On Jun 21, 7:48 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message

ups.com...



On Jun 20, 9:29 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message

roups.com...

On Jun 19, 10:47 am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
Hello Mr. Peter Brown.
I've been examining the ISU's 1983 decision
on equating Length to c*Time in a series of
preliminary brief's here...(see Modern SpaceTime),

Sorry Ken but I'm not familiar with that decision. What does "ISU" stand
for?

http://physics.trak4.com/

You don't know what you are talking about.

Is there a need to say this to Ken? Is this a sincere response, an
attempt
to correct what you see as an error or are you simply being sarcastic and
insulting him??

Yes, there is a need. If he is never challenged, he will think what he
is posting is without error. On the other hand, correcting the error
is a waste of my time because a) he will not understand and b) will
not change his actions.

Then it appears to me that your best action would be to either kill file him
or never read his posts again. Do you disagree?
Pete

Hi Pete.
I work positively with a lot of theoreticians,
including those who formed the 1983 meter standard.
I've posted reasons why I think the ISU decision is
good for relativity, subsequently, there are criticism's
of my reasoning, no problem. However, those who do the
criticism are clearly unable to make a difference.
Specifically, are they attacking my agreement with
the ISU or are they attacking the ISU's decision,
that they are unable to clarify.
Ken had help on that decision.
Best Regards
Ken S. Tucker

On Jun 22, 2:25 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
On Jun 21, 7:48 pm, "Pmb" wrote:



"Eric Gisse" wrote in message

oups.com...

On Jun 20, 9:29 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message

roups.com...

On Jun 19, 10:47 am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
Hello Mr. Peter Brown.
I've been examining the ISU's 1983 decision
on equating Length to c*Time in a series of
preliminary brief's here...(see Modern SpaceTime),

Sorry Ken but I'm not familiar with that decision. What does "ISU" stand
for?

http://physics.trak4.com/

You don't know what you are talking about.

Is there a need to say this to Ken? Is this a sincere response, an
attempt
to correct what you see as an error or are you simply being sarcastic and
insulting him??

Yes, there is a need. If he is never challenged, he will think what he
is posting is without error. On the other hand, correcting the error
is a waste of my time because a) he will not understand and b) will
not change his actions.

Then it appears to me that your best action would be to either kill file him
or never read his posts again. Do you disagree?
Pete

Hi Pete.
I work positively with a lot of theoreticians,
including those who formed the 1983 meter standard.
I've posted reasons why I think the ISU decision is
good for relativity, subsequently, there are criticism's
of my reasoning, no problem. However, those who do the
criticism are clearly unable to make a difference.
Specifically, are they attacking my agreement with
the ISU or are they attacking the ISU's decision,
that they are unable to clarify.

Just like how the incredibly dishonest Eugene Shubert attempts to
shield his stupidity behind Hilbert's name, you attempt to shield
yours using the ISU.

Ken had help on that decision.
Best Regards
Ken S. Tucker

"Bilge" wrote in message
...
On 2007-06-21, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Jun 20, 9:29 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Jun 19, 10:47 am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
Hello Mr. Peter Brown.
I've been examining the ISU's 1983 decision
on equating Length to c*Time in a series of
preliminary brief's here...(see Modern SpaceTime),

Sorry Ken but I'm not familiar with that decision. What does "ISU" stand
for?



http://physics.trak4.com/

You don't know what you are talking about.

Is there a need to say this to Ken? Is this a sincere response, an
attempt
to correct what you see as an error or are you simply being sarcastic
and
insulting him??

Yes, there is a need. If he is never challenged, he will think what he
is posting is without error. On the other hand, correcting the error
is a waste of my time because a) he will not understand and b) will
not change his actions.

Ken will never learn. He thinks that bluster and posturing are
a substitute for content - same as the rest of the kooks any time
they are asked to actually calculate something.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bilge"
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 8:04 AM
Subject: Ping PMB on Modern SpaceTime (MST).


On 2007-06-21, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Jun 20, 9:29 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Jun 19, 10:47 am, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
Hello Mr. Peter Brown.
I've been examining the ISU's 1983 decision
on equating Length to c*Time in a series of
preliminary brief's here...(see Modern SpaceTime),

Sorry Ken but I'm not familiar with that decision. What does "ISU" stand
for?



http://physics.trak4.com/

You don't know what you are talking about.

Is there a need to say this to Ken? Is this a sincere response, an
attempt
to correct what you see as an error or are you simply being sarcastic
and
insulting him??

Yes, there is a need. If he is never challenged, he will think what he
is posting is without error. On the other hand, correcting the error
is a waste of my time because a) he will not understand and b) will
not change his actions.

Ken will never learn.

Where did you get your degree in psychology?

Pmb

"Pmb" wrote in message ...

"Bilge" wrote in message
...
On 2007-06-21, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Jun 20, 9:29 pm, "Pmb" wrote:

[snip]

Is there a need to say this to Ken? Is this a sincere response, an
attempt
to correct what you see as an error or are you simply being sarcastic
and
insulting him??

Yes, there is a need. If he is never challenged, he will think what he
is posting is without error. On the other hand, correcting the error
is a waste of my time because a) he will not understand and b) will
not change his actions.

Ken will never learn.

Where did you get your degree in psychology?

Most of us got our degree in Village Idiot Psychology
right here :-)

Dirk Vdm

On Jun 23, 9:45 am, "Pmb" wrote:

Where did you get your degree in psychology?
Pmb

Hi Pete, I'm posting from a remote location.
Attending a conference on advanced antenna
design. I thought that we knew everything there
was to know about antenna design, wow, my eye's
are opened.
Over the next 2 weeks or so, possibly longer,
I'll spend at an improved testing location, to
evaluate the improvements, and max them.
My goal is to determine if we can set-up a new
corporate division dedicated to the R&D and then
the manufacture of these improvements.

Naturally, the improvements are proprietary,
(confidential), but with respect to your
interest in science, I can email you how it
works and expect reasonable discretion.

The same offer applies to anyone else who is
interested who is trustworthy.

For Conception Dynamics
Ken S. Tucker
Theoretics Group.

On 2007-06-23, Pmb wrote:

Where did you get your degree in psychology?


The University of P.O. Box 2000.

"Bilge" wrote in message
...
On 2007-06-23, Pmb wrote:

Where did you get your degree in psychology?


The University of P.O. Box 2000.


....which is bogus. Since you went to a bogus university you must therefore
have a bogus degree in psychology which implies that any phsyclological
diagnosing is therefore bogus as well.

After all these years you just can't lay off the intults? What drives your
abmition towards such a goal?

Personally I would guess its the same reason I started on you when you got
back. But that too was in response to insults towards others. But that
doesn't make it right. So I applogixe for recent flames and will state there
will be no more towards you. I will have kill filed you long before that.

Pete

On Jun 24, 3:25 pm, "Pmb" wrote:
"Bilge" wrote in message

...

On 2007-06-23, Pmb wrote:

Where did you get your degree in psychology?

The University of P.O. Box 2000.

...which is bogus. Since you went to a bogus university you must therefore
have a bogus degree in psychology which implies that any phsyclological
diagnosing is therefore bogus as well.

After all these years you just can't lay off the intults? What drives your
abmition towards such a goal?

Personally I would guess its the same reason I started on you when you got
back. But that too was in response to insults towards others. But that
doesn't make it right. So I applogixe for recent flames and will state there
will be no more towards you. I will have kill filed you long before that.

Pete

Amazing how many people want to be Mr. PMB.
I see an Eric, Dirk and Bilge in the trees,
gives one respect for evolution, Darwin was
uncanny .
Recently I've been delving into the relation
of inertia to ElectroMagnetism in view of the
Modern SpaceTime, it's looking good, I'll do
a bit more posting once I dot's the T's and
crosses me Eyes .
Ken

On Jun 28, 12:33 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
[...]

You might want to take the time to actually learn some physics while
your at it.

On Jun 28, 1:49 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Jun 28, 12:33 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
[...]

You might want to take the time to actually learn some physics while
your at it.

I knew if I shaked the tree Grisse would fall out ,
right into the net and back to it's cage!
Two stooges out of three ain't back in 15 minutes.
Good Hunting.
Ken