|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: einstein, extremely, incorrect, lorentz |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
August 26th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
Einstein "briefly" mentions light's aberration.
A large error for it substantialy affects Lorentz' length contraction. http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/aberration.html Due to ***light's aberration***, ALL of SPACETIME's dimensions contract to a single point, a singularity as light's speed reaches "c". ------------------------------------------------------------ One would expect the travel ***time*** dissipation (time dilation) along this different length contraction to also be affected, yet the muon's life contradicts this. 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
August 26th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
On Aug 26, 5:47 pm, " wrote:
Einstein "briefly" mentions light's aberration. A large error for it substantialy affects Lorentz' length contraction. http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/aberration.html Due to ***light's aberration***, ALL of SPACETIME's dimensions contract to a single point, a singularity as light's speed reaches "c". All dimensions dissolve, yet light has no trouble(energy & inertia wise) changing directions (reflecting, refracting) and propagating at different minute distances (no quantum leaps). ------------------------------------------------------------ One would expect the travel ***time*** dissipation (time dilation) along this different length contraction to also be affected, yet the muon's life contradicts this.
|
|
#3
August 26th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
wrote in message
oups.com... On Aug 26, 5:47 pm, " wrote: Einstein "briefly" mentions light's aberration. A large error for it substantialy affects Lorentz' length contraction. http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/aberration.html Due to ***light's aberration***, ALL of SPACETIME's dimensions contract to a single point, a singularity as light's speed reaches "c". It doesn't reach c .. it is c
|
|
#4
August 27th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:47:50 -0700, "
wrote: Einstein "briefly" mentions light's aberration. A large error for it substantialy affects Lorentz' length contraction. http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/aberration.html Due to ***light's aberration***, ALL of SPACETIME's dimensions contract to a single point, a singularity as light's speed reaches "c". ------------------------------------------------------------ One would expect the travel ***time*** dissipation (time dilation) along this different length contraction to also be affected, yet the muon's life contradicts this. I see high school has prepared you well to critique modern physics.
|
|
#5
August 27th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
Eric Gisse refused to accept being corrected for it could prove he
knows little. Eric Gisse didn't even know proper time is invariant which the sole reason they call it "proper" and the foundation of spacetime. Everyone had to reply to Eric Gisse for him to finally accept. Eric Gisse stills refuses that temperature can also be invariant. hopeless.
|
|
#6
August 27th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
On Aug 26, 6:43 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Aug 26, 5:47 pm, " wrote: Einstein "briefly" mentions light's aberration. A large error for it substantialy affects Lorentz' length contraction. http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/aberration.html Due to ***light's aberration***, ALL of SPACETIME's dimensions contract to a single point, a singularity as light's speed reaches "c". It doesn't reach c .. it is c Hey that's fun! Ok I'll play along. Contract is an action therefore it cannot contract when it already is c, thus it already would be a singularity. What's not fun is the incorrect focus.
|
|
#7
August 27th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
wrote in message
ups.com... Eric Gisse refused to accept being corrected for it could prove he knows little. Eric Gisse didn't even know proper time is invariant which the sole reason they call it "proper" and the foundation of spacetime. Everyone had to reply to Eric Gisse for him to finally accept. Eric Gisse stills refuses that temperature can also be invariant. hopeless. You're obsessed with Eric Gisse. Get over it.
|
|
#8
August 27th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
wrote in message
oups.com... On Aug 26, 6:43 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: wrote in message oups.com... On Aug 26, 5:47 pm, " wrote: Einstein "briefly" mentions light's aberration. A large error for it substantialy affects Lorentz' length contraction. http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/aberration.html Due to ***light's aberration***, ALL of SPACETIME's dimensions contract to a single point, a singularity as light's speed reaches "c". It doesn't reach c .. it is c Hey that's fun! Ok I'll play along. Contract is an action therefore it cannot contract when it already is c, thus it already would be a singularity. We already know a photon is a point particle. What's not fun is the incorrect focus. What incorrect focus?
|
|
#9
August 27th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
On Aug 26, 11:25 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... Eric Gisse refused to accept being corrected for it could prove he knows little. Eric Gisse didn't even know proper time is invariant which the sole reason they call it "proper" and the foundation of spacetime. Everyone had to reply to Eric Gisse for him to finally accept. Eric Gisse stills refuses that temperature can also be invariant. hopeless. You're obsessed with Eric Gisse. Get over it. he's obsessed with me.
|
|
#10
August 27th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.
wrote in message
oups.com... On Aug 26, 11:25 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Eric Gisse refused to accept being corrected for it could prove he knows little. Eric Gisse didn't even know proper time is invariant which the sole reason they call it "proper" and the foundation of spacetime. Everyone had to reply to Eric Gisse for him to finally accept. Eric Gisse stills refuses that temperature can also be invariant. hopeless. You're obsessed with Eric Gisse. Get over it. he's obsessed with me. Hardly .. the only time I see him mention you is in reply to you.. you post thread upon thread of attacks on him. Get over it.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Einstein & Lorentz seem completely incorrect. | guskz@hotmail.com | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | August 26th 07 10:33 PM |
| Extremely high-voltage yet extremely small-current electric shock -- symptoms? | Radium | Physics - General Discussion | 33 | June 8th 07 05:18 PM |
| Extremely high-voltage yet extremely small-current electric shock -- symptoms? | Radium | Physics - New Theories | 33 | June 8th 07 05:18 PM |
| Extremely high-voltage yet extremely weak-current electric shock -- symptoms? | Radium | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 3 | June 7th 07 04:09 AM |
| Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX | Peri of Pera | The Theory of Relativity | 111 | December 8th 06 05:08 PM |
Linear Mode
