qbit wrote:
"Proposed split-causality test of the relativity principle"
by George Jaroszkiewicz, School of Mathematical Sciences,
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, (Dated: June 27, 2007)
http://xxx.soton.ac.uk/abs/gr-qc/0612082

The author doesn't understand special relativity at all; he thinks that rest
planes of simultaneity have some physical significance, but they don't. It's
a worthless paper.

-- Ben

On Aug 8, 6:39 am, "qbit" wrote:
What do you think about this proposed relativity experiment? :

"Proposed split-causality test of the relativity principle"
by George Jaroszkiewicz, School of Mathematical Sciences,
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, (Dated: June 27, 2007)http://xxx.soton.ac.uk/abs/gr-qc/0612082
Abstract:
We propose a test of the principle of relativity,
involving quantum signals between two inertial frames.
If the principle is upheld, classical causality will appear
to be split in a dramatic and emphatic way.

From a brief reading of it, I believe that such an
experiment would give results that would appear
to disprove relativity by showing no difference
between the Ps and Qs in their Fig1 diagram.
In fact, this would disprove only the validity, in
physical reality, of the spacetime diagram, as
representing Minkowski spacetime.

Alen

Off topic news groups trimmed. Please don't respond
to this troll in off topic news groups.

Indeed, please don't respond to this troll at all.

On Aug 7, 4:39 pm, "qbit" wrote:
What do you think about this proposed relativity experiment? :

"Proposed split-causality test of the relativity principle"
by George Jaroszkiewicz, School of Mathematical Sciences,
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, (Dated: June 27, 2007)http://xxx.soton.ac.uk/abs/gr-qc/0612082
Abstract:
We propose a test of the principle of relativity,
involving quantum signals between two inertial frames.
If the principle is upheld, classical causality will appear
to be split in a dramatic and emphatic way.

"Puppet_Sock" wrote in message
ups.com...
: Off topic news groups trimmed. Please don't respond
: to this troll in off topic news groups.
:
: Indeed, please don't respond to this troll at all.

Shut the **** up, ignorant troll.

On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 22:39:44 +0200, "qbit" wrote:

What do you think about this proposed relativity experiment? :

"Proposed split-causality test of the relativity principle"
by George Jaroszkiewicz, School of Mathematical Sciences,
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, (Dated: June 27, 2007)
http://xxx.soton.ac.uk/abs/gr-qc/0612082
Abstract:
We propose a test of the principle of relativity,
involving quantum signals between two inertial frames.
If the principle is upheld, classical causality will appear
to be split in a dramatic and emphatic way.

Funny how they still hgave to test it when they are already 100% certain it is
correct.....



www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

The difference between a preacher and a used car salesman is that the latter at least has a product to sell.

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:32:04 GMT, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:

On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 22:39:44 +0200, "qbit" wrote:

What do you think about this proposed relativity experiment? :

"Proposed split-causality test of the relativity principle"
by George Jaroszkiewicz, School of Mathematical Sciences,
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, (Dated: June 27, 2007)
http://xxx.soton.ac.uk/abs/gr-qc/0612082
Abstract:
We propose a test of the principle of relativity,
involving quantum signals between two inertial frames.
If the principle is upheld, classical causality will appear
to be split in a dramatic and emphatic way.

Funny how they still hgave to test it when they are already 100% certain it is
correct.....

So *that* is why you never bother testing your theory...




www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

The difference between a preacher and a used car salesman is that the latter at least has a product to sell.