|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: parallel, universes |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
June 23rd 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
parallel universes
why are top scientists talkin about parallel universes so
vehemently, notknowingly that this is a blatant oximoron becus if universes were parallel then they would be observable, consequently, in order to be as it is, not observable, they will need ta be anything but parallel, and just crossing ouer universe in a point only or in a line, but not a 3d or a 4d parallel with another 3d or 4d 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
June 23rd 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
parallel universes
"fish" wrote in message
ups.com... why are top scientists talkin about parallel universes so vehemently, notknowingly that this is a blatant oximoron The only moron here seems to be you .. you don't seem to understand the concept of parallel universes. becus if universes were parallel then they would be observable, No.. because they would not intersect.. there is no point in common between them .. you would not observe one from the other. [snip corollaries from a flawed assertion]
|
|
#3
June 23rd 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
parallel universes
On Jun 23, 1:20 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"fish" wrote in message ups.com... why are top scientists talkin about parallel universes so vehemently, notknowingly that this is a blatant oximoron The only moron here seems to be you .. you don't seem to understand the concept of parallel universes. okay, you dont like your **** eat my ****, many times becus if universes were parallel then they would be observable, No.. because they would not intersect.. there is no point in common between them .. you would not observe one from the other. but they are parallel fool, hoe could be not observable, they flow in tha same direction, comes from tha same direction, and are at tha same stage, you stooopis moron fool [snip corollaries from a flawed assertion]
|
|
#4
June 23rd 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
parallel universes
"fishy" wrote in message
oups.com... On Jun 23, 1:20 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "fish" wrote in message ups.com... why are top scientists talkin about parallel universes so vehemently, notknowingly that this is a blatant oximoron The only moron here seems to be you .. you don't seem to understand the concept of parallel universes. okay, you dont like your **** eat my ****, many times Yeup .. you're a troll. Plonk.
|
|
#5
June 23rd 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
parallel universes
On Jun 23, 2:02 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"fishy" wrote in message oups.com... On Jun 23, 1:20 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "fish" wrote in message roups.com... why are top scientists talkin about parallel universes so vehemently, notknowingly that this is a blatant oximoron The only moron here seems to be you .. you don't seem to understand the concept of parallel universes. okay, you dont like your **** eat my ****, many times Yeup .. you're a troll. Plonk. you use dots in stead of coma, stooopid
|
|
#6
June 24th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
parallel universes
"John Smith" wrote in message
oups.com... On Jun 23, 2:02 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "fishy" wrote in message oups.com... On Jun 23, 1:20 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "fish" wrote in message roups.com... why are top scientists talkin about parallel universes so vehemently, notknowingly that this is a blatant oximoron The only moron here seems to be you .. you don't seem to understand the concept of parallel universes. okay, you dont like your **** eat my ****, many times Yeup .. you're a troll. Plonk. you use dots in stead of coma, stooopid I'd rather stay conscious.
|
|
#7
June 24th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
parallel universes
On Jun 24, 1:09 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message oups.com... On Jun 23, 2:02 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "fishy" wrote in message groups.com... On Jun 23, 1:20 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "fish" wrote in message roups.com... why are top scientists talkin about parallel universes so vehemently, notknowingly that this is a blatant oximoron The only moron here seems to be you .. you don't seem to understand the concept of parallel universes. okay, you dont like your **** eat my ****, many times Yeup .. you're a troll. Plonk. you use dots in stead of coma, stooopid I'd rather stay conscious. with only 2 dots? you need to type much more dots, try about ten thousands to be begin with
|
|
#8
June 24th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
parallel universes
"John Smith" wrote in message
oups.com... On Jun 24, 1:09 am, "Jeckyl" wrote: "John Smith" wrote in message oups.com... On Jun 23, 2:02 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "fishy" wrote in message groups.com... On Jun 23, 1:20 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "fish" wrote in message roups.com... why are top scientists talkin about parallel universes so vehemently, notknowingly that this is a blatant oximoron The only moron here seems to be you .. you don't seem to understand the concept of parallel universes. okay, you dont like your **** eat my ****, many times Yeup .. you're a troll. Plonk. you use dots in stead of coma, stooopid I'd rather stay conscious. with only 2 dots? you need to type much more dots, try about ten thousands to be begin with Better to have a dot, than be in a coma
|
|
#9
June 24th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
parallel universes
On Jun 24, 4:28 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message oups.com... On Jun 24, 1:09 am, "Jeckyl" wrote: "John Smith" wrote in message groups.com... On Jun 23, 2:02 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "fishy" wrote in message groups.com... On Jun 23, 1:20 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "fish" wrote in message roups.com... why are top scientists talkin about parallel universes so vehemently, notknowingly that this is a blatant oximoron The only moron here seems to be you .. you don't seem to understand the concept of parallel universes. okay, you dont like your **** eat my ****, many times Yeup .. you're a troll. Plonk. you use dots in stead of coma, stooopid I'd rather stay conscious. with only 2 dots? you need to type much more dots, try about ten thousands to be begin with Better to have a dot, than be in a coma is it you or your brain tumor talkin here?
|
|
#10
June 24th 07
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
|
parallel universes
"John Smith" wrote in message
ups.com... On Jun 24, 4:28 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "John Smith" wrote in message oups.com... On Jun 24, 1:09 am, "Jeckyl" wrote: "John Smith" wrote in message groups.com... On Jun 23, 2:02 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "fishy" wrote in message groups.com... On Jun 23, 1:20 pm, "Jeckyl" wrote: "fish" wrote in message roups.com... why are top scientists talkin about parallel universes so vehemently, notknowingly that this is a blatant oximoron The only moron here seems to be you .. you don't seem to understand the concept of parallel universes. okay, you dont like your **** eat my ****, many times Yeup .. you're a troll. Plonk. you use dots in stead of coma, stooopid I'd rather stay conscious. with only 2 dots? you need to type much more dots, try about ten thousands to be begin with Better to have a dot, than be in a coma is it you or your brain tumor talkin here? That's enough .. I've had a good laugh at you now.. bye troll
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| On The Creation Of The Parallel Universes | Jack Sarfatti | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | June 6th 05 07:25 PM |
| parallel universes | Sirius Black | Physics - General Discussion | 6 | February 2nd 04 05:43 PM |
| Parallel Universes | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | August 20th 03 11:11 PM |
| Parallel Universes | Jack Sarfatti | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | August 19th 03 10:04 PM |
Linear Mode
