![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: 400, factor, lorentz |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Randy Poe" wrote in message oups.com... On Jun 22, 4:54 pm, John C. Polasek wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:02:51 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel" wrote: "Matt Hickman" wrote in glegroups.com... Recent gamma-ray burster observations have clocked matter being expelled at 99.999% light-speed. This is said to give a Lorentz factor of 400. Does this mean that time for the speeding matter has slowed down by a factor of 400? Sort of, yes. It means that we would observe decaying particles of that matter with a normal half-life time H, to have a half-life time of 400 H. And what does this mean for the mass of the matter? How much as this increased? It hasn't. See for instance http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...y/SR/mass.html Dirk Vdm To the contrar;y, If you study that reference you will find only obfuscation. Where "obfuscation" means "perfectly clear statements that I either don't understand, choose not to read, or disagree with." "Physicists dont talk about relativistic mass anymore". They talk about invariant mass, what was formerly called "rest mass". Why is that "obfuscation"? and even Einstein said "avoid gamma" (just do something else). No idea where you think you read that whopper. That's why I didn't bother replying. Leaving the room with the door open is much more effective than slamming the door on your way out. Dirk Vdm |
| Ads |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dirk Van de moortel" wrote in message ... "Matt Hickman" wrote in message ps.com... Recent gamma-ray burster observations have clocked matter being expelled at 99.999% light-speed. This is said to give a Lorentz factor of 400. Does this mean that time for the speeding matter has slowed down by a factor of 400? Sort of, yes. It means that we would observe decaying particles of that matter with a normal half-life time H, to have a half-life time of 400 H. And what does this mean for the mass of the matter? How much as this increased? It hasn't. See for instance http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...y/SR/mass.html In reality it depends on which "school" you adhere to and people like to put up a fight about it. ;-) For some people time doesn't slow down and mass doesn't increase, but for others the mass increased by a factor 400. See for instance the Feynman lectures of physics or T. R. Sandin, Am. J. Phys. 59 p.1032 (1991). Cheers, Harald |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lorentz factor in GR? | Golden Boar | The Theory of Relativity | 33 | September 15th 06 12:27 AM |
| Another look at the Lorentz factor. | Golden Boar | The Theory of Relativity | 33 | June 7th 06 12:50 AM |
| Calculating the Lorentz factor when v = c | Golden Boar | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | May 5th 06 03:59 AM |
| Calculating the Lorentz factor when v = c | Golden Boar | Particle Physics | 2 | May 5th 06 03:59 AM |