I read somewhere, nuclie collide with each other to produce nuclear
reaction the same way as chemical reaction occurs.

Chemical Reaction

H+H - H2

O+O -O2

2H2 + O2 - 2H2O

Simmilarly Nuclear Reaction occur.

H1+H1 - He {fusion}

U238 - U235 {fission}

When Universe begain everything was hydrogen. Hydrogen collided with
each other to bring Helium.

Then these elements collided to bring larger elements. Like Li, B,
Carbon etc.

At even higher temprature they collide to give Iron, Aluminum & Gold.

Can someone tell me where can I get list of all such nuclear
Reactions.

Along with at what temprature these reactions take place.

And is it possible for Iron nucle to fuse together to give even higher
Elements? And where in our universe these reactions take place.

Hydrogen+Hydrogen-Helium take place in Sun. What about other
reactions?

Bye
Sanny

Play Chess at: http://www.getclub.com/Chess.html

Sanny wrote:

I read somewhere, nuclie collide with each other to produce nuclear
reaction the same way as chemical reaction occurs.

Stellar nucleosynthesis is all over the Web, including a Nobel Prize.
Google is your friend. Pull your thumb out and look it up.

If the product has a larger binding energy than its reacting
constituents summed then product formation is thermodynamically
allowed. Doesn't mean it's gonna happen. Hexamethlprismane C6(CH3)6
is 90 kcal/mole above hexamethylbenzene, C6(CH3)6. It must be heated
to add another 33 kcal/mole before it rearranges. C-C single bond
strength is 83 kcal/mole. The molecule must be literally shattered
before it heads downhill.

Thermodyamics proposes, kinetics disposes.

Chemical Reaction

H+H - H2
O+O -O2
2H2 + O2 - 2H2O

Simmilarly Nuclear Reaction occur.

H1+H1 - He {fusion}
U238 - U235 {fission}

A little short on facts, are we?

When Universe begain everything was hydrogen. Hydrogen collided with
each other to bring Helium.

Very short on facts.

Then these elements collided to bring larger elements. Like Li, B,
Carbon etc.

Ignorant of facts.

At even higher temprature they collide to give Iron, Aluminum & Gold.

Stupid.

Can someone tell me where can I get list of all such nuclear
Reactions.

Look it up. Put new batteries into your calculator.

http://t2.lanl.gov/data/astro/molnix96/massd.html

[snip]


--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

You're not a very nice person, are you Uncle Al???

Does your erudition in physics give you some elevated sense of worth
over the poor laymen struggling to learn some truths about the
universe he or she inhabits????

Is there some compelling compulsion you are afflicted with that
prevents you from passing knowledge to these lesser beings in a more
constructive way???

Are you related to Mike Gordge????

The preceding were all rhetorical questions, Uncle Al, from one not-
very-nice-person (but I'm workin' on it) to another. I'm only seeing
your "intellectually stimulating responses" when they get cross-posted
to alt.P; this forum **already** has an arrogant, pedantic, dogmatic,
condescending, insensitive misanthrope. If the position ever opens up,
I'll let you know.................

K e v

PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST. IT WILL NEVER BE READ.

On Oct 29, 2:33 pm, kevirwin wrote:

You're not a very nice person, are you Uncle Al???

Are you related to Mike Gordge????

PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST. IT WILL NEVER BE READ.

All ****ing lies, typical wanking agnostic dopey as all **** knuckle-
dragging leftist retard.


MG

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:33:28 -0700, kevirwin
wrote:


You're not a very nice person, are you Uncle Al???

Does your erudition in physics give you some elevated sense of worth
over the poor laymen struggling to learn some truths about the
universe he or she inhabits????

Is there some compelling compulsion you are afflicted with that
prevents you from passing knowledge to these lesser beings in a more
constructive way???

Are you related to Mike Gordge????

The preceding were all rhetorical questions, Uncle Al, from one not-
very-nice-person (but I'm workin' on it) to another. I'm only seeing
your "intellectually stimulating responses" when they get cross-posted
to alt.P; this forum **already** has an arrogant, pedantic, dogmatic,
condescending, insensitive misanthrope. If the position ever opens up,
I'll let you know.................

K e v

PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST. IT WILL NEVER BE READ.

That's not very nice.
Mr. Kettle, meet Mr. Pot.

On Oct 29, 3:30 am, Michael Gray wrote:


That's not very nice.
Mr. Kettle, meet Mr. Pot

I already **admitted** to NOT being very nice, but I do tend to limit
my opprobrium, invectives, pejoratives, slurs, epitaphs, vituperative
denunciations, vile & vulgar rebukes to those individuals where it
appears merited and appropriate. (of course it's subjective!!)

But then, you might disagree; I'm ok with that..

Excuse me, I have to read up on physics,
K e v

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 04:33:09 -0700, kevirwin
wrote:

On Oct 29, 3:30 am, Michael Gray wrote:


That's not very nice.
Mr. Kettle, meet Mr. Pot

I already **admitted** to NOT being very nice, but I do tend to limit
my opprobrium, invectives, pejoratives, slurs, epitaphs, vituperative
denunciations, vile & vulgar rebukes to those individuals where it
appears merited and appropriate.

You write *a lot* of missives to yourself?

Excuse me, I have to read up on physics,

Try "reading up" on "intelligence" first.
--
Al at Webdingers dot com
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of
themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts."
- Bertrand Russell

On Oct 29, 11:37 am, Al Klein wrote:

You write *a lot* of missives to yourself?

Try "reading up" on "intelligence" first.


Well Mr. Al,

You wrote that witless retort because:

(A) you're really Uncle Al under another uninspired alias

(B) you have developed an unnatural affinity to persons named "Al"

(C) your rejoinder passes for high wit on science forums and atheist's
forums

(D) you missed my veiled reference to the unnecessary ad hominems
Uncle Al loosed upon an unsuspecting seeker of knowledge

(E) you wished to engage in verbal sparring in an arena where you're
the under dog

(F) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (write-in)

If it's (E), sorry...I'm not interested, I like a challenge...
I studied intelligence a long time ago; I'm in the top 2%. I just
don't give a **** about physics, nor the endless atheist-theist
arguments.

My view (added unnecessarily) on scientific method/discovery:

(1) Have an epiphany of scientific wonder
(2) Develop hypothesis
(3) Test hypothesis
(4) (a) Upon failure of test, discard theory, destroying all data on
failure and return to step (1)
(b) upon accidental and fortuitous affirmation, notify like-
minded individuals and bask in glory
Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every once in awhile

If I failed to offend anyone in the three cross-posted forums (I've
already offended most people in alt.p), feel free to e-mail me for
further scathing, sardonic (and probably misunderstood) abuse, as
required..

I'm done in this ****ing thread...

peace out y'all,

K e v
friend to one and all,

kevirwin wrote:

On Oct 29, 11:37 am, Al Klein wrote:

You write *a lot* of missives to yourself?

Try "reading up" on "intelligence" first.

Well Mr. Al,
[snip whining crap]

Either answer the question or don't post. I posted the answer, the
nuclear mass and binding energy interactive database. What did you
post? You posted a lot of high school whiningg crap. Oh boo hoo hoo -
give him the answer and suck his dick for good measure.

Stupidity *should* be lethal.

Well, idiot? Why don't your repost the URl for the nuclear mass and
binding energy interactive database? Are you too stooopid to copy
from a crib sheet? If so, you are in good company,

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/immig.htm

Can God make a collection plate so vast that even He cannot fill it?
Sure! ALL OF THEM.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:53:12 -0700, kevirwin
wrote:

On Oct 29, 11:37 am, Al Klein wrote:

You write *a lot* of missives to yourself?

Try "reading up" on "intelligence" first.


Well Mr. Al,

You wrote that witless retort because:

(A) you're really Uncle Al under another uninspired alias

What a load of utter bull****!
You are an ignoramus on the subject.
You have libelled two sincere and earnest posters.
(With no more reason than that they have the letter string "Al" in
their handles)

(B) you have developed an unnatural affinity to persons named "Al"

Oh, Grow up.

And do some actual research before you accuse a real person, who posts
with their REAL name of impersonation.
Grow a ****ing backbone before casting stones.
After that: grow a cerebral cortex.
After that: Use it.
What is your real name?

(C) your rejoinder passes for high wit on science forums and atheist's
forums

Perhaps it *is* wit?
Or is it that atheist's fora are beyond you intellectually?

(D) you missed my veiled reference to the unnecessary ad hominems
Uncle Al loosed upon an unsuspecting seeker of knowledge

Read minds now, do you?
How extraordinary!
Can you read my mind now?
Here's a test :
I think that you are a .......

Fill in the missing word.

(E) you wished to engage in verbal sparring in an arena where you're
the under dog

WTF?

(F) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (write-in)

WTF?

If it's (E), sorry...I'm not interested, I like a challenge...
I studied intelligence a long time ago; I'm in the top 2%. I just
don't give a **** about physics, nor the endless atheist-theist
arguments.

Christ almighty, you are FULL OF YOURSELF, aren't you, you friggin'
arrogant arsehole PRICK?????

Show me the test results, oh please wondrous master.
The ones that showed that you are in the top 2% of those who have
STUDIED intelligence, whatever the **** that may mean, (not those who
are in the top 2% of the intelligent, that is, as it is perfectly
plain that you are nothing of the sort.)

My view (added unnecessarily) on scientific method/discovery:

(1) Have an epiphany of scientific wonder
(2) Develop hypothesis
(3) Test hypothesis
(4) (a) Upon failure of test, discard theory, destroying all data on
failure and return to step (1)
(b) upon accidental and fortuitous affirmation, notify like-
minded individuals and bask in glory
Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every once in awhile

If I failed to offend anyone in the three cross-posted forums (I've
already offended most people in alt.p), feel free to e-mail me for
further scathing, sardonic (and probably misunderstood) abuse, as
required..

I'm done in this ****ing thread...

At least you can recognize when you are intellectually defeated.
But your egotistically unkempt kind cannot help but go back on their
solemn word.
I await your unpromised response with an odd mixture of some boredom,
and some loathing.

peace out y'all,

Liar.'

K e v
friend to one and all,

Liar.