A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 27th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
guskz@hotmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,708
Default Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.



Another fun post!!!

the only time I see him mention you is in reply to you..


only time? fun....ny, he did NOT reply to me here
nor in """many""" others.


r u 2 friends

Ads
  #12  
Old September 1st 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
The TimeLord
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 472
Default Einstein & Lorentz extremely incorrect.

wrote:
Einstein "briefly" mentions light's aberration.

A large error for it substantialy affects Lorentz' length contraction.

http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/aberration.html

Due to ***light's aberration***, ALL of SPACETIME's dimensions
contract to a single point, a singularity as light's speed reaches
"c".


No. Stars just appear (as a first order correction to the rest
position) to more into the direction of motion. However, the point to
the aberration problem is that they _appear_ to have shifted due to
the fact that light's speed is not infinite.

One would expect the travel ***time*** dissipation (time dilation)
along this different length contraction to also be affected, yet the
muon's life contradicts this.


Actually such an expectation would be misplaced since nowhere in
physics is it justified.

For more detail read the URL you cited.

--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Einstein & Lorentz seem completely incorrect. guskz@hotmail.com The Theory of Relativity 0 August 26th 07 10:33 PM
Extremely high-voltage yet extremely small-current electric shock -- symptoms? Radium Physics - General Discussion 33 June 8th 07 05:18 PM
Extremely high-voltage yet extremely small-current electric shock -- symptoms? Radium Physics - New Theories 33 June 8th 07 05:18 PM
Extremely high-voltage yet extremely weak-current electric shock -- symptoms? Radium Current Physics Research (Moderated) 3 June 7th 07 04:09 AM
Lorentz chose one of three incorrect solutions for MMX Peri of Pera The Theory of Relativity 111 December 8th 06 05:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Image Hosting - Samsung - Sport Blog - Online Advertising - Symbian Cell Phone Software