Still blowing NASA/Apollo infomercial smoke out your Yiddish butt?

Where's big old Venus above that physically dark and hasty horizon?

Why doesn't your Zion conditional law of anticathode physics apply to
our salty but otherwise naked moon?

How about sharing those Zion approved fly-by-rocket physics?
- Brad Guth

On Jul 15, 9:36 am, jj stop.right.there.net wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
What is a "Kodak eye"?

A Kodak eye is an all-knowing eye, that's as true to recording a wide
range of raw photons as could be accomplished at the time.

Which simply means they had rather ordinary film which is not UV or IR
sensitive. The more exotic film was the super-fast B&W film of the time,
what we called a "Recording Film". It has extended red sensitivity, a
thick emulsion on a very thin estar base. I used it in the sixties.

Ever heard of what's anticathode and what's not?

One of the serious problems with film in a humidity-free environment is
static that will 'spark' across the film, ruining much of the exposure.
NASA minimized this by adding a semitransparent conductive coating to
the film side of the fiduciary-marking plate. The edges of the plate
were copper-clad to drain electrical discharges.

Oh, and there's your other filter.

Ever heard of the raw peak solar spectrum? (our naked moon gets well
over 2 kw/m2, as within the peak blue sensitivity of that film)

So what? The film is not sensitive but to a narrow spectrum.

OOPS! I forgot that Yiddish rusemasters and naysayers like yourself
are such incest born-again liars.

We can pretty much depend upon you kooks to self-identify like that.

Are all such pagan Zionist Yids as brown-nosed dumbfounded butts or
otherwise as rusemaster certified as yourself?

Would you like to get Kodak officially down on this record of your
lies?
- Brad Guth

In sci.math, BradGuth

wrote
on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:40:55 -0000
.com:
Still blowing NASA/Apollo infomercial smoke out your Yiddish butt?

Where's big old Venus above that physically dark and hasty horizon?

Which picture?


Why doesn't your Zion conditional law of anticathode physics apply to
our salty but otherwise naked moon?

Please explain the "conditional law of anticathode physics". I'm not
sure I'm familiar with that particular subbranch.


How about sharing those Zion approved fly-by-rocket physics?

I thought the most dangerous part of the issue was in fact
the lethal radiation from the salty, anticathode moon.
Compared to that, setting up an orbit-and-landing is
relatively easy, if deadly to all involved if done
improperly.

- Brad Guth




--
#191,
/dev/brain: Permission denied

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Jul 16, 4:05 pm, wrote:
On Jul 5, 10:38 am, wrote:

http://www.iamthewitness.com/NASA-exposes-Apollo.html

Those who were deceived by the Apollo Hoax will be remembered, for
eternity, as the greatest fools ever to have walked the surface of
this planet.

NOTE: Beware of iamthewitness.com site. It may be another deception
site. ThatApolloarticle may be the type of deception used to make
those who believe the landings were a hoax to keep believing it, and
those who believe it was authentic to keep believing it was authentic.
In a way making both sides happy, but increasing the sites credibility
to those who understand it is a hoax.

There is much better evidence for the hoax case, including non-
parallel shadows and anomalies in the motion of the astronauts, among
other things.

You are absolutely correct, in that our government has always excluded
truthful evidence, while otherwise having planted phony evidence and/
or having published bogus arguments and/or counter arguments as part
of their grand ruse/sting of the century. Our mutually perpetrated
cold-war was just that.

Just keep asking those wise old NASA/Apollo wizards; where's Venus?
(as it damn well should have been there, and in more than just a few
unavoidable FOVs, especially from orbit on at least three of those
missions)

Their oddly terrestrial guano island like modified environment, as
having been such a xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated terrain of such
an unusually reflective albedo, was simply incorporating way too much
hocus-pocus worth of their infomercial butt spewing smoke and mirrors,
including those pesky "non-parallel shadows and anomalies in the
motion of the astronauts", not to mention their fly-by-rocket physics
that simply doesn't add up, or of landers w/o momentum reaction wheels
that otherwise have no viable R&D or prototype proof of squat.

Notice how only our diehard Third Reich collaborating Jews and of
those brown-nosing their way along for the ride, claim with such
supposed expertise as to believing we've walked on that physically
dark and otherwise naked anticathode nasty moon of ours. Too bad they
have no such supportive physics or replicated science, much less
having any good excuse as to their avoiding local gamma and hard-Xrays
that are so freaking DNA lethal, and even the ongoing matter of fact
that we still haven't a viable fly-by-rocket lander.

On Earth as getting shielded by our magnetosphere and 10 tonnes/m3 of
atmosphere, but actually it's mostly due to the square of the 221r
distance is why we receive roughly from 1/48e3 to as little as 1/64e3
worth of the moon's gamma, and perhaps merely 1/256e3 to as little as
1/512e3 worth of hard-Xrays. Go figure how the frail DNA of us humans
and those roles of Kodak film survived that downright nasty gamma and
otherwise unavoidable secondary hard-Xray gauntlet, and still having
managed to entirely miss getting that big old vibrant crescent of
Venus included within most any easily obtained Kodak moment.

BTW, have you noticed how these GOOGLE supported MI5/NSA/CIA Zion
infomercial spewing bots, of Usenet's stealth damage control, have
managed to run various key words together, intended so as to foil
search engine results, such as my having to correct your
"theApolloHoax" back to the intended "the Apollo Hoax" phrase. There
are many similar tactics besides their usual of topic/author stalking,
bashings and having imposed as much banishment as they can muster on
top of their having continually infected our PCs with their nifty
interactive spermware/****ware.

Perhaps our using the/apollo/hoax or possibly the+apollo+hoax will
stick as is.
- Brad Guth

On 22 jul, 17:38, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 16, 4:05 pm, wrote:





On Jul 5, 10:38 am, wrote:

http://www.iamthewitness.com/NASA-exposes-Apollo.html

Those who were deceived by the Apollo Hoax will be remembered, for
eternity, as the greatest fools ever to have walked the surface of
this planet.

NOTE: Beware of iamthewitness.com site. It may be another deception
site. ThatApolloarticle may be the type of deception used to make
those who believe the landings were a hoax to keep believing it, and
those who believe it was authentic to keep believing it was authentic.
In a way making both sides happy, but increasing the sites credibility
to those who understand it is a hoax.

There is much better evidence for the hoax case, including non-
parallel shadows and anomalies in the motion of the astronauts, among
other things.

You are absolutely correct, in that our government has always excluded
truthful evidence, while otherwise having planted phony evidence and/
or having published bogus arguments and/or counter arguments as part
of their grand ruse/sting of the century. Our mutually perpetrated
cold-war was just that.

Just keep asking those wise old NASA/Apollo wizards; where's Venus?
(as it damn well should have been there, and in more than just a few
unavoidable FOVs, especially from orbit on at least three of those
missions)

Their oddly terrestrial guano island like modified environment, as
having been such a xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated terrain of such
an unusually reflective albedo, was simply incorporating way too much
hocus-pocus worth of their infomercial butt spewing smoke and mirrors,
including those pesky "non-parallel shadows and anomalies in the
motion of the astronauts", not to mention their fly-by-rocket physics
that simply doesn't add up, or of landers w/o momentum reaction wheels
that otherwise have no viable R&D or prototype proof of squat.

Notice how only our diehard Third Reich collaborating Jews and of
those brown-nosing their way along for the ride, claim with such
supposed expertise as to believing we've walked on that physically
dark and otherwise naked anticathode nasty moon of ours. Too bad they
have no such supportive physics or replicated science, much less
having any good excuse as to their avoiding local gamma and hard-Xrays
that are so freaking DNA lethal, and even the ongoing matter of fact
that we still haven't a viable fly-by-rocket lander.

On Earth as getting shielded by our magnetosphere and 10 tonnes/m3 of
atmosphere, but actually it's mostly due to the square of the 221r
distance is why we receive roughly from 1/48e3 to as little as 1/64e3
worth of the moon's gamma, and perhaps merely 1/256e3 to as little as
1/512e3 worth of hard-Xrays. Go figure how the frail DNA of us humans
and those roles of Kodak film survived that downright nasty gamma and
otherwise unavoidable secondary hard-Xray gauntlet, and still having
managed to entirely miss getting that big old vibrant crescent of
Venus included within most any easily obtained Kodak moment.

BTW, have you noticed how these GOOGLE supported MI5/NSA/CIA Zion
infomercial spewing bots, of Usenet's stealth damage control, have
managed to run various key words together, intended so as to foil
search engine results, such as my having to correct your
"theApolloHoax" back to the intended "the Apollo Hoax" phrase. There
are many similar tactics besides their usual of topic/author stalking,
bashings and having imposed as much banishment as they can muster on
top of their having continually infected our PCs with their nifty
interactive spermware/****ware.

Perhaps our using the/apollo/hoax or possibly the+apollo+hoax will
stick as is.
- Brad Guth-

************************************************** *******

You can laugh as much as you want about the nonsenses and plain
stupidities both Schoenfeld and Bradguth write about hokus-pokus
conspiracies by ALL the world (not ONLY NASA and USA are in this, but
also the ex-USSR, Europe and MANY independent astronomers that
ACTUALLY tracked the moon missions...) and stuff... but hey!: you have
to acknowledge the interesting antisemite Third-Reich-Jewish-
Zionistevilwitchofthewest spin Bradguth spices his rambling with.
That's originality, my friends!
Regards
Tonio

ahahaha... "Tonico" wrote in message
ps.com...
On 22 jul, 17:38, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 16, 4:05 pm, wrote:
On Jul 5, 10:38 am, wrote:

[Schoen]
http://www.iamthewitness.com/NASA-exposes-Apollo.html
Those who were deceived by the Apollo Hoax will be remembered, for
eternity, as the greatest fools ever to have walked the surface of
this planet.

[Schoen]
NOTE: Beware of iamthewitness.com site. It may be another deception
site. ThatApolloarticle may be the type of deception used to make
those who believe the landings were a hoax to keep believing it, and
those who believe it was authentic to keep believing it was authentic.
In a way making both sides happy, but increasing the sites credibility
to those who understand it is a hoax.
There is much better evidence for the hoax case, including non-
parallel shadows and anomalies in the motion of the astronauts, among
other things.

[Guth]
You are absolutely correct, in that our government has always excluded
truthful evidence, while otherwise having planted phony evidence and/
or having published bogus arguments and/or counter arguments as part
of their grand ruse/sting of the century. Our mutually perpetrated
cold-war was just that.

Just keep asking those wise old NASA/Apollo wizards; where's Venus?
(as it damn well should have been there, and in more than just a few
unavoidable FOVs, especially from orbit on at least three of those
missions)

Their oddly terrestrial guano island like modified environment, as
having been such a xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated terrain of such
an unusually reflective albedo, was simply incorporating way too much
hocus-pocus worth of their infomercial butt spewing smoke and mirrors,
including those pesky "non-parallel shadows and anomalies in the
motion of the astronauts", not to mention their fly-by-rocket physics
that simply doesn't add up, or of landers w/o momentum reaction wheels
that otherwise have no viable R&D or prototype proof of squat.

Notice how only our diehard Third Reich collaborating Jews and of
those brown-nosing their way along for the ride, claim with such
supposed expertise as to believing we've walked on that physically
dark and otherwise naked anticathode nasty moon of ours. Too bad they
have no such supportive physics or replicated science, much less
having any good excuse as to their avoiding local gamma and hard-Xrays
that are so freaking DNA lethal, and even the ongoing matter of fact
that we still haven't a viable fly-by-rocket lander.

On Earth as getting shielded by our magnetosphere and 10 tonnes/m3 of
atmosphere, but actually it's mostly due to the square of the 221r
distance is why we receive roughly from 1/48e3 to as little as 1/64e3
worth of the moon's gamma, and perhaps merely 1/256e3 to as little as
1/512e3 worth of hard-Xrays. Go figure how the frail DNA of us humans
and those roles of Kodak film survived that downright nasty gamma and
otherwise unavoidable secondary hard-Xray gauntlet, and still having
managed to entirely miss getting that big old vibrant crescent of
Venus included within most any easily obtained Kodak moment.

BTW, have you noticed how these GOOGLE supported MI5/NSA/CIA Zion
infomercial spewing bots, of Usenet's stealth damage control, have
managed to run various key words together, intended so as to foil
search engine results, such as my having to correct your
"theApolloHoax" back to the intended "the Apollo Hoax" phrase. There
are many similar tactics besides their usual of topic/author stalking,
bashings and having imposed as much banishment as they can muster on
top of their having continually infected our PCs with their nifty
interactive spermware/****ware.

Perhaps our using the/apollo/hoax or possibly the+apollo+hoax will
stick as is.
- Brad Guth-

************************************************** *******
[Tonio]
You can laugh as much as you want about the nonsenses and plain
stupidities both Schoenfeld and Bradguth write about hokus-pokus
conspiracies by ALL the world (not ONLY NASA and USA are in this, but
also the ex-USSR, Europe and MANY independent astronomers that
ACTUALLY tracked the moon missions...) and stuff... but hey!: you have
to acknowledge the interesting antisemite Third-Reich-Jewish-
Zionistevilwitchofthewest spin Bradguth spices his rambling with.
That's originality, my friends!
Regards
Tonio

[hanson]
..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA... Come on, Tonio! All that are not
"ramblings, hokus-pokus and nonsenses and plain stupidities".
In their minds, all this is true and hardcore fact.. proven by them!
You must appreciate and celebrate their honesty...
Mankind is guided & operates to 90% plus on pure emotionality,
which governs and rules all kinds of internal & external affairs...
To boot, Guth/Schoenfeld posts beat the Einstein Dingleberryism
that infests these NGs any time. Much better entertaiment!
So enjoy it... unabashed!
Thanks for the laughs, dudes!... Carry on!..

On Jul 22, 8:08 am, Tonico wrote:
On 22 jul, 17:38, BradGuth wrote:
Perhaps our using the/apollo/hoax or possibly the+apollo+hoax will
stick as is.
- Brad Guth-

************************************************** *******

You can laugh as much as you want about the nonsenses and plain
stupidities both Schoenfeld and Bradguth write about hokus-pokus
conspiracies by ALL the world (not ONLY NASA and USA are in this, but
also the ex-USSR, Europe and MANY independent astronomers that
ACTUALLY tracked the moon missions...) and stuff... but hey!: you have
to acknowledge the interesting antisemite Third-Reich-Jewish-
Zionist evil witch of the west spin Brad Guth spices his rambling with.
That's originality, my friends!
Regards
Tonio

In other words, you haven't another faith-based group to offer up
that's any more so at risk of losing all there's is to lose than your
Zionist and Yiddish friends represent. Imagine that, I'm right once
again.

BTW, I'm not the one that's laughing.
- Brad Guth

On Jul 22, 8:45 am, "hanson" wrote:
ahahaha... "Tonico" wrote in message

ps.com...



On 22 jul, 17:38, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 16, 4:05 pm, wrote:
On Jul 5, 10:38 am, wrote:

[Schoen]
http://www.iamthewitness.com/NASA-exposes-Apollo.html
Those who were deceived by the Apollo Hoax will be remembered, for
eternity, as the greatest fools ever to have walked the surface of
this planet.

[Schoen]
NOTE: Beware of iamthewitness.com site. It may be another deception
site. That Apollo article may be the type of deception used to make
those who believe the landings were a hoax to keep believing it, and
those who believe it was authentic to keep believing it was authentic.
In a way making both sides happy, but increasing the sites credibility
to those who understand it is a hoax.
There is much better evidence for the hoax case, including non-
parallel shadows and anomalies in the motion of the astronauts, among
other things.

[Guth]
You are absolutely correct, in that our government has always excluded
truthful evidence, while otherwise having planted phony evidence and/
or having published bogus arguments and/or counter arguments as part
of their grand ruse/sting of the century. Our mutually perpetrated
cold-war was just that.

Just keep asking those wise old NASA/Apollo wizards; where's Venus?
(as it damn well should have been there, and in more than just a few
unavoidable FOVs, especially from orbit on at least three of those
missions)

Their oddly terrestrial guano island like modified environment, as
having been such a xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated terrain of such
an unusually reflective albedo, was simply incorporating way too much
hocus-pocus worth of their infomercial butt spewing smoke and mirrors,
including those pesky "non-parallel shadows and anomalies in the
motion of the astronauts", not to mention their fly-by-rocket physics
that simply doesn't add up, or of landers w/o momentum reaction wheels
that otherwise have no viable R&D or prototype proof of squat.

Notice how only our diehard Third Reich collaborating Jews and of
those brown-nosing their way along for the ride, claim with such
supposed expertise as to believing we've walked on that physically
dark and otherwise naked anticathode nasty moon of ours. Too bad they
have no such supportive physics or replicated science, much less
having any good excuse as to their avoiding local gamma and hard-Xrays
that are so freaking DNA lethal, and even the ongoing matter of fact
that we still haven't a viable fly-by-rocket lander.

On Earth as getting shielded by our magnetosphere and 10 tonnes/m3 of
atmosphere, but actually it's mostly due to the square of the 221r
distance is why we receive roughly from 1/48e3 to as little as 1/64e3
worth of the moon's gamma, and perhaps merely 1/256e3 to as little as
1/512e3 worth of hard-Xrays. Go figure how the frail DNA of us humans
and those roles of Kodak film survived that downright nasty gamma and
otherwise unavoidable secondary hard-Xray gauntlet, and still having
managed to entirely miss getting that big old vibrant crescent of
Venus included within most any easily obtained Kodak moment.

BTW, have you noticed how these GOOGLE supported MI5/NSA/CIA Zion
infomercial spewing bots, of Usenet's stealth damage control, have
managed to run various key words together, intended so as to foil
search engine results, such as my having to correct your
"theApolloHoax" back to the intended "the Apollo Hoax" phrase. There
are many similar tactics besides their usual of topic/author stalking,
bashings and having imposed as much banishment as they can muster on
top of their having continually infected our PCs with their nifty
interactive spermware/****ware.

Perhaps our using the/apollo/hoax or possibly the+apollo+hoax will
stick as is.
- Brad Guth-

************************************************** *******
[Tonio]
You can laugh as much as you want about the nonsenses and plain
stupidities both Schoenfeld and Brad Guth write about hokus-pokus
conspiracies by ALL the world (not ONLY NASA and USA are in this, but
also the ex-USSR, Europe and MANY independent astronomers that
ACTUALLY tracked the moon missions...) and stuff... but hey!: you have
to acknowledge the interesting antisemite Third-Reich-Jewish-
Zionist evil witch of the west spin Brad Guth spices his rambling with.
That's originality, my friends!
Regards
Tonio

[hanson]
.... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA... Come on, Tonio! All that are not
"ramblings, hokus-pokus and nonsenses and plain stupidities".
In their minds, all this is true and hardcore fact.. proven by them!
You must appreciate and celebrate their honesty...
Mankind is guided & operates to 90% plus on pure emotionality,
which governs and rules all kinds of internal & external affairs...
To boot, Guth/Schoenfeld posts beat the Einstein Dingleberryism
that infests these NGs any time. Much better entertaiment!
So enjoy it... unabashed!
Thanks for the laughs, dudes!... Carry on!..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Your hokus-pokus (aka hocus-pocus) isn't the least bit funny unless
you're a Zionist bigot of a Yid on steroids.

Notice how you silly folks still can't seem to locate Venus on behalf
of anything NASA/Apollo. Why exactly is that?

What's still so Yiddish taboo/nondisclosure about our moon's L1?

Why does accomplishing relatively compact and otherwise least inert
GSO deployments demand nearly half again as much rocket per payload
tonnage ratio, than having supposedly placed Apollo's full tonnage
into lunar orbit?

Are those modern day GSO deployments having to cope with a 30% inert
GLOW?

BTW, perhaps as much as 25 tonnes of each Apollo mission is what
managed to reach, orbit and either impact or at best one-way hard-land
whatever onto our moon.
- Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote:

Are all such pagan Zionist Yids as [...]

Would you like to get Kodak officially down on this record of your
lies?

I am certain that Kodak would never remotely associate themselves with you.

On Jul 22, 6:56 am, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:
In sci.math, BradGuth

wrote
on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:40:55 -0000
.com:

Still blowing NASA/Apollo infomercial smoke out your Yiddish butt?

Where's big old Venus above that physically dark and hasty horizon?

Which picture?

Silly boy, you and others of your rusemaster kind know damn good and
well what I mean.


Why doesn't your Zion conditional law of anticathode physics apply to
our salty but otherwise naked moon?

Please explain the "conditional law of anticathode physics". I'm not
sure I'm familiar with that particular subbranch.

How about instead, you explain how our terrestrial laws of physics
somehow do not apply off-world.



How about sharing those Zion approved fly-by-rocket physics?

I thought the most dangerous part of the issue was in fact
the lethal radiation from the salty, anticathode moon.
Compared to that, setting up an orbit-and-landing is
relatively easy, if deadly to all involved if done
improperly.

It's not a significant radiation problem for our frail DNA if you
can't hardly get but to/from the moon's L1 (that's better than 32r)
and the amount of exposure is time limited. Each extra moon radius
cuts that available dosage by the square of that distance, although
it's not actually quite that good because, that big old salty moon
isn't a given point source of gamma and hard-Xrays, whereas instead
while on the deck your moonsuit butt is surrounded by at least 3.14e6
m2 worth of all that's anticathode worthy, plus getting directly
nailed by whatever solar and cosmic influx and not to mention by
whatever's of IR/FIR plus physical debris.

At any rate, if we were to simply give that moon a certain point-
source worth of whatever radiation at 2r, whereas at ten fold the
distance or 20r it would become roughly 1% of that 2r dosage, and so
forth according to those pesky terrestrial laws of physics. That
rather large moon of gamma and of hard-Xrays (especially Xray nasty by
moonshine) is roughly 221r from Earth.

BTW, according to Raytheon and TRW, our USAF uses that moon for
calibrating their various in-flight radiation detectors. Sorry about
that.
- Brad Guth