"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
Open sewer with Schwartztord floating (River of ****) snipped.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ic/brokpen.jpg
The pencil is broken. Don't like empirical observations, Schwartz****?
****head.

Catch 22:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img22.gif
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img76.gif

"BTW, you ****-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper, nor
could it. Hey Schwartz****, you are an ineducable idiot. Your high
school should be leveled and replaced by an abandoned bowling alley."

http://tinyurl.com/3pwu

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:57:40 GMT, Samantha Wormley
wrote:

kenseto wrote:
Doppler Shift is evidence for the varying speed of incoming light.


No Doppler effect affects frequency and wavelength--the speed
of light remains constant for all inertial observers.

ahahaha... Samantha, this is just *your* interpretation and that of
those whose asses you kiss day in and day out on usenet. And you do it
for free. ahahaha... You may not realize this but not everybody is an
ass kisser like you and not everybody feels the need to believe in
your crap just because you belive in it. ahahaha...

The fact is that, if the speed of light was really constant in all
inertial frames, frequencies and wavelengths would also be constant.
The fact that they are not is an indication that something in the
light changed its speed relative to the observer. Since light is made
of photons exclusively, it is logical to assume that the photons
changed their relative speeds.

IOW, Samantha, you are not just an ass kisser. You're stupid as ****.
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...

Louis Savain

Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:37:27 -0600, Traveler wrote:

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:57:40 GMT, Samantha Wormley
wrote:

kenseto wrote:
Doppler Shift is evidence for the varying speed of incoming light.


No Doppler effect affects frequency and wavelength--the speed
of light remains constant for all inertial observers.

ahahaha... Samantha, this is just *your* interpretation and that of
those whose asses you kiss day in and day out on usenet. And you do it
for free. ahahaha... You may not realize this but not everybody is an
ass kisser like you and not everybody feels the need to believe in
your crap just because you belive in it. ahahaha...

The fact is that, if the speed of light was really constant in all
inertial frames, frequencies and wavelengths would also be constant.

Wavelength is absolute and constant in all frames.
Frequency varies as (c+v)/v.

It's all a matter of definition.....

For a monochromatic ray, the distance between 'wavecrests' in the source frame
is the distance a photon moves in one period of its intrinsic oscillation, or:
lambda = cT, where T is the period in the source frame.
To an observer moving towards the source at v, T decreases to Tc/(c+v) and the
incident speed of the light is c+v.

According to that observer, wavelength is (c+v).Tc/(c+v), which is again just
cT.

Hahahahhahhahahhahahhihohohohohhhhawhawhawhaw!!!

Gotcha, Louis!!!!! !


Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

On Nov 27, 2:29 pm, Uncle Al wrote:
known. Then all your equipment can have the same precision but with
bigger, easier dimensions - like Frankenstein's monster giving Victor
more elbow room (presumably including a commensurately bigger pecker).



Please, Uncle Al! The correct term is "schwanzstucker"!

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:19:37 GMT, Sam Wormley wrote:

Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:


Wavelength is absolute and constant in all frames.
Frequency varies as (c+v)/v.

It's all a matter of definition.....


Speaking of definition...
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...edofLight.html

The Speed of light is a defined constant. :-)

'c' is a universal constant.
It has dimensions of speed.
It also happens to be the speed of EM relative to its source in vacuo.
'WHY?' is a good question, although Maxwell's equation explains it for a
medium..

Doppler Effect
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...lerEffect.html

Wormy, the doppler equation for sound doesn't apply to light. The 'vs' term
disappears because there is no aether.
As for the 'relativistic equation', it is untested nonsense like the rest of
that theory. For all practical situations the relativistic equation gives
almost the same answer as the BaTh one, anyway.




Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
: On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:19:37 GMT, Sam Wormley wrote:
:
: Dr. Henri Wilson wrote:
:
:
: Wavelength is absolute and constant in all frames.
: Frequency varies as (c+v)/v.
:
: It's all a matter of definition.....
:
:
: Speaking of definition...
: http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...edofLight.html
:
: The Speed of light is a defined constant. :-)
:
: 'c' is a universal constant.

Wilson is a universal ****wit.
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070411.html

"Dr. Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
: Wormy, the doppler equation for sound doesn't apply to light.

Yes it does,

c - v
f' = f ----------
c

for sound from a passing railway station as heard from the train.

c
f' = f ------------
c-u
for sound of a passing train as heard from the station.

c-v
f' = f ------------
c-u

for sound of a train as heard from a car following alongside
the train on PA route 65 between Pittsburgh and Beaver, I've
heard it myself.

Doppler knew, you are an arsehole.

HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote in news:vd4pk3hnaichkankh32efvnuk0df5bfvva@
4ax.com:

Wavelength is absolute and constant in all frames.
Frequency varies as (c+v)/v.

It's all a matter of definition.....

It is demonstrable by experiment (in the microwave region of the spectrum)
that wavelength varies with Doppler shift.
It is demonstrable by experiment (in the microwave region of the spectrum
that frequency varies with Doppler shift.
It is demonstrable by experiment (in the microwave region of the spectrum
that when frequency is multiplied by wavelength, one get the velocity:

v = lambda x frequency

It so happens that v = c, every time.

v has alway been measured as c, from the , regardless of the velocity of the
source

It has NEVER been demonstrated by ANY experiment in any region of the electro
magnetic spectrum that the velocity of the source has any influence on the
velocity of the emission.





--
bz

please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.

remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap

" wrote:

On Nov 27, 2:29 pm, Uncle Al wrote:
known. Then all your equipment can have the same precision but with
bigger, easier dimensions - like Frankenstein's monster giving Victor
more elbow room (presumably including a commensurately bigger pecker).


Please, Uncle Al! The correct term is "schwanzstucker"!

Mel Brooks took certain liberties with the German language re
"Schwanzstucker,"

http://a.in.urbandict.net/define.php?term=Schwanzstucker

More correctly it might be "Schwanztücker,"

http://a.in.urbandict.net/define.php...chwanzt%FCcker

Cf.: Schwanzlutscher

Now Androclitty will get all hot and bothered. Even now I suspect
he's got an arm draped over a chair back to compress the nerve,
rendering the associated hand numb so self-abuse will be credibly
deniable as instead having been performed by a stranger.

http://www.moderndrunkardmagazine.com/

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...

Open sewer with Schwartztord floating (River of ****) snipped.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ic/brokpen.jpg
The pencil is broken. Don't like empirical observations, Schwartz****?
****head.

Catch 22:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img22.gif
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img76.gif

"BTW, you ****-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper, nor
could it. Hey Schwartz****, you are an ineducable idiot. Your high
school should be leveled and replaced by an abandoned bowling alley."

http://tinyurl.com/3pwu