On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:42:36 -0600, UTC wrote:



"Dr. Henri Wilson" wrote:

I propose that this NG adopt a new physical unit called the 'Jeckyl' as its
standard for MESSAGE CONTENT STUPIDITY.

The scale should be logarithmic, so as to avoid the need for terms like 'Mega-
or Giga-Jeckyls' for people like Androcles and Eric Geese.

Negative ratings will imply only minor stupidity.

Some people will rate consistently high, whilst others such as Seto will
typically range from - infinity to + infinity.

Serious contributors, such as Hammond, Pencho and myself and will not appear on
the scale at all for obvious reasons. Rather, a separate scale indicating
MESSAGE CONSTRUCTIVENESS will be established with units of 'Wilson', 'Kennaugh'
or 'Valev'.

Other scales that may be considered in future might be ones for IRRELEVANCY
(unit: the 'Ghost' or the 'Sue') and for ALWAYS WRONG (unit: 'Draper' or
'Wormley'...or maybe the 'Poe'). Another, the NUISANCE VALUE, will have units
'Dono', 'Geese' or 'Van de Moombel'.

Tom Roberts will dominate a special complex scale, indicating an 'ABILITY TO
UTTER COMPLETE BULL**** WITH AN AIR OF GREAT AUTHORITY'. Diehards like Hobba,
DSmith, Jerry, Andersen, Pigpen, etc., who continually express huge amounts of
the former with very little of the latter will find themselves grouped around
zero on that scale.




Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

All I know is Im an ordinary idiot, masters degree in anthro
but like physics, do spectroscopy as a hobby, and I cant
get one damned question answered from anyone legit on any
physics related newsgroup! Something is lacking - severely.
Ive decided the ng's are nothing but a **** hole for nuts on
welfare or too much time on their hands? Sorry, but I had to
say it. Thanks
Ray

Nobody here cares about your ****ing qualifications...but you're right.

There are two camps here. One, the lunatic fringe, supports Einstein's stupid
theory. The others are usually those who have genuine physics or engineering
qualifications... and even the latter manage the occasional useful
contribution.

Actually, if you care to spend some time reading this stuff and ignoring the
morons, you will eventually learn quite a lot.




Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

"UTC" wrote in message
...
:
:
: "Dr. Henri Wilson" wrote:
:
: I propose that this NG adopt a new physical unit called the 'Jeckyl' as
its
: standard for MESSAGE CONTENT STUPIDITY.
:
: The scale should be logarithmic, so as to avoid the need for terms like
'Mega-
: or Giga-Jeckyls' for people like Androcles and Eric Geese.
:
: Negative ratings will imply only minor stupidity.
:
: Some people will rate consistently high, whilst others such as Seto will
: typically range from - infinity to + infinity.
:
: Serious contributors, such as Hammond, Pencho and myself and will not
appear on
: the scale at all for obvious reasons. Rather, a separate scale
indicating
: MESSAGE CONSTRUCTIVENESS will be established with units of 'Wilson',
'Kennaugh'
: or 'Valev'.
:
: Other scales that may be considered in future might be ones for
IRRELEVANCY
: (unit: the 'Ghost' or the 'Sue') and for ALWAYS WRONG (unit: 'Draper' or
: 'Wormley'...or maybe the 'Poe'). Another, the NUISANCE VALUE, will have
units
: 'Dono', 'Geese' or 'Van de Moombel'.
:
: Tom Roberts will dominate a special complex scale, indicating an
'ABILITY TO
: UTTER COMPLETE BULL**** WITH AN AIR OF GREAT AUTHORITY'. Diehards like
Hobba,
: DSmith, Jerry, Andersen, Pigpen, etc., who continually express huge
amounts of
: the former with very little of the latter will find themselves grouped
around
: zero on that scale.
:
:
:
:
: Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
:
: www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
:
: All I know is Im an ordinary idiot, masters degree in anthro
: but like physics, do spectroscopy as a hobby, and I cant
: get one damned question answered from anyone legit on any
: physics related newsgroup! Something is lacking - severely.
: Ive decided the ng's are nothing but a **** hole for nuts on
: welfare or too much time on their hands? Sorry, but I had to
: say it. Thanks
: Ray

Although Jeckyl is stupid, he can count.
The unit of stupidity is the "Wilson", who cannot.
What is your question?

"Dr." Henri Wilson wrote:
[...]
There are two camps here. One, the lunatic fringe,
supports Einstein's stupid theory.

Like they teach at these stupid fringe institutions:

http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...udoc_brief.php


--
--Bryan

wrote in message
...
: "Dr." Henri Wilson wrote:
: [...]
: There are two camps here. One, the lunatic fringe,
: supports Einstein's stupid theory.
:
: Like they teach at these stupid fringe institutions:
:
:
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...udoc_brief.php
:
:
The other lunatic fringe (membership of one) supports Wilson's stupid
theory.

"UTC" wrote in message
...
All I know is Im an ordinary idiot, masters degree in anthro
but like physics, do spectroscopy as a hobby, and I cant
get one damned question answered from anyone legit on any
physics related newsgroup! Something is lacking - severely.
Ive decided the ng's are nothing but a **** hole for nuts on
welfare or too much time on their hands? Sorry, but I had to
say it. Thanks

So does that means you've now joined the other nuts in the **** hole?

On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:56:01 GMT, "Androcles"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
: "Dr." Henri Wilson wrote:
: [...]
: There are two camps here. One, the lunatic fringe,
: supports Einstein's stupid theory.
:
: Like they teach at these stupid fringe institutions:
:
:
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...udoc_brief.php

Are these the people who have turned the US into a sick bankrupt society?

:
The other lunatic fringe (membership of one) supports Wilson's stupid
theory.

Somebody had to continue on from where Ritz left off.......




Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...udoc_brief.php
Are these the people who have turned the US into a sick bankrupt society?
:
The other lunatic fringe (membership of one) supports Wilson's stupid
theory.
Somebody had to continue on from where Ritz left off.......

You are a religious nutter .. not a physicist .. you believe in the faith of
ballistic theory. It must be a religious faith, as it is well proven that
ballistic theory is refuted, and so there is no objective reason to consider
that it to be correct. No wonder you simply will not listen to reason and
fact.

On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:21:43 +1100, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...udoc_brief.php
Are these the people who have turned the US into a sick bankrupt society?
:
The other lunatic fringe (membership of one) supports Wilson's stupid
theory.
Somebody had to continue on from where Ritz left off.......

You are a religious nutter .. not a physicist .. you believe in the faith of
ballistic theory. It must be a religious faith, as it is well proven that
ballistic theory is refuted, and so there is no objective reason to consider
that it to be correct. No wonder you simply will not listen to reason and
fact.

How is it that the Bath explanation of sagnac produces the right answer?
How is it that every known experiment supports BaTh?

I know the realization of this damages your pride... and makes you look like a
real dickhead...

The best thing you can do now is change your name and attitude.



Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:21:43 +1100, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
. ..
http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandre...udoc_brief.php
Are these the people who have turned the US into a sick bankrupt
society?
:
The other lunatic fringe (membership of one) supports Wilson's stupid
theory.
Somebody had to continue on from where Ritz left off.......

You are a religious nutter .. not a physicist .. you believe in the faith
of
ballistic theory. It must be a religious faith, as it is well proven that
ballistic theory is refuted, and so there is no objective reason to
consider
that it to be correct. No wonder you simply will not listen to reason and
fact.

How is it that the Bath explanation of sagnac produces the right answer?

It doesn't .. your explanation is incorrect and inconsistent with ballistic
theory

How is it that every known experiment supports BaTh?

It doesn't

I know the realization of this damages your pride... and makes you look
like a
real dickhead...

No .. that would be you .. you're th one in denial of a century of physcis

The best thing you can do now is change your name and attitude.

The best think you can do is shut the **** up

On Jan 4, 3:18*am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in messagenews:e0srn3t9gqgjp00elqsdmklvkc6tfca898@4ax .com...

How is it that every known experiment supports BaTh?

It doesn't

It wasn't so long ago that Henri was claiming that BaTh
effects are visible only in variable light curves, that
unification and mysterious "fields" would prevent BaTh
effects from ever being observable in laboratory
experiments. He has completely contradicted his earlier
writings on the subject.

Henri is not quite as bad as the White Queen, who practiced
believing impossible things for half-an-hour each day, and
believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.
But he's close...

Jerry