A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

My Absolute Reference Frame



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 5th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Douglas Eagleson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,024
Default My Absolute Reference Frame

t'=t/gamma

How do yo like that!

dt'/dc appears a solution while the solver tests always. SO in science
we always test the constancy of light as a truth.

In physical theory the constancy was given a law status. So all light
in a vacuum appears constant in all theory of a class of theory.

Just like that class of theory is born.

In modern theory a symmetry of form or logic allows the principle to
be reformed inverted. And this now means:

A frame.

All constant as theory appears to be....

I loose the average person so I put dots.

Here is a modern theory implication out in theory land:

Pretent the world is a set of doppler signals for relativistic
conservation. Which reference frame appears the constant! JUst as an
exercise inthinking. A lack of knwledge of the single reference on
which to base the "sun circling the earth or the other way."

An analogy to lost reference.

Believe it.

All solid state light velocity appears slower than vacuum, and
therefor all solid causes a reference constant to exist. And to
define it:

a= the lost differential constant.

All second differntial must conserve also allowing the frame of the
lost constant!

Ads
  #2  
Old April 6th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Bill Hobba
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,197
Default My Absolute Reference Frame


"Douglas Eagleson" wrote in message
oups.com...
t'=t/gamma

How do yo like that!

dt'/dc appears a solution while the solver tests always. SO in science
we always test the constancy of light as a truth.

In physical theory the constancy was given a law status.


As has been explained time and time again the constancy of the velocity of
light is not a law or even a requirement of SR. Quit posting rubbish that
simply demonstrates your ignorance - instead spend your time leering the
basics:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e....ih.lucent.com

Bill

So all light
in a vacuum appears constant in all theory of a class of theory.

Just like that class of theory is born.

In modern theory a symmetry of form or logic allows the principle to
be reformed inverted. And this now means:

A frame.

All constant as theory appears to be....

I loose the average person so I put dots.

Here is a modern theory implication out in theory land:

Pretent the world is a set of doppler signals for relativistic
conservation. Which reference frame appears the constant! JUst as an
exercise inthinking. A lack of knwledge of the single reference on
which to base the "sun circling the earth or the other way."

An analogy to lost reference.

Believe it.

All solid state light velocity appears slower than vacuum, and
therefor all solid causes a reference constant to exist. And to
define it:

a= the lost differential constant.

All second differntial must conserve also allowing the frame of the
lost constant!



  #3  
Old April 6th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
karandash2000@yahoo.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,013
Default My Absolute Reference Frame

On Apr 5, 6:29 am, "Douglas Eagleson"
wrote:


dt'/dc appears a solution while the solver tests always.


rest of crackpottery snipped



New cretin attack.

  #4  
Old April 6th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Douglas Eagleson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,024
Default My Absolute Reference Frame

On Apr 5, 10:13 pm, "Bill Hobba" wrote:
"Douglas Eagleson" wrote in message

oups.com...

t'=t/gamma


How do yo like that!


dt'/dc appears a solution while the solver tests always. SO in science
we always test the constancy of light as a truth.


In physical theory the constancy was given a law status.


As has been explained time and time again the constancy of the velocity of
light is not a law or even a requirement of SR. Quit posting rubbish that
simply demonstrates your ignorance - instead spend your time leering the
basics:http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...=54jfst%24glp%...

Bill



So all light
in a vacuum appears constant in all theory of a class of theory.


Just like that class of theory is born.


In modern theory a symmetry of form or logic allows the principle to
be reformed inverted. And this now means:


A frame.


All constant as theory appears to be....


I loose the average person so I put dots.


Here is a modern theory implication out in theory land:


Pretent the world is a set of doppler signals for relativistic
conservation. Which reference frame appears the constant! JUst as an
exercise inthinking. A lack of knwledge of the single reference on
which to base the "sun circling the earth or the other way."


An analogy to lost reference.


Believe it.


All solid state light velocity appears slower than vacuum, and
therefor all solid causes a reference constant to exist. And to
define it:


a= the lost differential constant.


All second differntial must conserve also allowing the frame of the
lost constant!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


A certain reference frame was the test. And the special frame was to
be the answer, not the implication.

  #5  
Old April 6th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Douglas Eagleson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,024
Default My Absolute Reference Frame

On Apr 5, 10:51 pm, wrote:
On Apr 5, 6:29 am, "Douglas Eagleson"
wrote:



dt'/dc appears a solution while the solver tests always.


rest of crackpottery snipped



New cretin attack.


In a media solid state speed appears hihgly variable! And my argument
was required to be refuted not lazy lam-blasted, making you the cretin.

  #6  
Old April 6th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
karandash2000@yahoo.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,013
Default My Absolute Reference Frame

On Apr 6, 4:10 am, "Douglas Eagleson"
wrote:
On Apr 5, 10:51 pm, wrote:

On Apr 5, 6:29 am, "Douglas Eagleson"
wrote:


dt'/dc appears a solution while the solver tests always.


rest of crackpottery snipped


New cretin attack.


In a media solid state speed appears hihgly variable! And my argument
was required to be refuted not lazy lam-blasted, making you the cretin.




Persistent cretin: dt/dc is unphysical

  #7  
Old April 7th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Bill Hobba
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,197
Default My Absolute Reference Frame


"Douglas Eagleson" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Apr 5, 10:13 pm, "Bill Hobba" wrote:
"Douglas Eagleson" wrote in message

oups.com...

t'=t/gamma


How do yo like that!


dt'/dc appears a solution while the solver tests always. SO in science
we always test the constancy of light as a truth.


In physical theory the constancy was given a law status.


As has been explained time and time again the constancy of the velocity
of
light is not a law or even a requirement of SR. Quit posting rubbish
that
simply demonstrates your ignorance - instead spend your time leering the
basics:http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...=54jfst%24glp%...

Bill



So all light
in a vacuum appears constant in all theory of a class of theory.


Just like that class of theory is born.


In modern theory a symmetry of form or logic allows the principle to
be reformed inverted. And this now means:


A frame.


All constant as theory appears to be....


I loose the average person so I put dots.


Here is a modern theory implication out in theory land:


Pretent the world is a set of doppler signals for relativistic
conservation. Which reference frame appears the constant! JUst as an
exercise inthinking. A lack of knwledge of the single reference on
which to base the "sun circling the earth or the other way."


An analogy to lost reference.


Believe it.


All solid state light velocity appears slower than vacuum, and
therefor all solid causes a reference constant to exist. And to
define it:


a= the lost differential constant.


All second differntial must conserve also allowing the frame of the
lost constant!- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


A certain reference frame was the test. And the special frame was to
be the answer, not the implication.


Why not address the assertion you made and my refutation of it rather than
use the standard crank tactic of irrelevant context switching?

Bill


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
absolute reference frame dwhig265@aol.com The Theory of Relativity 26 August 24th 06 04:28 AM
absolute reference frame dwhig265@aol.com The Theory of Relativity 0 August 22nd 06 07:24 PM
An 'Absolute' Reference Frame? Henri Wilson The Theory of Relativity 9 July 14th 05 08:50 AM
Absolute Frame of Reference Raheman Velji The Theory of Relativity 3 December 28th 04 12:38 PM
Absolute Frame of Reference Raheman Velji Physics - New Theories 0 December 28th 04 01:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Send Money Online - Mobile Phones - Moneygram - Mobile Phones - Loans