|
|
It's had it's day.!! by
brian a m stuckless
$ It's had it's day.!!
jOHN Baez ..on sci.physics.research (s.p.r.).!!
S.p.r. MODERATORs are NOT keeping out CRANKs.!!
Average QUALiTY of POSTs DROPPED since he...
|
|
0 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
164 |
|
|
About Einstein's aether by
Laurent
Einstein's aether - which the aether I mostly talk about - isn't bound by
time , but by topolgical properties, a set of ratios determined at the
aether scale; frame...
( 1 2 3 ... Last Page)
|
|
190 |
204 |
|
|
Urgent mass matter.!! by
Y.Porat
the photon has rest mass
you can know it before even doing any calculations
or knowing any modern theory
that is basic logic of physics just simple logic is enpugh...
( 1 2)
|
|
15 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
129 |
|
|
No Mass -- no real physics !! by
brian a m stuckless
You are using the old GR-coup definition of "mass".
Everybody knows NOW that *LiGHT-mass* is h*f / c^2.
Time to give your NONsense, cracked-pot CONscience.
EinsteiN's m = e /...
|
|
0 |
7 |
|
|
When does a FOR cease to be a FOR? by
Daniel Weston
I am sure that this is a naive question, but I would like it to be
clarified in my own mind. Take a laboratory as a FOR. Does movement
within the lab destroy the lab as a...
( 1 2 3)
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
No Mass -- no real physics !! by
john_ramsden@sagitta-ps.com
Y.Porat wrote:
No mass --- No real physics !!
Wrong (IMHO). If one really understood the vacuum,
i.e. obtained a general solution of the GR equations
(which hasn't yet...
|
|
6 |
12 |
|
|
Baryons as Third Rank Antisymmetric Tensors by
Jay R. Yablon
Hello again:
I just posted some further materials at
http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm, regarding my very strong
suspicion that baryons are third rank...
|
|
5 |
17 |
|
|
The Purpose of Inflation by
macromitch@internetCDS.com
There are no black holes and the
Big Bang proves it. If there were the
Big Bang itself would have been one;
a universal infinite gravity of an original
singularity.
What is...
|
October 20th 05
by JimC
|
4 |
26 |
|
|
sci.physics.relativity.crap by
makc.the.great@gmail.com
why there is so much crap postings in this group?
may it be because there is a demand?
after all, people answer all of that.
would they not, all these crappers would go away...
|
|
5 |
19 |
|
|
Hal Puthoff replies on EVO Model by
Jack Sarfatti
On Oct 19, 2005, at 3:11 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
bcc
Key point below is simply
V(Sarfatti)/c^2 = V(Puthoff)/c^2 + V(Dark Energy)/c^2
where
|
|
0 |
16 |
|
|
Progress in EVO R&D Paste typo by
Jack Sarfatti
Change
In contrast
V(Sarfatti)/c^2 = Casimir Energy + Coulomb Energy + Rotational Energy +
Dark Energy
= V(Puthoff)/c^2 V/c^2 = ahc/Nmr + bNe^2/mc^2r + ^2 +
/\zpfr^2
|
|
0 |
18 |
|
|
What Physical Force REALLY IS by
rem460@aol.com
Physical FORCE -- What It REALLY IS
Most orthodox physicists do NOT know what a force
REALLY IS. The best that they can do...
|
|
6 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
18 |
|
|
The true crackpots by
Dirk Van de moortel
"Dirk Van de moortel" wrote in message news:...
Forgetting about x and y, the constancy of light speed and
a few more...
|
|
0 |
30 |
|
|
Posted another Preview Paper by
Jay R. Yablon
Hello again:
I just today posted a second preview paper at
http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm.
This paper actually previews perhaps four or five distinct papers...
( 1 2 3)
|
|
27 |
52 |
|
|
Progress in EVO R&D & WMD issue by
Jack Sarfatti
bcc
Basically Hal Puthoff's EVO model (and all Casimir models that ignore
the absolute gravity of zero point energy density from Einstein's
equivalence principle) fails...
|
|
0 |
24 |
|
|
the absolute content of an apple by
beda pietanza
the absolute content of an apple
The value of an apple in money is very hard to be assessed,
it depends on subjective taste,
money currency change value day by day,
the...
( 1 2)
|
|
10 |
30 |
|
|
Tom Robert's forces by
Androcles
"Do you seriously think that tidal forces are not gravity???? In both
Newtonian gravitation and GR they certainly are (but in GR gravity is
not a force)."
Tom Roberts...
|
|
0 |
16 |