why at small scale tha rules imposed
by universe apparently makes sense,

while at large scales and nanosmall scales
tha same universe impose rules that
absolutely makes no any sense

here is how is works,

tha rules from tha larger scale contradict
tha rules from tha smaller scale

1. large scale contradix == small scale

2. small scall contradicts == nanoscale

3. == large scale contradict == small and nanoscales

consequently

4. mega large scale confirm == nanoscale

5 femto nano scale confirm == large scale

On Sep 27, 10:18 pm, core duo wrote:
why at small scale tha rules imposed
by universe apparently makes sense,

while at large scales and nanosmall scales
tha same universe impose rules that
absolutely makes no any sense

here is how is works,

tha rules from tha larger scale contradict
tha rules from tha smaller scale

1. large scale contradix == small scale

2. small scall contradicts == nanoscale

3. == large scale contradict == small and nanoscales

consequently

4. mega large scale confirm == nanoscale

5 femto nano scale confirm == large scale

and ta continue our discussin,

why that need for universe ta do all
these contradiction

this is becus in order to make tha
rules possible for tha other scales

here is hoe it woerks

1. the large scale exhibits and projects his
behavioral on small scale

2. tha nano scale exhibits and projects his
behavioral on small scale

3. tha intersection of all these projected
behaviorals impose namely tha rules on
our small scale

there is no other possibility,

how do you want to have any rules without
projections of behaviorals from other scales?

how do you like it, am i true?

On Sep 27, 10:30 pm, core duo wrote:
On Sep 27, 10:18 pm, core duo wrote:



why at small scale tha rules imposed
by universe apparently makes sense,

while at large scales and nanosmall scales
tha same universe impose rules that
absolutely makes no any sense

here is how is works,

tha rules from tha larger scale contradict
tha rules from tha smaller scale

1. large scale contradix == small scale

2. small scall contradicts == nanoscale

3. == large scale contradict == small and nanoscales

consequently

4. mega large scale confirm == nanoscale

5 femto nano scale confirm == large scale

and ta continue our discussin,

why that need for universe ta do all
these contradiction

this is becus in order to make tha
rules possible for tha other scales

here is hoe it woerks

1. the large scale exhibits and projects his
behavioral on small scale

2. tha nano scale exhibits and projects his
behavioral on small scale

3. tha intersection of all these projected
behaviorals impose namely tha rules on
our small scale

there is no other possibility,

how do you want to have any rules without
projections of behaviorals from other scales?

how do you like it, am i true?

i actually wonder why the selfestablished
are afraid making comments to sucha issue
in this paper

On Sep 28, 4:12 pm, core duo wrote:
On Sep 27, 10:30 pm, core duo wrote:



On Sep 27, 10:18 pm, core duo wrote:

why at small scale tha rules imposed
by universe apparently makes sense,

while at large scales and nanosmall scales
tha same universe impose rules that
absolutely makes no any sense

here is how is works,

tha rules from tha larger scale contradict
tha rules from tha smaller scale

1. large scale contradix == small scale

2. small scall contradicts == nanoscale

3. == large scale contradict == small and nanoscales

consequently

4. mega large scale confirm == nanoscale

5 femto nano scale confirm == large scale

and ta continue our discussin,

why that need for universe ta do all
these contradiction

this is becus in order to make tha
rules possible for tha other scales

here is hoe it woerks

1. the large scale exhibits and projects his
behavioral on small scale

2. tha nano scale exhibits and projects his
behavioral on small scale

3. tha intersection of all these projected
behaviorals impose namely tha rules on
our small scale

there is no other possibility,

how do you want to have any rules without
projections of behaviorals from other scales?

how do you like it, am i true?

i actually wonder why the selfestablished
are afraid making comments to sucha issue
in this paper

Probably because what you say is false.

Don Stockbauer wrote:
On Sep 28, 4:12 pm, core duo wrote:
On Sep 27, 10:30 pm, core duo wrote:



On Sep 27, 10:18 pm, core duo wrote:

why at small scale tha rules imposed
by universe apparently makes sense,

while at large scales and nanosmall scales
tha same universe impose rules that
absolutely makes no any sense

here is how is works,

tha rules from tha larger scale contradict
tha rules from tha smaller scale

1. large scale contradix == small scale

2. small scall contradicts == nanoscale

3. == large scale contradict == small and nanoscales

consequently

4. mega large scale confirm == nanoscale

5 femto nano scale confirm == large scale

and ta continue our discussin,

why that need for universe ta do all
these contradiction

this is becus in order to make tha
rules possible for tha other scales

here is hoe it woerks

1. the large scale exhibits and projects his
behavioral on small scale

2. tha nano scale exhibits and projects his
behavioral on small scale

3. tha intersection of all these projected
behaviorals impose namely tha rules on
our small scale

there is no other possibility,

how do you want to have any rules without
projections of behaviorals from other scales?

how do you like it, am i true?

i actually wonder why the selfestablished
are afraid making comments to sucha issue
in this paper

Probably because what you say is false.

are you saying that tha rules and konstants in our
scale are not constrained by tha intersection of
the behaviorals and tha projections coming from
tha scale below and tha scale beyond?

are you sure you are a sane individual, or am i
wasting my seed?