As I'd said, all you silly Yiddish folks need is any one of those
fully interactive 3D orbital simulators, just exactly like the ones
used by our warm and fuzzy NASA. Too bad it's all so hocus-pocus.
- Brad Guth

Are you folks having another bad LLPOF butt spewing kind of day?
(apparently so)

Got that nifty 3D interactive orbital simulator up and running yet?

Got that 30% inert GLOW worth of a 60:1 ratio of procket per payload,
that goes so quickly towards getting its nearly 50 tonne payload into
orbiting our moon with fuel to spare?

Got that R&D prototype/demo craft as proof of any such fly-by-rocket
lander?

Got banked bone marrow, or perhaps any of them rad-hard DNA to boot?
- Brad Guth

On Aug 15, 3:10 pm, mike3 wrote:
On Jul 9, 7:53 pm, Jew stop.right.there.net wrote:





BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 9, 6:38 am, John Boy wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
[...] I even have
a pathetic VGA cellphone camera with sufficienr DR for having recorded
Venus and that of our physically darkmoonwithin the same FOV.
Shine a flashlight into the lens while you make the same picture. Venus
will not show up, providing the toy camera has exposure control. It will
shutter down to accomodate the flashlight image.

Silly Jewspeak. I see that incest cloning hasn't been exactly kind to
your family tree.

Your so-called range of exposure has to include the intent to gather
fine detail. We do no such thing with astro shots.

Ah, why do I bother with friggin genetically inferior white people like
your sorry ass, I'll never know but it stops here. You are a dead-end of
humanity.

Then you're just as wrong TOO since you think your race is superior,
genetically. With that attitude you're just asking for more war.
Racism is racism, discrimination is discrimination, plain and simple
REGARDLESS of what race it goes from or to. And it's sickening to see
so many people give this post 5 stars.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I've never said my race was more or less than any other, just that at
least my race of whatever faith-based mindset cares enough to police
it's own kind (at least sometimes, which is a whole lot better than
never).

Faith-based(ism) is an unfortunate fact of human life, and for the
most part that faith-based swarm is what has far too many of us by our
private parts.
- Brad Guth

On Aug 15, 3:12 pm, mike3 wrote:
On Jul 10, 12:16 pm, BradGuth wrote:





On Jul 10, 6:12 am, jj stop.right.there.net wrote:

BradGuth wrote:
An unfiltered Kodak eye always sees so much more of the available
spectrum than the human eye,

No it absolutely DOES NOT. Consumer film is made to approximate the
human eye's color response. There are a couple colors that the eye does
not 'see' properly, depending upon adjacencies and background, but it
doesn't matter whether it's IRL or on a print.

That's very Jewspeak LLPOF, especially about the film utilized by our
not so rad-hard NASA/Apollorusemasters and of their xenon arc lamp
spectrum of illuminations which created very little (less than
terrestrial) UVa. Perhaps guano islands just arn't what they used to
be.

Insults = 0 points to your argument.

Would you like to talk about those pesky red, white and blue color
saturations. How about those near-blue ones of pesky secondary/recoil
photons, of what such raw UVa unavoidably generates.

And how does this change the simple fact that the surface of theMoondrowns out Venus by a great deal of magnitude?! That's all
about sheer raw INTENSITY of the light, not the FREQUENCY.

BTW, where's Venus? (perhaps hiding along with all of those Muslim WMD
and Usama bin Laden?)

It's there, the camera just wasn't set up to record that. If it
was theMoon'ssurface would look like a big white splotch -- no
fine details. That's the rub -- FINE DETAIL.



-
Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On one hand you seem perfectly logical, whereas on the other hand
you're a damn liar just like our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush), and
then some.
- Brad Guth

On Aug 15, 3:01 pm, mike3 wrote:
On Jul 9, 1:01 am, BradGuth wrote:

On Jul 4, 5:38 pm, wrote:

http://www.iamthewitness.com/NASA-exposes-Apollo.html

Those who were deceived by theApolloHoax will be remembered, for
eternity, as the greatest fools ever to have walked the surface of
this planet.

Just keep asking; where's Venus? where's Venus? where's Venus?

Venus was big, it was bright and it was certainly nearby. I even have
a pathetic VGA cellphone camera with sufficienr DR for having recorded
Venus and that of our physically darkmoonwithin the same FOV.
-
Brad Guth

Now take a film camera, capable of taking pictures of the stars
at night. Set it up for such a shot, and then do such a shot --
only in broad daylight. Now set the camera up as you would for a
broad daylight shot, only try shooting a pic of Venus at night
with those settings. Tell me the results of this experiment, and
how well it agrees with theMoonHoax theory.

NASA/Apollo already took such unfiltered pictures from that nifty
xenon arc lamp illuminated quano island of theirs, of an astronaut
with flag and that of good old mother Earth, with plenty of DR(dynamic
range) to spare, and not even so much as any hint of UV getting in the
way. So, what's your point, or was that merely another mike3 fart?
- Brad Guth

On Aug 15, 3:08 pm, mike3 wrote:
On Jul 9, 9:05 am, BradGuth wrote:

On Jul 9, 6:38 am, John Boy wrote:

BradGuth wrote:
[...] I even have
a pathetic VGA cellphone camera with sufficienr DR for having recorded
Venus and that of our physically darkmoonwithin the same FOV.

Shine a flashlight into the lens while you make the same picture. Venus
will not show up, providing the toy camera has exposure control. It will
shutter down to accomodate the flashlight image.

Silly Jewspeak. I see that incest cloning hasn't been exactly kind to
your family tree.

INSULTING him is not going to prove your point. That's one ad hominem
fallacy to your credit, which means you have failed to refute his
claim, and you also employ a sad fallacy of thinking people's
behaviors
or viewpoints are strictly tied to genetics.

There are many posted examples of ourmoonand Venus sided by side,
meaning within the very same FOV and using the very same exposure.
There are even official satellite images having accomplish such.
Obviously we have those NASA/Apolloimages of ourmoonalong with the
very darkest portions of Earth as recorded within the same frame, as
exposed onto the very same Kodak film.

But now then why, why, why, if the surface of the Earth is so much
dimmer than themoon, do we have different settings and cameras for
broad-daylight photography and night photography? Try reversing the
roles of a night-photo camera and a day-photo one and tell me how it
works out. Oh and point it at the ground, by the way, if you think
Earth's albedo is so bad.

Oddly, Venus wasn't all that far away, and of its illuminated clouds
were most certainly a whole lot brighter than the darkest portions of
Earth that recorded just fine and dandy. Those photons derived from
Venus also included a whole lot mome near-blue, violet and UV photons
to boot than given off by Earth's wussy albedo, of which the
unfiltered Kodak eye was in fact highly sensitive to.

And yet Earth's "wussy" albedo is enough to necessitate setting the
camera differently for day/night shots, as the experiment I outlined
above demonstrates. Now imagine what theMOON, with even MORE albedo,
does.

Why are you and so many others of your Zion kind such dumnbfounded
fools and/or such born-again liars?

More insults. But those add zero points to your argument. And as you
know, 0+0 = 0, so two insults are no better than one.



-
Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You're not even worth a good insult, unless I get 10 extra bonus
points for your being Uncle Hitler, or perhaps worse yet GW Bush.
- Brad Guth

why do you even bother, if you refuze to follow what we're saying?...
yeah,
it's our fault for "trying to edjewkate you," as if
the ability to speak Yid had a thing to do with this --
don't you have any other vaudeville schtick,
other than the rectal display unit?

do you even get that joke?

computerized simulations are why people truly believe
in "global warming," even though
there is really no cumulative dataset
of "real earth data" that would show such a thing.

so, you expect us to buy into your hoax, just because
you've never bothered to take a photograph at night, or because
you've never used a telescope, or because
you don't know any trigonometry, or because
you're not personal friends with *all* of the Semetic astronauts?

Venus is always some where in your stimulator, butt
everyone else knows it as the morningstar, or
otherwise as the eveningstar, completely invisible
to the naked eye (or typically exposed-for-foreground film),
when EVER Sun is "up" --
this is a total nonissue, having little to do
with whether or not there's an atmosphere, butt
for your armchair klingon attitude.

go ahead & say that I'm semitic, Beauxeau, since
you can't refute the argument, as simple as it is;
you're all alone with this, note:
even your fellow-travelers like Schoenfeld have abandoned you,
as far as arguing with me, myself & yiddishkite goes.

of course, having a German name,
he might be of semitic descent, and
he otherwise would be defending your dumbass!

fully interactive 3D orbital simulators, just exactly like the ones
used by our warm and fuzzy NASA. Too bad it's all so hocus-pocus.

thus quoth:
Only fragments of these remarks have been reported in the West, while
in Russia RIA Novosti gave its readers a headline
("Clinton supports placement of BMD in Poland and the Czech
Republic")
that was directly opposite to what President Clinton said.
http://larouchepub.com/other/2007/34..._at_yalta.html

--n~nerfman~n!
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2007/07073...each_dick.html
14 Italian Senators Call for Cheney Impeachment
Aug. 1, 2007 (EIRNS)-
The Lyndon LaRouche Political Action Committee
(LPAC) issued the following release today.
Fourteen members of the Italian Senate have signed a call "to the
Members of Congress to support Rep. Kucinich's House Resolution 333
for the Impeachment of Dick Cheney."
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2007/07080...tors_call.html

NASA exposes Apollo Hoax

***************

Why would you bother to hoax such an extremely simple thing to do
(compared to what will be possible in the future, that is).

Why are you avoiding the regular laws of physics, and otherwise
banishing or simply excluding the best available science of evidence?
Is it another one of those pesky Jewish things?
- Brad Guth

On Aug 23, 10:10 pm, Don Stockbauer wrote:
NASA exposes Apollo Hoax

***************

Why would you bother to hoax such an extremely simple thing to do
(compared to what will be possible in the future, that is).

Apparently it's so simple that you silly folks haven't a freaking clue
as to the required fly-by-rocket physics, the necessary protection of
our frail DNA, or the subsequent science that should have been easily
obtained.

Are we supposed to ponder most everything for the last half century
until China or India accomplishes a platform of instruments within the
moon's L1 ?
- Brad Guth