|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: cannot, cases, entity, interfee, itself, physical, single, subdivided |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
July 1st 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
That should be my amended postulate No 10:
'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided -- ** it cannot interfere with itself *!! copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07 ---------------- here you see again that advance in science is done by trial and error ! i noticed that my previous postulate might not be unequivocal so i decided to amend it more detailed TIA Y.Porat ------------------------------- 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
July 1st 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided--it cannot interfee with itself !
Y.Porat wrote:
That should be my amended postulate No 10: 'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided -- ** it cannot interfere with itself *!! Take a cardboard plate, put two wholes in it so you can put your arms through them. Put your arms in the wholes. Shake your hands. Retract your arms. - Are you stil in one piece ? - did you interfere with yourself ? Uwe Hayek. copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07 ---------------- here you see again that advance in science is done by trial and error ! i noticed that my previous postulate might not be unequivocal so i decided to amend it more detailed TIA Y.Porat -------------------------------
|
|
#3
July 1st 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided--it cannot interfee with itself !
Hayek wrote:
Y.Porat wrote: That should be my amended postulate No 10: 'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided -- ** it cannot interfere with itself *!! Take a cardboard plate, put two wholes Must be a contraction of wormhole and hole. :-) in it so you can put your arms through them. Put your arms in the wholes. Shake your hands. Retract your arms. - Are you stil in one piece ? - did you interfere with yourself ? Uwe Hayek. copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07 ---------------- here you see again that advance in science is done by trial and error ! i noticed that my previous postulate might not be unequivocal so i decided to amend it more detailed TIA Y.Porat -------------------------------
|
|
#4
July 1st 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
On Jul 1, 1:47 pm, Hayek wrote:
Y.Porat wrote: That should be my amended postulate No 10: 'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided -- ** it cannot interfere with itself *!! Take a cardboard plate, put two wholes in it so you can put your arms through them. Put your arms in the wholes. Shake your hands. Retract your arms. Or: he (Poor Ratatouille) can take a rope and make a slip knot in it. Attach one end to a ceiling fan. Stand on rickety chair. Stick neck into knot. Jump. Repeat as necessary. Now Porat won't "interfere" with anyone! - Are you stil in one piece ? - did you interfere with yourself ? Uwe Hayek. copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07 ---------------- here you see again that advance in science is done by trial and error ! i noticed that my previous postulate might not be unequivocal so i decided to amend it more detailed TIA Y.Porat -------------------------------- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -
|
|
#5
July 1st 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
On Jul 1, 8:47 pm, Hayek wrote:
Y.Porat wrote: That should be my amended postulate No 10: 'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided -- ** it cannot interfere with itself *!! Take a cardboard plate, put two wholes in it so you can put your arms through them. Put your arms in the wholes. Shake your hands. Retract your arms. - Are you stil in one piece ? - did you interfere with yourself ? Uwe Hayek. copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07 ---------------- here you see again that advance in science is done by trial and error ! i noticed that my previous postulate might not be unequivocal so i decided to amend it more detailed TIA Y.Porat -------------------------------- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - yess but i ddint *pass * the boared 2 you ddint notice my new phrasing of my postulate i saed: ic cases the single physical entity *cannt be subdivided i n your case a i **can** be subdivided (and jekyle migh tbe very happy then (:-) 2 as i saied not *all of me* interfered 3 my postulate does not deal with organic entities that are far more complicated and the concept interfering is soemthing else in the biologic world so pleae just concentrate on the basic inorganic world it is complicated enough for itself no need to add complications on it ... anyway thank you for the cute example ps you dont mean that i will go on entring more sub limits on my postulate dont you (:-) Y.Porat ------------
|
|
#6
July 1st 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
On Jul 1, 9:03 pm, The_Man wrote:
On Jul 1, 1:47 pm, Hayek wrote: Y.Porat wrote: That should be my amended postulate No 10: 'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided -- ** it cannot interfere with itself *!! Take a cardboard plate, put two wholes in it so you can put your arms through them. Put your arms in the wholes. Shake your hands. Retract your arms. Or: he (Poor Ratatouille) can take a rope and make a slip knot in it. Attach one end to a ceiling fan. Stand on rickety chair. Stick neck into knot. Jump. Repeat as necessary. Now Porat won't "interfere" with anyone! - Are you stil in one piece ? - did you interfere with yourself ? Uwe Hayek. copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07 ---------------- here you see again that advance in science is done by trial and error ! i noticed that my previous postulate might not be unequivocal so i decided to amend it more detailed TIA Y.Porat -------------------------------- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ------------ saied the honorable professor of chemistry (:-) is it not a poofe he realy is a professor ??(:-) and not a fish seller in the market ? (:-) go one amuse us thanks for the laughs (:-) Y.Porat ----------------
|
|
#7
July 1st 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --itcannot interfee with itself !
Y.Porat wrote:
On Jul 1, 8:47 pm, Hayek wrote: Y.Porat wrote: That should be my amended postulate No 10: 'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided -- ** it cannot interfere with itself *!! Take a cardboard plate, put two wholes in it so you can put your arms through them. Put your arms in the wholes. Shake your hands. Retract your arms. - Are you stil in one piece ? - did you interfere with yourself ? Uwe Hayek. copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07 ---------------- here you see again that advance in science is done by trial and error ! i noticed that my previous postulate might not be unequivocal so i decided to amend it more detailed TIA Y.Porat -------------------------------- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - yess but i ddint *pass * the boared 2 you ddint notice my new phrasing of my postulate i saed: ic cases the single physical entity *cannt be subdivided i n your case a i **can** be subdivided (and jekyle migh tbe very happy then (:-) 2 as i saied not *all of me* interfered A little bit of interference is enough. Uwe Hayek. 3 my postulate does not deal with organic entities that are far more complicated and the concept interfering is soemthing else in the biologic world so pleae just concentrate on the basic inorganic world it is complicated enough for itself no need to add complications on it ... anyway thank you for the cute example ps you dont mean that i will go on entring more sub limits on my postulate dont you (:-) Y.Porat ------------
|
|
#8
July 1st 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
On Jul 1, 9:54 pm, Hayek wrote:
Y.Porat wrote: On Jul 1, 8:47 pm, Hayek wrote: Y.Porat wrote: That should be my amended postulate No 10: 'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided -- ** it cannot interfere with itself *!! Take a cardboard plate, put two wholes in it so you can put your arms through them. Put your arms in the wholes. Shake your hands. Retract your arms. - Are you stil in one piece ? - did you interfere with yourself ? Uwe Hayek. copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07 ---------------- here you see again that advance in science is done by trial and error ! i noticed that my previous postulate might not be unequivocal so i decided to amend it more detailed TIA Y.Porat -------------------------------- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - yess but i ddint *pass * the boared 2 you ddint notice my new phrasing of my postulate i saed: ic cases the single physical entity *cannt be subdivided i n your case a i **can** be subdivided (and jekyle migh tbe very happy then (:-) 2 as i saied not *all of me* interfered A little bit of interference is enough. Uwe Hayek. 3 my postulate does not deal with organic entities that are far more complicated and the concept interfering is soemthing else in the biologic world so pleae just concentrate on the basic inorganic world it is complicated enough for itself no need to add complications on it ... anyway thank you for the cute example ps you dont mean that i will go on entring more sub limits on my postulate dont you (:-) Y.Porat ------------- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ---------- nice but see the rest of my remarks Y.P ------------
|
|
#9
July 1st 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
On Jul 1, 8:37 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
That should be my amended postulate No 10: [...] Who cares?
|
|
#10
July 2nd 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
"Y.Porat" wrote in message
oups.com... That should be my amended postulate No 10: 'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided -- ** it cannot interfere with itself *!! Still wrong copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07 ---------------- here you see again that advance in science is done by trial and error ! Well. you've got the error part down pat. And your postare a trial. But no advancement of science as a result i noticed that my previous postulate might not be unequivocal so i decided to amend it more detailed So .. give an example of such an physical entity. And note that for all subatomic particles, as well as atoms and molecules .. the entire entity can interfere with itself .. there is no subdividing it happening (ie when an electron interferes with itself, its not because its subdivided into some other sub-particle that do interfere with each other). Really.. you're flogging a dead horse here
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself ! | Y.Porat | Physics - General Discussion | 145 | July 16th 07 07:38 AM |
| No single physical entity can interfere with itself !! | Y.Porat | Physics - General Discussion | 40 | July 2nd 07 02:47 PM |
| No single physical entity can interfere with itself !! | Y.Porat | The Theory of Relativity | 40 | July 2nd 07 02:47 PM |
| No single physical entity can interfere with itself !! | Y.Porat | Particle Physics | 40 | July 2nd 07 02:47 PM |
| A single-entity unified theory | R.G.Broten | Physics - New Theories | 1 | October 14th 03 08:06 PM |
Linear Mode
