On Jul 1, 11:55 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Jul 1, 8:37 am, "Y.Porat" wrote: That should be my amended postulate No 10:

[...]

Who cares?

--------------
Hi Gisse my unconditional friend.. (:-)

i would lkie you to be a 'man' and to keep your word!!
ie
if you dont care as you say
i would like to get form you a promise
thast you will not interveane in this thread
(THAT YOU DONT CARE !!!)
do we have a deal from a manof honour like you

(:-)
BTW i dont like hypocrits .....

TIA
Y.Porat
-----------

On Jul 2, 5:03 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Y.Porat" wrote in message

oups.com...

That should be my amended postulate No 10:

'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided --
** it cannot interfere with itself *!!

Still wrong

copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07

----------------
here you see again that advance in science
is done by trial and error !

Well. you've got the error part down pat. And your postare a trial. But no
advancement of science as a result

i noticed that my previous postulate
might not be unequivocal
so i decided to amend it more detailed

So .. give an example of such an physical entity.
-------------

1
photon

2
electron

now about the photon
in the other thread of mine
you defined a single photon energy as

E=hf
right ??
----------

2 the great use of my postulate will be
this one :

once you will get a single physical entity that
'interferes with itself '
youwill be able to infere imediately
that

THIS PHYSICAL SINGLE ENTITY-
**CAN BE SUBDIVIDED *
OR IS ACTUALLY COMPOSED OF SUB PHYSICAL ENTITIES!!

it will be mighty useful
and not jsut an abstarct postulate ??

can you stand it Mr .. (who .. sorryi dont know your name ..)
ie such an achievement from your
personal enemy ??
if not
lets see your achievements .......

ATB
Y.Porat
---------------

And note that for all subatomic particles, as well as atoms and molecules ..
the entire entity can interfere with itself .. there is no subdividing it
happening (ie when an electron interferes with itself, its not because its
subdivided into some other sub-particle that do interfere with each other).

Really.. you're flogging a dead horse here

"Y.Porat" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jul 1, 11:55 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Jul 1, 8:37 am, "Y.Porat" wrote: That should be
my amended postulate No 10:

[...]

Who cares?

--------------
Hi Gisse my unconditional friend.. (:-)

i would lkie you to be a 'man' and to keep your word!!
ie
if you dont care as you say
i would like to get form you a promise
thast you will not interveane in this thread
(THAT YOU DONT CARE !!!)
do we have a deal from a manof honour like you

(:-)
BTW i dont like hypocrits .....

Laughable coming from you

"Y.Porat" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jul 2, 5:03 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Y.Porat" wrote in message

oups.com...

That should be my amended postulate No 10:

'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided --
** it cannot interfere with itself *!!

Still wrong

copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07

----------------
here you see again that advance in science
is done by trial and error !

Well. you've got the error part down pat. And your postare a trial. But
no
advancement of science as a result

i noticed that my previous postulate
might not be unequivocal
so i decided to amend it more detailed

So .. give an example of such an physical entity.
-------------

1
photon

A Photon Interferes with itself

2
electron

An Electron Interferes with itself

Same with neutrons, protons, whole atoms, molecules etc

They can all interfere with themselves.

Your potulate is wrong

now about the photon
in the other thread of mine
you defined a single photon energy as
E=hf
right ??

I didn't define it .. that was done long ago. You've even used it yourself

----------
2 the great use of my postulate will be
this one :

Hahaha .. what's the use of something that is WRONG!

once you will get a single physical entity that
'interferes with itself '
youwill be able to infere imediately
that
THIS PHYSICAL SINGLE ENTITY-
**CAN BE SUBDIVIDED *
OR IS ACTUALLY COMPOSED OF SUB PHYSICAL ENTITIES!!

Shame that's just plain wrong.

it will be mighty useful
and not jsut an abstarct postulate ??

Except its just wrong

can you stand it Mr .. (who .. sorryi dont know your name ..)
ie such an achievement from your
personal enemy ??

No acheivement at all .. you've not shown any achievements in physics so far
... just a lot of noise and nonsense

if not
lets see your achievements .......

No thanks .. I'm not playing your game

On Jul 2, 6:46 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Y.Porat" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Jul 1, 11:55 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Jul 1, 8:37 am, "Y.Porat" wrote: That should be
my amended postulate No 10:

[...]

Who cares?

--------------
Hi Gisse my unconditional friend.. (:-)

i would lkie you to be a 'man' and to keep your word!!
ie
if you dont care as you say
i would like to get form you a promise
thast you will not interveane in this thread
(THAT YOU DONT CARE !!!)
do we have a deal from a manof honour like you

(:-)
BTW i dont like hypocrits .....

Laughable coming from you- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

-----------
Mr Kekyle

if you like Gisse dont care about my posts
why not ignore them and thats all ??

Y.Porat
----------------

On Jul 2, 6:49 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Y.Porat" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Jul 2, 5:03 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Y.Porat" wrote in message

groups.com...

That should be my amended postulate No 10:

'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided --
** it cannot interfere with itself *!!

Still wrong

copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07

----------------
here you see again that advance in science
is done by trial and error !

Well. you've got the error part down pat. And your postare a trial. But
no
advancement of science as a result

i noticed that my previous postulate
might not be unequivocal
so i decided to amend it more detailed

So .. give an example of such an physical entity.
-------------

1
photon

A Photon Interferes with itself

2
electron

An Electron Interferes with itself

Same with neutrons, protons, whole atoms, molecules etc

They can all interfere with themselves.

Your potulate is wrong

now about the photon
in the other thread of mine
you defined a single photon energy as
E=hf
right ??

I didn't define it .. that was done long ago. You've even used it yourself

----------
2 the great use of my postulate will be
this one :

Hahaha .. what's the use of something that is WRONG!

once you will get a single physical entity that
'interferes with itself '
youwill be able to infere imediately
that
THIS PHYSICAL SINGLE ENTITY-
**CAN BE SUBDIVIDED *
OR IS ACTUALLY COMPOSED OF SUB PHYSICAL ENTITIES!!

Shame that's just plain wrong.

it will be mighty useful
and not jsut an abstarct postulate ??

Except its just wrong

can you stand it Mr .. (who .. sorryi dont know your name ..)
ie such an achievement from your
personal enemy ??

No acheivement at all .. you've not shown any achievements in physics so far
.. just a lot of noise and nonsense

if not
lets see your achievements .......

No thanks .. I'm not playing your game- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

------------
Mr jekyle

who is the copyrighter
of the crackpot postulate above

TIA
Y.Porat
----------------

On Jul 2, 6:49 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Y.Porat" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Jul 2, 5:03 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Y.Porat" wrote in message

groups.com...

That should be my amended postulate No 10:

'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub divided --
** it cannot interfere with itself *!!

Still wrong

copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07

----------------
here you see again that advance in science
is done by trial and error !

Well. you've got the error part down pat. And your postare a trial. But
no
advancement of science as a result

i noticed that my previous postulate
might not be unequivocal
so i decided to amend it more detailed

So .. give an example of such an physical entity.
-------------

1
photon

A Photon Interferes with itself

2
electron

An Electron Interferes with itself

Same with neutrons, protons, whole atoms, molecules etc

They can all interfere with themselves.
------------
did you read the posutale above ?? (:-)do you understand waht it
saies ??
(if not i will help you
what is 'an entity that cannot be subdivided?is it a Poroton?
is it an Atom??
or may be a personal enemy is in suhc animosity
thatit blinds his brain??
btw do you have soemthing in your mind except
Y.Porat ?? (:-)
whould you like to get a recomendation for a
psychiatrist ??)

keep well
Y.Porat
----------------


Your potulate is wrong

now about the photon
in the other thread of mine
you defined a single photon energy as
E=hf
right ??

I didn't define it .. that was done long ago. You've even used it yourself

----------
2 the great use of my postulate will be
this one :

Hahaha .. what's the use of something that is WRONG!

once you will get a single physical entity that
'interferes with itself '
youwill be able to infere imediately
that
THIS PHYSICAL SINGLE ENTITY-
**CAN BE SUBDIVIDED *
OR IS ACTUALLY COMPOSED OF SUB PHYSICAL ENTITIES!!

Shame that's just plain wrong.

it will be mighty useful
and not jsut an abstarct postulate ??

Except its just wrong

can you stand it Mr .. (who .. sorryi dont know your name ..)
ie such an achievement from your
personal enemy ??

No acheivement at all .. you've not shown any achievements in physics so far
.. just a lot of noise and nonsense

if not
lets see your achievements .......

No thanks .. I'm not playing your game- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"Y.Porat" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jul 2, 6:46 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
-----------
Mr Kekyle

if you like Gisse dont care about my posts
why not ignore them and thats all ??

Its fun showing you up for the fool that you are.

"Y.Porat" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jul 2, 6:49 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Y.Porat" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Jul 2, 5:03 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Y.Porat" wrote in message

groups.com...

That should be my amended postulate No 10:

'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub
divided --
** it cannot interfere with itself *!!

Still wrong

copyright Y.Porat 1-07-07

----------------
here you see again that advance in science
is done by trial and error !

Well. you've got the error part down pat. And your postare a trial.
But
no
advancement of science as a result

i noticed that my previous postulate
might not be unequivocal
so i decided to amend it more detailed

So .. give an example of such an physical entity.
-------------

1
photon

A Photon Interferes with itself

2
electron

An Electron Interferes with itself

Same with neutrons, protons, whole atoms, molecules etc

They can all interfere with themselves.

Your potulate is wrong

now about the photon
in the other thread of mine
you defined a single photon energy as
E=hf
right ??

I didn't define it .. that was done long ago. You've even used it
yourself

----------
2 the great use of my postulate will be
this one :

Hahaha .. what's the use of something that is WRONG!

once you will get a single physical entity that
'interferes with itself '
youwill be able to infere imediately
that
THIS PHYSICAL SINGLE ENTITY-
**CAN BE SUBDIVIDED *
OR IS ACTUALLY COMPOSED OF SUB PHYSICAL ENTITIES!!

Shame that's just plain wrong.

it will be mighty useful
and not jsut an abstarct postulate ??

Except its just wrong

can you stand it Mr .. (who .. sorryi dont know your name ..)
ie such an achievement from your
personal enemy ??

No acheivement at all .. you've not shown any achievements in physics so
far
.. just a lot of noise and nonsense

if not
lets see your achievements .......

No thanks .. I'm not playing your game- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

------------
Mr jekyle

who is the copyrighter
of the crackpot postulate above

Nobody cares. That all you're interested in is your supposed copyright and
not whether things are right or wrong just goes to show what a shallow
person you are, and how unimportant physics really is to you.

"Y.Porat" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jul 2, 6:49 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"Y.Porat" wrote in message
oups.com...

[snip]
'In cases that *a single* physical entity - cannot be sub
divided --
** it cannot interfere with itself *!!
[snip]
1
photon
A Photon Interferes with itself
2
electron
An Electron Interferes with itself
Same with neutrons, protons, whole atoms, molecules etc
They can all interfere with themselves.
------------
did you read the posutale above ?? (:-)do you understand waht it
saies ??

Yes

(if not i will help you
what is 'an entity that cannot be subdivided?is it a Poroton?
is it an Atom??

I asked you . .and you gave me particles that interfere with each other.

You've not provided a single example where your supposed postulate applies.

or may be a personal enemy is in suhc animosity
thatit blinds his brain??

I'm not the one who fails t osee your postulate is just plain wrong.

btw do you have soemthing in your mind except
Y.Porat ?? (:-)
whould you like to get a recomendation for a
psychiatrist ??)

I'm sure you know LOTS of psychiatrists