![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: permanence, relativity |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The study of relativity can not be complete without a subjected
analysis of the permanent and unchanging aspects of reality. For example, lets take a very simple example of calculations... You need a good calculator for this, so visit http://www.mininova.org/tor/1028156 (use utorrent from utorrent.com to download and use the .torrent file from above). Ready? Now lets say that given there is a finite set of atoms in the universe at a given time frame. (or slice of time). This set is finite, and each atom or particle will move and participate with other particles based on defined mathematical equations. A simpler case would be to examine a pool table with billilard balls. Given enough precision you can guarantee 100% that hitting a ball at a certain angle with another ball will sink that last ball into the corner pocket. You can repeat this to infinity and you will always be able guarantee that the ball will go into that corner pocket. If you expand this and zoom back and say that those billiard balls are the particles that make up matter, you can also say that life is predetermined, it is a permanence that is non-changing, calculate-able, thus someone with enough computing power can predict the future. The only problem is that you must be able to have at any one instant all the trajectory data of all those billiard balls. The computations are enormous. But given the small sample of a few billiard balls, you can see that with 100% certainty those balls WILL go where you predict it will go, 100% of the time. You can expand this to a billion balls or whatnot, and the same... with 100% certainty the outcome. Life is predetermined. The kink in this equation happens because someone came up and said those particles don't actually go from one place to another in a line, but go randomly from one place to another at the lowest level, but they can be predicted to be within a certain boundary. Then someone tried to measure a particle and decided that the process of observing changes the particle. Now when you go into such low detail, you cannot predict one way or another what the particle is doing. So they named it the god particle, saying that god is in control at this low level. So we need to backtrack and think about this. If the lower level you go the less you know, and the higher level you go the more predictable, then that means within a certain part of your life you are in full control. Life is not predetermined at the lower level. If the reality of our existence is dependent on our consciousness feeding back info from our senses then the senses provide the object reality (the measuring device). This gets complicated because you can use a computer to measure for you and you observe the computer output. So at the physical level, it is predetermined. But your actions are determined by the neurons in your brain. And the neurons are operating from conditioning at a lower level. So you can probably say that a person will probably do something 100% of the time given a finite set of possibilities in that person's senses. Life is not predetermined through reality meter of observer So how is life not predetermined? The possible way is the lower level activators group together and determine the input of our senses at a global and macroscopic scale. It is like how sci-fi likes to say that if you travel back in time, doing a small thing may end up changing the whole future because everything is interconnected. A butterfly you step on is no longer a feast for another animal, causing starvation, which triggers aggresive attacking of another species of animal, and maybe that was the last species before mating, etc etc. So if you take into account all the GLOBAL possibilities, and you have parallel universes, going from one micro second to another microsecond in parallel universes you actually would not see any differences, if you take into account all the billiard balls at once. But you can see differences if you are able to isolate certain billiard balls and let that subset be the whole of an individual and that person's lifetime experience. Given this small subset as the observer, the rest of the billiards are free- form. They can be manifestations of miracles or destiny or calamity, etc. This subset can be isolated and moved into different environments without affecting this observer's reality. For example, a person is inside a room with the door closed. The person can open the door and there can be a dog outside, nobody, a man, a woman, or an aquaintance, etc. Each a different reality of the parallel universe that is changeable without upsetting the observer's reality meter. If a man is there, that man's complete interaction with the observer's subset billiard balls comes into play and we are moved into the new parallel universe of these two people (the observed and the man). If it is the dog, then we move into the parallel universe of the dog with the observer (with all the previous histories etc). So given this scenario you can say "God" can play a role at the physical level by choosing your experiences that do not alter your reality meter. This is an advancement because previously the unpredictable were at the subatomic level "the god particle". Now the physical higher level is possible too. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message
... The study of relativity can not be complete without a subjected analysis of the permanent and unchanging aspects of reality. For example, lets take a very simple example of calculations... [snip a load of nonsense] Nothing left. Oh well. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear VinegarTasters:
On Dec 18, 4:09 am, " wrote: The study of relativity can not be complete without a subjected analysis of the permanent and unchanging aspects of reality. For example, lets take a very simple example of calculations... You need a good calculator for this, .... snip down to this first formula or number Yes, that was very insightful blather. David A. Smith |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity? | Retne | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | May 5th 05 05:29 PM |
| Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity? | Ypoc | The Theory of Relativity | 2 | May 5th 05 06:54 AM |
| Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity? | Ypoc | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | May 4th 05 03:09 PM |
| Posting #33 - Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity? | Einsteinhoax | Physics - New Theories | 0 | March 29th 05 04:49 PM |
| Validity of the assumption of General Relativity and possible revision of Special Relativity? | qchiang2@yahoo.com | Particle Physics | 0 | January 18th 05 11:06 PM |