Anti matter could not make it pass the atmosphere in cosmic rays to be
captured by an accelerator. Since it is attractive it would
immediately anihalate with its counterpart. There is the possibility
of 500 quintillion attractive interactions before it reaches the
ground.

The proton and supposed anti proton colliders do not produce what anti
matter theory predicts. When matter is smashed you get more exotic
forms of hadrons but no light. You should get some high energy light
but you don't. This is simply a fact. Antimatter is fake.

Mitch Raemsch -- Light Fell --

On Dec 29, 8:25*pm, BURT wrote:
Anti matter could not make it pass the atmosphere in cosmic rays to be
captured by an accelerator. Since it is attractive it would
immediately anihalate with its counterpart. There is the possibility
of 500 quintillion attractive interactions before it reaches the
ground.

The proton and supposed anti proton colliders do not produce what anti
matter theory predicts. When matter is smashed you get more exotic
forms of hadrons but no light. You should get some high energy light
but you don't. This is simply a fact. Antimatter is fake.

Mitch Raemsch -- Light Fell --

Look at mesons. They are half matter half antimatter. This is dumb.
There is no union of a quark and an anti quark. They can't be both
matter and antimatter. Its as stupid as that.

Mitch Reamsch -- Light fall --

On Dec 29, 11:25*pm, BURT wrote:
Anti matter could not make it pass the atmosphere in cosmic rays to be
captured by an accelerator. Since it is attractive it would
immediately anihalate with its counterpart. There is the possibility
of 500 quintillion attractive interactions before it reaches the
ground.

The proton and supposed anti proton colliders do not produce what anti
matter theory predicts. When matter is smashed you get more exotic
forms of hadrons but no light. You should get some high energy light
but you don't. This is simply a fact. Antimatter is fake.

Mitch Raemsch -- Light Fell --

Actually Burt, antimatter particles produced by accelerator behave
precisly as predicted. This today is not considered "rocket sceince".

May I suggest that you take a introductory course in calculus at your
local community college, then purchase introductory atomic physics and
nuclear physics texts.

Harry C.

On Dec 30, 2:42*pm, " wrote:
On Dec 29, 11:25*pm, BURT wrote:

Anti matter could not make it pass the atmosphere in cosmic rays to be
captured by an accelerator. Since it is attractive it would
immediately anihalate with its counterpart. There is the possibility
of 500 quintillion attractive interactions before it reaches the
ground.

The proton and supposed anti proton colliders do not produce what anti
matter theory predicts. When matter is smashed you get more exotic
forms of hadrons but no light. You should get some high energy light
but you don't. This is simply a fact. Antimatter is fake.

Mitch Raemsch -- Light Fell --

Actually Burt, antimatter particles produced by accelerator behave
precisly as predicted. *This today is not considered "rocket sceince".

Accelerators don't produce antimatter.


May I suggest that you take a introductory course in calculus at your
local community college, then purchase introductory atomic physics and
nuclear physics texts.

Harry C.

On Dec 30, 7:59 pm, BURT wrote:
On Dec 30, 2:42 pm, " wrote:



On Dec 29, 11:25 pm, BURT wrote:

Anti matter could not make it pass the atmosphere in cosmic rays to be
captured by an accelerator. Since it is attractive it would
immediately anihalate with its counterpart. There is the possibility
of 500 quintillion attractive interactions before it reaches the
ground.

The proton and supposed anti proton colliders do not produce what anti
matter theory predicts. When matter is smashed you get more exotic
forms of hadrons but no light. You should get some high energy light
but you don't. This is simply a fact. Antimatter is fake.

Mitch Raemsch -- Light Fell --

Actually Burt, antimatter particles produced by accelerator behave
precisly as predicted. This today is not considered "rocket sceince".

Accelerators don't produce antimatter.

What do you base this declaration on?

Fermi Labs can make 124 billion antiprotons per HOUR.

http://www.fnal.gov/pub/inquiring/qu...atterprod.html

Why do you declare they can't?

- Randy

BURT writes:

Actually Burt, antimatter particles produced by accelerator behave
precisly as predicted. =A0This today is not considered "rocket sceince".

Accelerators don't produce antimatter.

Another "proclamation" from Burt that must be true because Burt says so,
not because of any facts. And apparently pulled from the same orifice as
the "protons rise to the surface of the nucleus" proclamation.

On Dec 30, 7:08 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Dec 30, 7:59 pm, BURT wrote:



On Dec 30, 2:42 pm, " wrote:

On Dec 29, 11:25 pm, BURT wrote:

Anti matter could not make it pass the atmosphere in cosmic rays to be
captured by an accelerator. Since it is attractive it would
immediately anihalate with its counterpart. There is the possibility
of 500 quintillion attractive interactions before it reaches the
ground.

The proton and supposed anti proton colliders do not produce what anti
matter theory predicts. When matter is smashed you get more exotic
forms of hadrons but no light. You should get some high energy light
but you don't. This is simply a fact. Antimatter is fake.

Mitch Raemsch -- Light Fell --

Actually Burt, antimatter particles produced by accelerator behave
precisly as predicted. This today is not considered "rocket sceince".

Accelerators don't produce antimatter.

What do you base this declaration on?

Fermi Labs can make 124 billion antiprotons per HOUR.

http://www.fnal.gov/pub/inquiring/qu...atterprod.html


NB: That's an old number. The current record is 244 billion in
an hour (see "accumulator records")
http://mccrory.fnal.gov/ops/records.php

Why do you declare they can't?

Shot in the dark he because he's an ignorant moron?

-jc



- Randy

On Dec 29, 10:25 pm, BURT wrote:
Anti matter could not make it pass the atmosphere in cosmic rays to be
captured by an accelerator.

Your ignorance of the nature of cosmic rays notwithstanding, the
antimatter used in accelerators is not "captured" from cosmic
rays; it is produced from protons:
http://www-bd.fnal.gov/public/antiproton.html

Since it is attractive it would
immediately anihalate with its counterpart. There is the possibility
of 500 quintillion attractive interactions before it reaches the
ground.

The proton and supposed anti proton colliders do not produce what anti
matter theory predicts.

In fact, they produce exactly what theory predicts.

When matter is smashed you get more exotic
forms of hadrons but no light. You should get some high energy light
but you don't.

Eh, yes you do.See for example:
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/469031.html

This is simply a fact.
The fact is you are simple.

-jc

On Dec 30, 5:08*pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On Dec 30, 7:59 pm, BURT wrote:





On Dec 30, 2:42 pm, " wrote:

On Dec 29, 11:25 pm, BURT wrote:

Anti matter could not make it pass the atmosphere in cosmic rays to be
captured by an accelerator. Since it is attractive it would
immediately anihalate with its counterpart. There is the possibility
of 500 quintillion attractive interactions before it reaches the
ground.

The proton and supposed anti proton colliders do not produce what anti
matter theory predicts. When matter is smashed you get more exotic
forms of hadrons but no light. You should get some high energy light
but you don't. This is simply a fact. Antimatter is fake.

Mitch Raemsch -- Light Fell --

Actually Burt, antimatter particles produced by accelerator behave
precisly as predicted. *This today is not considered "rocket sceince".

Accelerators don't produce antimatter.

What do you base this declaration on?

Fermi Labs can make 124 billion antiprotons per HOUR.

How?



http://www.fnal.gov/pub/inquiring/qu...atterprod.html

Why do you declare they can't?

* * * * * * - Randy- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Dec 31, 2:20 pm, BURT wrote:
On Dec 30, 5:08 pm, Randy Poe wrote:



On Dec 30, 7:59 pm, BURT wrote:

On Dec 30, 2:42 pm, " wrote:

On Dec 29, 11:25 pm, BURT wrote:

Anti matter could not make it pass the atmosphere in cosmic rays to be
captured by an accelerator. Since it is attractive it would
immediately anihalate with its counterpart. There is the possibility
of 500 quintillion attractive interactions before it reaches the
ground.

The proton and supposed anti proton colliders do not produce what anti
matter theory predicts. When matter is smashed you get more exotic
forms of hadrons but no light. You should get some high energy light
but you don't. This is simply a fact. Antimatter is fake.

Mitch Raemsch -- Light Fell --

Actually Burt, antimatter particles produced by accelerator behave
precisly as predicted. This today is not considered "rocket sceince".

Accelerators don't produce antimatter.

What do you base this declaration on?

Fermi Labs can make 124 billion antiprotons per HOUR.

How?

Apparently you like to just make these random troll declarations
and don't even want to pretend to use Google.

http://agni.phys.iit.edu/~vpa/fnalantiproton.html

"Protons from the Main Injector start the antiproton creation process
by colliding onto a stack of nickel plates called the Target. For
every
1 million protons colliding in these nickel plates, only about 20-30
8
GeV antiprotons are produced"

http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1402-4896/48/2/012
"We measured cross sections for production of antiprotons, K- and ð-
mesons at èlab = 0° in nucleus-nucleus collisions for the systems Ne
+
NaF, Ne + Cu, Ne + Sn, Ne + Bi and for Ni + Ni..."

Apparently the proton-on-nickel collision is the most productive
reaction we know, as inefficient as it is (20 antiprotons out
for every million protons in).

- Randy