A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Is Global Warming Caused By Man?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 20th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Cino
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 45
Default Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

There has been an enormous publicity effort in the recent years to get
the public to accept the idea that the release of greenhouse gases, mainly
CO2, has resulted in an inexorable rise in the surface temperature of the
Earth. A pair of graphs on page 6 of "An Inconvenient Book", by Glenn Beck,
shows that premise to be completely false. (I am currently attempting to
determine the source and validity of the data.) These graphs cover a period
of time between 1870 and 2000. As anyone with more than a double digit IQ
can plainly see, if this data is valid, then what we assert to be global
warming is due to Solar activity and not to man's activities. Furthermore,
the correlation is so obvious that a reasonable man would assert that the
Global Warming scare does not represent truth but is propaganda for some
ulterior motive. No scientist could be stupid enough not to recognize the
implications of these curves and have survived the PhD process.

The first pair of curves shows artic temperatures over the 130 year
period and the solar activity. The correlation between the curves is almost
perfect, indicating an extremely strong cause and effect relationship! The
second pair of curves shows the CO2 content of the atmosphere and the arctic
temperature over the same time period. The correlation between these curves
is virtually non-existent. Providing I am able to verify the data
represented by these curves, it is reasonable to assert that Al Gore et al
are not merely mistaken, they are deliberately lying.

In all of the discussions of global warming, it has not been possible
to find any description of the actual mechanism by which CO2 etc. affect the
surface temperature of the Earth. All of the discussions seem to assume that
it is the amount of greenhouse gasses in the volume of the atmosphere which
control the Earth's surface temperature. That assumption is false! Earth's
temperature is determined by the altitude amd temperature of the "CO2
horizon". It is at this altitude and below the greenhouse gases cause the
atmosphere to be opaque to the 10 to 14.5 micron band of electromagnetic
radiation. It is the greenhouse gases at this altitude that radiate the
Earth's energy input (internal and solar) to space. No greenhouse radiation
to space occurs since below this altitude (about 55,000 feet) since any such
radiation is re-absorbed by the gasses above. The equilibrium temperature
for re-radiation of Earth's energy input to space is about -55C. (Depends
upon Solar input, ice cover and internal heat). Heat transfer from lower
levels to the CO2 horizon is primarily by convection. From the altitude of
the CO2 horizon downward, the atmospheres absolute temperature rises due to
adiabatic compression in proportion to the pressure ratio raised to the 1.35
power (see any thermodynamics text). It is this adiabatic temperature rise
which determined the surface temperature. It is This adiabatic temperature
rise effect from CO2 horizon is atop a very thick atmosphere which causes
the surface of Venus to be so hot. It is not the amount of greenhouse
contained in the bulk of the atmosphere.

All of the information needed to determine the global warming effects
of greenhouse gasses can be obtained by directly measuring the altitude at
which the atmosphere becomes opaque in the 10 to 14.5 micron band of
electromagnetic radiation. Its a simple observation readily made by
satellite. With this data, the Earth's average equilibrium surface
temperature is readily determined. The effort does not require a battalion
of PhDs,

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- . If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.




Ads
  #2  
Old December 21st 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
xxein@comcast.net
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 174
Default Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

On Dec 20, 9:33*am, "Cino" wrote:
Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

* * *There has been an enormous publicity effort in the recent years to get
the public to accept the idea that the release of greenhouse gases, mainly
CO2, has resulted in an inexorable rise in the surface temperature of the
Earth. A pair of graphs on page 6 of "An *Inconvenient Book", by Glenn Beck,
shows that premise to be completely false. (I am currently attempting to
determine the source and validity of the data.) These graphs cover a period
of time between 1870 and 2000. As anyone with more than a double digit IQ
can plainly see, if this data is valid, then what we assert to be global
warming is due to Solar activity and not to man's activities. Furthermore,
the correlation is so obvious that a reasonable man would assert that the
Global Warming scare does not represent truth but is propaganda for some
ulterior motive. No scientist could be stupid enough not to recognize the
implications of these curves and have survived the PhD process.

* * *The first pair of curves shows artic temperatures over the 130 year
period and the solar activity. The correlation between the curves is almost
perfect, indicating an extremely strong cause and effect relationship! The
second pair of curves shows the CO2 content of the atmosphere and the arctic
temperature over the same time period. The correlation between these curves
is virtually non-existent. Providing I am able to verify the data
represented by these curves, it is reasonable to assert that Al Gore et al
are not merely mistaken, they are deliberately lying.

* * *In all of the discussions of global warming, it has not been possible
to find any description of the actual mechanism by which CO2 etc. affect the
surface temperature of the Earth. All of the discussions seem to assume that
it is the amount of greenhouse gasses in the volume of the atmosphere which
control the Earth's surface temperature. That assumption is false! Earth's
temperature is determined by the altitude amd temperature of the "CO2
horizon". It is at this altitude and below the greenhouse gases cause the
atmosphere to be opaque to the 10 to 14.5 micron band of electromagnetic
radiation. It is the greenhouse gases at this altitude that radiate the
Earth's energy input (internal and solar) to space. No greenhouse radiation
to space occurs since below this altitude (about 55,000 feet) since any such
radiation is re-absorbed by the gasses above. The equilibrium temperature
for re-radiation of Earth's energy input to space is about -55C. (Depends
upon Solar input, ice cover and internal heat). Heat transfer from lower
levels to the CO2 horizon is primarily by convection. From the altitude of
the CO2 horizon downward, the atmospheres absolute temperature rises due to
adiabatic compression in proportion to the pressure ratio raised to the 1.35
power (see any thermodynamics text). It is this adiabatic temperature rise
which determined the surface temperature. It is This adiabatic temperature
rise effect from CO2 horizon is atop a very thick atmosphere which causes
the surface of Venus to be so hot. It is not the amount of greenhouse
contained in the bulk of the atmosphere.

* * *All of the information needed to determine the global warming effects
of greenhouse gasses can be obtained by directly measuring the altitude at
which the atmosphere becomes opaque in the 10 to 14.5 micron band of
electromagnetic radiation. Its a simple observation readily made by
satellite. With this data, the Earth's average equilibrium surface
temperature is readily determined. The effort does not require a battalion
of PhDs,

* * *Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

* * *E-mail:- . If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.


xxein: You conveniantly ignored the actual proportioned mix of O, O2,
N, H and CO2 wrt r.

While I agree with more than much in your other essays, you are
souring in this.
  #3  
Old December 21st 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
vanep@cox.net
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 359
Default Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

On Dec 20, 6:33*am, "Cino" wrote:
Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

* * *There has been an enormous publicity effort in the recent years to get
the public to accept the idea that the release of greenhouse gases, mainly
CO2, has resulted in an inexorable rise in the surface temperature of the
Earth. A pair of graphs on page 6 of "An *Inconvenient Book", by Glenn Beck,
shows that premise to be completely false. (I am currently attempting to
determine the source and validity of the data.) These graphs cover a period
of time between 1870 and 2000. As anyone with more than a double digit IQ
can plainly see, if this data is valid, then what we assert to be global
warming is due to Solar activity and not to man's activities. Furthermore,
the correlation is so obvious that a reasonable man would assert that the
Global Warming scare does not represent truth but is propaganda for some
ulterior motive. No scientist could be stupid enough not to recognize the
implications of these curves and have survived the PhD process.

* * *The first pair of curves shows artic temperatures over the 130 year
period and the solar activity. The correlation between the curves is almost
perfect, indicating an extremely strong cause and effect relationship! The
second pair of curves shows the CO2 content of the atmosphere and the arctic
temperature over the same time period. The correlation between these curves
is virtually non-existent. Providing I am able to verify the data
represented by these curves, it is reasonable to assert that Al Gore et al
are not merely mistaken, they are deliberately lying.

* * *In all of the discussions of global warming, it has not been possible
to find any description of the actual mechanism by which CO2 etc. affect the
surface temperature of the Earth. All of the discussions seem to assume that
it is the amount of greenhouse gasses in the volume of the atmosphere which
control the Earth's surface temperature. That assumption is false! Earth's
temperature is determined by the altitude amd temperature of the "CO2
horizon". It is at this altitude and below the greenhouse gases cause the
atmosphere to be opaque to the 10 to 14.5 micron band of electromagnetic
radiation. It is the greenhouse gases at this altitude that radiate the
Earth's energy input (internal and solar) to space. No greenhouse radiation
to space occurs since below this altitude (about 55,000 feet) since any such
radiation is re-absorbed by the gasses above. The equilibrium temperature
for re-radiation of Earth's energy input to space is about -55C. (Depends
upon Solar input, ice cover and internal heat). Heat transfer from lower
levels to the CO2 horizon is primarily by convection. From the altitude of
the CO2 horizon downward, the atmospheres absolute temperature rises due to
adiabatic compression in proportion to the pressure ratio raised to the 1.35
power (see any thermodynamics text). It is this adiabatic temperature rise
which determined the surface temperature. It is This adiabatic temperature
rise effect from CO2 horizon is atop a very thick atmosphere which causes
the surface of Venus to be so hot. It is not the amount of greenhouse
contained in the bulk of the atmosphere.

* * *All of the information needed to determine the global warming effects
of greenhouse gasses can be obtained by directly measuring the altitude at
which the atmosphere becomes opaque in the 10 to 14.5 micron band of
electromagnetic radiation. Its a simple observation readily made by
satellite. With this data, the Earth's average equilibrium surface
temperature is readily determined. The effort does not require a battalion
of PhDs,

* * *Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

* * *E-mail:- . If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.


Your constant emission of gaseous bull**** over the
last ....whatever.... is the main cause of global warming.

Put a cork in it.
  #4  
Old December 21st 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
JanPB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,972
Default Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

On Dec 20, 6:33 am, "Cino" wrote:
Is Global Warming Caused By Man?

There has been an enormous publicity effort in the recent years to get
the public to accept the idea that the release of greenhouse gases, mainly
CO2, has resulted in an inexorable rise in the surface temperature of the
Earth. A pair of graphs on page 6 of "An Inconvenient Book", by Glenn Beck,
shows that premise to be completely false. (I am currently attempting to
determine the source and validity of the data.) These graphs cover a period
of time between 1870 and 2000. As anyone with more than a double digit IQ
can plainly see, if this data is valid, then what we assert to be global
warming is due to Solar activity and not to man's activities.


This is just a little *too* obvious for not to have been noticed
earlier. His political affiliation doesn't help either :-)

--
Jan Bielawski
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Global Warming Caused By Man? Cino Physics - General Discussion 11 December 22nd 07 10:31 PM
Global Warming is caused by the Sun, the Moon and the Stars. piggypalace.2@goodtimessociety.net Particle Physics 1 October 18th 07 09:14 AM
Global Warming is caused by the Sun, the Moon and the Stars. piggypalace.2@goodtimessociety.net Fusion Discussions 0 October 17th 07 02:26 AM
Global Warming is caused by the Sun, the Moon and the Stars. piggypalace.2@goodtimessociety.net Particle Physics 0 October 17th 07 02:21 AM
Global Warming is caused by the Sun, the Moon and the Stars. piggypalace.2@goodtimessociety.net The Theory of Relativity 0 October 17th 07 02:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Gas Electricity - Loans - Equity Release - Remortgages - Loans