Quantum Geometry
Model Four-Dimensional of Matter, Energy and Vacuum
Rafael Javier MartÃ*nez Olmo
www.gravityquantum.com
Madrid
Spain
Extract:
If we understand the Differential Calculus as a Physical Theory
(reality), before as a mathematical model of approach to reality
represented by the Real numbers (R), we see that shows the elementary
Nature of the Geometry of the Spacetime. Which elementary components,
in the sense of without parts, are temporary volumes (VT) four-
dimensional (D=4), infinitesimal (e0), and topology curved (Pi) .
This route based on the Differential Calculus, is the Quantum
Geometry.
The writing tries to sit the bases and theoretical essentials of this
path, which unifies the experimental results of the Quantum Mechanics
with the theory of the General Relativity, by means of the hidden
variables (OPi), curvatures space-temporally of the quantum events.
The model is relational and independently of background (Quantum
Relativity), where both, the General Relativity and the Quantum
Mechanics, are specifying.
The first one is specifying with a spherical geometry of radial
dynamics.
The second one is repairing strongly with the causality, replacing the
statistical processing (random) with a geometric processing
(determinist).
The Quantum Geometry gives a causal explanation of the Quantum
Mechanics, establishing a connection of one to one, between the
results probabilistic and the elementary geometries (without parts) of
the spacetime, which wraps and contains the above mentioned quantum
event. Likewise, it determines the geometry and the metrics of the
Nature in its elementary scale, specifying the model of Quantum
Relativity.
The attempts of unification, of both theories, have always aborted for
the appearance of the infinites. The origin of these indeterminations
is in an equivocal reading of the Calculus. Consequence of the bug of
expressing the continuity in terms of points (Dimensional = 0). It has
allowed us up to today, to use the set of the real numbers to
represent the reality. They were failing of unequivocal form on the
description of the elementary Nature of the Spacetime; that can be
described only in indivisible terms, for geometric objects four-
dimensional (Volumes in the time; VT); and represented by the set of
the natural numbers �.
Consequently, the term continued that it is put up only to discreet in
terms of points (dimensional = 0; D0; �) (infinite divisibility).
The singularities do not exist, therefore, in the Nature; they are the
result of to using the set of the real numbers. They are mathematical
singularities (division for zero) and Not Physical.
This model is finite, quantifiable and completely predictive;
Contrastable experimentally at a level of energy lower than
253,177660585902 TeV. (Supreme value of energy for one process Quantum)

"GravityQuantum" wrote in message
ups.com...

If we understand the Differential Calculus as a Physical Theory
(reality),

Physics is not concerned with 'reality' what-ever that is. It is concerned
with models that fit observation. Mathematics is the language that
experience has shown physics is written in. Why that is is a very deep
mystery - fully worthy of philosophical discourse - on the appropriate
forum - namely a philosophy forum.
http://euler.slu.edu/~srivastava/wigner.pdf

Scientists do not usually worry too much about it - except to occasionally
comment on it as Wigner did - they simply accept that is the way nature is.

Mathematics is nether true not false - it simply is a lot of axioms that may
or may not be part of a model that may or may not be in accord with
observation. Any musings beyond that is philosophy - not science.

Rest of philosophical musings masquerading as 'science' snipped. That is
not to say I think it is good philosophy - I suspect it would make a real
philosopher wince - but then again I am not a philosopher.

Bill

On Sep 12, 7:58 pm, "Bill Hobba" wrote:
[..]

Physics is not concerned with 'reality' what-ever that is. It is concerned
with models that fit observation.

The decoupling of physics from reality is the prime reason for its
modern failure.

wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 12, 7:58 pm, "Bill Hobba" wrote:
[..]

Physics is not concerned with 'reality' what-ever that is. It is
concerned
with models that fit observation.

The decoupling of physics from reality is the prime reason for its
modern failure.


Not understanding why such is irrelevant is the reason you will never
understand physics, or actuarial science, or stochastic finance or etc etc
........ Mathematical models only need to fit observation. Any relation
that requirement has to 'reality' is for philosophers to debate - as soon as
they agree what reality is - which it is very very highly doubtful.

Bill