On Jan 9, 2:02 am, "Dilaudid" wrote:
You spoke with him?

I'm gonna spend a moment helping you understand.

"VISUAL COMPLEX ANALYSIS by Tristan Needham

Pg 139 IV The Riemann Sphere

1 The Point at Infinity

"In discussing inversion we saw that results about lines could always be
understood as special limiting cases of results about circles, simply by
letting the radius tend to infinity. This limiting process is nevertheless
tiresome and clumsy; how much better it would be if lines could literally be
described as circles of an infinite radius.

Here is another, related inconvenience. Inversion in the unit circle is
a one-to-one mapping of the plane to itself that swaps pairs of points. The
same is true of the mapping z -- (1/z). However, there are exceptions: no
image point is presently associated with z = 0, nor is 0 to be found among
the image points.

To resolve both these difficulties, note that as z moves further and
further away from the origin, (1/z) moves closer and closer to zero. Thus as
z travels to ever greater distances (in any direction), it is as though it
were approaching a single point at infinity, written (sideways figure
eight), whose image is 0. Thus by definition, this point (infinity)
satisfies the following equations:

1/(infinity) = 0, 1/0 = (infinity)

The addition of this single point at infinity turns the complex plane
into the so called "extended complex plane." Thus we may now say, without
qualification, that z -- (1/z) is a one-to-one mapping of the extended
plane to itself."

See my friend Albert was a real rebel and only he could appreciate the
absolute brilliance of my friend Riemann. As soon as Al saw Riemann dividin'
by zero he just had to incorporate Riemann's Math into his General
Relativity Theory. "Of only two things I am certain, the stupidity of
humanity and the universe, and I'm not certain about the
universe." -Einstein

These two to see eye to eye on things of such mystical relevance to
everything. It's like Newton being "The Last Sorceror" Alchemy is a matter
of necessity not choice. Only the epiphany of humanity can actually do the
magical. You speak with Riemann about this when you get time cause he also
has some secrets about Prime Number Distribution that will rattle the
foundations of Knowledge. But enough for now digest division by zero because
it is infinite or remains undefined either way we get closer to GOD!

Peace

"bernardz" wrote in message

...

On Jan 7, 11:35 pm, "Dilaudid" wrote:
Perhaps, you should investigate a treatise on complex analysis. I got
this
friend named Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann who created his very own
non-Euclidean geometry and decided to assert that 1/0 tends to infinity

Wrong.

1/0 is not solvable.

and
1/infinity tends to zero.

True.

The Mathematica Symbols did not translate to the
newsgroup leaving the Y superimposed on the = sign in the proof.

Not that it is too critical since the post is tongue in cheek God does
not
have time to do math but Riemann's sphere is the non-Euclidean geometry
that
accurately describes the real universe.

It is yet to be shown that Riemann's geometry accurately describes the
real universe.

Triangles on Earth add to 182
degrees.

Irrelevant.

I got another friend named Albert who insists this geometry describes
real
events. Now look at the proof and go figure.

When did Albert say that?

You may want a mild CNS
depressant to relax with. If so try Dilaudid, its so refreshing.

That may explain your comments.

Peace!

"bernardZ" wrote in message

news:MPG.21ecae054627e2a5989730@news...

In article ,
says...
Conversely, dividing both sides

1/1 = 1/1 and 0/0 = 0/0

No No No

you cannot divide by zero.

God and the Universe are identical concepts.

There are just 2 infinities, the potential and the actual.