The Skeptics like to debunk zero point energy as "psychoceramics"
(Visser's "Lorentzian Wormholes") well let's see who has the last laugh
now? ;-)

I forgot to mention that this same simple idea also explains the flat
stellar rotation curves in the galactic halos. Obviously, if the
attractive force is constant, like for the quarks, the orbiting speeds
of the stars will not depend upon their distance from the center of the
galaxy.

Three at a blow

1. Quark Force

2. NASA Pioneer Anomaly

3. Flat stellar rotation curves in dark matter galactic halo.


On May 13, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

First a short review of potential theory.

I. If the force f decreases with distance and the potential energy U is
(positive) negative, then the force is (repulsive) attractive.

Example I.1

U = +e^2/r 0

f = -dU/dr = +e^2/r^2 points toward r - infinity, i.e. repulsion

note that (d/dr)(1/r) = - 1/r^2

the two - signs cancel

II. If the force increases with distance and the potential energy U is
(positive) negative, then the force is (attractive) repulsive.

Example II.1 /\zpf is the vacuum zero point space curvature, assumed
constant here.

Zero point energy, as mentioned by Andrei Sakharov in 1967, directly
induces gravity because of the equivalence principle of Albert Einstein.

In the weak field low speed limit of general relativity, the universal
zero point energy induced gravity potential energy per unit test particle is

V ~ -c^2/\zpf r^2

r R

for a uniform sphere of isotropic zero point energy of radius R centered
at r = 0, with vanishing /\zpf for r R. This is same as drilling a
straight hole all the way through the center of a sphere of constant
mass density to the other side and dropping a test particle down the
hole. This is a harmonic oscillator because the mass beyond the
momentary position of the test particle makes no contribution to the
force on the test particle.

Baron Munchausen on the geodesic test particle feels weightless of
course, but from the POV of the non-inertial observer fixed to the
non-geodesic surface of the sphere by non-gravity electrical and quantum
forces, it's AS IF there is a force per unit test mass on the test particle

g = - dV/dr = +2c^2/\zpfr

When /\zpf 0 this is repulsive.

This same formal result carries over into cosmology where r is replaced
by the scale factor a(t) stretching space itself and what happens is
that there is an extra acceleration of a(t) opposing the ordinary matter
that tends to decelerate the stretching of the rubbery fabric of space
itself, i.e. the 3Dim spacelike piece of the geometrodynamic field.

The cosmological equations are here
http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/ss...age_05_jpg.htm

Therefore, in these sign conventions, /\zpf 0 is the repelling dark
energy and /\zpf 0 is the attracting dark matter.

Repelling dark energy is isotropic w = -1 positive zero point energy
density with equal but opposite negative pressure.

Attracting dark matter is isotropic w = -1 negative zero point energy
density with equal but opposite positive pressure.

Adding torsion fields converts Einstein's cosmological constant /\zpf
into a locally variable "quintessent" field. You get torsion with
curvature by locally gauging the entire 10-parameter Poincare group of
globally rigid special relativity.

Now what happens between quarks inside the hadronic "bag"? What we have
is a bag of dark matter where the quintessent field is

/\zpf(quarks) = - 1/ar

Therefore, the constant attractive force per unit mass between the quarks is

g = -c^2/a ~ string tension

for strong short-range (Abdus Salam) ZPF induced gravity

We see exactly the same thing on the larger scale of the NASA Pioneer
Anomaly where

g = -cH ~ 1 nanometer/sec^2

i.e. c^2/Hubble radius ~ 10^21/10^28 ~ 10^-7 cm/sec^2

i.e. a hollow sphere of dark matter centered at Sun beginning at about
orbit of Saturn.



Jack Sarfatti

"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research,
would it?"
- Albert Einstein
http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore...x?bookid=23999
http://lifeboat.com/ex/bios.jack.sarfatti
http://qedcorp.com/APS/Dec122006.ppt
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...ausation&hl=en
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lub/sets/72157594439814784

"Jack Sarfatti"
....
http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore...x?bookid=23999

Excerpt:

Don't be fooled by the "vibrating strings" of Brian Greene's "Elegant
Universe" on PBS NOVA. SUPER COSMOS tells you what is really going on in the
"black world." The mystery of observed anti-gravitating dark energy that is
three-quarters of the universe is explained. The nano-technological control
of dark zero point vacuum energy shaping the fabric of space-time is called
"metric engineering." The physics of how your mind emerges from your body,
CIA experiments in "remote viewing," flying saucer propulsion and star gate
time travel to parallel universes in hyperspace are explained. This is
physics you will not find in any other book! The ideas are explained as part
of the thrilling true adventures of the "Indiana Jones" of post-modern
physics.

"Dr H"
Jack Sarfatti and the Temple of Doom?
Careful, old chap. Covert agencies read Jack Sarfatti threads, or so Jack
Sarfatti says.

For another JS collectible, Google on:
"It's exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defects! That's the Pioneer
anomaly!"

On Tue, 15 May 2007, Larry Hammick fervently declaimed:

}"Dr H"
} Jack Sarfatti and the Temple of Doom?
}Careful, old chap. Covert agencies read Jack Sarfatti threads, or so Jack
}Sarfatti says.

As near as I've been able to tell he mostly responds to his own posts.
I suppose he could be a couple of "agencies," too.

Dr H



}
}For another JS collectible, Google on:
}"It's exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defects! That's the Pioneer
}anomaly!"
}
}
}
}

On May 15, 8:06 pm, Dr H wrote:

On Tue, 15 May 2007, Larry Hammick fervently declaimed:
}
}"Dr H"
}
} Jack Sarfatti and the Temple of Doom?
}
} Careful, old chap. Covert agencies read Jack Sarfatti threads,
} or so Jack Sarfatti says.

As near as I've been able to tell he mostly responds to his own
posts. I suppose he could be a couple of "agencies," too.

There's currently a weird thread in which Jack is replying to almost
every post, which is most unlike him.

At first he seemed genuine, until Phil Carmody pointed out that the
Jack posting replies there had a different host to the usual one,
and someone else mentioned that the "technical" replies seemed
rather lacking in Jack's inimitable (literally) quality.

Also, the Jack in that thread seems if anything a little bit _too_
responsive, even by normal standards let alone his usual inscrutable
non-replying self.

I guess we'll have to see if he starts replying in other threads
that he starts.

If the Jack in that thread is a troll, I wonder if the single John
Baez post that popped up was also by the same troll. I didn't think
Baez followed sci.math or sci.physics (although it may be he had
a quick look in after someone alerted him to the extraordinary
phenomenon of Jack replying to posts!)


Cheers

John R Ramsden

On May 14, 9:06 pm, "Larry Hammick" wrote:
"Dr H" Jack Sarfatti and the Temple of Doom?

Careful, old chap. Covert agencies read Jack Sarfatti threads, or so Jack
Sarfatti says.

For another JS collectible, Google on:
"It's exotic vacuum hedgehog topological defects! That's the Pioneer
anomaly!"

http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v44/i10/p3152_1

(among others)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
galathaea: prankster, fablist, magician, liar

"OwlHoot"

On May 15, 8:06 pm, Dr H wrote:

On Tue, 15 May 2007, Larry Hammick fervently declaimed:
}
}"Dr H"
}
} Jack Sarfatti and the Temple of Doom?
}
} Careful, old chap. Covert agencies read Jack Sarfatti threads,
} or so Jack Sarfatti says.

As near as I've been able to tell he mostly responds to his own
posts. I suppose he could be a couple of "agencies," too.

There's currently a weird thread in which Jack is replying to almost
every post, which is most unlike him.

At first he seemed genuine, until Phil Carmody pointed out that the
Jack posting replies there had a different host to the usual one,
and someone else mentioned that the "technical" replies seemed
rather lacking in Jack's inimitable (literally) quality.

Also, the Jack in that thread seems if anything a little bit _too_
responsive, even by normal standards let alone his usual inscrutable
non-replying self.

I guess we'll have to see if he starts replying in other threads
that he starts.

If the Jack in that thread is a troll, I wonder if the single John
Baez post that popped up was also by the same troll. I didn't think
Baez followed sci.math or sci.physics (although it may be he had
a quick look in after someone alerted him to the extraordinary
phenomenon of Jack replying to posts!)

Cheers

John R Ramsden

Interesting. I'll put in a request for ID in the other thread
The thread in which "he" (whoever) is responding to everybody, and
threatening to sue, and trying to provoke excuses to sue, seems to have been
posted via "The Math Forum". I guess that means Drexel's outfit? Would JS
visit that room? It's doubtful IMO.
JS traditionally, for years, has completely ignored all the heckling that
greets his announcements of revolutionary breakthroughs that appear so
frequently on Usenet (everyone's #1 source for science news). I figured he
was just using fire-and-forget software to start the threads. If the flamer
is a fake then the real JS might still be doing so. Like everyone else I was
surprised at the departure from tradition.
I don't know anything about this Baez flap, but the name-dropping, about
Gell-Mann in this case, is one of JS's unsightly mannerisms, as is well
known.
One other detail:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jack_Sarfatti
Check out TenOfAllTrades explaining why /that/ Jack Sarfatti was banned from
editing at Wiki. TenOfAllTrades has (as JS might say) security clearance at
Wiki. The behavior described by TenOfAllTrades is the behavior of a real
asshole.

If it turns out I've been suckered by an imposter, even an expert imposter,
I'll be embarrassed, no doubt about it. Not because of the real JS, but
because I pride myself on being a real expert in the diagnosis of bull****.
LH

"Larry Hammick"
The thread in which "he" (whoever) is responding to everybody, and
threatening to sue, and trying to provoke excuses to sue, seems to have
been posted via "The Math Forum". ... Would JS visit that room? It's
doubtful IMO.
[for the usual JS spam] I figured he was just using fire-and-forget
software to start the threads.
Hold the phone. He might well be using some sort of spamware for his usual
threads, whereas for the threads in which he wants to provoke others, he
would need an interface (such as The Math Forum).

Larry Hammick wrote:
"OwlHoot"
On May 15, 8:06 pm, Dr H wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Larry Hammick fervently declaimed:
}
}"Dr H"
}
} Jack Sarfatti and the Temple of Doom?
}
} Careful, old chap. Covert agencies read Jack Sarfatti threads,
} or so Jack Sarfatti says.

As near as I've been able to tell he mostly responds to his own
posts. I suppose he could be a couple of "agencies," too.
There's currently a weird thread in which Jack is replying to almost
every post, which is most unlike him.

At first he seemed genuine, until Phil Carmody pointed out that the
Jack posting replies there had a different host to the usual one,
and someone else mentioned that the "technical" replies seemed
rather lacking in Jack's inimitable (literally) quality.

Also, the Jack in that thread seems if anything a little bit _too_
responsive, even by normal standards let alone his usual inscrutable
non-replying self.

I guess we'll have to see if he starts replying in other threads
that he starts.

If the Jack in that thread is a troll, I wonder if the single John
Baez post that popped up was also by the same troll. I didn't think
Baez followed sci.math or sci.physics (although it may be he had
a quick look in after someone alerted him to the extraordinary
phenomenon of Jack replying to posts!)

Cheers

John R Ramsden

Interesting. I'll put in a request for ID in the other thread
The thread in which "he" (whoever) is responding to everybody, and
threatening to sue, and trying to provoke excuses to sue, seems to have been
posted via "The Math Forum". I guess that means Drexel's outfit? Would JS
visit that room? It's doubtful IMO.
JS traditionally, for years, has completely ignored all the heckling that
greets his announcements of revolutionary breakthroughs that appear so
frequently on Usenet (everyone's #1 source for science news). I figured he
was just using fire-and-forget software to start the threads. If the flamer
is a fake then the real JS might still be doing so. Like everyone else I was
surprised at the departure from tradition.
I don't know anything about this Baez flap, but the name-dropping, about
Gell-Mann in this case, is one of JS's unsightly mannerisms, as is well
known.
One other detail:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jack_Sarfatti
Check out TenOfAllTrades explaining why /that/ Jack Sarfatti was banned from
editing at Wiki. TenOfAllTrades has (as JS might say) security clearance at
Wiki. The behavior described by TenOfAllTrades is the behavior of a real
asshole.

If it turns out I've been suckered by an imposter, even an expert imposter,
I'll be embarrassed, no doubt about it. Not because of the real JS, but
because I pride myself on being a real expert in the diagnosis of bull****.
LH



Below, I copy the "Path" thing from the headers for your post
( @ videotron) :

wagner.videotron.net!
wesley.videotron.net!
newsfeed.nyu.edu!
newsfeed.telusplanet.net!
newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!
newsfeed.telus.net!
edtnps82.POSTED!
53ab2750!
not-for-mail

But for the post with "Dear Galathea, [...]"
i.e.:

Subject: Gerald t' Hooft
From: Jack Sarfatti
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 16:42:58 EDT
Message-ID: thforum.org

The Path (at Google Groups) looks weird:
g2news1.google.com!
news3.google.com!
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!
nntp.giganews.com!
nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!
newshosting.com!
38.119.100.149.MISMATCH!
out.nntp.be!
sp6iad.superfeed.net!
in1.nntp.be!
support1.mathforum.org!
not-for-mail

Weird because of: "38.119.100.149.MISMATCH!" for example.

David

Uri Geller is weighing Jack down with a lot of ruined tinware;
unbend thyself, Jack, because Uri (said that) he gave that crap up!...
if Jack is the real (self-colliding) Delorean deal,
that would also explain the Da Vinci Code intro
to British Theology '01.

unfortunately, he was saddled with his father's annointment,
to be the "next Einstein," as if one wasn't more than enough, or
a bit too-many. truly flaky but interestig:
http://www.qedcorp.com/destiny/DaVin...0Century%22%22

he does read his critics. he showed this,
after I made an obvious criticism re the "Shipov Drive,"
found at http://shipov.com/Oil.htm,
by (only temporarily) bakcing away from it.

the real question is,
is he still working for MK-infra?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jack_Sarfatti

thus:
the probabilities are just due to the fact that
the system is not just like the model of it,
same problem as predicting the climate (sic)....
just saw "The Global Warming Swindle" from Channel 4 (UK),
which makes the interesting point that
the GW funding allegedly started with a *misinterpretation*
of some thing that Dame Magggie said about nuclear energy
-- have I got that, correctly?

it's not a perfect documentary. for instance,.
just like the awful "ozone hole" coverstory
in Popular Science (tribune co.),
they failed to note that S. Fred Singer was the head
of the Office of Technology Assessment, and also
of Computer Scientists for Social Responsibility (unfortunately,
I guess it was anti-nukie).

I happen to have learned that the USA turn to "warming" came
at the behest of the NSF, message delivered at the meeting
by a future Iran-contra character!

I once observed, to a recent student of Bart Kosko,
that fuzzy logic was nothing but the application of probability
to logics with more than two values, and could thus
be used to instantiate QM....
and, the cat is presumably still dead, if
it ever did die.

the geocentrical frame's rotational (or
fixed) axis is just the trifold axis of symmetry,
similar to the one in "descartesian" coordinates,
which also has a left & right (or mirror, or
inversion) symmetry or framework.
using the triple (gamma, alpha, beta), with a dystinction, and

of a tripod; symmetrical equations and Galois;
don't trip on the tripod[*], G. -- *mon pauvre petit*.

* a 3-point landing;
dually, a trigon. adverbially:
three-legged or three-sided what ever;
tripodally or trigonally.

n~nerfman~n!