robert j. kolker wrote:
kenseto wrote:
Why do you think that he abused the language? Is it not possible that he
said exactly what he meant to say?? Who...
|
November 8th 04
by RP
|
0 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
26 |
|
|
Generalizing the Equivalence Principle by
Uncle Al
Mitchell wrote:
The equivalence principle must be generalized.
All bodies fall identically in vacuum regardless of composition,
internal structure, or situation.
Idiot.
|
|
0 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
5 |
|
|
|
November 8th 04
by Ross
|
0 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
5 |