![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: empty, gravity, quantization, space |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In spacetime there is no such thing as a 'vacuum', there is a 'false vacuum', as Alan Guth called it, this is why the CBR's minimum temperature is uniformly at 2.7 K throughout the observable universe. Scientists now are starting to call space by names like Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR), and Zero Point Radiation (ZPR), which is akin to John A. Wheeler's pre-geometry or quantum foam. Most scientists agree with Max Planck in that quanta are the smallest measurable energy amount or quantum of action, and that Planck's constant 'h' relates the energy in one quantum of electromagnetic radiation to the frequency of that radiation. That all of matter's spectral properties and patterns can be explained in terms of exact multiples of a basic minimum value, and that thanks to the determination of 'h' we now can conceive order at the quantum mechanical level. Many also agree with de Broglie in that every object in motion would move in a wave and is accompanied by a wave, also that he showed that electrons traverse an integral number of wavelengths for each complete orbit of an atom and that the quantization and structure of quanta will always depend on the properties of their source and the objects with which they interact. Quanta are measurable amounts of cycling spacetime. In reality there aren't any vibrating point particles, as Werner Heisenberg properly and adeptly assumed, it's more like wavefronts... or membranes. A quantum of action (quanta) appears as a very small region of randomly fluctuating, process independent, object. There are no point particles, a point particle must be internally static, with no internal time, and that is not possible. Points don't even occupy space, they don't really exist, the point is only a mathematical convenience. Each particle, even the smallest, is in constant internal motion, each is the product of an internal instability, each particle possessing its own internal time, for this reason it is not possible to get rid of uncertainty at a spacetime level. That's why we need to round up measurements to no less than 4 decimal places in order to more accurately describe reality. Planck's constant is closely related to a particle's wave-length and it is from where particle complementarity and the non-commutativity between momentum and position emerge as properties of space and matter and as proof of the inseparability of quantum processes. Momentum and position don't commute because subatomic particles can be seen as standing and moving at the same time, energy is constantly flowing in and out of the system as matter feeds from empty space. The fundamental particle must then be a small spherical region of pulsating spacetime whose diameter equals one Planck length. Material space is packed full of particles, it is a sea of randomly fluctuating particles. Material space is grainy, it is quantum matter, and each grain has its own internal motion or cycle, some grains having a diameter as small as one Planck length. Much much smaller than any neutron, or proton. The size ratio between the cells in a human body and the body itself is much smaller than the size ratio between ZPR particles and a hydrogen atom. In this view, these ZPR particles are gathered and organized by matter waves (morphic fields), as matter crystallizes or condenses into atoms, molecules, cells... etc. Quantum matter continuously flow into matter as it is quantized and carried by concentric, spherical, standing waves, at the same time EMR radiates from and into matter, exchanging information with the surrounding objects in space about its objective state. Each object, regardless of size, is accompanied by its own particular matter wave. Therefore, the concept of a super-wave-function where various particles are described by a single wave-function applies. The aether I believe in is akin to Basil Hiley's pre-space and Einstein's gravitational aether. A realm where the concepts of motion, therefore, extension, are not applicable. Motion and space come with spacetime, not before. What you call free space, or absolute space, complies with Einstein's aether. This aether is also very similar to Newton's absolute space, but with physical properties. The aether is where the laws of electromagnetism, ratios like permittivity and permeability, are determined. It is not bound by the rules of spacetime, and exists independently from spacetime. It is before spacetime, just as your, absolutely free of EMR and establishment accepted, free space. Newton's absolute space (an empty plenum, a void, which he considered to be real) was the seed to Einstein's aether, but he saw that, for Newton's view to be correct, objects would have to be perceived as really separated, related only by their macroscopic mechanical interactions (billiard ball model), and there would be no need for the principles of equivalency and relativity to accurately describe this universe, but fact says we need relativation. In Mach's view there is reciprocity between space and matter. Einstein's equivalency principle sprang from the same concept of unity and wholeness implied in most of Mach's ideas. This unity and oneness which distills from the GTR, is the philosophical basis for Einstein's holistic views. Without an aether there can't be spacetime, there can't be continuity, hence, no causality or process. This is also what Mach had realized. Resistance to motion, he thought, could only be the product of unity among all objects. He believed that there is a constant dependence (reciprocity) between matter and the space that surrounds it, and that this unity could only be explained by an all pervading aether. Space is a medium with mechanical properties (pressure and density). It is observable, hence measurable and, unlike Einstein's aether, it possesses material or mechanical properties. Space is made from particles, the aether is not, space is material, the aether is not. Space is made from many different types of particles, some resist compression, or exhibit negative-gravitation (thermal radiation, light), and some are infinitely compressible and exhibit positive- gravitation (zero-point radiation, dark matter). Boyer described the ZPR as fundamental to space and thermal radiation as a product generated by the motion of ZPR particles. Which in turn were buffeted back into motion by this thermal radiation which they themselves had produced, providing the basis for a perpetual motion system and solving the riddle of the apparently infinite energy coming from space. [See Puthoff, Haisch and Rueda's papers] Now, if space is made from particles, then it may be subject to changes in pressure and density, like a gas. Therefore, if space particles, carried by matter waves, continuously condense into material objects, that would mean that the closer you get to the object the denser the space would be as a function of the object's mass and radius, explaining why gravitic pressure in space flow theories still obeys the inverse square law. Space particles are carried by, matter selective, inwardly flowing, matter waves in an electrical current. Just like electrons are moved by an electromotive force. From Relativity we get that a physical system accelerated through space has the same equilibrium properties as an unaccelerated system immersed in a gravitational field. Timothy Boyer said - A physical system accelerated through space has the same equilibrium properties as an unaccelerated system immersed in thermal radiation at a temperature above absolute zero, and that, at a temperature of absolute zero, a harmonic oscillator in a resting frame of reference or moving with constant velocity is subject only to zero-point oscillations. In an accelerated frame the oscillator responds as if it were at a temperature greater than zero. As an object accelerates through space, there is an EMR exchange between the object and space, as a mechanism in Nature there to keep thermal equilibrium between the accelerating object and the space that surrounds it, as required by the GTR's equivalency principle and the laws of Thermodynamics. When an object is just sitting, but immersed in a gravitational field, space is what's being accelerated in relation to the object. Nature, in order to maintain thermal equilibrium, uses this mechanism, now known as Boyer's 'equilibrium spectrum' or Unruh-Davies radiation. And this is how gravity is explained; space flow manifesting as gravitic pressure. It is material space flowing into matter. And this flow is caused by an electromotive force. Pressure goes up as space gets radially closer to the source of the electromotive force because it becomes denser, as described by the inverse square law. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Dec 28, 5:35*am, Laurent wrote:
In spacetime there is no such thing as a 'vacuum', there is a 'false vacuum', as Alan Guth called it, this is why the CBR's minimum temperature is uniformly at 2.7 K throughout the observable universe. Scientists now are starting to call space by names like Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR), and Zero Point Radiation (ZPR), which is akin to John A. Wheeler's pre-geometry or quantum foam. Most scientists agree with Max Planck in that quanta are the smallest measurable energy amount or quantum of action, and that Planck's constant 'h' relates the energy in one quantum of electromagnetic radiation to the frequency of that radiation. That all of matter's spectral properties and patterns can be explained in terms of exact multiples of a basic minimum value, and that thanks to the determination of 'h' we now can conceive order at the quantum mechanical level. Many also agree with de Broglie in that every object in motion would move in a wave and is accompanied by a wave, also that he showed that electrons traverse an integral number of wavelengths for each complete orbit of an atom and that the quantization and structure of quanta will always depend on the properties of their source and the objects with which they interact. Quanta are measurable amounts of cycling spacetime. In reality there aren't any vibrating point particles, as Werner Heisenberg properly and adeptly assumed, it's more like wavefronts... or membranes. A quantum of action (quanta) appears as a very small region of randomly fluctuating, process independent, object. There are no point particles, a point particle must be internally static, with no internal time, and that is not possible. Points don't even occupy space, they don't really exist, the point is only a mathematical convenience. Each particle, even the smallest, is in constant internal motion, each is the product of an internal instability, each particle possessing its own internal time, for this reason it is not possible to get rid of uncertainty at a spacetime level. That's why we need to round up measurements to no less than 4 decimal places in order to more accurately describe reality. Planck's constant is closely related to a particle's wave-length and it is from where particle complementarity and the non-commutativity between momentum and position emerge as properties of space and matter and as proof of the inseparability of quantum processes. Momentum and position don't commute because subatomic particles can be seen as standing and moving at the same time, energy is constantly flowing in and out of the system as matter feeds from empty space. The fundamental particle must then be a small spherical region of pulsating spacetime whose diameter equals one Planck length. Material space is packed full of particles, it is a sea of randomly fluctuating particles. Material space is grainy, it is quantum matter, and each grain has its own internal motion or cycle, some grains having a diameter as small as one Planck length. Much much smaller than any neutron, or proton. The size ratio between the cells in a human body and the body itself is much smaller than the size ratio between ZPR particles and a hydrogen atom. In this view, these ZPR particles are gathered and organized by matter waves (morphic fields), as matter crystallizes or condenses into atoms, molecules, cells... etc. Quantum matter continuously flow into matter as it is quantized and carried by concentric, spherical, standing waves, at the same time EMR radiates from and into matter, exchanging information with the surrounding objects in space about its objective state. Each object, regardless of size, is accompanied by its own particular matter wave. Therefore, the concept of a super-wave-function where various particles are described by a single wave-function applies. The aether I believe in is akin to Basil Hiley's pre-space and Einstein's gravitational aether. A realm where the concepts of motion, therefore, extension, are not applicable. Motion and space come with spacetime, not before. What you call free space, or absolute space, complies with Einstein's aether. This aether is also very similar to Newton's absolute space, but with physical properties. The aether is where the laws of electromagnetism, ratios like permittivity and permeability, are determined. It is not bound by the rules of spacetime, and exists independently from spacetime. It is before spacetime, just as your, absolutely free of EMR and establishment accepted, free space. Newton's absolute space (an empty plenum, a void, which he considered to be real) was the seed to Einstein's aether, but he saw that, for Newton's view to be correct, objects would have to be perceived as really separated, related only by their macroscopic mechanical interactions (billiard ball model), and there would be no need for the principles of equivalency and relativity to accurately describe this universe, but fact says we need relativation. In Mach's view there is reciprocity between space and matter. Einstein's equivalency principle sprang from the same concept of unity and wholeness implied in most of Mach's ideas. This unity and oneness which distills from the GTR, is the philosophical basis for Einstein's holistic views. Without an aether there can't be spacetime, there can't be continuity, hence, no causality or process. This is also what Mach had realized. Resistance to motion, he thought, could only be the product of unity among all objects. He believed that there is a constant dependence (reciprocity) between matter and the space that surrounds it, and that this unity could only be explained by an all pervading aether. Space is a medium with mechanical properties (pressure and density). It is observable, hence measurable and, unlike Einstein's aether, it possesses material or mechanical properties. Space is made from particles, the aether is not, space is material, the aether is not. Space is made from many different types of particles, some resist compression, or exhibit negative-gravitation (thermal radiation, light), and some are infinitely compressible and exhibit positive- gravitation (zero-point radiation, dark matter). Boyer described the ZPR as fundamental to space and thermal radiation as a product generated by the motion of ZPR particles. Which in turn were buffeted back into motion by this thermal radiation which they themselves had produced, providing the basis for a perpetual motion system and solving the riddle of the apparently infinite energy coming from space. [See Puthoff, Haisch and Rueda's papers] Now, if space is made from particles, then it may be subject to changes in pressure and density, like a gas. Therefore, if space particles, carried by matter waves, continuously condense into material objects, that would mean that the closer you get to the object the denser the space would be as a function of the object's mass and radius, explaining why gravitic pressure in space flow theories still obeys the inverse square law. Space particles are carried by, matter selective, inwardly flowing, matter waves in an electrical current. Just like electrons are moved by an electromotive force. From Relativity we get that a physical system accelerated through space has the same equilibrium properties as an unaccelerated system immersed in a gravitational field. Timothy Boyer said - A physical system accelerated through space has the same equilibrium properties as an unaccelerated system immersed in thermal radiation at a temperature above absolute zero, and that, at a temperature of absolute zero, a harmonic oscillator in a resting frame of reference or moving with constant velocity is subject only to zero-point oscillations. In an accelerated frame the oscillator responds as if it were at a temperature greater than zero. As an object accelerates through space, there is an EMR exchange between the object and space, as a mechanism in Nature there to keep thermal equilibrium between the accelerating object and the space that surrounds it, as required by the GTR's equivalency principle and the laws of Thermodynamics. When an object is just sitting, but immersed in a gravitational field, space is what's being accelerated in relation to the object. Nature, in order to maintain thermal equilibrium, uses this mechanism, now known as Boyer's 'equilibrium spectrum' or Unruh-Davies radiation. And this is how gravity is explained; space flow manifesting as gravitic pressure. It is material space flowing into matter. And this flow is caused by an electromotive force. Pressure goes up as space gets radially closer to the source of the electromotive force because it becomes denser, as described by the inverse square law. Like There is space between millions of swiming sardines thatmove as a unitwe can relate this to molecules and atoms.We know in the case of sardines its mediam is water. With sub-microscopic particles its tricky stuff and we call this tricky stuff(space) ether. Reality is there is no area in both the micro realm or macro realm that has nothing there. QM tells us that Sunbeam & Bert |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Empty Space, Quantization and Gravity | Laurent | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | December 28th 07 02:42 PM |
| is empty space up for debate? | Aaron | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 4 | September 30th 07 05:41 PM |
| gravity is vibrations in empty space | contactee | The Theory of Relativity | 19 | August 23rd 07 01:23 PM |
| Any SPACE where a particle is, is NOT empty.!! | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | January 18th 06 09:09 AM |
| space-time quantization | alistair | Particle Physics | 1 | June 5th 04 09:56 PM |