A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , ,

is gravity really physical geometry or only an interpretation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 29th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
jaydee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default is gravity really physical geometry or only an interpretation

this is becus if gravity were geometry, then this
automatically would imply physical real shapes

for instance, a sphere, like our sun or earth, has
gravity

now the interesting observation,

a disk is just a flat sphere, accordingly he should
also generate gravity, but tha gravity from missing
sphere around the disk is now subtracted from
tha sphere, and therefore it has a negative gravity

consequently lets put some numbers

gravity_disk = 10mg

gravity_sphere = 1g (related sphere for tha disk)

now
gravity_disk - gravity_sphere = 10mg -1g = -0.99g

herby follows immediately that according to relativity
a disk, like a ufo, would works using negative gravity

Ads
  #2  
Old July 29th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
jaydee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default is gravity really physical geometry or only an interpretation

On Jul 29, 6:51 pm, jaydee wrote:
this is becus if gravity were geometry, then this
automatically would imply physical real shapes

for instance, a sphere, like our sun or earth, has
gravity

now the interesting observation,

a disk is just a flat sphere, accordingly he should
also generate gravity, but tha gravity from missing
sphere around the disk is now subtracted from
tha sphere, and therefore it has a negative gravity

consequently lets put some numbers

gravity_disk = 10mg

gravity_sphere = 1g (related sphere for tha disk)

now
gravity_disk - gravity_sphere = 10mg -1g = -0.99g

herby follows immediately that according to relativity
a disk, like a ufo, would works using negative gravity


and to continue our discussion, the only remaining
trick is now to make the space-time think that tha
disk is sphere not a disk

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quantum Gravity 154.4: Gravity/Expansion Interpretation of P- and P ' - Independence/Dependence OsherD Physics - General Discussion 1 June 12th 07 05:56 PM
D-theory, a new interpretation of QM based on cell-structured physical space pekka.virtanen@webinfo.fi Physics - New Theories 0 May 12th 07 12:54 PM
correction:physical interpretation of "normal"(as opposed to "shear") viscosity stress =mu*[du/dx] mdmill9999@yahoo.com Computational Fluid Dynamics 1 September 8th 06 02:58 PM
physical interpretation of "normal"(as opposed to "shear") viscosity stress =mu*[du/dx] mdmill9999@yahoo.com Computational Fluid Dynamics 0 September 6th 06 05:22 AM
Geometry by itself has no physical content reany@asu.edu The Theory of Relativity 21 February 23rd 05 12:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mobile Phone deals - Mortgage Calculator - Loans - Car Loan - Mortgage