![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: apology, gran, time, wrt |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I probably owe everyone an apology for an omission and misconception
caused. The only constant of time would be '0', because none other than '0' could be a constant regarding time. I've alluded to it many times, worked with it many times in scenarios I've presented, literally swiped it (with possibly some modification as to interpretation) from at least Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking to begin with, and I just made an assumption of automatic recognition in my post "Time WRT SR and GR." I should not have assumed, omitted, and caused whatever of misconception. Again, my apologies. But, it changes nothing else I said, or that was said in following discussion. That to and fro stands. GLB |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:17:21 -0400, "G. L. Bradford"
wrote: [snip junk] Your apology is meaningless becuase you have been posting garbage about both special and general relativity since at least 1994 and show no sign of stopping or getting educated. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Time WRT SR and GR...An Apology | G. L. Bradford | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | August 30th 07 01:14 PM |
| ANOTHER APOLOGY IN ORDER | Ed Conrad | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | January 20th 06 08:44 PM |
| an apology | Francis Harrington | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | December 5th 03 08:26 PM |