A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

Special Relativity Blog



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 8th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
WaiteDavid137@aol.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default Special Relativity Blog

I've started a special relativity blog-lecture section of a yahoo
video. Watch and discuss at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYVmUzac44Q

Ads
  #2  
Old July 8th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
kenseto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,877
Default Special Relativity Blog


wrote in message
oups.com...
I've started a special relativity blog-lecture section of a yahoo
video. Watch and discuss at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYVmUzac44Q


Einstein's conclusion in his 1905 paper that it doesn't matter whether the
magnet or the coil is doing moving to derive his principle of relativity is
wrong. What he missed are as follows:
1. If the magnet is doing the moving a clock on the magnet will run at a
slower rate by a factor of 1/gamma then a clock on the coil.
2. If the coil is doing the moving a clock on the coil will run at a slower
rate by a factor of 1/gamma then a clock on the magnet.

See the paper entitled "Improved Relativity Theory" (IRT) in the following
website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
IRT includes SRT as a subset. However, unlike SRT, the equations of IRT are
valid in all environments, including gravity.

Ken Seto


  #3  
Old July 8th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
WaiteDavid137@aol.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default Special Relativity Blog

On Jul 8, 6:49 am, "kenseto" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

I've started a special relativity blog-lecture section of a yahoo
video. Watch and discuss at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYVmUzac44Q


Einstein's conclusion in his 1905 paper that it doesn't matter whether the
magnet or the coil is doing moving to derive his principle of relativity is
wrong. What he missed are as follows:
1. If the magnet is doing the moving a clock on the magnet will run at a
slower rate by a factor of 1/gamma then a clock on the coil.
2. If the coil is doing the moving a clock on the coil will run at a slower
rate by a factor of 1/gamma then a clock on the magnet.

See the paper entitled "Improved Relativity Theory" (IRT) in the following
website:http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
IRT includes SRT as a subset. However, unlike SRT, the equations of IRT are
valid in all environments, including gravity.

Ken Seto


You're insane so no one cares about your misconceptions about reality.

  #4  
Old July 8th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
kenseto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,877
Default Special Relativity Blog


wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jul 8, 6:49 am, "kenseto" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

I've started a special relativity blog-lecture section of a yahoo
video. Watch and discuss at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYVmUzac44Q


Einstein's conclusion in his 1905 paper that it doesn't matter whether

the
magnet or the coil is doing moving to derive his principle of relativity

is
wrong. What he missed are as follows:
1. If the magnet is doing the moving a clock on the magnet will run at a
slower rate by a factor of 1/gamma then a clock on the coil.
2. If the coil is doing the moving a clock on the coil will run at a

slower
rate by a factor of 1/gamma then a clock on the magnet.

See the paper entitled "Improved Relativity Theory" (IRT) in the

following
website:http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
IRT includes SRT as a subset. However, unlike SRT, the equations of IRT

are
valid in all environments, including gravity.

Ken Seto


You're insane so no one cares about your misconceptions about reality.

So what is my misconception? What's wrong with what I said in items 1 and 2
above?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Special Relativity as Special Case of perceptual Universes brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 36 January 20th 06 06:33 AM
Special Relativity as Special Case of perceptual Universes brian a m stuckless Particle Physics 36 January 20th 06 06:33 AM
Special Relativity as Special Case of perceptual Universes ESKI The Theory of Relativity 40 January 11th 06 03:04 AM
Special Relativity as Special Case of perceptual Universes kenseto@erinet.com Physics - General Discussion 13 December 30th 05 10:12 PM
Special Relativity as Special Case of perceptual Universes brian a m stuckless Electromagnetic Theory and Applications 0 December 15th 05 11:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Vanzari Auto - Remortgages - Advertising - Loans - Internet Advertising