"Retic Postings and SPAM"

There have been multiple accusations that the postings of H.E. Retic
are SPAM. The writer's postings are carefully constructed so as remain
within the commonly accepted rules concerning SPAM, to wit:

1. Postings of essentially identical material shall not be made to more
than eight Newsgroups. The writer has limited his postings to seven
Newsgroups.

2. Postings of essentially identical material shall not be made more
frequently than every 14 days. The writer's posting are separated by a
longer time span.

3. Postings shall be reasonably close to the topic to which the
Newsgroups is dedicated. My postings are closer to being on topic for each
Newsgroup than are most of the postings within that group.

4. The postings shall not be used for commercial purposes. They are
not.

5. There shall be no alteration of the header material of the
postings. While the postings are made under many different E-mail names,
however my ISP provides for multiple user names and permits them to be
altered at will.

None of the writer's actions constitute SPAM as it is currently
defined. The accusations that the writer is a SPAMMER can reasonably
considered to be the slanderous behavior of sick minds. My postings are to
de facto public newsgroups which, as such, cannot limit their postings to
material that agrees with the majority viewpoint and still retain their
legitimacy. That type of censorship is legitimate only when done by
moderated groups. To avoid this censorship, the writer has made use of his
ISP's useful capability of allowing E-mail name changes. (It has been
alleged that such changes are the characteristic of a "crank". They are not,
they are the response of any reasonable individual whose ideas are being
suppressed.)

The writer concludes that the strident protest against the writer's
postings can only result from fear, otherwise why wouldn't they just be
ignored if the content were thought not to be valid. After all, there are
many more foolish postings than mine made to these Newsgroups without
evoking complaint. The only reason for the complaints would seem to be that
the complainer is not upset by the fact the posted material is "wrong", he
is upset by the idea that they challenge what he has been taught and he may
be forced to "go back to the drawing board" and relearn his physics.

Even more sinister is the possibility that the complainers know that
their science is defective and wish to shield it from question from students
of the subject. Such questions make it much more difficult to indoctrinate
students with the "one true faith" which must not be questioned. It should
be noted that the complainers have not attempted to answer any of the basic
questions which have been raised, instead they have resorted to
vilification.

The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- . If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.

"Tlu" wrote in message
.. .
"Retic Postings and SPAM"

There have been multiple accusations that the postings of H.E. Retic
are SPAM. The writer's postings are carefully constructed so as remain
within the commonly accepted rules concerning SPAM, to wit:

If this isn't spam then tell me what I have to do to not see it on the forum
anymore? This is just a repeatative process that has been going on for years
and its exteremly annoying/aggrevating. If you had any sense of humanity in
you then you'd post this under the same name so that those of us who don't
wish to see this posted over and over again can block you. Instead you
change your name and post the same thing, i.e. you're sneaking around
forcing people to see your posts. The worst part about it is that you never
respond to posts by people and that's why we don't want to read your stuff.

Please post under one and onlyh one name like a normal person or at least
explain why you keep changing names and thus force us to keep seeing these
same old posts.

Pete

On Jun 20, 10:59 pm, "Pmb" wrote:

If this isn't spam then tell me what I have to do to not see it on the forum
anymore?

Just get lost. Just how difficult can that be?

This is just a repeatative process that has been going on for years
and its exteremly annoying/aggrevating.

Why? Because it does not agree with you?

If you had any sense of humanity in
you then you'd post this under the same name so that those of us who don't
wish to see this posted over and over again can block you.

If you have any sense of human integrity, you would not even bother
with any post opposing to your view point. shrug

Instead you
change your name and post the same thing, i.e. you're sneaking around
forcing people to see your posts.

Big deal! So, you want to be a Gestapo.

The worst part about it is that you never
respond to posts by people and that's why we don't want to read your stuff.

Why should he respond to posts that are personally insulting? Do you
not understand the freedom of choice?

Please post under one and onlyh one name like a normal person or at least
explain why you keep changing names and thus force us to keep seeing these
same old posts.

Normal persons are Einstein Dingleberries. shrug

On Jun 20, 9:59 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
[...]

Forward, with full headers, to the following addresses every time he
posts:

"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 20, 10:59 pm, "Pmb" wrote:

If this isn't spam then tell me what I have to do to not see it on the
forum
anymore?

Just get lost. Just how difficult can that be?

First off, nobody was speaking to you. In the second place I have no problem
with him posting here. .But I do have a problem with him forcing it on
everyone. Since he changes his name to something new and since I forget what
topics he posted in the past, I accidentally read that gaarbage again.

If you don't like my request to this spammer then I recommend you never read
my posts again. In fact consider it a request.

Pmb

"Eric Gisse" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jun 20, 9:59 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
[...]

Forward, with full headers, to the following addresses every time he
posts:






Thanks. Will do.

Pete

On Jun 21, 7:45 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:

Just get lost. Just how difficult can that be?

First off, nobody was speaking to you.

When you post to the public, it is basically telling the public your
opinion. In this case, it is a political one. Gestapo-like
suppression of free speech does offend me.

In the second place I have no problem
with him posting here. .But I do have a problem with him forcing it on
everyone.

Just like you have forcing it on everyone? By the way, Jack Sarfatti
is another one. Why have you not complained about him?

Since he changes his name to something new and since I forget what
topics he posted in the past, I accidentally read that gaarbage again.

Consider "Retic" has outsmarted you again and again. shrug

Life is too short to whine about imperfections. shrug

If you don't like my request to this spammer then I recommend you never read
my posts again. In fact consider it a request.

Unfortunately, if it is public information, it is hard not to plonk it
as you have plonked me in the past.

Ps. I sincerely hope you beat that dreaded that "c" disorder. Good
luck to you.

On Jun 21, 9:06 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
[...]


Just like you have forcing it on everyone? By the way, Jack Sarfatti
is another one. Why have you not complained about him?

Jacko doesn't post the same **** over and over with a rotating
pseudonym while having to post MORE spam explaining how his spam isn't
spam.

[...]

"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Jun 21, 7:45 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote:

Just get lost. Just how difficult can that be?

First off, nobody was speaking to you.

When you post to the public, it is basically telling the public your
opinion. In this case, it is a political one. Gestapo-like
suppression of free speech does offend me.

Then you don't know what you were talking about at all. I have no wish to
suppress his posting. However I have the right to not be subjected to it.
That's why I asked him to allow us to block his messages so we don't have to
see them all the time in the same way we don't wish to be bombarded by spam.
Now, since I have no wish to supress his freedom of speach which every post
I posted to him implies, what is is that is so Gestapo like?


In the second place I have no problem
with him posting here. .But I do have a problem with him forcing it on
everyone.

Just like you have forcing it on everyone?

I've not forced this on anyone. Everyone can block me if they so choose.

By the way, Jack Sarfatti
is another one. Why have you not complained about him?

He's amusing and posts interesting stuff every once in a while. Since he
always posts his name I can always block him if he turns irritating and
that block will hold. Someday I might like to read his stuff. If I do and he
never respods

Ps. I sincerely hope you beat that dreaded that "c" disorder.

What is a "c" disorder?

Pmb

"Eric Gisse" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 21, 9:06 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
[...]


Just like you have forcing it on everyone? By the way, Jack Sarfatti
is another one. Why have you not complained about him?

Jacko doesn't post the same **** over and over with a rotating
pseudonym while having to post MORE spam explaining how his spam isn't
spam.

[...]


Here here!

Pete