On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:41:01 -0000, BradGuth
wrote:

On Jul 22, 6:56 am, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:
In sci.math, BradGuth

wrote
on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:40:55 -0000
.com:

Still blowing NASA/Apollo infomercial smoke out your Yiddish butt?

Where's big old Venus above that physically dark and hasty horizon?

Which picture?

Silly boy, you and others of your rusemaster kind know damn good and
well what I mean.

You do know, don't you, that you're the only one in the entire world
who isn't in on the conspiracy? And tonight, when you're asleep,
we're coming for you . . .
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank]

"BradGuth" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jul 22, 8:45 am, "hanson" wrote:
ahahaha... "Tonico" wrote in message
ps.com...
On 22 jul, 17:38, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 16, 4:05 pm, wrote:
On Jul 5, 10:38 am, wrote:

[Schoen]
http://www.iamthewitness.com/NASA-exposes-Apollo.html
Those who were deceived by the Apollo Hoax will be remembered,
for eternity, as the greatest fools ever to have walked the surface of
this planet.

[Schoen]
NOTE: Beware of iamthewitness.com site. It may be another deception
site. That Apollo article may be the type of deception used to make
those who believe the landings were a hoax to keep believing it, and
those who believe it was authentic to keep believing it was authentic.
In a way making both sides happy, but increasing the sites credibility
to those who understand it is a hoax.
There is much better evidence for the hoax case, including non-
parallel shadows and anomalies in the motion of the astronauts, among
other things.

[Guth]
You are absolutely correct, in that our government has always excluded
truthful evidence, while otherwise having planted phony evidence and/
or having published bogus arguments and/or counter arguments as part
of their grand ruse/sting of the century. Our mutually perpetrated
cold-war was just that.

Just keep asking those wise old NASA/Apollo wizards; where's Venus?
(as it damn well should have been there, and in more than just a few
unavoidable FOVs, especially from orbit on at least three of those
missions)

Their oddly terrestrial guano island like modified environment, as
having been such a xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated terrain of such
an unusually reflective albedo, was simply incorporating way too much
hocus-pocus worth of their infomercial butt spewing smoke and mirrors,
including those pesky "non-parallel shadows and anomalies in the
motion of the astronauts", not to mention their fly-by-rocket physics
that simply doesn't add up, or of landers w/o momentum reaction wheels
that otherwise have no viable R&D or prototype proof of squat.

Notice how only our diehard Third Reich collaborating Jews and of
those brown-nosing their way along for the ride, claim with such
supposed expertise as to believing we've walked on that physically
dark and otherwise naked anticathode nasty moon of ours. Too bad they
have no such supportive physics or replicated science, much less
having any good excuse as to their avoiding local gamma and hard-Xrays
that are so freaking DNA lethal, and even the ongoing matter of fact
that we still haven't a viable fly-by-rocket lander.

On Earth as getting shielded by our magnetosphere and 10 tonnes/m3 of
atmosphere, but actually it's mostly due to the square of the 221r
distance is why we receive roughly from 1/48e3 to as little as 1/64e3
worth of the moon's gamma, and perhaps merely 1/256e3 to as little as
1/512e3 worth of hard-Xrays. Go figure how the frail DNA of us humans
and those roles of Kodak film survived that downright nasty gamma and
otherwise unavoidable secondary hard-Xray gauntlet, and still having
managed to entirely miss getting that big old vibrant crescent of
Venus included within most any easily obtained Kodak moment.

BTW, have you noticed how these GOOGLE supported MI5/NSA/CIA Zion
infomercial spewing bots, of Usenet's stealth damage control, have
managed to run various key words together, intended so as to foil
search engine results, such as my having to correct your
"theApolloHoax" back to the intended "the Apollo Hoax" phrase. There
are many similar tactics besides their usual of topic/author stalking,
bashings and having imposed as much banishment as they can muster on
top of their having continually infected our PCs with their nifty
interactive spermware/****ware.

Perhaps our using the/apollo/hoax or possibly the+apollo+hoax will
stick as is.
- Brad Guth-

************************************************** *******
[Tonio]
You can laugh as much as you want about the nonsenses and plain
stupidities both Schoenfeld and Brad Guth write about hokus-pokus
conspiracies by ALL the world (not ONLY NASA and USA are in this, but
also the ex-USSR, Europe and MANY independent astronomers that
ACTUALLY tracked the moon missions...) and stuff... but hey!: you have
to acknowledge the interesting antisemite Third-Reich-Jewish-
Zionist evil witch of the west spin Brad Guth spices his rambling with.
That's originality, my friends!
Regards
Tonio

[hanson]
..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA... Come on, Tonio! These are not
"ramblings, hokus-pokus and nonsenses and plain stupidities".
In their minds, all this is true and hardcore fact.. proven by them!
You must appreciate and celebrate their honesty...
Mankind is guided & operates to 90% plus on pure emotionality,
which governs and rules all kinds of internal & external affairs...
To boot, Guth/Schoenfeld posts beat the Einstein Dingleberryism
that infests these NGs any time. Much better entertaiment!
So enjoy it... unabashed!
Thanks for the laughs, dudes!... Carry on!..-

[Brad]
Your hokus-pokus (aka hocus-pocus) isn't the least bit funny unless
you're a Zionist bigot of a Yid on steroids.

[hanson]
..... ahahahaha... in case that you have addressed your profound
displeasure at me, let me point out, Brad, that I have said that "the
Guth/Schoenfeld posts are much better entertainment"... So, there
is no need for you to behave almost like this splendid member of
your favorite ilk he http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e1842edc4f
I gave you a well deserved plug, Brad. What do you want from me?..
OTOH, don't expect me to bank on/with your opinions... ...yet.

[Brad]
Notice how you silly folks still can't seem to locate Venus on behalf
of anything NASA/Apollo. Why exactly is that?
What's still so Yiddish taboo/nondisclosure about our moon's L1?

[hanson]
.... yeah, yeah, the Yidds have done a lot of strange things, but that
they have taboos about the lunar L1 is new to me. Tell me about it.

[Brad]
Why does accomplishing relatively compact and otherwise least inert
GSO deployments demand nearly half again as much rocket per payload
tonnage ratio, than having supposedly placed Apollo's full tonnage
into lunar orbit?
Are those modern day GSO deployments having to cope with a 30% inert
GLOW?
BTW, perhaps as much as 25 tonnes of each Apollo mission is what
managed to reach, orbit and either impact or at best one-way hard-land
whatever onto our moon.
- Brad Guth

[hanson]
Hold the door, or "Hoe-de-doh" as afro-zionists would say, Brad.
We shall get to your latter 3 paras above after you explain and do
convince me of/about that mysterious yiddish lunar L1 situation...
Meanwhile, Brad, thanks for the laughs!... AHAHAHA... ahahanson

On 22 jul, 20:06, BradGuth wrote:

************************************************** *******
[Tonio]
You can laugh as much as you want about the nonsenses and plain
stupidities both Schoenfeld and Brad Guth write about hokus-pokus
conspiracies by ALL the world (not ONLY NASA and USA are in this, but
also the ex-USSR, Europe and MANY independent astronomers that
ACTUALLY tracked the moon missions...) and stuff... but hey!: you have
to acknowledge the interesting antisemite Third-Reich-Jewish-
Zionist evil witch of the west spin Brad Guth spices his rambling with.
That's originality, my friends!
Regards
Tonio

[hanson]
.... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA... Come on, Tonio! All that are not
"ramblings, hokus-pokus and nonsenses and plain stupidities".
In their minds, all this is true and hardcore fact.. proven by them!
You must appreciate and celebrate their honesty...
Mankind is guided & operates to 90% plus on pure emotionality,
which governs and rules all kinds of internal & external affairs...
To boot, Guth/Schoenfeld posts beat the Einstein Dingleberryism
that infests these NGs any time. Much better entertaiment!
So enjoy it... unabashed!
Thanks for the laughs, dudes!... Carry on!..-

Your hokus-pokus (aka hocus-pocus) isn't the least bit funny unless
you're a Zionist bigot of a Yid on steroids.

Notice how you silly folks still can't seem to locate Venus on behalf
of anything NASA/Apollo. Why exactly is that?

************************************************** ******

Uuuuh....well, after our overall world coonspiracy has been finally
exposed by the two fine and superb minds of Schoenfeld and Bradguth, I
supose I can come out clean now about this huge hoax:
we zionist-evilish-yiddishish....boooh!!!!-ish conspirators actually
took Venus to Israel in 1969 since we ran short of rain in the
promised land and we needed the clouds. That's why Venus doesn't show
up in the pics.
There, I've confessed!

On the other hand: it's obvious your hokus-pokussian conspiracy is NOT
funny for you, my dear boy. You're the clown, you're NOT supposed to
laugh! We, the readers of your stuff, are the ones making ALL the
laughing, and we deeply thank you!
Regards
Tonio

Tonico wrote:

Uuuuh....well, after our overall world coonspiracy has been finally
exposed by the two fine and superb minds of Schoenfeld and Bradguth, I
supose I can come out clean now about this huge hoax:
we zionist-evilish-yiddishish....boooh!!!!-ish conspirators actually
took Venus to Israel in 1969

At first I was alarmed that you gave it away, Tonico, but it is time for
the world to know and it really couldn't hoit.

Bradgoo - We have a name for our universal conspiracy network: we call
ourselves the Oysters. Yah know, Oy, oy, oy!

In sci.math, BradGuth

wrote
on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:41:01 -0000
. com:
On Jul 22, 6:56 am, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:
In sci.math, BradGuth

wrote
on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:40:55 -0000
.com:

Still blowing NASA/Apollo infomercial smoke out your Yiddish butt?

Where's big old Venus above that physically dark and hasty horizon?

Which picture?

Silly boy, you and others of your rusemaster kind know damn good and
well what I mean.

That's just it; there are at least two or three of the
more famous ones that you could be alluding to, and many
others which are less famous but still verifiable.

But there's a more fundamental point. Gene Roddenberry and many others
were able to put stars in their shots; the classic one is the Enterprise
orbiting a planet of various colors, with stars happily in the
background.



Why doesn't your Zion conditional law of anticathode physics apply to
our salty but otherwise naked moon?

Please explain the "conditional law of anticathode physics". I'm not
sure I'm familiar with that particular subbranch.

How about instead, you explain how our terrestrial laws of physics
somehow do not apply off-world.

You'll have to be more specific. All laws apply
everywhere; that is a fundamental postulate of SR.
There are some issues, such as termination velocity, that
need to be adjusted -- or simply not used, since Earthside
conditions do not apply.




How about sharing those Zion approved fly-by-rocket physics?

I thought the most dangerous part of the issue was in fact
the lethal radiation from the salty, anticathode moon.
Compared to that, setting up an orbit-and-landing is
relatively easy, if deadly to all involved if done
improperly.

It's not a significant radiation problem for our frail DNA if you
can't hardly get but to/from the moon's L1 (that's better than 32r)
and the amount of exposure is time limited. Each extra moon radius
cuts that available dosage by the square of that distance, although
it's not actually quite that good because, that big old salty moon
isn't a given point source of gamma and hard-Xrays, whereas instead
while on the deck your moonsuit butt is surrounded by at least 3.14e6
m2 worth of all that's anticathode worthy, plus getting directly
nailed by whatever solar and cosmic influx and not to mention by
whatever's of IR/FIR plus physical debris.

At any rate, if we were to simply give that moon a certain point-
source worth of whatever radiation at 2r, whereas at ten fold the
distance or 20r it would become roughly 1% of that 2r dosage, and so
forth according to those pesky terrestrial laws of physics. That
rather large moon of gamma and of hard-Xrays (especially Xray nasty by
moonshine) is roughly 221r from Earth.

BTW, according to Raytheon and TRW, our USAF uses that moon for
calibrating their various in-flight radiation detectors. Sorry about
that.

Depends on what radiation they're detecting.

- Brad Guth



--
#191,
Windows. Multi-platform(1), multi-tasking(1), multi-user(1).
(1) if one defines "multi" as "exactly one".

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

In sci.math, Bill Snyder

wrote
on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:58:19 -0500
:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:41:01 -0000, BradGuth
wrote:

On Jul 22, 6:56 am, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:
In sci.math, BradGuth

wrote
on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:40:55 -0000
.com:

Still blowing NASA/Apollo infomercial smoke out your Yiddish butt?

Where's big old Venus above that physically dark and hasty horizon?

Which picture?

Silly boy, you and others of your rusemaster kind know damn good and
well what I mean.

You do know, don't you, that you're the only one in the entire world
who isn't in on the conspiracy? And tonight, when you're asleep,
we're coming for you . . .

No, the conspiracy is far more subtle than that. He will
die a natural death, and his ideas given the Ozymandius
treatment. :-)

--
#191,
Windows. Multi-platform(1), multi-tasking(1), multi-user(1).
(1) if one defines "multi" as "exactly one".

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

In sci.math, jj
stop.right.there.net
wrote
on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:25:30 -0500
:
BradGuth wrote:

Are all such pagan Zionist Yids as [...]

Would you like to get Kodak officially down on this record of your
lies?

I am certain that Kodak would never remotely associate themselves with you.

I'm still wondering why NASA didn't simply employ the optical methods of
such TV shows as Star Trek in their shots. :-) That more or less throws
the conspiracy theory right out of the water...

--
#191,
Windows. Multi-platform(1), multi-tasking(1), multi-user(1).
(1) if one defines "multi" as "exactly one".

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"hanson" w/i news:kbNoi.2599$Da.944@trnddc07...
"BradGuth" wrote in message
"hanson" wrote:
"pico" picodigoliardi.nowhere.universe wrote
"Tonico" wrote in message
BradGuth wrote:
wrote:

[Schoenfeld]
http://www.iamthewitness.com/NASA-exposes-Apollo.html
Those who were deceived by the Apollo Hoax will be remembered,
for eternity, as the greatest fools ever to have walked the surface of
this planet. ... [snip] ... There is much better evidence for the hoax
case, including non-parallel shadows and anomalies in the motion
of the astronauts, among other things.

[Guth]
You are absolutely correct, in that our government has always excluded
truthful evidence, while otherwise having planted phony evidence ...
[snip] ... Just keep asking those wise old NASA/Apollo wizards;
where's Venus? ... [snip]...
Notice how only our diehard Third Reich collaborating Jews ...[snip]...
claim with such supposed expertise as to believing we've walked on
that nasty moon of ours...[snip]... avoiding local gamma and hard-Xrays
that are so freaking DNA lethal... [snip, but note Brad's Yiddish words]:
** Go figure** how the frail DNA of us humans survived and still having
managed to miss that crescent of Venus included in any Kodak film.
....[snip]... notice how these GOOGLE supported MI5/NSA/CIA Zion
bots of Usenet's stealth damage control, have managed to foil
searches, besides their usual of topic/author stalking, bashings and
having infected our PCs with their interactive spermware/****ware.
- Brad Guth-

[Tonio]
.... [snip]... both Schoenfeld and Brad Guth write about hokus-pokus
conspiracies ... [snip]... but hey!: you have to acknowledge the
interesting antisemite Third-Reich-Jewish-Zionist evil witch of the
west spin Brad Guth spices his rambling with. That's originality...

[hanson]
..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA... Come on, Tonio! These are not
"ramblings, hokus-pokus and nonsenses and plain stupidities".
In their minds, all this is true and hardcore fact.. proven by them!
To boot, Guth/Schoenfeld posts..[snip].. are better entertaiment!
So enjoy it... unabashed! ...[snip]... Carry on!..-

[Brad]
Your hokus-pokus (aka hocus-pocus) isn't the least bit funny
unless you're a Zionist bigot of a Yid on steroids.

[hanson]
.... [snip.... ahahahaha...]... Brad, in case that you have addressed
your profound displeasure at me, let me point out that I gave you
a well deserved plug .. [snip]... So, there is no need for you to
behave almost like this splendid member of your favorite ilk he
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e1842edc4f ...[snip]... OTOH,
don't expect me to bank on/with your opinions... ...yet.

[Brad]
....[snip]...
What's still so Yiddish taboo/nondisclosure about our moon's L1?

[hanson]
.... yeah, yeah, Brad, [[snip]... Tell me more about the Yidds' taboos
about the lunar L1. This is new to me. ...

[Brad]
....[section snipped for later investigations]....

[hanson]
Hold the door, or "Hoe-de-doh" as afro-zionists would say, Brad.
We shall get to... [the snipped]... 3 paras after you explain and do
convince me of/about that mysterious yiddish lunar L1 situation...

[Toni]
"Tonico" wrote in message
ups.com...
Uuuuh....well, after our overall world **coon-spiracy** has been
finally exposed by the superb minds of Schoenfeld and Bradguth,
I supose I can come out clean now about this huge hoax:
we zionist-evilish-yiddishish....boooh!!!!-ish conspirators actually
took Venus to Israel ... [snip]... That's why Venus doesn't show
up in the pics. There, I've confessed!

[hanson]
Hmm... **Coon-spiracy**...See, you racist, lying Zionist, Tonio,
you were/are & always will be thieves thru' your heritage and by
your X-ray resistant DNA, just like Brad said... [snipped... ahahaha...]

[Pico]
"pico" picodigoliardi.nowhere.universe wrote in message
...
At first I was alarmed that you gave it away, Tonico, but it is time for
the world to know [that] We have a name for our universal conspiracy
? network: we call ourselves the Oysters. Yah know, Oy, oy, oy!

[hanson]
AHH.. ha!... The plot thickens!... You two Salamis, Tonio and Pico,
you are NOT Yidds, but Sephardim who are the real Zionists and
who look down onto your low class quasi-Jew AshkeNazim ilk...
& mock them here with your "Oy, oy, oyster gag", to cover up that
Brad was right all along: You Jews have indeed stolen Venus!...
and to make matters worse for you, Brad has the last laugh!
Brad Guth said ** Go figure** which proves that Brad is really
an honest Jew under deep cover... [snip... ahahahaha...]... hanson

On Jul 22, 2:14 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:
In sci.math, Bill Snyder

wrote
on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:58:19 -0500
:





On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:41:01 -0000, BradGuth
wrote:

On Jul 22, 6:56 am, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:
In sci.math, BradGuth

wrote
on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:40:55 -0000
.com:

Still blowing NASA/Apollo infomercial smoke out your Yiddish butt?

Where's big old Venus above that physically dark and hasty horizon?

Which picture?

Silly boy, you and others of your rusemaster kind know damn good and
well what I mean.

You do know, don't you, that you're the only one in the entire world
who isn't in on the conspiracy? And tonight, when you're asleep,
we're coming for you . . .

No, the conspiracy is far more subtle than that. He will
die a natural death, and his ideas given the Ozymandius
treatment. :-)

Once again, and new and improved because unlike yourselves, I make my
fair share of honest mistakes.

Even along with a few of my honesly dyslexic mistakes and math that's
usually less than ideal, no amount of Zion/Yiddish damage control can
possibly avoid the regular laws of physics, such as pertaining to a
given nearby source of radiation (our moon being so much grater
surface area than any point-source by perhaps a million fold is what
makes the square of whatever distance a whole lot less effective),
plus whatever else it takes in order to minimize and/or shield your
exposure from that potentially lethal dosage.

It's not a significant radiation problem for our frail DNA if you
can't hardly get your moonsuit butt to/from the moon's L1 (that's
better than 32r from the moon), and the amount of mission exposure is
obviously somewhat shielded and otherwise time limited. Each extra
moon radius cuts that available dosage by the inverse square of that
distance, although it's not ever actually quite that good because,
that big old salty moon simply isn't a given point source of gamma and
hard-Xrays, whereas instead while actually on the lunar deck your
moonsuit butt is unavoidably surrounded by at least 3.14e6 m2 worth of
all that's anticathode worthy, plus getting directly nailed by
whatever's of raw solar and cosmic influx and not to mention by
whatever's of local IR/FIR plus physical debris that's not exactly
slowing down for nothing (in fact, debris that's headed for the moon
or of whatever the moon is running itself into is only going faster
and faster before final impact with your moonsuit butt that's making a
fairly big target).

At any rate, if we were to simply give that moon a certain point-
source worth of whatever radiation at 2r, whereas at ten fold the
distance(20r) it would become roughly 1% of that 2r dosage, and so
forth according to those pesky terrestrial laws of physics. That
rather much larger than point-source moon area of gamma and of hard-
Xrays (especially Xray nasty via moonshine) is situated roughly 221r
from Earth.

BTW, according to Raytheon and TRW, our USAF uses that moon for
calibrating their various in-flight radiation sensitive detectors.
Terribly sorry about that.

Even if it were a full moon worth of a target contributing merely an
extra 1 mr/sec/cm2 of Hard-Xrays while calibrating such detection
instruments upon looking directly at our full moon, accomplishing such
while our USAF whatever craft is cruising above Earth at 50,000',
whereas that's merely worth 48 rads/hr/cm2 plus our having to factor
in whatever attinuation our terrestrial environment (worth at least
64:1) might represent that moon being a whole lot extra Xray dosage
worthy than just based upon the inverse square of whatever that
distance represents. However, gamma radiation (via moon day or night)
isn't nearly as attinuated by our magnetosphere or atmosphere (perhaps
merely 8:1), so that's potentially much worse off in addition to that
moon's gamma also not being of any point source that you can so easily
get yourself away from unless that naked and thus anticathode worthy
moon is kept entirely out of sight by cruising above the far side of
Earth.

BTW No.2 whenever gamma interacts with a given mass, such as that of
your spacecraft or even that of your moonsuit protected butt, Xrays
are unavoidably created (including deep soft-Xrays depending upon
various density factors) by roughly the square root of the gamma
count. Meaning that a given cm2 or cm3 receiving 100 gamma hits = 10
Xrays created (usually within human bone that's surrounding your
precious marrow). The greater the shield density (such as the
aluminum craft that's surrounding yourself or especially via that
nearby basalt and salty moon itself that offers loads of extra high
density surface mascon considerations) the greater the birth rate of
such pesky hard-Xrays that are not exactly known for their being DNA
friendly.

Even at one miserly gamma count/cm3/sec is 3600 such counts per hour
(times all the 1.25e5 cm3 of DNA within that moonsuit) that'll birth
at least 60 counts of Xrays/hr/cm3, or 7.5e6 full body counts/hr.
You'd think that even that's got to hurt considering your moonsuit
butt is continually surrounded by such a reactive aluminum craft and/
or by the moon itself that's of even better density for reacting with
cosmic and local gamma. Without any speck of possible question, and
fully according to official NASA science that's on record, whereas
that physically dark and nasty moon of ours gives off many fold
greater gamma counts than does the surrounding cosmic gamma plus
whatever solar influx that's actually a whole lot more direct hard-
Xray worthy than gamma.

Another good question to ask might be; how much titanium and cobalt is
on the surface of our moon?

If you've actually got some kind of Yiddish/MIB conditional physics
that works differently off-world, let us see the root of wherever such
weird physics is established. Otherwise, stop suggesting or otherwise
incessantly whining that we've walked on that moon of ours, and
perhaps also get a fresh grip on your private parts.
- Brad Guth

Why don't you Skull and Bones as supposed honest folks (aka spooks,
moles and rusemasters) share with us, by simply telling the rest of us
village idiots where Venus was hiding.

Please use an interactive 3D solar system simulator (like any number
of such owned and operated by NASA or countless other publically
funded alternatives), as though you were standing on the moon at the
same times as those Apollo missions. (you can even post the hour by
hour results on U-Tube)
- Brad Guth