"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:54:25 +1000, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 11:20:55 -0700, Pentcho Valev
wrote:


While some hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult (e.g. Tom Roberts) are
fighting heroically against the emission theory of light, others claim
that Einstein never abandoned it and that now this theory is
incorporated "in the quantum theory of fields, to the satisfaction of
most physicists":

Einstein's second postulate claims that the speed of all starlight in
the
universe is miraculously adjusted (by the fairies) to be precisely 'c'
wrt
little planet earth.

It says nothing of the sort. There is NO 'adjustment' of the speed of
light
.. it is 'c'. That you think there are fairies involved says a lot about
you, but nothing about SR.

His theory based on this postulate has survived to this day simply
because
every good christian and jew realizes that it fully supports the age old
belief
that the Earth has special status and really IS the centre of the
universe.
I would wager that every relativist on this NG is also a regular church
goer.
The Big Bang theory belongs in the same category as SR.

No .. it is because there is no experimental evidence to suggest
otherwise.

Do you go to a church every day or once a week?

No .. do you? And is that in some way related to the physics involved and
your misunderstandings of it?

On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:24:01 +1000, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:54:25 +1000, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 11:20:55 -0700, Pentcho Valev
wrote:


While some hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult (e.g. Tom Roberts) are
fighting heroically against the emission theory of light, others claim
that Einstein never abandoned it and that now this theory is
incorporated "in the quantum theory of fields, to the satisfaction of
most physicists":

Einstein's second postulate claims that the speed of all starlight in
the
universe is miraculously adjusted (by the fairies) to be precisely 'c'
wrt
little planet earth.

It says nothing of the sort. There is NO 'adjustment' of the speed of
light
.. it is 'c'. That you think there are fairies involved says a lot about
you, but nothing about SR.

His theory based on this postulate has survived to this day simply
because
every good christian and jew realizes that it fully supports the age old
belief
that the Earth has special status and really IS the centre of the
universe.
I would wager that every relativist on this NG is also a regular church
goer.
The Big Bang theory belongs in the same category as SR.

No .. it is because there is no experimental evidence to suggest
otherwise.

Do you go to a church every day or once a week?

No ..

Then why do you believe Earth is the centre of the universe.



www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

The difference between a preacher and a used car salesman is that the latter at least has a product to sell.

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:24:01 +1000, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 14:54:25 +1000, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 11:20:55 -0700, Pentcho Valev
wrote:


While some hypnotists in Einstein criminal cult (e.g. Tom Roberts) are
fighting heroically against the emission theory of light, others claim
that Einstein never abandoned it and that now this theory is
incorporated "in the quantum theory of fields, to the satisfaction of
most physicists":

Einstein's second postulate claims that the speed of all starlight in
the
universe is miraculously adjusted (by the fairies) to be precisely 'c'
wrt
little planet earth.

It says nothing of the sort. There is NO 'adjustment' of the speed of
light
.. it is 'c'. That you think there are fairies involved says a lot
about
you, but nothing about SR.

His theory based on this postulate has survived to this day simply
because
every good christian and jew realizes that it fully supports the age
old
belief
that the Earth has special status and really IS the centre of the
universe.
I would wager that every relativist on this NG is also a regular
church
goer.
The Big Bang theory belongs in the same category as SR.

No .. it is because there is no experimental evidence to suggest
otherwise.

Do you go to a church every day or once a week?

No ..

Then why do you believe Earth is the centre of the universe.

**** off idiot troll

On Jul 8, 9:46 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:

His theory based on this postulate has survived to this day simply because
every good christian and jew realizes that it fully supports the age old belief


How about the muslims , ralph? Do they believe the same or are they
just being contrarian? You a "good" muslim, ralph?

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
....
Einstein's second postulate claims that the speed of all starlight in the
universe is miraculously adjusted (by the fairies) to be precisely 'c' wrt
little planet earth.

Clueless garbage, it states that the speed is not affected
by the speed of the source, exactly as confirmed by Sagnac.

A _consequence_ is that it is the same in _all_ inertial
frames but since that is for _all_ frames, nothing in the
theory says Earth is unique, obviously, as Henry knows
perfectly well. He is just trolling of course.

George

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:21:28 +0100, "George Dishman"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
...
Einstein's second postulate claims that the speed of all starlight in the
universe is miraculously adjusted (by the fairies) to be precisely 'c' wrt
little planet earth.

Clueless garbage, it states that the speed is not affected
by the speed of the source, exactly as confirmed by Sagnac.

In Sagnac, the light moves at c wrt an absolute frame and c+v wrt the source,
according to your standard explanation. So Sagnac definitely refutes SR.

A _consequence_ is that it is the same in _all_ inertial
frames but since that is for _all_ frames, nothing in the
theory says Earth is unique, obviously, as Henry knows
perfectly well. He is just trolling of course.

Oh no George, all starlight is miraculously adjusted by the fairies. Didn't you
know that?


George




www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

The difference between a preacher and a used car salesman is that the latter at least has a product to sell.

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:21:28 +0100, "George Dishman"

wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
. ..
...
Einstein's second postulate claims that the speed of all starlight in
the
universe is miraculously adjusted (by the fairies) to be precisely 'c'
wrt
little planet earth.

Clueless garbage, it states that the speed is not affected
by the speed of the source, exactly as confirmed by Sagnac.

In Sagnac, the light moves at c wrt an absolute frame and c+v wrt the
source,
according to your standard explanation. So Sagnac definitely refutes SR.

Trolling again are you?

Oh no George, all starlight is miraculously adjusted by the fairies.
Didn't you
know that?

Ah .. now you're talking about emission theory .. where starlight is
adjusted in its speed

In SR there is no adjustment needed .. and no fairies required.

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:52:34 +1000, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:21:28 +0100, "George Dishman"

wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
...
Einstein's second postulate claims that the speed of all starlight in
the
universe is miraculously adjusted (by the fairies) to be precisely 'c'
wrt
little planet earth.

Clueless garbage, it states that the speed is not affected
by the speed of the source, exactly as confirmed by Sagnac.

In Sagnac, the light moves at c wrt an absolute frame and c+v wrt the
source,
according to your standard explanation. So Sagnac definitely refutes SR.

Trolling again are you?

Have another lok at the standard Sagnac explanation, idiot.
It plainly requires that the light moves at c+v wrt the source.

This is far too hard for morons though.

Oh no George, all starlight is miraculously adjusted by the fairies.
Didn't you
know that?

Ah .. now you're talking about emission theory .. where starlight is
adjusted in its speed

In SR there is no adjustment needed .. and no fairies required.






www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

The difference between a preacher and a used car salesman is that the latter at least has a product to sell.

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:52:34 +1000, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:21:28 +0100, "George Dishman"

wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
m...
...
Einstein's second postulate claims that the speed of all starlight in
the
universe is miraculously adjusted (by the fairies) to be precisely 'c'
wrt
little planet earth.

Clueless garbage, it states that the speed is not affected
by the speed of the source, exactly as confirmed by Sagnac.

In Sagnac, the light moves at c wrt an absolute frame and c+v wrt the
source,
according to your standard explanation. So Sagnac definitely refutes SR.

Trolling again are you?

Have another lok at the standard Sagnac explanation, idiot.
It plainly requires that the light moves at c+v wrt the source.

Measure in what iFoR?

This is far too hard for morons though.

And how does it refute SR?

Surely someone other than you would have noticed that if it did.

On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:32:15 +1000, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .

Trolling again are you?

Have another lok at the standard Sagnac explanation, idiot.
It plainly requires that the light moves at c+v wrt the source.

Measure in what iFoR?

This is far too hard for morons though.

And how does it refute SR?

Surely someone other than you would have noticed that if it did.

Of course they have. If you knew anything about anything you would already know
that.


www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

The difference between a preacher and a used car salesman is that the latter at least has a product to sell.