On 17 Dec, 18:22, Igor wrote:
On Dec 16, 12:35 am, BURT wrote:

Everything you know is wrong. "Weird Al" Yankovic

Actually it was the Firesign Theatre that said that.

Time doesn't curve. It slows down. If it curved; what direction?

It curves in the direction of 5 PM. That's why it's so difficult to
see 6 oclock from 4.

Listen, very carefully: 'time' is a general notion, of course, but
there is no reason it should pass at the same rate here, there or
anywhere! Nor, of course, is there any sound reason why you cannot
visit any time in times past so long as you can recreate or visit its
conditions. This applies with regard to 'materialists' in particular!
There must, they have to argue, be in principle a potentially exact
replica of their world. Funny!
--
'foolsrushin.'

On Dec 18, 11:01 am, "foolsrushin." wrote:
On 17 Dec, 18:22, Igor wrote:

On Dec 16, 12:35 am, BURT wrote:

Everything you know is wrong. "Weird Al" Yankovic

Actually it was the Firesign Theatre that said that.

Time doesn't curve. It slows down. If it curved; what direction?

It curves in the direction of 5 PM. That's why it's so difficult to
see 6 oclock from 4.

Listen, very carefully: 'time' is a general notion, of course, but
there is no reason it should pass at the same rate here, there or
anywhere!

There is fastest ideal time that life lives in.

Nor, of course, is there any sound reason why you cannot
visit any time in times past so long as you can recreate or visit its
conditions.

Wrong you would have to run the whole universe backward to return it
top its previous state. That is time travel.

This applies with regard to 'materialists' in particular!
There must, they have to argue, be in principle a potentially exact
replica of their world. Funny!
--
'foolsrushin.'

Mitch Raemsch

On Dec 18, 1:35 pm, BURT wrote:
On Dec 18, 11:01 am, "foolsrushin." wrote:





On 17 Dec, 18:22, Igor wrote:

On Dec 16, 12:35 am, BURT wrote:

Everything you know is wrong. "Weird Al" Yankovic

Actually it was the Firesign Theatre that said that.

Time doesn't curve. It slows down. If it curved; what direction?

It curves in the direction of 5 PM. That's why it's so difficult to
see 6 oclock from 4.

Listen, very carefully: 'time' is a general notion, of course, but
there is no reason it should pass at the same rate here, there or
anywhere!

There is fastest ideal time that life lives in.

Nor, of course, is there any sound reason why you cannot
visit any time in times past so long as you can recreate or visit its
conditions.

Wrong you would have to run the whole universe backward to return it
top its previous state. That is time travel.

This applies with regard to 'materialists' in particular!
There must, they have to argue, be in principle a potentially exact
replica of their world. Funny!
--
'foolsrushin.'

Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The fasestt time is light's clock. It is gamma one undihalated.

On 18 Dec, 21:35, BURT wrote:
On Dec 18, 11:01 am, "foolsrushin." wrote:





On 17 Dec, 18:22, Igor wrote:

On Dec 16, 12:35 am, BURT wrote:

Everything you know is wrong. "Weird Al" Yankovic

Actually it was the Firesign Theatre that said that.

Time doesn't curve. It slows down. If it curved; what direction?

It curves in the direction of 5 PM. That's why it's so difficult to
see 6 oclock from 4.

Listen, very carefully: 'time' is a general notion, of course, but
there is no reason it should pass at the same rate here, there or
anywhere!

There is fastest ideal time that life lives in.

Nor, of course, is there any sound reason why you cannot
visit any time in times past so long as you can recreate or visit its
conditions.

Wrong you would have to run the whole universe backward to return it
top its previous state. That is time travel.

No! You would only have to review what is stored, use a viewer, though
please do not kill your grandfather. You couldn't, anyway. We have
this understandable but silly notion that 'grandfather' is non-
ontoligically existent! Where did we get such an idea?

This applies with regard to 'materialists' in particular!
There must, they have to argue, be in principle a potentially exact
replica of their world. Funny!
--
'foolsrushin.'
Mitch Raemsch.
--
'foolsrushin.'

On Dec 18, 2:19 pm, "foolsrushin." wrote:
On 18 Dec, 21:35, BURT wrote:





On Dec 18, 11:01 am, "foolsrushin." wrote:

On 17 Dec, 18:22, Igor wrote:

On Dec 16, 12:35 am, BURT wrote:

Everything you know is wrong. "Weird Al" Yankovic

Actually it was the Firesign Theatre that said that.

Time doesn't curve. It slows down. If it curved; what direction?

It curves in the direction of 5 PM. That's why it's so difficult to
see 6 oclock from 4.

Listen, very carefully: 'time' is a general notion, of course, but
there is no reason it should pass at the same rate here, there or
anywhere!

There is fastest ideal time that life lives in.

Nor, of course, is there any sound reason why you cannot
visit any time in times past so long as you can recreate or visit its
conditions.

Wrong you would have to run the whole universe backward to return it
top its previous state. That is time travel.

No! You would only have to review what is stored,

Stored where? In a tree perhaps? Maybe in a wall idiot?

use a viewer, though
please do not kill your grandfather. You couldn't, anyway. We have
this understandable but silly notion that 'grandfather' is non-
ontoligically existent! Where did we get such an idea?

This applies with regard to 'materialists' in particular!
There must, they have to argue, be in principle a potentially exact
replica of their world. Funny!
--
'foolsrushin.'
Mitch Raemsch.

--
'foolsrushin.'- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On 19 Dec, 00:30, BURT wrote:
On Dec 18, 2:19 pm, "foolsrushin." wrote:
On 18 Dec, 21:35, BURT wrote:
On Dec 18, 11:01 am, "foolsrushin." wrote:
On 17 Dec, 18:22, Igor wrote:
On Dec 16, 12:35 am, BURT wrote:
Everything you know is wrong. "Weird Al" Yankovic
Actually it was the Firesign Theatre that said that.
Time doesn't curve. It slows down. If it curved; what direction?
It curves in the direction of 5 PM. That's why it's so difficult to
see 6 oclock from 4.
Listen, very carefully: 'time' is a general notion, of course, but
there is no reason it should pass at the same rate here, there or
anywhere!
There is fastest ideal time that life lives in.
Nor, of course, is there any sound reason why you cannot
visit any time in times past so long as you can recreate or visit its
conditions.
Wrong you would have to run the whole universe backward to return it
top its previous state. That is time travel.
No! You would only have to review what is stored,
Stored where? In a tree perhaps? Maybe in a wall idiot?
use a viewer, though
please do not kill your grandfather. You couldn't, anyway. We have
this understandable but silly notion that 'grandfather' is non-
ontoligically existent! Where did we get such an idea?
This applies with regard to 'materialists' in particular!
There must, they have to argue, be in principle a potentially exact
replica of their world. Funny!

--
'foolsrushin.'
Mitch Raemsch.
--
'foolsrushin.'

''Wall idiot"? A Talking and dotty wall?
--
'foolsrushin.'

On 19 Dec, 00:58, "foolsrushin." wrote:
On 19 Dec, 00:30, BURT wrote:
On Dec 18, 2:19 pm, "foolsrushin." wrote:
On 18 Dec, 21:35, BURT wrote:
On Dec 18, 11:01 am, "foolsrushin." wrote:
On 17 Dec, 18:22, Igor wrote:
On Dec 16, 12:35 am, BURT wrote:
Everything you know is wrong. "Weird Al" Yankovic
Actually it was the Firesign Theatre that said that.
Time doesn't curve. It slows down. If it curved; what direction?
It curves in the direction of 5 PM. That's why it's so difficult to
see 6 oclock from 4.
Listen, very carefully: 'time' is a general notion, of course, but
there is no reason it should pass at the same rate here, there or
anywhere!
There is fastest ideal time that life lives in.
Nor, of course, is there any sound reason why you cannot
visit any time in times past so long as you can recreate or visit its
conditions.
Wrong you would have to run the whole universe backward to return it
top its previous state. That is time travel.
No! You would only have to review what is stored,
Stored where? In a tree perhaps? Maybe in a wall idiot?
use a viewer, though
please do not kill your grandfather. You couldn't, anyway. We have
this understandable but silly notion that 'grandfather' is non-
ontoligically existent! Where did we get such an idea?
This applies with regard to 'materialists' in particular!
There must, they have to argue, be in principle a potentially exact
replica of their world. Funny!

--
'foolsrushin.'
Mitch Raemsch.
--
'foolsrushin.'

''Wall idiot"? A Talking and Dotty wall? I like it!
--
'foolsrushin.'

Macaroni, you just don't get it, do you, when your leg is being
pulled! If you were an octopus, you'd be 87.5 - at least in the
octopus world, 'in their garden in a cave'.
--
'foolsrushin.'