![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: geometry, gravity, interpretation, only, physical, really |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
this is becus if gravity were geometry, then this
automatically would imply physical real shapes for instance, a sphere, like our sun or earth, has gravity now the interesting observation, a disk is just a flat sphere, accordingly he should also generate gravity, but tha gravity from missing sphere around the disk is now subtracted from tha sphere, and therefore it has a negative gravity consequently lets put some numbers gravity_disk = 10mg gravity_sphere = 1g (related sphere for tha disk) now gravity_disk - gravity_sphere = 10mg -1g = -0.99g herby follows immediately that according to relativity a disk, like a ufo, would works using negative gravity |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jul 29, 6:51 pm, jaydee wrote:
this is becus if gravity were geometry, then this automatically would imply physical real shapes for instance, a sphere, like our sun or earth, has gravity now the interesting observation, a disk is just a flat sphere, accordingly he should also generate gravity, but tha gravity from missing sphere around the disk is now subtracted from tha sphere, and therefore it has a negative gravity consequently lets put some numbers gravity_disk = 10mg gravity_sphere = 1g (related sphere for tha disk) now gravity_disk - gravity_sphere = 10mg -1g = -0.99g herby follows immediately that according to relativity a disk, like a ufo, would works using negative gravity and to continue our discussion, the only remaining trick is now to make the space-time think that tha disk is sphere not a disk |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quantum Gravity 154.4: Gravity/Expansion Interpretation of P- and P ' - Independence/Dependence | OsherD | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | June 12th 07 05:56 PM |
| D-theory, a new interpretation of QM based on cell-structured physical space | pekka.virtanen@webinfo.fi | Physics - New Theories | 0 | May 12th 07 12:54 PM |
| correction:physical interpretation of "normal"(as opposed to "shear") viscosity stress =mu*[du/dx] | mdmill9999@yahoo.com | Computational Fluid Dynamics | 1 | September 8th 06 02:58 PM |
| physical interpretation of "normal"(as opposed to "shear") viscosity stress =mu*[du/dx] | mdmill9999@yahoo.com | Computational Fluid Dynamics | 0 | September 6th 06 05:22 AM |
| Geometry by itself has no physical content | reany@asu.edu | The Theory of Relativity | 21 | February 23rd 05 12:49 AM |