when you ask a relativists a practical question about gravity
they use simple newtonian relations and not relativity, like
these white mens here in this thread

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...a9663524ad336b

why simple newtonian relations, or at least differential newtonians

why not using geometry and differential geomtry?

gravity is geometry, isnt it anymore?

wahahahaa

On Jun 30, 9:34 am, toxic wrote:
when you ask a relativists a practical question about gravity
they use simple newtonian relations and not relativity, like
these white mens here in this thread

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/bea9663524a...

why simple newtonian relations, or at least differential newtonians

Why resort to a more complicated theory when classical models, which
are just as accurate at the level of the question, will suffice?

Or do you always swat flys with sledgehammers?

On Jun 30, 8:39 pm, Igor wrote:
On Jun 30, 9:34 am, toxic wrote:

when you ask a relativists a practical question about gravity
they use simple newtonian relations and not relativity, like
these white mens here in this thread

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/bea9663524a...

why simple newtonian relations, or at least differential newtonians

Why resort to a more complicated theory when classical models, which
are just as accurate at the level of the question, will suffice?

Or do you always swat flys with sledgehammers?

it is foken stoopid ta say that gravity
is geometry, then use old simple newton,
which is not accurate, in stead of geometry

now show me by geometry,

here comes tha newtonian, constant density
and ****, which is wrong

% gravity

clear all, clc;

Er = 6.37e+6;
r = [0.001:100:Er];
Em = 5.973e+24;
Gc = 6.67428e-11;

Sv = (4*pi*r.^3)/3;
Ed = 5.52e+3;

m =Sv.*Ed;

g = (Gc*m)./r.^2;

plot(r,g),grid;

On Jun 30, 3:41 pm, toxic wrote:
On Jun 30, 8:39 pm, Igor wrote:

On Jun 30, 9:34 am, toxic wrote:

when you ask a relativists a practical question about gravity
they use simple newtonian relations and not relativity, like
these white mens here in this thread

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/bea9663524a...

why simple newtonian relations, or at least differential newtonians

Why resort to a more complicated theory when classical models, which
are just as accurate at the level of the question, will suffice?

Or do you always swat flys with sledgehammers?

it is foken stoopid ta say that gravity
is geometry, then use old simple newton,
which is not accurate, in stead of geometry

now show me by geometry,

here comes tha newtonian, constant density
and ****, which is wrong

% gravity

clear all, clc;

Er = 6.37e+6;
r = [0.001:100:Er];
Em = 5.973e+24;
Gc = 6.67428e-11;

Sv = (4*pi*r.^3)/3;
Ed = 5.52e+3;

m =Sv.*Ed;

g = (Gc*m)./r.^2;

plot(r,g),grid;

And I need your nonsense about as much as a fish needs a bicycle.

On Jul 1, 8:05 pm, Igor wrote:
On Jun 30, 3:41 pm, toxic wrote:



On Jun 30, 8:39 pm, Igor wrote:

On Jun 30, 9:34 am, toxic wrote:

when you ask a relativists a practical question about gravity
they use simple newtonian relations and not relativity, like
these white mens here in this thread

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/bea9663524a...

why simple newtonian relations, or at least differential newtonians

Why resort to a more complicated theory when classical models, which
are just as accurate at the level of the question, will suffice?

Or do you always swat flys with sledgehammers?

it is foken stoopid ta say that gravity
is geometry, then use old simple newton,
which is not accurate, in stead of geometry

now show me by geometry,

here comes tha newtonian, constant density
and ****, which is wrong

% gravity

clear all, clc;

Er = 6.37e+6;
r = [0.001:100:Er];
Em = 5.973e+24;
Gc = 6.67428e-11;

Sv = (4*pi*r.^3)/3;
Ed = 5.52e+3;

m =Sv.*Ed;

g = (Gc*m)./r.^2;

plot(r,g),grid;

And I need your nonsense

is been said you are a foken hypocrite

if you dont understan, tell us what you dont
understan, so we can help you, stoopid

if you see an error, point out that error, fool

about as much as a fish needs a bicycle.

you are a foken fish and need a bicycle