A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Parity calorimetery Experiment, III



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 13th 07 posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.physics.relativity
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,655
Default Parity calorimetery Experiment, III

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

1) 72 space group P3(1)21 single crystal benzil test masses,
2) 72 space group P3(2)21 single crystal benzil test masses,
3) 1 gram of finely powdered racemic benzil from equal masses of
P3(1)21 and P3(2)21 single crystals crushed and mixed,

are verified received at a pair of differential scanning calorimeters
located at 45.04 degrees north. Instrument time and personnel are
allocated 27-30 December inclusive. Instrument runs for calibration
and precision with racemic benzil are SOP.

Response maxima are 44.95 degees latitude (WGS 84) and 03 January
(Earth perihelion).

Simultaneous measurements will be performed with enantiomeric test
masses aligned North(R)-South(S) at 0600, 1200, and 1800 hrs the first
day and East(R)-West(S) the second day. If non-zero net output
obtains, both days will be repeated at 30-minute intervals 0530-1630
hrs.

1) Zero net output within experimental error validates achiral
isotropic vacuum in the mass sector. That is physics as we know it.

2) Non-zero net output with proper amplitude modulation and phasing
Day 3 vs. Day 4 validates chiral anisotropic vacuum in the mass
sector.
2a) General Relativity is falsified vs. teleparallel
gravitation,
2b) perturbative string theory is falsified vs. BRST invariance,
2c) conservation of angular momentum is falsified via Noether's
theorem,
2d) biological homochirality may be sourced,
2e) post-Big Bang inflation may be sourced by a chiral vacuum
pseudoscalar background,
2f) Weak interaction chirality may be sourced,
2g) matter-antimatter imbalance may be sourced,

and it all happens at the founding postulate level without
contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale.

Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
kilobuck?

Shades of Yang, Lee, and New Years 1957. We'll see how an added
half-century of science fares. Festivus - for the rest of us.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Ads
  #2  
Old December 13th 07 posted to sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.physics.relativity
Eric Gisse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,383
Default Parity calorimetery Experiment, III

On Dec 12, 4:34 pm, Uncle Al wrote:
[...]

I want to believe the universe has more depth than it currently
appears to have. Good luck, Al.

Please keep us updated. I want a stardrive, and the best route to that
is finding an empirical falsification of GR.
  #3  
Old December 13th 07 posted to sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.physics.relativity
Douglas Eagleson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 996
Default Parity calorimetery Experiment, III

On Dec 12, 5:34 pm, Uncle Al wrote:
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

1) 72 space group P3(1)21 single crystal benzil test masses,
2) 72 space group P3(2)21 single crystal benzil test masses,
3) 1 gram of finely powdered racemic benzil from equal masses of
P3(1)21 and P3(2)21 single crystals crushed and mixed,

are verified received at a pair of differential scanning calorimeters
located at 45.04 degrees north. Instrument time and personnel are
allocated 27-30 December inclusive. Instrument runs for calibration
and precision with racemic benzil are SOP.

Response maxima are 44.95 degees latitude (WGS 84) and 03 January
(Earth perihelion).

Simultaneous measurements will be performed with enantiomeric test
masses aligned North(R)-South(S) at 0600, 1200, and 1800 hrs the first
day and East(R)-West(S) the second day. If non-zero net output
obtains, both days will be repeated at 30-minute intervals 0530-1630
hrs.

1) Zero net output within experimental error validates achiral
isotropic vacuum in the mass sector. That is physics as we know it.

2) Non-zero net output with proper amplitude modulation and phasing
Day 3 vs. Day 4 validates chiral anisotropic vacuum in the mass
sector.
2a) General Relativity is falsified vs. teleparallel
gravitation,
2b) perturbative string theory is falsified vs. BRST invariance,
2c) conservation of angular momentum is falsified via Noether's
theorem,
2d) biological homochirality may be sourced,
2e) post-Big Bang inflation may be sourced by a chiral vacuum
pseudoscalar background,
2f) Weak interaction chirality may be sourced,
2g) matter-antimatter imbalance may be sourced,

and it all happens at the founding postulate level without
contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale.

Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
kilobuck?

Shades of Yang, Lee, and New Years 1957. We'll see how an added
half-century of science fares. Festivus - for the rest of us.

--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2


You are all over the place in physics.

The standard model was the basis for the inferred parity. A basic.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111

In first order, after a clear third order predicate warning. All
transition as a spin temperature was the trial.

I can read the system clearly, and the transition was to be
understood. But the class as each crystal was the basic discovery.
You can equate a type to class. SO you used a spin crystal test.

Why does Standard Theory temperature cause typed crystal? And the
answer ( class 1/2 spin or class 2 spin) effect in your experiment.

And so the third derivative constant would be inferred.

8!!!!! A cause to the eight 2*4=8

So simply remath. Get the net guru to remath it.

Here is the task:

psi= 2

Just write the gravity effect on this Standard Theory function???
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It is a failure to have gravity effect transition in math. You would
have TWO spin constants to deal with then

Drop all gravity function. And state time difference. All right so
the spin constant of gravity caused transition as the discovery! See.
Write the discovery, nOT the failed constant of parity for General
Relativity.









  #4  
Old December 13th 07 posted to sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.physics.relativity
Douglas Eagleson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 996
Default Parity calorimetery Experiment, III

On Dec 12, 8:09 pm, Douglas Eagleson
wrote:
On Dec 12, 5:34 pm, Uncle Al wrote:





http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2


1) 72 space group P3(1)21 single crystal benzil test masses,
2) 72 space group P3(2)21 single crystal benzil test masses,
3) 1 gram of finely powdered racemic benzil from equal masses of
P3(1)21 and P3(2)21 single crystals crushed and mixed,


are verified received at a pair of differential scanning calorimeters
located at 45.04 degrees north. Instrument time and personnel are
allocated 27-30 December inclusive. Instrument runs for calibration
and precision with racemic benzil are SOP.


Response maxima are 44.95 degees latitude (WGS 84) and 03 January
(Earth perihelion).


Simultaneous measurements will be performed with enantiomeric test
masses aligned North(R)-South(S) at 0600, 1200, and 1800 hrs the first
day and East(R)-West(S) the second day. If non-zero net output
obtains, both days will be repeated at 30-minute intervals 0530-1630
hrs.


1) Zero net output within experimental error validates achiral
isotropic vacuum in the mass sector. That is physics as we know it.


2) Non-zero net output with proper amplitude modulation and phasing
Day 3 vs. Day 4 validates chiral anisotropic vacuum in the mass
sector.
2a) General Relativity is falsified vs. teleparallel
gravitation,
2b) perturbative string theory is falsified vs. BRST invariance,
2c) conservation of angular momentum is falsified via Noether's
theorem,
2d) biological homochirality may be sourced,
2e) post-Big Bang inflation may be sourced by a chiral vacuum
pseudoscalar background,
2f) Weak interaction chirality may be sourced,
2g) matter-antimatter imbalance may be sourced,


and it all happens at the founding postulate level without
contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale.


Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
kilobuck?


Shades of Yang, Lee, and New Years 1957. We'll see how an added
half-century of science fares. Festivus - for the rest of us.


--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2


You are all over the place in physics.

The standard model was the basis for the inferred parity. A basic.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111

In first order, after a clear third order predicate warning. All
transition as a spin temperature was the trial.

I can read the system clearly, and the transition was to be
understood. But the class as each crystal was the basic discovery.
You can equate a type to class. SO you used a spin crystal test.

Why does Standard Theory temperature cause typed crystal? And the
answer ( class 1/2 spin or class 2 spin) effect in your experiment.

And so the third derivative constant would be inferred.

8!!!!! A cause to the eight 2*4=8

So simply remath. Get the net guru to remath it.

Here is the task:

psi= 2

Just write the gravity effect on this Standard Theory function???
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It is a failure to have gravity effect transition in math. You would
have TWO spin constants to deal with then

Drop all gravity function. And state time difference. All right so
the spin constant of gravity caused transition as the discovery! See.
Write the discovery, nOT the failed constant of parity for General
Relativity.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


A.

If you want the NOBLE prize just do this:

All spin was the fact, you discovered gravity in effect the hard way.
Place a magnetic field just like the old NBS spin temperature
experiment and see solid then placable in a NMR machine. A magnetic
field will solidify the crystal to the time.

Nice litte chunks that can b eimaged in a MRI/NMR machine. A dose
type of measure would suffice. Although an image would make a crystal
emitt teleparralel. A re-emission also time dependent would occur. A
stabble reusable sample should be what you try to make now.
  #5  
Old December 13th 07 posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.physics.relativity
Richard Schultz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,140
Default Parity calorimetery Experiment, III

In sci.chem Uncle Al wrote:

: Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
: be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
: commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
: worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
: kilobuck?

What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I remember --
your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found out that you
had lied to him.

-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"A mensch takes personal responsiblity for his actions. When demonstrated to
be empirically wrong a mensch admits error and becomes a better mensch."
-- "Uncle Al" Schwartz, in article
  #6  
Old December 13th 07 posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.physics.relativity
harry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,635
Default Parity calorimetery Experiment, III


"Richard Schultz" wrote in message
...
In sci.chem Uncle Al wrote:

: Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
: be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
: commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
: worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
: kilobuck?

What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I
remember --
your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found out that you
had lied to him.

-----
Richard Schultz
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"A mensch takes personal responsiblity for his actions. When demonstrated
to
be empirically wrong a mensch admits error and becomes a better mensch."
-- "Uncle Al" Schwartz, in article


What was the lie?


  #7  
Old December 13th 07 posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.physics.relativity
harry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,635
Default Parity calorimetery Experiment, III


"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

[...]
1) Zero net output within experimental error validates achiral
isotropic vacuum in the mass sector. That is physics as we know it.

2) Non-zero net output with proper amplitude modulation and phasing
Day 3 vs. Day 4 validates chiral anisotropic vacuum in the mass
sector.

[...]
and it all happens at the founding postulate level without
contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale.

Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
kilobuck?

Shades of Yang, Lee, and New Years 1957. We'll see how an added
half-century of science fares. Festivus - for the rest of us.


"A chiral vacuum background can be detected and measured."
Very interesting! :-)
- Are you going to perform the experiment yourself?
- Half of the time you repeat the mantra "There Is No Ether" but here you
propose that the "vacuum background" may even have chiral property. How
come?

Harald





  #8  
Old December 13th 07 posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.physics.relativity
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,655
Default Parity calorimetery Experiment, III

Richard Schultz wrote:

In sci.chem Uncle Al wrote:

: Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
: be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
: commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
: worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
: kilobuck?

What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I remember --
your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found out that you
had lied to him.


Gee, Schultzy, without the longitude you cannot pester and harass the
scientist, eh? Too bad. Here's what you will do for the holidays
(you guys have holidays end of year, right? End of Christian year?
Yahweh was singularly incompetent with calendars. Did Hebrews ever
discover zero and place-holding math?): Go to Google Earth and skim
along 45 north,

Bordeux, France
Valence, France
Grenoble, France
Torinao, Italy
Piacenza, Italy
Ferara, Italy,
Istarska, Croatia
Belgrade, Serbia
Ploiesti, Romania
Simferopol, Ukraine
Krasnodar Yuzhnyy
Qiqihar, China
Salem, Oregon
Minneapolis, Minnesota
St. Paul, Minnesota
Green Bay, Wisconsin
Midland, Ontario
Montpelier, Vermont
others

Find the pair (oooh! Could there be more than two?) of differential
scanning calorimeters with an English-speaking technician and again
validate what a consummate asshole you are. In the meanwhile we will
have the empirical answer by New Years. A null result is entirely
acceptable... but Uncle Al at a Swedish podium would especially enjoy
shoving a big fat reproducible net output up your sloppy ass and out
your mouth.

The only vote that matters was cast 13.7 billion years ago. Uncle Al
and his Army of Light are opening the ballot box to look. If you
don't like it, grab George Hammond and complain to the Election
Commission.

Mediocrity is a vice of the doomed.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
  #9  
Old December 13th 07 posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.physics.relativity
Androcles[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 975
Default Parity calorimetery Experiment, III


"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
: Richard Schultz wrote:
:
: In sci.chem Uncle Al wrote:
:
: : Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
: : be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common
: : commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
: : worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
: : kilobuck?
:
: What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I
remember --
: your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found out that you
: had lied to him.
:
: Gee, Schultzy,

[snip crap]
Idiot.



  #10  
Old December 14th 07 posted to sci.physics,sci.chem,sci.physics.relativity
hanson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,738
Default Parity calorimetery Experiment, III

AHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha... ahahaha... AHAHAHA...

Uncle Al wrote below: "... we will have the empirical answer
by New Year 2008. It can do no worse than fail. A null result
is entirely acceptable... but Uncle Al at a Swedish podium would
especially enjoy... [yada, yada, yada]... Did Hebrews ever discover
zero and place-holding math?"....

[hanson]
This is too much!... ahahahaha... Again, Al, just like last time you
are not smart enough to keep your mouth shut and wait until you
have "the bird in you hand" to sing about it"... Now, you are setting
yourself up again, "empirically", to be the laughing stock, this time
by
(a) arguing with your brother-in-faith Richie over Xian holidays
(b) showing your yearnings for Nobel dreams.. and
(c) hedging, pre-weaseling and talking yourself into that even
a useless ****up will be grand achievement... ahahaha...
but inevitably your one-man-Army of Light, (you being its General,
the Corporal, the trooper and the Recruit, all in one) will complain
later that it's all a "River of ****"... as has been **empirically**seen
before. Happy Hanukah, you Schmuck and thanks for the laughs!
ahahahaha... ahahahaha.... ahahahanson


----- experps from the diary of Al Schwartz's epic
travail into that undiscovered land from whose
borne no traveler has yet returned ... --------

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...

== Uncle Al Schwartz wrote [edited]:
1 gram of powdered racemic Benzil single crystals [will be] crushed
mixed [& molten in] a pair of calorimeters, loc. @ 45.04° north by/on.
27-30 December. Simultaneous measurements will be performed
with enantiomeric Benzil aligned North(R)-South(S) at 0600, 1200,
and 1800 hrs the first day and East(R)-West(S) the second day.
If non-zero net output obtains, both days will be repeated at 30-min.
intervals 0530-1630 hrs... & Schwartz has the following anticipations:
1) Zero net output validates physics as we know it. [BFD!.. ahaha... ]
2) Non-zero net output IN-validates/falsifies General Relativity,
string theory, conservation of angular momentum, biological
homochirality , post-Big Bang inflation, Weak interaction,
matter-antimatter imbalance...
.... & it all happens at the founding postulate level without contradicting
any observation in any venue at any scale.
Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can
be accurately, easily, rapidly, & inexpensively reproduced in common
commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no
worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a
kilobuck?

== the US-expatriate Israeli, Richard Schultz wrote to Al:
What happened the last time that you tried the experiment?
Now I remember -- your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment
when he found out that you had lied to him.

== the US Jew, Uncle Al Schwartz wrote to "Schultzy":
Gee, Schultzy, without the longitude you cannot pester and harass the
scientist, eh? Too bad. Here's what you will do for the holidays
(you guys have holidays end of year, right? End of Christian year?
Yahweh was singularly incompetent with calendars. Did Hebrews ever
discover zero and place-holding math?): Go to Google Earth and skim
along 45 north,

Bordeux, France / Valence, France / Grenoble, France/ Torinao, Italy /
Piacenza, Italy / Ferara, Italy, / Istarska, Croatia / Belgrade, Serbia /
Ploiesti, Romania / Simferopol, Ukraine / Krasnodar Yuzhnyy / Qiqihar,
China / Salem, Oregon / Minneapolis, Minnesota / St. Paul, Minnesota /
Green Bay, Wisconsin / Midland, Ontario / Montpelier, Vermont / others

Find the pair (oooh! Could there be more than two?) of differential
scanning calorimeters with an English-speaking technician and again
validate what a consummate asshole you are. In the meanwhile we will
have the empirical answer by New Years. A null result is entirely
acceptable... but Uncle Al at a Swedish podium would especially enjoy
shoving a big fat reproducible net output up your sloppy ass and out
your mouth.

The only vote that matters was cast 13.7 billion years ago. Uncle Al
and his Army of Light are opening the ballot box to look. If you
don't like it, grab George Hammond and complain to the Election
Commission.
Mediocrity is a vice of the doomed.
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parity calorimetery Experiment, III Uncle Al Physics - General Discussion 15 December 21st 07 09:22 PM
Full parity Eotvos experiment Uncle Al Current Physics Research (Moderated) 0 April 22nd 05 09:54 AM
Parity Eotvos experiment, update. Uncle Al Physics - General Discussion 3 September 17th 04 06:00 PM
Parity Eotvos experiment, update. Uncle Al Physics - General Discussion 19 August 24th 04 09:40 PM
Parity Eotvos experiment, update Uncle Al Physics - General Discussion 188 October 29th 03 06:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Free Ringtones - Credit Cards - Compare - Online Advertising - Sexy Lingerie