On Jan 4, 8:10 pm, BURT wrote:
On Jan 4, 8:08 am, Randy Poe wrote:



On Jan 3, 11:09 pm, BURT wrote:

On Jan 3, 4:12 pm, THE_ONE wrote:

If you mix an Anti-Matter Hoax with a Matter Hoax, will this cause an
explosion ?

Mesons should

You mean they should decay immediately into other
particles?

Guess what mesons do, some of them within femtoseconds?

and that's the point.

And they do.

- Randy

There is no such thing as a matter-antimatter particle at all.
Mesons are a hoax. So is antimatter itself.
Mitch Raemsch

Mesons are a hoax?
So, let's see. We have this observed particle, charge 1, spin 1, mass
140 MeV, and it decays into a muon and a neutrino. This we know
because we observe it. We've been calling it a pion for...well, ages.
Because it has middlin' mass, we've been calling it a meson. What
should we be calling it?

PD

"PD" wrote in message
...
| On Jan 4, 8:10 pm, BURT wrote:
| On Jan 4, 8:08 am, Randy Poe wrote:
|
|
|
| On Jan 3, 11:09 pm, BURT wrote:
|
| On Jan 3, 4:12 pm, THE_ONE wrote:
|
| If you mix an Anti-Matter Hoax with a Matter Hoax, will this cause
an
| explosion ?
|
| Mesons should
|
| You mean they should decay immediately into other
| particles?
|
| Guess what mesons do, some of them within femtoseconds?
|
| and that's the point.
|
| And they do.
|
| - Randy
|
| There is no such thing as a matter-antimatter particle at all.
| Mesons are a hoax. So is antimatter itself.
| Mitch Raemsch
|
| Mesons are a hoax?
| So, let's see. We have this observed particle, charge 1, spin 1, mass
| 140 MeV, and it decays into a muon and a neutrino. This we know
| because we observe it. We've been calling it a pion for...well, ages.
| Because it has middlin' mass, we've been calling it a meson. What
| should we be calling it?
|
Err... err ... pi-youson and it decays to a mu-meson?

On Jan 5, 9:59 am, "Androcles" wrote:
"PD" wrote in message

...
| On Jan 4, 8:10 pm, BURT wrote:
| On Jan 4, 8:08 am, Randy Poe wrote:
|
|
|
| On Jan 3, 11:09 pm, BURT wrote:
|
| On Jan 3, 4:12 pm, THE_ONE wrote:
|
| If you mix an Anti-Matter Hoax with a Matter Hoax, will this cause
an
| explosion ?
|
| Mesons should
|
| You mean they should decay immediately into other
| particles?
|
| Guess what mesons do, some of them within femtoseconds?
|
| and that's the point.
|
| And they do.
|
| - Randy
|
| There is no such thing as a matter-antimatter particle at all.
| Mesons are a hoax. So is antimatter itself.
| Mitch Raemsch
|
| Mesons are a hoax?
| So, let's see. We have this observed particle, charge 1, spin 1, mass
| 140 MeV, and it decays into a muon and a neutrino. This we know
| because we observe it. We've been calling it a pion for...well, ages.
| Because it has middlin' mass, we've been calling it a meson. What
| should we be calling it?
|
Err... err ... pi-youson and it decays to a mu-meson?

A muon isn't a meson -- and it hasn't been since about the 1950's. Do
catch up.

"PD" wrote in message
...
| On Jan 5, 9:59 am, "Androcles" wrote:
| "PD" wrote in message
|
| ...
| | On Jan 4, 8:10 pm, BURT wrote:
| | On Jan 4, 8:08 am, Randy Poe wrote:
| |
| |
| |
| | On Jan 3, 11:09 pm, BURT wrote:
| |
| | On Jan 3, 4:12 pm, THE_ONE wrote:
| |
| | If you mix an Anti-Matter Hoax with a Matter Hoax, will this
cause
| an
| | explosion ?
| |
| | Mesons should
| |
| | You mean they should decay immediately into other
| | particles?
| |
| | Guess what mesons do, some of them within femtoseconds?
| |
| | and that's the point.
| |
| | And they do.
| |
| | - Randy
| |
| | There is no such thing as a matter-antimatter particle at all.
| | Mesons are a hoax. So is antimatter itself.
| | Mitch Raemsch
| |
| | Mesons are a hoax?
| | So, let's see. We have this observed particle, charge 1, spin 1, mass
| | 140 MeV, and it decays into a muon and a neutrino. This we know
| | because we observe it. We've been calling it a pion for...well, ages.
| | Because it has middlin' mass, we've been calling it a meson. What
| | should we be calling it?
| |
| Err... err ... pi-youson and it decays to a mu-meson?
|
| A muon isn't a meson -- and it hasn't been since about the 1950's. Do
| catch up.

Yeah, but the feral variety are faster than photons in a fair race, you
can't catch up to that, and millions of electron volts are not mass until
you can put some joules on the bathroom scales and measure
them in kilograms. But you ****heads went to looney tunes school,
you wouldn't know that.

PD wrote:
So, let's see. We have this observed particle, charge 1, spin 1, mass
140 MeV, and it decays into a muon and a neutrino.

Spin 0. And there are three of them: pi+, pi-, pi0 -- the pi+ and pi- do
indeed decay into a muon and a neutrino, but the pi0 decays a billion
times more quickly into a pair of gammas (that type of decay is
forbidden to the charged pions).


This we know
because we observe it. We've been calling it a pion for...well, ages.
Because it has middlin' mass, we've been calling it a meson. What
should we be calling it?

Yes.


A muon isn't a meson -- and it hasn't been since about the 1950's. Do
catch up.

Yes. Originally the properties of the many newly-discovered particles
were unclear. Today we have a solid classification of them, and the
definitions of the terms have been modified to correspond to our
improved understanding.


Tom Roberts

On Jan 4, 9:10 pm, BURT wrote:
On Jan 4, 8:08 am, Randy Poe wrote:



On Jan 3, 11:09 pm, BURT wrote:

On Jan 3, 4:12 pm, THE_ONE wrote:

If you mix an Anti-Matter Hoax with a Matter Hoax, will this cause an
explosion ?

Mesons should

You mean they should decay immediately into other
particles?

Guess what mesons do, some of them within femtoseconds?

and that's the point.

And they do.

- Randy

There is no such thing as a matter-antimatter particle at all.
Mesons are a hoax. So is antimatter itself.

Yes, you keep saying that over and over. But you've
never explained what makes you think so. You
haven't explained what you think is detected by
gamma detectors, but just declared that there are
no gammas produced. You haven't said you think the
other particle is that annihilates a proton, or
is produced when a proton-X pair is created from
gammas. Just declared that it isn't anti-matter
because anti-matter doesn't exist. You haven't
stated what the particles used in positron
emitter tomography, just that anti-matter doesn't
exist.

Do you have any thoughts about what is happening
in PET and in these experiments other than
something involving anti-matter?

What exactly do you think anti-matter is?

Are you in fact capable of forming a sentence
or a thought other than "anti-matter is a hoax"?

- Randy

On Jan 5, 11:34 am, Tom Roberts wrote:
PD wrote:
So, let's see. We have this observed particle, charge 1, spin 1, mass
140 MeV, and it decays into a muon and a neutrino.

Spin 0.

Whoops. I knew that. :)

And there are three of them: pi+, pi-, pi0 -- the pi+ and pi- do
indeed decay into a muon and a neutrino, but the pi0 decays a billion
times more quickly into a pair of gammas (that type of decay is
forbidden to the charged pions).

This we know
because we observe it. We've been calling it a pion for...well, ages.
Because it has middlin' mass, we've been calling it a meson. What
should we be calling it?

Yes.

A muon isn't a meson -- and it hasn't been since about the 1950's. Do
catch up.

Yes. Originally the properties of the many newly-discovered particles
were unclear. Today we have a solid classification of them, and the
definitions of the terms have been modified to correspond to our
improved understanding.

Tom Roberts