![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: before, beginning, plancktime, universe |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Quantum-Universe before the Planck-time. The first Cosmic Quantum-process. Derivation of E = Mc^2. By Louis Nielsen Denmark Treatise: http://www.rostra.dk/louis THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE. How was the beginning of the Universe? The 'Standard Model' in cosmology based on the general theory of relativity can not give acceptable calculations for the evolution of the Universe when it had an age smaller than the planck-time about 10^(-43) sec. Most cosmologists, trying to describe the earliest phases of the Universe by the Big Bang model, use the Planck time bout 10^(-43) sec, as the nearest possible time which can be used to approach the 'moment' of the Big Bang. Events before the Planck time cannot be described by the conventional cosmological theories. Einstein's general theory of relativity, which is basic for the accepted cosmological models, collapses when we try to analyse the early Universe. The reason is that the theory of general relativity is not based on quantum physics. If time-intervals and distances are smaller than the planck-time and the planck-length then we must use a quantum-mechanical theory. In the following I give a quantum-mechanical model of the quantum- evolution of the Universe before the planck-time. The model is based on quantization of space, time and mass. THE SPACE-ATOM AND THE TIME-ATOM. THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT. The Universe with all its matter, motions and interactions has been developed from ONE primordial matter-quantum with a primordial mass M equal to the total mass of the Universe and a primordial extension d which define the quantum of length - the cosmic space-atom. The primordial first 'particle' in the Universe I had given the name 'The Cosmic Embryoton'. The Universe came into active existence when the cosmic embryoton had separate into two scale-invariant matter-/energy-quanta with masses M/ 2. These first two active matter-/energy-quanta I call the 'Primordial Unitons'. Each of the unitons had an extension d equal to the quantum of length and each of them had been accelerated up to the velocity of light c. The first cosmic quantum-process which is the first cosmic change in the embryonic Universe defines the first cosmic quantum of time- interval t. The velocity of light c is given by the ratio between the 'space-atom' d and the 'time-atom' t: (1a) c = d/t As d and t are cosmic absolute and invariant quantities we see that c also is a cosmic invariant quantity. UNITONS, THE UNIT-QUANTA OF THE UNIVERSE. The two primordial Unitons disintegrate into more and more scale- invariant unitons that are spreading out in an active and expanding Universe. The quantum-evolution of the Universe can be described by a 'Cosmic Evolution Quantum Number' which is 'ticking' up through the natural numbers. (Please study my treatise) The actual value of the 'Cosmic Evolution Quantum Number' is equal to the actual total number of created unitons. In our epoch the Universe consists of about 7*10^127 unitons. THE PRIMORDIAL COSMIC QUANTUM-WORK. The total cosmic embryonic physical work W(cosmic) done when the cosmic embryoton is separated into the two primordial unitons is equal to the total energy E(cosmic) of the evolving Universe. A simple calculation, based on Newtonian physics, show that the total energy E(cosmic) of the Universe is given by E(cosmic) = M*c^2 where c is the velocity of light. The calculations a Each of the two primordial unitons with masses M/2 is acted by a force F applied over a distance d. The value of the force F is given by the second law of Newton: (2a) F = (M/2)*a = (M/2)* (c/t) In equation (2a) a = c/t is the acceleration of the primordial unitons, the greatest possible acceleration in the Universe. The force F is the maximum value of a force in the Universe and it can be regarded as a Quantum-force. The total cosmic embryonic work W(cosmic) is equal to the released total kinetic energy E(cosmic) given by: (3a) W(cosmic) = 2*(F*d) = 2*(M/2)*(c/t)*d = M*c*c = M*c^2 = E(cosmic) The total primordial released kinetic energy E(cosmic) is thus given by: (4a) E(cosmic) = M*c^2 We see that equation (4a) is the same energy-/mass equation that Albert Einstein derived in 1905, but here it is derived more simple and the derivation is based on the first primordial cosmic quantum- jump when the Universe came into active existence! THE PLANCK QUANTITIES. The so-called Planck quantities are not based on a physical theory, and neither they are themselves basis for a physical theory. They are 'constructed' purely by dimensional analysis, based on Newton's gravitational constant G, the velocity of light c and Planck's constant h. The intention of Max Planck (1858-1947) was - in 1899 - to find a unit of length l(pl), a unit of time t(pl) and a unit of mass m(pl), independent of specific local systems. ( Reference: Max Planck: ,Über irreversible Strahlungsvorgänge'. Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, vol. 5, p. 479 (1899) ) The Planck quantities are defined, without the geometrical number pi, by: (1) l(pl) = ((h*G)/c^(3))^(1/2) = 4.1*10^(-35) meter (2) t(pl) = l(pl)/c = 1.4*10^(-43) sec (3) m(pl) = ((h*c)/G)^(1/2) = 5.5*10^(-8) kg THE QUANTUM-COSMOLOGICAL UNITS. Let us define the following absolute quantum-cosmological quantities: The elementary length, the 'quantum of length' d, the elementary time, the 'quantum of time't, and the actual elementary mass, the 'quantum of mass' m. The absolute quantum-cosmological units are defined by: (4) d = h/(M*c) = 1.4*10^(-102) meter (5) t = d/c = 4.7*10^(-111) sec (6) m = h/(R*c) = 2.2*10^(-68) kg In equation (4) M = 1.6*10^(60) kg is the total and constant mass of the Universe (See my treatise about a calculation of the value of M), h is Planck's constant and c is the velocity of light. In equation (6) R = 1*10^(26) meter is the actual estimated extension of the Universe. The magnitude of the mass-quantum m in equation (6) is the value in our epoch. All lengths, time-intervals and masses are quantized. THE QUANTUM-EVOLUTION OF THE UNIVERSE. I postulate that the connection between the actual extension R of the Universe and the 'quantum of length' d is: (7) R = n* d We can call n the 'cosmic evolution quantum number'. As the Universe evolves in 'quantum jumps' n is 'ticking' up through the natural numbers, beginning with the number one when the Universe came into existence. A discovery is that n is equal to the third power of the actual and variable ratio between the magnitude of the electrostatic and the gravitostatic forces between two electrons. (Please see my treatise) The connection between the total mass M of the Universe and the actual 'quantum of mass' m is: (8) M = n*m In (8) m is the mass of the actual - and variable - smallest energy-/ matter quantum in the Universe. This energy-/matter quantum I have given the name Uniton (The cosmic unit particle). In our epoch n = 7.2*10^127. The actual value of n is equal to the actual number of possible Unitons in the Universe. In our epoch the number of possible Unitons in the Universe is thus equal to 7.2*10^127. The connection between the actual age T of the Universe and the 'quantum of time' t is: (9) T = R/c = n* t RELATIONS BETWEEN THE COSMIC QUANTUM-UNITS AND THE PLANCK'S-UNITS. The quantum-cosmological quantities define a set of cosmic quantum- units, which are much smaller and much more fundamental than the Planck units. In my dissertation I show the connection between the cosmic quantum-units and the Planck units, and furthermore I show which role the Planck units play in the quantum-evolution of the Universe. From the equations (1) and (7) we can calculate the value n(pl) of the cosmic evolution quantum number when the Universe had an extension equal to the Planck-length l(pl) and an age equal to the Planck-time t(pl). We get: (10) n(pl) = l(pl)/r = 2.9*10^(67) n(pl) - which is a natural number - is also the number of unitons in the Universe, when its age was equal to the Planck-time. From equation (8) we can calculate the mass m(t(pl)) of a single Uniton when the Universe had an age equal to the Planck-time t(pl). We get: (11) m(t(pl)) = M/n(pl) = 5.5*10^(-8) kg INTERPRETATION OF THE PLANCK-QUANTITIES. The result in equation (11) is interesting. Comparing the value in equation (11) with the value in equation (3) we see the following: The Planck-mass m(pl) is equal to the mass m(t(pl)) of the Uniton, when the Universe had an extension equal to the Planck-length and an age equal to the Planck-time! The relatively great Planck mass has been an enigma. The above give the explanation of the great value of the Planck mass. When the Universe had an extension equal to the Planck-length 4.1*10^(-35) meter, then it had an age equal to the Planck-time 1.4*10^(-43) sec, and it consisted of 2.9*10^(67) Unitons, each with a mass equal to the Planck mass 5.5*10^(-8) kg. The Planck quantities can thus be derived from the more fundamental quantum-cosmological quantities: The quantum of length r, the quantum of time t and the total mass M of the Universe. You can study more in my treatise: http://www.rostra.dk/louis Serious comments are very welcome. Best regards Louis Nielsen Denmark |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
skrev i en meddelelse
ups.com... The Quantum-Universe before the Planck-time. The first Cosmic Quantum-process. BW: Planck was a genius in experiments and empiri. But his findings of the quant are not much related to relativity and have not been very inspiring for TECKNOLOGY Lasers and semiconductors had been invented without him Speculations about the start of the universe are not interesting to pracitical people and has little use of Planck |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Quantum-Universe before the Planck-time.
The first Cosmic Quantum-process. Derivation of E = Mc^2. By Louis Nielsen Denmark Treatise: http://www.rostra.dk/louis THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE. How was the beginning of the Universe? The 'Standard Model' in cosmology bas.... ********************************* How are you defining "Universe"? As just the space interior to the causal horizon, or all space? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Don Stockbauer" skrev i en meddelelse
oups.com... The Quantum-Universe before the Planck-time. The first Cosmic Quantum-process. Derivation of E = Mc^2. By Louis Nielsen Denmark Treatise: http://www.rostra.dk/louis THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE. How was the beginning of the Universe? The 'Standard Model' in cosmology bas.... ********************************* How are you defining "Universe"? As just the space interior to the causal horizon, or all space? All space Nothing is outside the universe except thoughts, fantasy, memory, soul - which might be about brain wiring, but we dont know causal horizon - what is that - metaphor for understanding? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 1, 7:39 am, "Bo Warming" wrote:
"Don Stockbauer" skrev i en meddelelsenews:1191241673.620845.275620@y42g2000hs y.googlegroups.com... The Quantum-Universe before the Planck-time. The first Cosmic Quantum-process. Derivation of E = Mc^2. By Louis Nielsen Denmark Treatise: http://www.rostra.dk/louis THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE. How was the beginning of the Universe? The 'Standard Model' in cosmology bas.... ********************************* How are you defining "Universe"? As just the space interior to the causal horizon, or all space? All space Nothing is outside the universe except thoughts, fantasy, memory, soul - which might be about brain wiring, but we dont know causal horizon - what is that - metaphor for understanding? It's the distance where the Hubble expansion causes galaxies to recede faster than light, thus we cannot observe the space past it. Almost every time one sees "Universe" referred to it is defined as the space we can observe (interior to the causal horizon). I just like to see what people think might be beyond it, if anything, or if anything can ever be know about it, for that would violate causality. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 1, 6:12 am, wrote:
The Quantum-Universe before the Planck-time. It's not only time, it's the very fabric of the Universe which is why they call it spacetime. Nothing can come earlier then the fabric, because before the fabric: NOTHING EXISTED. The planck time is directy related to the quantum unit which is the smallest unit of this fabric. To reduce the planck time, you would have to have a smaller unit then the quantum = IMPOSSIBLE. Your theory doesn't hold water nor the quantum unit. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 1, 6:59 am, "Bo Warming" wrote:
skrev i en meddelelsenews:1191233536.197603.21900@y42g2000hsy .googlegroups.com... The Quantum-Universe before the Planck-time. The first Cosmic Quantum-process. BW: Planck was a genius in experiments and empiri. But his findings of the quant are not much related to relativity and have not been very inspiring for TECKNOLOGY Lasers and semiconductors had been invented without him Lasers are hot, Bo know Warming. Speculations about the start of the universe are not interesting to pracitical people and has little use of Planck |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 1, 8:27 am, Don Stockbauer wrote:
The Quantum-Universe before the Planck-time. The first Cosmic Quantum-process. Derivation of E = Mc^2. By Louis Nielsen Denmark Treatise: http://www.rostra.dk/louis THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE. How was the beginning of the Universe? The 'Standard Model' in cosmology bas.... ********************************* How are you defining "Universe"? As just the space interior to the causal horizon, or all space? No he "Stocks" them vertically, "Bauer" style. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 2 Okt., 17:39, " wrote:
On Oct 1, 6:12 am, wrote: The Quantum-Universe before the Planck-time. It's not only time, it's the very fabric of the Universe which is why they call it spacetime. Nothing can come earlier then the fabric, because before the fabric: NOTHING EXISTED. The planck time is directy related to the quantum unit which is the smallest unit of this fabric. To reduce the planck time, you would have to have a smaller unit then the quantum = IMPOSSIBLE. Your theory doesn't hold water nor the quantum unit. The cosmological 'quantum of length' d defined by: (1) d = h/(M*c) where h is planck's constant, c the velocity of ligth and M the TOTAL MASS of the UNIVERSE is much smaller than the 'planck-length'. And the cosmological 'quantum of time' t defined by: (2) t = d/c is much smaller than the 'planck-time'. Smaller quanta units than the planck units are not impossible! The Universe came into existence within the first quantum of time t given by equation (1). Best regards Louis Nielsen Denmark http://www.rostra.dk/louis |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Oct 2, 5:42 pm, wrote:
On 2 Okt., 17:39, " wrote: On Oct 1, 6:12 am, wrote: The Quantum-Universe before the Planck-time. It's not only time, it's the very fabric of the Universe which is why they call it spacetime. Nothing can come earlier then the fabric, because before the fabric: NOTHING EXISTED. The planck time is directy related to the quantum unit which is the smallest unit of this fabric. To reduce the planck time, you would have to have a smaller unit then the quantum = IMPOSSIBLE. Your theory doesn't hold water nor the quantum unit. The cosmological 'quantum of length' d defined by: (1) d = h/(M*c) where h is planck's constant, c the velocity of ligth and M the TOTAL MASS of the UNIVERSE is much smaller than the 'planck-length'. And the cosmological 'quantum of time' t defined by: (2) t = d/c is much smaller than the 'planck-time'. Smaller quanta units than the planck units are not impossible! The Universe came into existence within the first quantum of time t given by equation (1). Best regards Louis Nielsen Denmark http://www.rostra.dk/louis then they got the mass wrong. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The beginning of the Universe before the Planck-time | Louis_N@edu.herlufsholm.dk | Physics - General Discussion | 11 | October 8th 07 02:57 AM |
| How can we be seeing the beginning of the universe? | wiiwiillwiin@gmail.com | Physics - General Discussion | 7 | October 27th 06 05:48 AM |
| How can we be seeing the beginning of the universe? | wiiwiillwiin@gmail.com | The Theory of Relativity | 6 | October 26th 06 10:13 AM |
| The beginning of the universe. | John Leonard | Physics - New Theories | 30 | August 20th 03 04:16 AM |
| The beginning of the universe. | John Leonard | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 19 | August 12th 03 11:26 AM |