![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: 1994, camouflage, relativistic |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...d7baf4ffcae461
On February 23, 1994, Hartmut Frommert wrote in sci.physics: Though the natural constant "c" which is usually called the vacuum light velocity (or speed) can only be changed by re-definition of units (as any conversion factor), the (actual) speed of (the propagation of) light (photons !) is NOT constant, e.g. in a gravitational field (see any textbook on elementary General Relativity). JOHN BAEZ replied: "This is darn misleading. The speed of light is constant in GR, it's just that the spacetime the light is moving around in is a bit wiggly. Of course, one *could* think of it the way you suggest, but one would have to say, not just that the speed of light was different in a "gravitational field," but that all other laws of physics were different too, in a fairly complicated manner." Pentcho Valev |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 11, 11:43 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
[...] What a sad life you lead. Do you have anything in your life other than searching for 'dirt' on relativity? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
[...]
What a sad life you lead. Do you have anything in your life other than searching for 'dirt' on relativity? Life is not lead, it is fabricated, and Einstein's world is fabricated. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eric Gisse wrote: On May 11, 11:43 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote: [...] What a sad life you lead. Do you have anything in your life other than searching for 'dirt' on relativity? No. Compare Baez's camouflage with what other relativists say about the variability of the speed of light in the presence of a gravitational field: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...7ce7429cbc7ffa Pentcho Valev |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 12, 12:37 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote: On May 11, 11:43 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote: [...] What a sad life you lead. Do you have anything in your life other than searching for 'dirt' on relativity? No. Compare Baez's camouflage with what other relativists say about the variability of the speed of light in the presence of a gravitational field: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...rowse_frm/thre... Pentcho Valev I think Eric's point is that all your posts miss the mark - they are pointless because they always assume a falsehood somewhere and it's simply boring to keep deriving random claims from some false assumption or other. -- Jan Bielawski |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
JanPB wrote: On May 12, 12:37 am, Pentcho Valev wrote: Eric Gisse wrote: On May 11, 11:43 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote: [...] What a sad life you lead. Do you have anything in your life other than searching for 'dirt' on relativity? No. Compare Baez's camouflage with what other relativists say about the variability of the speed of light in the presence of a gravitational field: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...rowse_frm/thre... Pentcho Valev I think Eric's point is that all your posts miss the mark - they are pointless because they always assume a falsehood somewhere and it's simply boring to keep deriving random claims from some false assumption or other. -- Jan Bielawski Perhaps but in this case I am just comparing the explanations of your masters. For instance, according to Master John Baez's explanation, the following explanation of Master Tom Roberts is "darn misleading": Pentcho Valev asked on sci.physics.relativity: CAN THE SPEED OF LIGHT EXCEED 300000 km/s IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD? Tom Roberts answered: "Sure, depending on the physical conditions of the measurement. It can also be less than "300000 km/s" (by which I assume you really mean the standard value for c). And this can happen even for an accelerated observer in a region without any significant gravitation (e.g. in Minkowski spacetime)." Tom Roberts Pentcho Valev |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 11 May 2007 23:43:25 -0700, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...d7baf4ffcae461 On February 23, 1994, Hartmut Frommert wrote in sci.physics: Though the natural constant "c" which is usually called the vacuum light velocity (or speed) can only be changed by re-definition of units (as any conversion factor), the (actual) speed of (the propagation of) light (photons !) is NOT constant, e.g. in a gravitational field (see any textbook on elementary General Relativity). JOHN BAEZ replied: "This is darn misleading. The speed of light is constant in GR, it's just that the spacetime the light is moving around in is a bit wiggly. Of course, one *could* think of it the way you suggest, but one would have to say, not just that the speed of light was different in a "gravitational field," but that all other laws of physics were different too, in a fairly complicated manner." ahahaha... Funny that Baez would write that light is moving in spacetime since nothing can move in spacetime by definition. IOW, there is no spacetime. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha... What is even funnier is that Baez knows this. He just has to kiss the asses of his masters (e.g., Brian Greene) by preaching the same old lie. ahahaha... There are two kinds of science, the ass kissing kind and the truth seeking kind. Guess which one Baez is in. ahahaha... Crackpots in high places are the most dangerous crackpots of them all. Nasty Little Truth About Spacetime Physics: http://www.rebelscience.org/Crackpots/notorious.htm Louis Savain |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Traveler wrote: Crackpots in high places are the most dangerous crackpots of them all. Fortunately for us you're just a crackpot. -- Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy singularity. Official Science Team mascot. COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command). |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 12 May 2007 14:22:49 +0100, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote: In article , Traveler wrote: Crackpots in high places are the most dangerous crackpots of them all. Fortunately for us you're just a crackpot. ahahaha... Unfortunately for you, you're just an unpaid ass kisser. You volunteered. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha... Louis Savain Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It: http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Traveler wrote: ahahaha... Unfortunately for you, you're just an unpaid ass kisser. You volunteered. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha... Louis Savain Yet again class response. -- COOSN-174-07-82116: Official Science Team mascot and alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command). Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy singularity. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RELATIVISTIC CAMOUFLAGE IN 1994 | Pentcho Valev | Physics - General Discussion | 22 | May 13th 07 09:43 PM |
| ERROR correction (in summary called Readme.all (ASCII text file 19.10.1994)) | h.poropudas@luukku.com | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | February 1st 05 12:09 PM |
| ERROR correction (in summary called Readme.all (ASCII text file 19.10.1994)) | h.poropudas@luukku.com | Particle Physics | 4 | February 1st 05 12:09 PM |
| ERROR correction (in summary called Readme.all (ASCII text file 19.10.1994)) | h.poropudas@luukku.com | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | January 26th 05 03:28 PM |
| 1994 AP Exam | NeedAPHelp | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | May 16th 04 05:44 AM |