A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 8th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Igor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,675
Default Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD

On Sep 7, 6:00 pm, hungus wrote:
On Sep 7, 11:32 pm, Igor wrote:





On Sep 6, 2:53 pm, " wrote:


On Sep 6, 1:59 pm, Igor wrote:


On Sep 6, 12:21 pm, " wrote:


Is this true:


1.


a) An electron charge has an negative? electric field (E_FIELD)


The standard convention is for electric fields to go from positive
charges to negative charges.'


wrong fool

the current of charges is that standard convention, not
the electric field or any fields



b) ...but a photon's E_Field is neutral?


Your statement is meaningless. The electric field of an EM wave
oscillates transverse to the direction in which it is traveling.


wrong fool,

that is only a depiction, for fools, in a try to understand,
and it is an amplitude of somthin, not a field



So is it's magnetic component but that doesn't make the photon's
magnetic field neutral.


Tom Roberts or someone once told me either the photon has zero charge
and/or zero electric field, most likely both since I believe the
Electric Force is a component of the Electric field and if E = 0 then
likewise the E_Field (E= kqq/r^2).


c) An electron E_Field becomes neutral when coupled with a proton.


The word neutral is meaningless with electric fields. There is a


exactly fool,

you just said before that it has a direction, from plus ta minus

what a fool

combined field going from the proton to the electron that is divergent
at the opposite ends.


what tha fok is a combined field, which goes, still,

you foken moron







A neutral E_field will have zero effect on other charges (other
electrons).


2.


a) An electron charge's E_FIELD is in all directions


Correct.


b) A photon's E_FIELD is longitudinal "only" with the photon's travel
direction?


My mistake, transverse as you said.


Longitudinal fields are associated with mass. The fields of an EM
wave are transverse. However, there may be sa longitudinal component
if the photon had a mass, which would need to be extremely small. The
latest experimental upper bound is on the order of 10^-51 grams.


c) A electron charge's E_FIELD is in zero direction (neutral) when
coupled with a proton (or perhaps longitudinal with the direction of
the proton...and likewise in an electric circuit)?


What the hell is a zero direction? Not that it gets much better. You
really enjoy going out with complete nonsense, don't you?


look whos talkin

you are more foken stoopid than anyone else

get lost



I understand that you keep getting physics the science mixed up with
the physic that is colloquially used to describe a laxative, but try
to keep up.


Ads
  #12  
Old September 8th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
hungus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Comparing Charge and Photon's E_FIELD

On Sep 8, 8:12 pm, Igor wrote:
On Sep 7, 6:00 pm, hungus wrote:



On Sep 7, 11:32 pm, Igor wrote:


On Sep 6, 2:53 pm, " wrote:


On Sep 6, 1:59 pm, Igor wrote:


On Sep 6, 12:21 pm, " wrote:


Is this true:


1.


a) An electron charge has an negative? electric field (E_FIELD)


The standard convention is for electric fields to go from positive
charges to negative charges.'


wrong fool


the current of charges is that standard convention, not
the electric field or any fields


b) ...but a photon's E_Field is neutral?


Your statement is meaningless. The electric field of an EM wave
oscillates transverse to the direction in which it is traveling.


wrong fool,


that is only a depiction, for fools, in a try to understand,
and it is an amplitude of somthin, not a field


So is it's magnetic component but that doesn't make the photon's
magnetic field neutral.


Tom Roberts or someone once told me either the photon has zero charge
and/or zero electric field, most likely both since I believe the
Electric Force is a component of the Electric field and if E = 0 then
likewise the E_Field (E= kqq/r^2).


c) An electron E_Field becomes neutral when coupled with a proton.


The word neutral is meaningless with electric fields. There is a


exactly fool,


you just said before that it has a direction, from plus ta minus


what a fool


combined field going from the proton to the electron that is divergent
at the opposite ends.


what tha fok is a combined field, which goes, still,


you foken moron


A neutral E_field will have zero effect on other charges (other
electrons).


2.


a) An electron charge's E_FIELD is in all directions


Correct.


b) A photon's E_FIELD is longitudinal "only" with the photon's travel
direction?


My mistake, transverse as you said.


Longitudinal fields are associated with mass. The fields of an EM
wave are transverse. However, there may be sa longitudinal component
if the photon had a mass, which would need to be extremely small. The
latest experimental upper bound is on the order of 10^-51 grams.


c) A electron charge's E_FIELD is in zero direction (neutral) when
coupled with a proton (or perhaps longitudinal with the direction of
the proton...and likewise in an electric circuit)?


What the hell is a zero direction? Not that it gets much better. You
really enjoy going out with complete nonsense, don't you?


look whos talkin


you are more foken stoopid than anyone else


get lost


I understand that you keep getting physics the science mixed up with
the physic that is colloquially used to describe a laxative, but try
to keep up.


stop talkin about science you foken hypocrite

once again, you are totally parallel and not
tangent to any science

get lost

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
photon's wavefunction kvblake Current Physics Research (Moderated) 10 May 11th 07 01:24 PM
photon's wavefunction kvblake Physics - General Discussion 5 January 9th 07 09:52 AM
Question about a mirror from a photon's perspecitve? tamabisca2@gmail.com Physics - General Discussion 4 April 19th 06 04:23 AM
A Photon's Perspective Dave@Henry. Physics - New Theories 12 January 28th 04 01:04 AM
Is it possible that photon's have mass ? Spud The Theory of Relativity 83 July 21st 03 12:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
News - News - Vegas Hotel - Loans - News