![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: calorimetery, experiment, iii, parity |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
1) 72 space group P3(1)21 single crystal benzil test masses, 2) 72 space group P3(2)21 single crystal benzil test masses, 3) 1 gram of finely powdered racemic benzil from equal masses of P3(1)21 and P3(2)21 single crystals crushed and mixed, are verified received at a pair of differential scanning calorimeters located at 45.04 degrees north. Instrument time and personnel are allocated 27-30 December inclusive. Instrument runs for calibration and precision with racemic benzil are SOP. Response maxima are 44.95 degees latitude (WGS 84) and 03 January (Earth perihelion). Simultaneous measurements will be performed with enantiomeric test masses aligned North(R)-South(S) at 0600, 1200, and 1800 hrs the first day and East(R)-West(S) the second day. If non-zero net output obtains, both days will be repeated at 30-minute intervals 0530-1630 hrs. 1) Zero net output within experimental error validates achiral isotropic vacuum in the mass sector. That is physics as we know it. 2) Non-zero net output with proper amplitude modulation and phasing Day 3 vs. Day 4 validates chiral anisotropic vacuum in the mass sector. 2a) General Relativity is falsified vs. teleparallel gravitation, 2b) perturbative string theory is falsified vs. BRST invariance, 2c) conservation of angular momentum is falsified via Noether's theorem, 2d) biological homochirality may be sourced, 2e) post-Big Bang inflation may be sourced by a chiral vacuum pseudoscalar background, 2f) Weak interaction chirality may be sourced, 2g) matter-antimatter imbalance may be sourced, and it all happens at the founding postulate level without contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale. Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a kilobuck? Shades of Yang, Lee, and New Years 1957. We'll see how an added half-century of science fares. Festivus - for the rest of us. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Dec 12, 4:34 pm, Uncle Al wrote:
[...] I want to believe the universe has more depth than it currently appears to have. Good luck, Al. Please keep us updated. I want a stardrive, and the best route to that is finding an empirical falsification of GR. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Dec 12, 5:34 pm, Uncle Al wrote:
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 1) 72 space group P3(1)21 single crystal benzil test masses, 2) 72 space group P3(2)21 single crystal benzil test masses, 3) 1 gram of finely powdered racemic benzil from equal masses of P3(1)21 and P3(2)21 single crystals crushed and mixed, are verified received at a pair of differential scanning calorimeters located at 45.04 degrees north. Instrument time and personnel are allocated 27-30 December inclusive. Instrument runs for calibration and precision with racemic benzil are SOP. Response maxima are 44.95 degees latitude (WGS 84) and 03 January (Earth perihelion). Simultaneous measurements will be performed with enantiomeric test masses aligned North(R)-South(S) at 0600, 1200, and 1800 hrs the first day and East(R)-West(S) the second day. If non-zero net output obtains, both days will be repeated at 30-minute intervals 0530-1630 hrs. 1) Zero net output within experimental error validates achiral isotropic vacuum in the mass sector. That is physics as we know it. 2) Non-zero net output with proper amplitude modulation and phasing Day 3 vs. Day 4 validates chiral anisotropic vacuum in the mass sector. 2a) General Relativity is falsified vs. teleparallel gravitation, 2b) perturbative string theory is falsified vs. BRST invariance, 2c) conservation of angular momentum is falsified via Noether's theorem, 2d) biological homochirality may be sourced, 2e) post-Big Bang inflation may be sourced by a chiral vacuum pseudoscalar background, 2f) Weak interaction chirality may be sourced, 2g) matter-antimatter imbalance may be sourced, and it all happens at the founding postulate level without contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale. Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a kilobuck? Shades of Yang, Lee, and New Years 1957. We'll see how an added half-century of science fares. Festivus - for the rest of us. -- Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 You are all over the place in physics. The standard model was the basis for the inferred parity. A basic. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 In first order, after a clear third order predicate warning. All transition as a spin temperature was the trial. I can read the system clearly, and the transition was to be understood. But the class as each crystal was the basic discovery. You can equate a type to class. SO you used a spin crystal test. Why does Standard Theory temperature cause typed crystal? And the answer ( class 1/2 spin or class 2 spin) effect in your experiment. And so the third derivative constant would be inferred. 8!!!!! A cause to the eight 2*4=8 So simply remath. Get the net guru to remath it. Here is the task: psi= 2 Just write the gravity effect on this Standard Theory function??? NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is a failure to have gravity effect transition in math. You would have TWO spin constants to deal with then ![]() Drop all gravity function. And state time difference. All right so the spin constant of gravity caused transition as the discovery! See. Write the discovery, nOT the failed constant of parity for General Relativity. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Dec 12, 8:09 pm, Douglas Eagleson
wrote: On Dec 12, 5:34 pm, Uncle Al wrote: http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 1) 72 space group P3(1)21 single crystal benzil test masses, 2) 72 space group P3(2)21 single crystal benzil test masses, 3) 1 gram of finely powdered racemic benzil from equal masses of P3(1)21 and P3(2)21 single crystals crushed and mixed, are verified received at a pair of differential scanning calorimeters located at 45.04 degrees north. Instrument time and personnel are allocated 27-30 December inclusive. Instrument runs for calibration and precision with racemic benzil are SOP. Response maxima are 44.95 degees latitude (WGS 84) and 03 January (Earth perihelion). Simultaneous measurements will be performed with enantiomeric test masses aligned North(R)-South(S) at 0600, 1200, and 1800 hrs the first day and East(R)-West(S) the second day. If non-zero net output obtains, both days will be repeated at 30-minute intervals 0530-1630 hrs. 1) Zero net output within experimental error validates achiral isotropic vacuum in the mass sector. That is physics as we know it. 2) Non-zero net output with proper amplitude modulation and phasing Day 3 vs. Day 4 validates chiral anisotropic vacuum in the mass sector. 2a) General Relativity is falsified vs. teleparallel gravitation, 2b) perturbative string theory is falsified vs. BRST invariance, 2c) conservation of angular momentum is falsified via Noether's theorem, 2d) biological homochirality may be sourced, 2e) post-Big Bang inflation may be sourced by a chiral vacuum pseudoscalar background, 2f) Weak interaction chirality may be sourced, 2g) matter-antimatter imbalance may be sourced, and it all happens at the founding postulate level without contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale. Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a kilobuck? Shades of Yang, Lee, and New Years 1957. We'll see how an added half-century of science fares. Festivus - for the rest of us. -- Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 You are all over the place in physics. The standard model was the basis for the inferred parity. A basic. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 In first order, after a clear third order predicate warning. All transition as a spin temperature was the trial. I can read the system clearly, and the transition was to be understood. But the class as each crystal was the basic discovery. You can equate a type to class. SO you used a spin crystal test. Why does Standard Theory temperature cause typed crystal? And the answer ( class 1/2 spin or class 2 spin) effect in your experiment. And so the third derivative constant would be inferred. 8!!!!! A cause to the eight 2*4=8 So simply remath. Get the net guru to remath it. Here is the task: psi= 2 Just write the gravity effect on this Standard Theory function??? NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is a failure to have gravity effect transition in math. You would have TWO spin constants to deal with then ![]() Drop all gravity function. And state time difference. All right so the spin constant of gravity caused transition as the discovery! See. Write the discovery, nOT the failed constant of parity for General Relativity.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - A. If you want the NOBLE prize just do this: All spin was the fact, you discovered gravity in effect the hard way. Place a magnetic field just like the old NBS spin temperature experiment and see solid then placable in a NMR machine. A magnetic field will solidify the crystal to the time. Nice litte chunks that can b eimaged in a MRI/NMR machine. A dose type of measure would suffice. Although an image would make a crystal emitt teleparralel. A re-emission also time dependent would occur. A stabble reusable sample should be what you try to make now. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In sci.chem Uncle Al wrote:
: Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can : be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common : commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no : worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a : kilobuck? What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I remember -- your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found out that you had lied to him. ----- Richard Schultz Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University ----- "A mensch takes personal responsiblity for his actions. When demonstrated to be empirically wrong a mensch admits error and becomes a better mensch." -- "Uncle Al" Schwartz, in article |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Richard Schultz" wrote in message ... In sci.chem Uncle Al wrote: : Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can : be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common : commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no : worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a : kilobuck? What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I remember -- your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found out that you had lied to him. ----- Richard Schultz Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University ----- "A mensch takes personal responsiblity for his actions. When demonstrated to be empirically wrong a mensch admits error and becomes a better mensch." -- "Uncle Al" Schwartz, in article What was the lie? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Uncle Al" wrote in message ... http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 [...] 1) Zero net output within experimental error validates achiral isotropic vacuum in the mass sector. That is physics as we know it. 2) Non-zero net output with proper amplitude modulation and phasing Day 3 vs. Day 4 validates chiral anisotropic vacuum in the mass sector. [...] and it all happens at the founding postulate level without contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale. Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a kilobuck? Shades of Yang, Lee, and New Years 1957. We'll see how an added half-century of science fares. Festivus - for the rest of us. "A chiral vacuum background can be detected and measured." Very interesting! :-) - Are you going to perform the experiment yourself? - Half of the time you repeat the mantra "There Is No Ether" but here you propose that the "vacuum background" may even have chiral property. How come? Harald |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Schultz wrote:
In sci.chem Uncle Al wrote: : Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can : be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common : commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no : worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a : kilobuck? What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I remember -- your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found out that you had lied to him. Gee, Schultzy, without the longitude you cannot pester and harass the scientist, eh? Too bad. Here's what you will do for the holidays (you guys have holidays end of year, right? End of Christian year? Yahweh was singularly incompetent with calendars. Did Hebrews ever discover zero and place-holding math?): Go to Google Earth and skim along 45 north, Bordeux, France Valence, France Grenoble, France Torinao, Italy Piacenza, Italy Ferara, Italy, Istarska, Croatia Belgrade, Serbia Ploiesti, Romania Simferopol, Ukraine Krasnodar Yuzhnyy Qiqihar, China Salem, Oregon Minneapolis, Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota Green Bay, Wisconsin Midland, Ontario Montpelier, Vermont others Find the pair (oooh! Could there be more than two?) of differential scanning calorimeters with an English-speaking technician and again validate what a consummate asshole you are. In the meanwhile we will have the empirical answer by New Years. A null result is entirely acceptable... but Uncle Al at a Swedish podium would especially enjoy shoving a big fat reproducible net output up your sloppy ass and out your mouth. The only vote that matters was cast 13.7 billion years ago. Uncle Al and his Army of Light are opening the ballot box to look. If you don't like it, grab George Hammond and complain to the Election Commission. Mediocrity is a vice of the doomed. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Uncle Al" wrote in message ... : Richard Schultz wrote: : : In sci.chem Uncle Al wrote: : : : Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can : : be accurately, easily, rapidly, and inexpensively reproduced in common : : commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no : : worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a : : kilobuck? : : What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I remember -- : your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found out that you : had lied to him. : : Gee, Schultzy, [snip crap] Idiot. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
AHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha... ahahaha... AHAHAHA...
Uncle Al wrote below: "... we will have the empirical answer by New Year 2008. It can do no worse than fail. A null result is entirely acceptable... but Uncle Al at a Swedish podium would especially enjoy... [yada, yada, yada]... Did Hebrews ever discover zero and place-holding math?".... [hanson] This is too much!... ahahahaha... Again, Al, just like last time you are not smart enough to keep your mouth shut and wait until you have "the bird in you hand" to sing about it"... Now, you are setting yourself up again, "empirically", to be the laughing stock, this time by (a) arguing with your brother-in-faith Richie over Xian holidays (b) showing your yearnings for Nobel dreams.. and (c) hedging, pre-weaseling and talking yourself into that even a useless ****up will be grand achievement... ahahaha... but inevitably your one-man-Army of Light, (you being its General, the Corporal, the trooper and the Recruit, all in one) will complain later that it's all a "River of ****"... as has been **empirically**seen before. Happy Hanukah, you Schmuck and thanks for the laughs! ahahahaha... ahahahaha.... ahahahanson ----- experps from the diary of Al Schwartz's epic travail into that undiscovered land from whose borne no traveler has yet returned ... -------- "Uncle Al" wrote in message ... == Uncle Al Schwartz wrote [edited]: 1 gram of powdered racemic Benzil single crystals [will be] crushed mixed [& molten in] a pair of calorimeters, loc. @ 45.04° north by/on. 27-30 December. Simultaneous measurements will be performed with enantiomeric Benzil aligned North(R)-South(S) at 0600, 1200, and 1800 hrs the first day and East(R)-West(S) the second day. If non-zero net output obtains, both days will be repeated at 30-min. intervals 0530-1630 hrs... & Schwartz has the following anticipations: 1) Zero net output validates physics as we know it. [BFD!.. ahaha... ] 2) Non-zero net output IN-validates/falsifies General Relativity, string theory, conservation of angular momentum, biological homochirality , post-Big Bang inflation, Weak interaction, matter-antimatter imbalance... .... & it all happens at the founding postulate level without contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale. Unlike cold fusion, the Fifth Force, polywater... the experiment can be accurately, easily, rapidly, & inexpensively reproduced in common commercial equipment, by undergraduates if convenient. It can do no worse than fail. How much more fun could a fella have for under a kilobuck? == the US-expatriate Israeli, Richard Schultz wrote to Al: What happened the last time that you tried the experiment? Now I remember -- your "collaborator" cancelled the experiment when he found out that you had lied to him. == the US Jew, Uncle Al Schwartz wrote to "Schultzy": Gee, Schultzy, without the longitude you cannot pester and harass the scientist, eh? Too bad. Here's what you will do for the holidays (you guys have holidays end of year, right? End of Christian year? Yahweh was singularly incompetent with calendars. Did Hebrews ever discover zero and place-holding math?): Go to Google Earth and skim along 45 north, Bordeux, France / Valence, France / Grenoble, France/ Torinao, Italy / Piacenza, Italy / Ferara, Italy, / Istarska, Croatia / Belgrade, Serbia / Ploiesti, Romania / Simferopol, Ukraine / Krasnodar Yuzhnyy / Qiqihar, China / Salem, Oregon / Minneapolis, Minnesota / St. Paul, Minnesota / Green Bay, Wisconsin / Midland, Ontario / Montpelier, Vermont / others Find the pair (oooh! Could there be more than two?) of differential scanning calorimeters with an English-speaking technician and again validate what a consummate asshole you are. In the meanwhile we will have the empirical answer by New Years. A null result is entirely acceptable... but Uncle Al at a Swedish podium would especially enjoy shoving a big fat reproducible net output up your sloppy ass and out your mouth. The only vote that matters was cast 13.7 billion years ago. Uncle Al and his Army of Light are opening the ballot box to look. If you don't like it, grab George Hammond and complain to the Election Commission. Mediocrity is a vice of the doomed. Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parity calorimetery Experiment, III | Uncle Al | Physics - General Discussion | 15 | December 21st 07 09:22 PM |
| Full parity Eotvos experiment | Uncle Al | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 0 | April 22nd 05 09:54 AM |
| Parity Eotvos experiment, update. | Uncle Al | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | September 17th 04 06:00 PM |
| Parity Eotvos experiment, update. | Uncle Al | Physics - General Discussion | 19 | August 24th 04 09:40 PM |
| Parity Eotvos experiment, update | Uncle Al | Physics - General Discussion | 188 | October 29th 03 06:05 AM |