![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: faked, iss, mission |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was watching http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/
as the shuttle Discovery was passing over the Earth carrying Harmony to the ISS. These images are clearly faked and made in a Hollywood studio, you can't see the stars and that was all the proof needed that man didn't set foot on the Moon.:-) I just love the conspiracy theorists... enough to want to hit them with a 2x4 to knock some sense into their crazy heads. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 24, 12:01 pm, "Androcles" wrote:
I was watchinghttp://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/ as the shuttle Discovery was passing over the Earth carrying Harmony to the ISS. These images are clearly faked and made in a Hollywood studio, you can't see the stars and that was all the proof needed that man didn't set foot on the Moon.:-) I just love the conspiracy theorists... enough to want to hit them with a 2x4 to knock some sense into their crazy heads. NASA is a US government agency, Androcles. We're not supposed to believe any data, especially data from a government agency. Local conspiracy theorist Brad Guth has the right idea: disbelieve all data, pull your own data out of your rectum and call it "hard science". That's science the Androcles way! - Randy |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Androcles wrote:
I was watching http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/ as the shuttle Discovery was passing over the Earth carrying Harmony to the ISS. These images are clearly faked and made in a Hollywood studio, you can't see the stars and that was all the proof needed that man didn't set foot on the Moon.:-) I just love the conspiracy theorists... enough to want to hit them with a 2x4 to knock some sense into their crazy heads. Hey Androclitty - I'm looking up into the sky and I can see only one star. There is no universe. Hey Androclitty - do you have one of those hand-cranked TV sets, or do have one with deep sub-pixel resolution and 32 million grey levels? -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Uncle Al" wrote in message ... : Androcles wrote: : : I was watching http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/ : as the shuttle Discovery was passing over the Earth carrying : Harmony to the ISS. These images are clearly faked and made in : a Hollywood studio, you can't see the stars and that was all : the proof needed that man didn't set foot on the Moon.:-) : I just love the conspiracy theorists... enough to want to hit : them with a 2x4 to knock some sense into their crazy heads. : : Hey Androclitty - I'm looking up into the sky and I can see only one : star. There is no universe. : : Hey Androclitty - do you have one of those hand-cranked TV sets, or do : have one with deep sub-pixel resolution and 32 million grey levels? : Heller wrote: "There was only one catch and that was Catch 22, which specified that a concern for one's safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. "Orr (a character in the novel) was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask, and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions. "Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, but if he was sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't want to he was sane and had to." In Einstein's case if you use c+v you can derive c = (c+v)/(1+v/c) from the cuckoo malformations he blamed on Lorentz. That says you can't use c+v. What kooks like Schwartz and Poe fail to realise is the isomorphism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomorphism between Sagnac's real experiment and Einstein's thought experiment, shown he http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...oSpeedRack.gif Einstein sends light along the rack and back again, the rack moving at velocity v in his thoughts. Sagnac sends the light around the gear wheel for real. If you analyse one you should get the same result as the other, but you cannot use SR to derive SR, that is petitio principii, circularity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question c+v is essential to the derivation of the cuckoo malformations, the part where Einstein screws up is: 'we establish by definition that the "time" required by light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A' because I SAY SO. -- Rabbi Albert Einstein http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...rt/tAB=tBA.gif Here are some mathematical proofs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof Not included are Proof by "because I say so", Proof by "everybody knows", Proof by "it is written", the three most popular forms used in sci.physics.relativity. You'll often see this pathetic mob muttering "Lorentz Transformations" but they haven't a clue how they are derived and faithfully follow their indoctrination like lemmings. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Androcles" wrote in message .uk... [snip] Here are some mathematical proofs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof Not included are Proof by "because I say so", Proof by "everybody knows", Proof by "it is written", the three most popular forms used in sci.physics.relativity. Proof by "I said it is gibberish, so I keep saying it is gibberish": http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...Gibberish.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...ROnceMore.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...revisited.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...Continued.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...rsistence.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...RWildStab.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...ksBoolean.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...ORforever.html Dirk Vdm |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dirk Van de moortel" wrote in message ... "Androcles" wrote in message .uk... [snip] Here are some mathematical proofs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof Not included are Proof by "because I say so", Proof by "everybody knows", Proof by "it is written", the three most popular forms used in sci.physics.relativity. Proof by "I said it is gibberish, so I keep saying it is gibberish": http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...Gibberish.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...ROnceMore.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...revisited.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...Continued.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...rsistence.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...RWildStab.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...ksBoolean.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...ORforever.html Dirk Vdm Not forgetting Proof by animated gif |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not forgetting Proof by animated gif And remember: Proof by endless discussion. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 24, 2:03 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-
MORE-SperM.please.com wrote: "Androcles" wrote: [snip] Here are some mathematical proofs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof Not included are Proof by "because I say so", Proof by "everybody knows", Proof by "it is written", the three most popular forms used in sci.physics.relativity. Proof by "I said it is gibberish, so I keep saying it is gibberish": http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...Gibberish.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...ROnceMore.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...revisited.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...Continued.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...XORpersistence... http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...RWildStab.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...ksBoolean.html http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/di...ORforever.html So, the fumble-too-often Androcles is supporting the hoax of moon landing. How does it feel when Androcles is on your side? What does that tell you about the moon landing nonsense? Deep space radiation along proves it to be a hoax. shrug |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message oups.com... : So, the fumble-too-often Androcles is supporting the hoax of moon : landing. That's got two chances of being right... fat and slim. 1) Learn what sarcasm is. 2) Learn to totally ignore local village idiot trolls. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Koobee Wublee says...
So, the fumble-too-often Androcles is supporting the hoax of moon landing. How does it feel when Androcles is on your side? What does that tell you about the moon landing nonsense? Deep space radiation along proves it to be a hoax. I'm sorry I was mean to you, Koobee. I didn't realize you were mentally ill. You are insane, and people shouldn't be disturbing you by confronting you without guidance from your doctors. -- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Faked mission to the ISS. | Androcles | Physics - General Discussion | 10 | October 25th 07 02:50 PM |
| was relativity faked? | capstan | The Theory of Relativity | 15 | September 22nd 07 11:04 AM |
| Oh no! Video proof of Faked Boeing into WTC!! | u2r2h@gmx.net | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | June 12th 07 10:14 PM |
| Michelangelo faked dazzling archaeological find, scholar says | glitter0999@yahoo.com | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | March 31st 05 05:55 AM |
| The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | Physics - General Discussion | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |