On Nov 30, 3:39 pm, some %^&* A$% wrote:

"But this is NOT what you claim in YOUR paper. In your paper you
claim
that the accumulated precession is 43 arcseconds."

The word "accumulated" does not appear anywhere in my paper. In the
very first sentance I speak of the anomalous precession.

anomalous: 1) inconsistent with or deviating from what is usual,
normal, or expected : irregular, unusual
2 a: of uncertain nature or classification b: marked by incongruity or
contradiction : paradoxical

I have to teach you second grade arithmetic, basic reading skills, how
to use a dictionary.

Who turns your computer on for you?

"dr_strangelove" wrote in message
...
: On Nov 30, 3:39 pm, some %^&* A$% wrote:
:
: "But this is NOT what you claim in YOUR paper. In your paper you
: claim
: that the accumulated precession is 43 arcseconds."
:
: The word "accumulated" does not appear anywhere in my paper. In the
: very first sentance I speak of the anomalous precession.
:
: anomalous: 1) inconsistent with or deviating from what is usual,
: normal, or expected : irregular, unusual
: 2 a: of uncertain nature or classification b: marked by incongruity or
: contradiction : paradoxical
:
: I have to teach you second grade arithmetic, basic reading skills, how
: to use a dictionary.
:
: Who turns your computer on for you?

So being proved wrong requires that you pout. Who changes
your diaper for you?

On Nov 30, 2:48 pm, dr_strangelove wrote:
On Nov 30, 3:39 pm, some %^&* A$% wrote:

"But this is NOT what you claim in YOUR paper. In your paper you
claim
that the accumulated precession is 43 arcseconds."

The word "accumulated" does not appear anywhere in my paper. In the
very first sentance I speak of the anomalous precession.

anomalous: 1) inconsistent with or deviating from what is usual,
normal, or expected : irregular, unusual
2 a: of uncertain nature or classification b: marked by incongruity or
contradiction : paradoxical

I have to teach you second grade arithmetic, basic reading skills, how
to use a dictionary.

Who turns your computer on for you?


Dallas only speaks to hear the sound of his own voice. I've corrected
him twice now on very basic concepts in GR, and I'm still the
"crackpot". I honestly don't care what word he uses to describe me,
just as long as it presents a clear distinction between my kind and
his.

- Shawn

On Nov 30, 3:02 pm, "Androcles" wrote:
"dr_strangelove" wrote in message

...
: On Nov 30, 3:39 pm, some %^&* A$% wrote:
:
: "But this is NOT what you claim in YOUR paper. In your paper you
: claim
: that the accumulated precession is 43 arcseconds."
:
: The word "accumulated" does not appear anywhere in my paper. In the
: very first sentance I speak of the anomalous precession.
:
: anomalous: 1) inconsistent with or deviating from what is usual,
: normal, or expected : irregular, unusual
: 2 a: of uncertain nature or classification b: marked by incongruity or
: contradiction : paradoxical
:
: I have to teach you second grade arithmetic, basic reading skills, how
: to use a dictionary.
:
: Who turns your computer on for you?

So being proved wrong requires that you pout. Who changes
your diaper for you?


Deliberate misinterpretation does not equal refutation Androcles. Of
course, if you realized that you wouldn't have anything to post.

- Shawn

On Nov 30, 4:03 pm, wrote:
On Nov 30, 2:48 pm, dr_strangelove wrote:





On Nov 30, 3:39 pm, some %^&* A$% wrote:

"But this is NOT what you claim in YOUR paper. In your paper you
claim
that the accumulated precession is 43 arcseconds."

The word "accumulated" does not appear anywhere in my paper. In the
very first sentance I speak of the anomalous precession.

anomalous: 1) inconsistent with or deviating from what is usual,
normal, or expected : irregular, unusual
2 a: of uncertain nature or classification b: marked by incongruity or
contradiction : paradoxical

I have to teach you second grade arithmetic, basic reading skills, how
to use a dictionary.

Who turns your computer on for you?

Dallas only speaks to hear the sound of his own voice. I've corrected
him twice now on very basic concepts in GR, and I'm still the
"crackpot". I honestly don't care what word he uses to describe me,
just as long as it presents a clear distinction between my kind and
his.

- Shawn- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I'd say there is a clear distinction between his kind and the human
race.

On Nov 30, 12:39 pm, dr_strangelove wrote:
On Nov 30, 12:49 pm, Dono wrote:





On Nov 27, 4:58 pm, dr_strangelove wrote:

I developed an explanation of orbital precession that does not require
GR. It only uses 2 well accepted physical formulas and some math. It
can be viewed at:http://toe.sytes.net:65333/planetary%20precession.pdf

I await your personal attacks and name calling.

Thank you very much.

From your "discovery":

"The precession per revolution in radians is 5.014717113745×10
radians

Converting to arc seconds the precession becomes: 0.103435965

Mercury orbits the sun 414.9378 times in one earth century, so the
precession per century is: 42.9195 arc seconds per century in
excellent agreement with observation and GR"

You still continue to lie, you clearly don't know what the 43
arcseconds stands for.

To convert radians to degrees multiply by 360 and divide by 2pi.

There are 60 arc minutes in a degree and 60 arc seconds in an arc
minute.

Please tell me I don't have to do the $%#$ arithmetic for you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Imbecile, it is not about the conversion, it is about what you are
pretending to calculate.

wrote in message
...
: On Nov 30, 3:02 pm, "Androcles" wrote:
: "dr_strangelove" wrote in message
:
:
...
: : On Nov 30, 3:39 pm, some %^&* A$% wrote:
: :
: : "But this is NOT what you claim in YOUR paper. In your paper you
: : claim
: : that the accumulated precession is 43 arcseconds."
: :
: : The word "accumulated" does not appear anywhere in my paper. In the
: : very first sentance I speak of the anomalous precession.
: :
: : anomalous: 1) inconsistent with or deviating from what is usual,
: : normal, or expected : irregular, unusual
: : 2 a: of uncertain nature or classification b: marked by incongruity or
: : contradiction : paradoxical
: :
: : I have to teach you second grade arithmetic, basic reading skills, how
: : to use a dictionary.
: :
: : Who turns your computer on for you?
:
: So being proved wrong requires that you pout. Who changes
: your diaper for you?
:
:
: Deliberate misinterpretation does not equal refutation Androcles. Of
: course, if you realized that you wouldn't have anything to post.


Barwacky's toilet paper "Orbital Precession without GR" says:

"Converting to arc seconds the precession becomes: 0.103435965
Mercury orbits the sun 414.9378 times in one earth century, so the
precession per century is: 42.9195 arc seconds per century in excellent
agreement with observation and GR."

The 43 arc seconds is 415 orbits of 0.103435965 arc seconds ACCUMULATED, the
clueless child David Barwacz

of 7778 Thornapple Bayou SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49512

is pouting and squirming because he's been called on his crap.

Of course, if you realized that you wouldn't have anything to post, you
snivelling git. **** you too.

On Nov 30, 12:48 pm, dr_strangelove wrote:
On Nov 30, 3:39 pm, some %^&* A$% wrote:

"But this is NOT what you claim in YOUR paper. In your paper you
claim
that the accumulated precession is 43 arcseconds."

The word "accumulated" does not appear anywhere in my paper. In the
very first sentance I speak of the anomalous precession.


You are not only an imbecile, you are also a pathological liar, a
common trait amongst crackpots. Here is your very own "discovery",
from the end of your paper:

"The precession per revolution in radians is 5.014717113745×10
radians

Converting to arc seconds the precession becomes: 0.103435965

Mercury orbits the sun 414.9378 times in one earth century, so the
precession per century is: 42.9195 arc seconds per century in
excellent agreement with observation and GR"


The precession per century is 5600 arcseconds, imbecile. 43 arcseconds
is the difference between the Newtonian prediction and observation,
dumbass. The "dumbass" applies to your sidekick , Shawn Shalayka as
well . :-)

Donce aka Dono is an IDIOT!.

On Nov 30, 3:16 pm, Dono wrote:
On Nov 30, 12:48 pm, dr_strangelove wrote:

On Nov 30, 3:39 pm, some %^&* A$% wrote:

"But this is NOT what you claim in YOUR paper. In your paper you
claim
that the accumulated precession is 43 arcseconds."

The word "accumulated" does not appear anywhere in my paper. In the
very first sentance I speak of the anomalous precession.
...
"The precession per revolution in radians is 5.014717113745×10
radians

Donce, Become a post-birth abortion and do
everybody a favor!!!
Your father left, leaving your bitch
mother with $20 after 15 minutes and
your old lady took it serious and pooped
you, well mistakes happen.

That's meant to be good advice.
Ken

On Nov 30, 3:31 pm, "Ken S. Tucker"

http://eldoradoclub.net/images/wacko-lg_1_.gif