|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: cannot, cases, entity, interfee, itself, physical, single, subdivided |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#141
July 16th 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
"Y.Porat" wrote in message
oups.com... ---------------- do you support the exsitance a photon with one cycle per year ?? Why not .. what reason is there for me to assume that such a thing cannot exist, when it does not contradict any know properties of photons? do you suport the existanc of a photon with one cycle per 100 billion years ?? Why not .. what reason is there for me to assume that such a think cannot exist, when it does not contradict any know properties of photons? Of course .. you blindly and randomly contradict all known theoretical and experimental results of physics .. but that's just you. 
|
| Ads |
|
#142
July 16th 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
On Jul 16, 8:07 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Y.Porat" wrote in message oups.com... ---------------- do you support the exsitance a photon with one cycle per year ?? Why not .. what reason is there for me to assume that such a thing cannot exist, when it does not contradict any know properties of photons? do you suport the existanc of a photon with one cycle per 100 billion years ?? Why not .. what reason is there for me to assume that such a think cannot exist, when it does not contradict any know properties of photons? Of course .. you blindly and randomly contradict all known theoretical and experimental results of physics .. but that's just you. -------------- so your stupidity is recorded just now !! i don tbother to exppalin to you why you are an idiot scientist it will be a wast of words and secondly that is another pofe thst youare Bjoern feuerbacher from heidelberg it is not only that lase stupidity of yourse it is a long serie of subtle 'nuances' that only me can detectfrom our long aqaintance and are uniquly defining you as feuerbacher .. as acurate as a finger print !!! a pig remaines a pig and cant be deformed to a lion ... you cant cheat every body forever !! Y.P ----------------
|
|
#143
July 16th 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
"Y.Porat" wrote in message
s.com... On Jul 16, 8:07 am, "Jeckyl" wrote: "Y.Porat" wrote in message oups.com... ---------------- do you support the exsitance a photon with one cycle per year ?? Why not .. what reason is there for me to assume that such a thing cannot exist, when it does not contradict any know properties of photons? do you suport the existanc of a photon with one cycle per 100 billion years ?? Why not .. what reason is there for me to assume that such a think cannot exist, when it does not contradict any know properties of photons? Of course .. you blindly and randomly contradict all known theoretical and experimental results of physics .. but that's just you. -------------- so your stupidity is recorded just now !! What stupditiy? ... oh .. you mean YOUR stupidity. That's been recorded for YEARS here, well before I started posting. i don tbother to exppalin to you why you are an idiot scientist You're just an idiot .. you don't deserve the title scientist' because what you do isn't science. Perhaps you can explain scientifically why a photon with a frequenzy of 1/year, or 1/100 years, or 1/billion years, or 1/100billion years cannot possible exist? That should be good for a laugh. it will be a wast of words Your words are ALWAYS a waste and secondly that is another pofe thst youare Bjoern feuerbacher from heidelberg Who? it is not only that lase stupidity of yourse it is a long serie of subtle 'nuances' You woulnd't know a subtle nuance if you were hit over the head with one that only me can detectfrom our long aqaintance What long aquaintance? and are uniquly defining you as feuerbacher .. But I'm not .. you're deluded. as acurate as a finger print !!! Sad a pig remaines a pig And a poor rat remains a poor rat and cant be deformed to a lion ... you cant cheat every body forever !! But you keep trying.
|
|
#144
July 16th 07
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.particle,sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself !
On Jul 16, 8:27 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Y.Porat" wrote in message s.com... On Jul 16, 8:07 am, "Jeckyl" wrote: "Y.Porat" wrote in message groups.com... ---------------- do you support the exsitance a photon with one cycle per year ?? Why not .. what reason is there for me to assume that such a thing cannot exist, when it does not contradict any know properties of photons? do you suport the existanc of a photon with one cycle per 100 billion years ?? Why not .. what reason is there for me to assume that such a think cannot exist, when it does not contradict any know properties of photons? Of course .. you blindly and randomly contradict all known theoretical and experimental results of physics .. but that's just you. -------------- so your stupidity is recorded just now !! What stupditiy? ... oh .. you mean YOUR stupidity. That's been recorded for YEARS here, well before I started posting. i don tbother to exppalin to you why you are an idiot scientist You're just an idiot .. you don't deserve the title scientist' because what you do isn't science. Perhaps you can explain scientifically why a photon with a frequenzy of 1/year, or 1/100 years, or 1/billion years, or 1/100billion years cannot possible exist? That should be good for a laugh. it will be a wast of words Your words are ALWAYS a waste and secondly that is another pofe thst youare Bjoern feuerbacher from heidelberg Who? it is not only that lase stupidity of yourse it is a long serie of subtle 'nuances' You woulnd't know a subtle nuance if you were hit over the head with one that only me can detectfrom our long aqaintance What long aquaintance? and are uniquly defining you as feuerbacher .. But I'm not .. you're deluded. as acurate as a finger print !!! Sad a pig remaines a pig And a poor rat remains a poor rat and cant be deformed to a lion ... you cant cheat every body forever !! But you keep trying.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ----------- (:-) -------------
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| In cases that a single physical entity cannot be subdivided --it cannot interfee with itself ! | Y.Porat | Physics - General Discussion | 145 | July 16th 07 07:38 AM |
| No single physical entity can interfere with itself !! | Y.Porat | Physics - General Discussion | 40 | July 2nd 07 02:47 PM |
| No single physical entity can interfere with itself !! | Y.Porat | The Theory of Relativity | 40 | July 2nd 07 02:47 PM |
| No single physical entity can interfere with itself !! | Y.Porat | Particle Physics | 40 | July 2nd 07 02:47 PM |
| A single-entity unified theory | R.G.Broten | Physics - New Theories | 1 | October 14th 03 08:06 PM |
Linear Mode
