![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: incorrect, right, roberst, tom, was |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tom Roberts doesn't believe that: Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons)
also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair. (He thinks that the energy of only two individual photons can do this) at http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...46878da7c586d1 Tommy wrote: "That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams. Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies that IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. " Wrong read below: PROOF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair." Particle PAIR and not PAIRS (plural). The required Energy above is that of the Temperature (INTENSITY of MULTIPLE PHOTONS and not the energy of only two photons) must exceed the rest mass of the SINGLE particle pair. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 27, 6:01 pm, " wrote:
Tom Roberts doesn't believe that: Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons) also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair. (He thinks that the energy of only two individual photons can do this) at http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/6146878da7c... Tommy wrote: "That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams. Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies that IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. " Wrong read below: PROOF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair." Particle PAIR and not PAIRS (plural). The required Energy above is that of the Temperature (INTENSITY of MULTIPLE PHOTONS and not the energy of only two photons) must exceed the rest mass of the SINGLE particle pair. No debating the quote above clarifies the truth. Intensity can also create a Single Particle pair. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 27, 3:01 pm, " wrote:
Tom Roberts doesn't believe that: Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons) also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair. (He thinks that the energy of only two individual photons can do this) at http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/6146878da7c... Tommy wrote: "That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams. Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies that IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. " Wrong read below: PROOF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair." Particle PAIR and not PAIRS (plural). The required Energy above is that of the Temperature (INTENSITY of MULTIPLE PHOTONS and not the energy of only two photons) must exceed the rest mass of the SINGLE particle pair. You know that a "single particle pair" means two particles, right? You may be forgiven if the English-language construction is throwing you on this one. The key word is "pair". If you are producing a "pair", that means "two". "Multiple pairs" means many groups of two. "A single pair" means one group of two. - Randy |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 28, 3:40 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On May 27, 3:01 pm, " wrote: Tom Roberts doesn't believe that: Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons) also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair. (He thinks that the energy of only two individual photons can do this) at http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/6146878da7c... Tommy wrote: "That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams. Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies that IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. " Wrong read below: PROOF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair." Particle PAIR and not PAIRS (plural). The required Energy above is that of the Temperature (INTENSITY of MULTIPLE PHOTONS and not the energy of only two photons) must exceed the rest mass of the SINGLE particle pair. You know that a "single particle pair" means two particles, right? You may be forgiven if the English-language construction is throwing you on this one. The key word is "pair". If you are producing a "pair", that means "two". "Multiple pairs" means many groups of two. "A single pair" means one group of two. - Randy- 100% Correct Randy and yet Tom Roberts said I was wrong and that QUOTE: "MORE pairs can be produced" (from high intensity beam) Where as Wikipedia says a high intensity beam produces, QUOTE ABOVE: "a SINGLE particle pair." Tom Roberts only believes a particle pair can be produce by only ***TWO*** photons instead of a multiple of photons. He said that multiple photons must produce multiple pairs....= Incorrect they can produce a SINGLE pair as quoted from Wikipedia above here. Wikipedia (not me) says the important ingredient be that the INTENTITY (and not the energy of two photons only) be higher than the rest mast of the particle pair to be created. I have yet to receive an apology from Tom Roberts, which would be the mature behavior. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 28, 12:40 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
[...] Please stop giving the idiot child any more attention.... |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 28, 1:09 pm, " wrote:
On May 28, 3:40 pm, Randy Poe wrote: On May 27, 3:01 pm, " wrote: Tom Roberts doesn't believe that: Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons) also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair. (He thinks that the energy of only two individual photons can do this) at http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/6146878da7c... Tommy wrote: "That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams. Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies that IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. " Wrong read below: PROOF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair." Particle PAIR and not PAIRS (plural). The required Energy above is that of the Temperature (INTENSITY of MULTIPLE PHOTONS and not the energy of only two photons) must exceed the rest mass of the SINGLE particle pair. You know that a "single particle pair" means two particles, right? You may be forgiven if the English-language construction is throwing you on this one. The key word is "pair". If you are producing a "pair", that means "two". "Multiple pairs" means many groups of two. "A single pair" means one group of two. - Randy- 100% Correct Randy and yet Tom Roberts said I was wrong and that QUOTE: "MORE pairs can be produced" (from high intensity beam) Where as Wikipedia says a high intensity beam produces, QUOTE ABOVE: "a SINGLE particle pair." Tom Roberts only believes a particle pair can be produce by only ***TWO*** photons instead of a multiple of photons. He said that multiple photons must produce multiple pairs....= Incorrect they can produce a SINGLE pair as quoted from Wikipedia above here. Wikipedia (not me) says the important ingredient be that the INTENTITY (and not the energy of two photons only) be higher than the rest mast of the particle pair to be created. By "intensity" they mean "energy". I have yet to receive an apology from Tom Roberts, which would be the mature behavior. Why? He's right and you're wrong. - Randy |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 28, 4:24 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On May 28, 12:40 pm, Randy Poe wrote: Tom Roberts doesn't believe that: Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons) also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair. (He thinks that the energy of only two individual photons can do this) at http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/6146878da7c... Tommy wrote: "That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams. Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies that IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. " Wrong read below: PROOF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair." Particle PAIR and not PAIRS (plural). The required Energy above is that of the Temperature (INTENSITY of MULTIPLE PHOTONS and not the energy of only two photons) must exceed the rest mass of the SINGLE particle pair. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 28, 5:45 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On May 28, 1:09 pm, " wrote: On May 28, 3:40 pm, Randy Poe wrote: On May 27, 3:01 pm, " wrote: Tom Roberts doesn't believe that: Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons) also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair. (He thinks that the energy of only two individual photons can do this) at http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/6146878da7c... Tommy wrote: "That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams. Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies that IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. " Wrong read below: PROOF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair." Particle PAIR and not PAIRS (plural). The required Energy above is that of the Temperature (INTENSITY of MULTIPLE PHOTONS and not the energy of only two photons) must exceed the rest mass of the SINGLE particle pair. You know that a "single particle pair" means two particles, right? You may be forgiven if the English-language construction is throwing you on this one. The key word is "pair". If you are producing a "pair", that means "two". "Multiple pairs" means many groups of two. "A single pair" means one group of two. - Randy- 100% Correct Randy and yet Tom Roberts said I was wrong and that QUOTE: "MORE pairs can be produced" (from high intensity beam) Where as Wikipedia says a high intensity beam produces, QUOTE ABOVE: "a SINGLE particle pair." Tom Roberts only believes a particle pair can be produce by only ***TWO*** photons instead of a multiple of photons. He said that multiple photons must produce multiple pairs....= Incorrect they can produce a SINGLE pair as quoted from Wikipedia above here. Wikipedia (not me) says the important ingredient be that the INTENTITY (and not the energy of two photons only) be higher than the rest mast of the particle pair to be created. By "intensity" they mean "energy". Intensity and frequency both mean energy (higher energy), but both Intensity and Temperature of a light beam means multiple photons (the higher the intensity or temperature then the more photons in the beam and NOT THE MORE ENERGY PER PHOTON). Even Tom Roberts ****agrees with me**** on that,his words on this subject are quote from above: "Higher intensity means more photons in the beam" I have yet to receive an apology from Tom Roberts, which would be the mature behavior. Why? He's right and you're wrong. Please read carefully below: Tom Roberts says multiple photons (or higher intensity or temperature) ***ONLY*** can create ***mutilple**** particle pairs, where as Wikipedia(not me) says that multiple photons (intensity/temperatature) can create a ***SINGLE pair*** (pair is NOT PLURAL). Tom believe a single pair can only be created by ONLY two photons and never multiple photons where as Wikipedia (not me) says the opposite. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 28, 2:54 pm, " wrote:
On May 28, 4:24 pm, Eric Gisse wrote: On May 28, 12:40 pm, Randy Poe wrote: Tom Roberts doesn't believe that: You are misunderstanding - what I said - what you read - what Roberts said - what everybody else says to you. Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons) No, photon intensity does not mean "multiple photons". also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair. No, intensity does not create pairs. (He thinks that the energy of only two individual photons can do this) That is correct, and it's what you read. at http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/6146878da7c... Tommy wrote: "That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams. Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies that IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. " Wrong read below: PROOF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair." Particle PAIR and not PAIRS (plural). Yes, that statement occurs in that article. The required Energy above is that of the Temperature (INTENSITY of MULTIPLE PHOTONS and not the energy of only two photons) must exceed the rest mass of the SINGLE particle pair. That statement does not occur in that article. - Randy |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| f=ma is incorrect | Mark Oliver | Physics - General Discussion | 28 | April 22nd 05 08:30 PM |
| Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0 | ring_theory | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 12 | March 15th 05 06:56 AM |
| Obviously incorrect theory... | Josh | Electromagnetic Theory and Applications | 2 | January 11th 05 04:28 PM |
| Wrong, incorrect and the like. | Jeff Relf | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 4th 04 08:01 AM |
| Wrong, incorrect and the like. | Jeff Relf | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 4th 04 08:01 AM |