A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

Tom Roberst was Incorrect and I was Right.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 29th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Jeckyl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,421
Default Tom Roberst was Incorrect and I was Right.

"Bilge" wrote in message
...
On 2007-05-27, , pathetic troll
Not only were you wrong, you keep finding new ways to be wrong.


That's how science advances, you know


Ads
  #12  
Old May 29th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
pheromon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Tom Roberst was Incorrect and I was Right.

On May 28, 12:01 am, " wrote:
Tom Roberts doesn't believe that: Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons)
also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair. (He thinks that the energy
of only two individual photons can do this)


you are tha most active poster in alt.morons

take a look
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.morons/topics?hl=en

if your girlfriend search google and find you in alt.morons
i dont think she will allow you play pussy with her pussy

  #13  
Old May 29th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
guskz@hotmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,771
Default Tom Roberst was Incorrect and I was Right.

On May 28, 7:23 pm, Randy Poe wrote:
On May 28, 2:54 pm, " wrote:

On May 28, 4:24 pm, Eric Gisse wrote: On May 28, 12:40 pm, Randy Poe wrote:


Tom Roberts doesn't believe that:


You are misunderstanding
- what I said
- what you read
- what Roberts said
- what everybody else says to you.

Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons)


No, photon intensity does not mean "multiple photons".


Both me and Tom Roberts disagree with you on that, here are Tom
Roberts own words, quote: "Higher intensity means more photons in the
beam".




also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair.


No, intensity does not create pairs.

(He thinks that the
energy
of only two individual photons can do this)


That is correct, and it's what you read.





at http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/6146878da7c...


Tommy wrote:


"That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and
depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams.
Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies
that
IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. "


Wrong read below:


PROOF:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation
Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed
the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair."


Particle PAIR and not PAIRS (plural).


Yes, that statement occurs in that article.



The required Energy above is that of the Temperature (INTENSITY of
MULTIPLE PHOTONS and not the energy of only two photons) must exceed
the rest mass of the SINGLE particle pair.


That statement does not occur in that article.

Correct it doesn't say "MULTIPLE PHOTONS" ...but a higher intensity
AUTOMATICALLY means multiple photons...a single photon CANNOT have a
higher intensity (or temperature). In brief the higher the intensity
or temperature then the more photons.

Even Tom Roberts ***AGREES WITH ME on the above****, here are Tom
Roberts own words on Intensity, quote: " Tommy wrote: "Higher
intensity means more photons in the beam"

Tom Roberts full reply below:
"That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and
depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams.
Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies
that
IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. "



-----------------------------------

What Tom Roberts doesn't agree is that multiple photons (and not only
two) therefore higher intensity cannot create a single particle pair.
Where as the quote from Wikipedia (not me) says the very opposite.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation
Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed
the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair."




- Randy- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



  #14  
Old May 29th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
guskz@hotmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,771
Default Tom Roberst was Incorrect and I was Right.

On May 28, 10:44 pm, Bilge wrote:

Not only were you wrong, you keep finding new ways to be wrong.


Proof you can't read, because this time the quote is from Wikipedia
which says the opposite of what Tom Roberts wrote. Wikipedia says: the
Intensity (Temperature) must exceed the rest mass of the particle
pair. (Not pairs, but a single pair).

Tommy wrote: "That is completely ****independent**** of the intensity
of the beams"



Tom Roberts doesn't believe that: Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons)
also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair. (He thinks that the energy
of only two individual photons can do this)


at http://groups.google.com/gro


up/sci.physics.relativity/msg/6146878da7c586d1



Tommy wrote:


"That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and
depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams.
Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies
that
IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. "


Wrong read below:


PROOF:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation
Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed
the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair."


Particle PAIR and not PAIRS (plural).


The required Energy above is that of the Temperature (INTENSITY of
MULTIPLE PHOTONS and not the energy of only two photons) must exceed
the rest mass of the SINGLE particle pair.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -



  #15  
Old May 30th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Bilge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 586
Default Tom Roberst was Incorrect and I was Right.

On 2007-05-29, wrote:
On May 28, 10:44 pm, Bilge wrote:

Not only were you wrong, you keep finding new ways to be wrong.


Proof you can't read, because this time the quote is from Wikipedia


You only continue to prove that you are an idiot.



which says the opposite of what Tom Roberts wrote. Wikipedia says: the
Intensity (Temperature) must exceed the rest mass of the particle
pair. (Not pairs, but a single pair).

Tommy wrote: "That is completely ****independent**** of the intensity
of the beams"



Tom Roberts doesn't believe that: Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons)
also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair. (He thinks that the energy
of only two individual photons can do this)


at
http://groups.google.com/gro

up/sci.physics.relativity/msg/6146878da7c586d1



Tommy wrote:


"That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and
depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams.
Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies
that
IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. "


Wrong read below:


PROOF:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation
Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed
the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair."


Particle PAIR and not PAIRS (plural).


The required Energy above is that of the Temperature (INTENSITY of
MULTIPLE PHOTONS and not the energy of only two photons) must exceed
the rest mass of the SINGLE particle pair.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -



  #16  
Old June 2nd 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Bilge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 586
Default Tom Roberst was Incorrect and I was Right.

On 2007-05-29, wrote:
On May 28, 10:44 pm, Bilge wrote:

Not only were you wrong, you keep finding new ways to be wrong.


Proof you can't read, because this time the quote is from Wikipedia


Obviously, your concept of proof is opposite that found in
dictionaries.

which says the opposite of what Tom Roberts wrote. Wikipedia says: the
Intensity (Temperature) must exceed the rest mass of the particle
pair. (Not pairs, but a single pair).

Tommy wrote: "That is completely ****independent**** of the intensity
of the beams"



Tom Roberts doesn't believe that: Photon INTENSITY (multiple photons)
also creates SINGLE electron/positron pair. (He thinks that the energy
of only two individual photons can do this)


at
http://groups.google.com/gro

up/sci.physics.relativity/msg/6146878da7c586d1



Tommy wrote:


"That is completely independent of the intensity of the beams, and
depends only on the energies of the individual photons in the beams.
Higher intensity means more photons in the beam, and that implies
that
IF the photons are above threshold then MORE pairs can be produced. "


Wrong read below:


PROOF:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation
Quote:"....the energy (temperature) of photons must obviously exceed
the rest mass energy of the given matter particle pair."


Particle PAIR and not PAIRS (plural).


The required Energy above is that of the Temperature (INTENSITY of
MULTIPLE PHOTONS and not the energy of only two photons) must exceed
the rest mass of the SINGLE particle pair.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
f=ma is incorrect Mark Oliver Physics - General Discussion 28 April 22nd 05 08:30 PM
Mathematics incorrect regarding = 0 ring_theory Physics - General (alternative forum) 12 March 15th 05 06:56 AM
Obviously incorrect theory... Josh Electromagnetic Theory and Applications 2 January 11th 05 04:28 PM
Wrong, incorrect and the like. Jeff Relf Physics - General Discussion 0 April 4th 04 08:01 AM
Wrong, incorrect and the like. Jeff Relf Physics - General Discussion 0 April 4th 04 08:01 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - J j benitez - Credit Card Debt Consolidation - Mortgage Calculator - Loans