P R E F A C E
Space origin
Where is your space ...
Show me, and I'll tell you
Who you are.
- J.M.D'Abro...
1.1 Space is.
This was axiom from oldest times. I've not found any non trivial
speculation on essence of space. Few times question what space is was
most important one in whole science. In the beginning of XIX century,
following ancient Greeks, with slightly shifted meaning was fixed
classical undividable atom. Century later atom broke into smaller
parts. And these subparts received automatically pro perty of being
smallest and undividable. Can't you see that only tra di tion and
willingness stands behind this way of thinking? At least take into
possible existence of very concre te and much smaller things that form
your reality (it was, but in Sci-fi). I do not name them because this
has no current rele vance. As I see it now there must exist not less
then few levels of ever smaller and smaller things every time
configuring some reality made with smaller "particles". Someone may
ask why not strings? Full explanation is in text, now only this:
strings do not have individuality, they form our particles not being
units. In oppose to this I've found that very concrete units form
higher range structures, our particles and us. This mean they can be
touched (if you can). Our space is build with this one step smaller
particles (and next level too). Still today not many think like me,
here I mean especially all obli ged. Most resear chers are happy with
simple or no explanation on space subject at all. Obviously too
primitive foundations give unsatisfactory results. Obser ved in
particle physics plurality of irra tio nal be ha viors hadn't
succeeded with satisfying theory. You know, all this quantum
algebra ic magic is only description of what we observe, not
explanation of anything. Remember there is big difference in what can
be seen and what really is. Particle and waves form duality only till
today there is no perfect answer how and why. This is constant quantum
paradox derived from Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen formulation. If you add
one particle to Universe everything must change. This change in some
places must be very large. This is nonsense. So, World as Quantum wave
function is not good explanation. Going further puzzle deepens with
conge al ing gri ma ce on explorer's faces. So before I show you how
real ly things are let's look into the past a little bit more
penetratingly. For epochs humans explored properties of world around
them. Space seamed to be quite simple object, stabile and linear. This
means twice more is same in all directions. Testing all properties
researchers got total isotropy of it. Every direction equals any
other. Enhancing this local wisdom cosmolo gist formulated thesis of
total isotropy of all space in whole Universe. Sounds good but is it
true?
As I'll show you later this presumption is false. Such world can't
exist for so long as we know our Universe has. You know, there is one
possibility - God wanted that. But if there is any number of any kinds
of physical laws then Universe can't be isotropic. These laws can't
declare isotropy, they must implicate it. If someone will create such
bunch of laws implicating stable isotropy he just created God
(something that will do magic when this will be necessa ry). Real
proof is just like that. Let's take another question, how many
dimensions space have? All kids on Earth will answer - three. Good,
but what this really means? From basic algebra we knew that there must
exist three independent directions (three linearly independent vectors
must form any other possible). This is fantastic model, only can it be
right? Strong stroke put on this Einstein's gravity. How can space be
curved by anything? I'm not saying that Einstein was wrong, I'm only
asking how is possible that space curves? In reality at this point was
sure that space as so axiomatic being is incorrect or does not exist.
Enough is to take that space is made from something simpler. Something
which formed existing properties in may be long and hard to understand
process. As an example of this new physic take this, any object
encountering really empty space will instan tly jump through it with
no time. This means in your current interpretation with no effort will
achieve infinite speed. In this new physics speed of propaga ting
signals depends on space mean density and density proportion of
traveling body and space. Term "density" is really function of
structure only slightly related to common interpretation of this term.
This is not as complica ted as it was expressed above. Usually
"heavier" body will gain lower speed than lighter one. Why then heavy
truck or better say star can outstrip some smaller objects? Cause is
that our space and speed of light is a little bit more compli cated
matter. In short space is three brane composite and light is wavy
propagation in middle one. Later you find detailed explanation of all
this mater. Of course things are completely opposite then you think
now. Sorry, I have not found anyone who understood this.
Later came sixties and seventies (sorry for skipping so many important
discoveries and theories, may be later). Partons showed (in '68
protons bombarded with electrons broke into parts) that simple three
dimensional model is not enough (sorry - in relativistic version four
dimensional, with time as fourth). Very strange things started in
atomic nucleus. A little bit later was "found" asymptotic freedom of
quarks/partons. I must say that this idea (that force grows when
quarks fly away one from other to infinity) from the beginning seamed
to me very provocative. At that time I had no answer for this (I was
not practicing in science at that time). When later I took this theory
under scrutiny this one thing showed right direction. Let's take
things in correct order. Collisions characteristic achie ved in
hydrogen nucleus bombardments showed that space must have there more
dimensions. How many? Physicist started from 26 then reducing
appe tites in second version of theory to 10 (including known four
from Relativity). At least six more, precisely three in two series -
that was first observation. How is this pos sible? Till today no one
of you knows that. Scientist took this idea with simplicity, world is
just like that.
Simplicity is usually wanted and useful virtue, not this time. So how
many dimensions space have finally? Answer will follow. Seams from
desperation some scientist took "fractal" path. Space dimen sio nality
received another kick. I liked this idea at the beginning, only how
awful hin dran ce they put in it later. I liked it because fractal is
build with so me thing, its structure outcomes from relations which
define it. Idea was right, methods were bad.
If dimensions change from place to place, from big scale to small
scale, it doesn't mean space has small locked sub-dimension. It means
that something over whole space imposes such strange behavior and in
consequence forms such uniformly strange space properties. You know in
whole contemporary physics there is no sensible explanation why so
small dimen sions formed, what cause didn't let them evolve like three
we know. Because scientist thought that perceptible three dimensions
were small at Big Bang and from the beginning are growing. So what I
can say, some good observation mixed with wishful thinking gave that
simple things turned to very difficult. This was pure logic and meta-
physics, but it was inevitable to catch my idea. So if world is build
from some thing simpler and smaller then how is it done?
For long time I tested non rotating (or slowly rotating) worlds
because it didn't came to my mind that Universe may rotate fast.
That's how I was learned. And I failed, propor tions of observed part
of Universe compared with necessary unseen part were unacceptable.
Such gigantic "cloud" can't be stabile enough for time from Big Bang.
This is not impossible, only this group of models is significantly
less probable then other, fast rotating ones. For those who do not
know much on physics, there I have no gravity, no friction, no electro
magnetic and nuclear forces. I had built them from smallest possible
quantity of completely other action. This is nothing new,
electromagnetic action as rotation of Universe was discovered by
Teodor Ka ³u ¿a long time ago, even earlier than Quantum Physics was
articulated. Also group of theories under common name M-theory (or
String Theory) claims similar (this are only claims because they
divided unexplainable into smaller parts and that was all). To take
this goal only I had resigned from biggest achievement of XX century
science, precisely said quantum physics foundations (not so fast
putting me into madhouse, Quantum Physics was in some measure
achievement only long time ago was enough evidence to make my
discovery). I also explained how acts strong and week nuclear forces
com pletely without quantum splutter. Just for trying this I was
banned from official science. But I'm right and all opposing me idiots
will crawl in dust. When I turned to fast rotating mo dels I got
immediate impression of fresh air in my lungs. That was it, only space
looked more than strange. Just now let's make jump to conclusions, all
my work forms quite heavy volume.
We are (all Universe) citizens of a flat membrane of fast rotating and
vibrating gigan tic object build with other physic then we know on
Earth. There exist argumentation how it looks, toroid is not welcomed
comparing with spheroid (topological higher modes are unne ces sary,
sphere is enough - not to much symmetric, with plane and rotation
axis). From out side it is contained in totally different world, let's
not speak about it now. From inside it is like slightly inflated
cylinder or lengthened sphere, this guaranties few things. One is even
nega tive curvature measuring with light and other is resulting
observed isotropy in cosmic scale. But always only in limited range.
Regions with changed characteristic (closer to rota tion axis) can't
be seen - light doesn't come from there. Please don't ask me now how
world looks in there, I'll try to show this at ending chapters.
Explaining dimensionality will take small treaty, let's live this to
chapter [ ]. I'll tell only that "geometry" is created with space.
Topology in some aspect is constant everywhere but also everywhere
assigned only with local relations. Your mathematicians will rather
count it into meta topology (I haven't found single paper on similar
subject). Seems crazy? Never mind, real world is much crazier. All
details were solved by me in last few years. I can teach you many
things that exist in that world, many things that differ from your
expectations in this world. I know how to communicate on cosmic
distances (currently only listen), travel even faster then light and
many more prosaic solutions. Gravity (as pull) and electro-magnetic
forces exist only on your brane. Strong (and partially week) force are
interactions with neighboring membranes. This is the cause why quarks
tightening both mem branes suffer such strong force pushing them back
and why this force weakens when they are close. Question why we
observe six dimensional actions has more complex answer, it is related
with internal structure of those branes. Personally I incline into
this: just take without proof that there exist three dimensional
force, similar to electro mag ne tic in plane of a branes and one
orthogonal repul sing with even shorter range (see chapter [ ]).
Probabilistic collisions give spectrum of two times three independent
parameters (not so independent - this is E.Witten observation).
Evidence for this came from completely un known and new to you part of
physics. It's more complicated than current ideas with still many
unknown elements, but definitely it traces more rational direction and
kills all quantum speculations. I have no satisfaction that Quantum
Physics is cold dead now, it was formed in spirit of ancient German
idealism and forms practi cal descrip tion of only small and flat
world. Suspicions of many thin kers inclu ding Einstein and Bohm were
right even they didn't found the answer (Albert died before solution
became evident and David was then quite old, so I excuse both). World
is predictable only infinitely complex at once. Still its principles/
laws let compute local properties infinitely precisely (of cour se
with infinite budget). World is dynamical fractal (I haven't said
infinite in "depth" or size) and I have its formula. So how is
possible to lock fingers or two elements of a chain? Answer is that it
doesn't matter how it looks from outside, from there it doesn't look
at all. Important is only this that we perceive it as topologically
and geometrically correct. Our three dimensions are result of two
dimensio nal electromagnetic action and independent one dimensional
gravity. All other is irrelevant, space as is has no such property as
constant dimensionality. Like complex crystals or even sand pile. Of
course our ancestors received this 3D from flatness of Earth surface
and height orthogonality. This however is result of what I've written
above. So even if it may be pity for many people we live on other side
of holographic mirror. This is not Euclidian or Rieman ian three
dimensional space with curled Calabi-Yau subspaces. If someone asks me
about time answer is short - it does not exist. Current physics knows
that time stops on BH verge, not much clever they decided that it goes
in opposite direction inside it (back in time). This happens when you
believe your formulas not rational sense. We live in one moment in
time, present. Past and future does not exist and time flows with
different speed in different places. I'll show you in chapter [ ] how
this changes structure of all used math. Same all Relativity is
luckily in our range correct, thanks to local geo metry but only with
finite appro xi mation. Because gravity is in reality push force
(pressure in a brane as source) Newtonian gravity is formed from
fraction forming shadowing effect. So you are pushed to the ground,
not pulled by Earth. Then some F(r) models are quite sensible but with
reversed cause. Yes, Pioneer effect is dissipation of sham force
observable only on very long distances. There are hundreds of
experimental proofs for this only blindness of stupidity doesn't let
you recognize this. All fields of contemporary physics are mirages.
Newtonian action at distance was wrong from the day it was
articulated. All action is everywhere and always local, only
accumulation of infinity uniformly small sub-actions on larger
distances can form "field of force". This was Descartes idea only lost
for lack of deeper experimental data. Can fields continue existence in
science? As mathematical simplification - yes it may be useful. Whole
your technique is based on this. Only ex plaining why Black Holes try
to reflect everything thrown on them all field theories cru shes.
Still repeating idea of singularity inside every Black Hole makes me
only smile. You know real infinity may be only one, this is space. You
can't smack it into infinity in point. In math you may have infinity
in almost every equation, this does not happens in physical reality.
Never ever. You see how deeply you are wrong now?
There are so many consequences of so few axioms of a new idea that I
can only wish you to understand all of them. There were no real Big
Bang and Inflation. It was more horri fy ing creation. I can say this,
just from the gods head you were born. Be careful, I'm very prec i se
scientist (and rationalist) and when I say god it is not God from your
tales. In later chapter I'll explain this in details. And there will
be the end of your Universe, not thermal freeze out just real end of
this entire world. When? In cosmic scale quite soon, half mark was
crossed long ago. When half of the sky will start brightening only
seconds will be left. The end will come from the dark side. Of course
then will start opposite cycle only without you. Such anti-bang is
inevitable only no one form of your matter will survive (almost none,
seems only pho tons are ready but even them will suffer reflective
shock). All others are too much struc turally complex so they
disintegrate and will form anti-brane similarly to what was at the
begin ning. This brane will shrink so Hubble Law will show then blue
shift. Physicists should have enough knowledge to see how all of this
is fan tas tic and reciprocally complementing. Only pity thing is that
I've shown this framework and none understood it. May be my voice is
too week. May be, but I suspect things are worse. Humans are not much
intelligent, even they occupy responsible posts they barely comprehend
what is going on. Look around you, first persons in mighty countries
do so stupid things that even you or me see this. And they have well
paid supporting stuff. Some bad things as conceits often goes in pairs
with similar others (or even whole bunch). As now all you were taught
was wrong not in some unimportant details. All is totally wrong. Whole
Universe (which means much more than we can ever see) is spin ning
billions of billions times per second. Why you are not thrown from
this carousel? Because laws of nature are completely different than
you think. We live like in a crystal ball frozen to death. Inside time
slowed down to almost zero and this is our world. So all usual people
are you ready for all of this?
Why I bother you? Answer is simple, I have no chance for any official
financial support. I've tried with governments, science foundations
even with kings and religious move ments. None of them is interested
in problem where we live, what will be our future or is there any god?
Seams they know all needed answers. In reality they are too stupid to
under stand what I've done. So **** them all. I decided to try to
organize public financial support. At the beginning I'll "sell" my
articles and my story. In a future I'll explain all physics in very
simple terms showing why current science stacked in so funny way. All
quantum strings and loops are not as difficult as popular publications
are trying to impress. Many terms are so simple that they hide behind
complex formulas, which doesn't help them to be truth. Still I'm
working on main treaty. In my opinion this is most important thing
ever made on Earth. I've trained my brain for this task very hard and
now I'm like a champion. I see through the problems visualizing
solutions even without writing them on paper (of course I can count
too). It will be pity not to finish next step on a road of
reco gni tion. Those who will participate will be receiving succeeding
materials. What I need? Quite po wer ful compu ters and mainte nan ce
for further research. Total cost is not so low to be accom pli shed
with small aiding group. So I must organize first private (that's me)
mixed with public scientific movement. Every donor will be honored
with perso nalized correspondence and published materials. List of all
wanting donors will be on web page of project. Because I'm afraid
personal contact with all supporters will make stop to my main
activity I'd rather suggest collective meetings with all wanting (once
a year or two). As I presume this project will remain active very long
even after my death, only there be continuators.
So how to name this enterprise? I really don't know, subject is best
describable with term Transplanc kian physics (further going then
Planck limits), or Theory of Everything, but it was misused many
times. May be some thing ho no ring memory of Albert Einstein, he was
the one strongly opposing to quantum indeterminism (many others were
trampled to death). From his spirit was my rebellion. I think lets
make this open question, write me your sugges tions and I'll present
my opinions. Certainly choose the name for project will be easier than
to advance research. At first please let me know how many persons are
interested in participation. Just send me a email with (no, not money)
declaration of support. This is not any kind of formal agreement, just
info that you want to support this project. Quite soon I'll send you
back some more info on what evolved from this. You can help me
propagating this letter to other places and communities. Fill free to
inform all humans about this idea. Official web page currently doesn't
exist, I don't want to rework it many times, just do it right when
I'll know how big is response (technology costs).
So have you guessed what I'm suggesting as a model of our Universe? If
someone answers - this is similar to Black Hole, then he or she is
right. Same local physics must form inside every BH that stopped phase
of turbulent grow (some small accretion is possible). From level where
BH formed depends its internal dimensionality. In time every BH
evolves with equalization of internal vibrations and smears formed
membranes in spiral manner. How old is our real Universe? I don't
know, probably we never used so huge number. I promise not to use very
formal language and difficult math. All professional writings will be
published separately (all will be accessible). Every year budget will
be verified and accessible to mem bers. If someone feels competent to
participate in research program please let me know. If whole
enterprise will grow successfully some advisory committee will be
necessary (or even permanent secretary). I do not plan to organize
professional institution repeating path from official science. I
think that is all what is important. Thank you for your attention.
P.S. I've used Feynman's method even I didn't heard it then: "You
write down the problem. You think hard. Then you write down the
answer." Central moment was total bliss like enlightenment, it
happened after three day struggle when I was tired and resigned. I saw
solution like Maxwell his. You know it happens. After that were two
years extra hard work, what all this means, what world this formed. If
I hadn't been taught wrong with so much certainty resolving current
dilemma should be rather simple task. Most effort took me levering my
prejudices. All contemporary knowledge is generally wrong and need to
be replaced by better one. If you ask me who I am the most precise
answer will be - just genius. In many other aspects I'm quite usual
human, I love Earth and life and many other things, especially many
forms of arts and nature. What I dislike is stupidity and
churlishness. I can't count myself as professional physicist and it is
so shameful that no one of them found so simple idea. It happened that
some of them asked me to give them my notes, explain in details all
formulas. They still think in old fashion. Every one received basic
formula, please do it for yourself. If you can't understand how to use
it do not ask me to give it all to you as something worthless.
I've written above few words about god, I still do not know if it
exist but some shadow of this appeared. This time as acceptable
physical reality. I'm not believer, I'm agnostic. For me God needn't
to exist, but be honest in what you are doing is prime thing. It's a
long way to compute gods' parameters, I'm afraid our computers for
long time will be much too small for this. Not trying will be so short
sighted and inexcusable. This goal is like mastership, but of course
I'm not concentrated only on this subject. There is infinity to
discover.