Silly boy!

Why don't you folks say that you're no photographic expert, or much
less of any Kodak wizard at much of anything.

Obviously your PC/MAC or whatever MI/NSA computer isn't capable of
honestly doing a fail-safe search for much of anything, that which
might actually end up better supporting our side of the Kodak
argument, as far better off than taking up your hocus-pocus side.

Why don't you folks select upon any one of those EVA Kodak moments
that proves your side of the argument, or would you much rather that I
pick out a given image or two?
-
Brad Guth

it's your silly hypothesis -- how in Hell
can I conduct a "failsafe search," what ever that is, if
I can't even tell how it is that you determined that
the "Kodak Moments (tm)" somehow were calibrated to detect lunar UV,
in the first place?

Obviously your PC/MAC or whatever MI/NSA computer isn't capable of
honestly doing a fail-safe search for much of anything, that which
might actually end up better supporting our side of the Kodak
argument, as far better off than taking up your hocus-pocus side.

Why don't you folks select upon any one of those EVA Kodak moments
that proves your side of the argument, or would you much rather that I
pick out a given image or two?

thus:
the integral quaternions include those
with all half-integers in the imaginary parts.

"wayhandy?"
amanuensis

--DARFUR CONSISTS OF ARABs & nonARABs;
NEWS-ITEM: there are too kinds of people -- or 3?...
Harry Potter IIX, ?Ordeal @ Oxford//Baghdad ^ Parachute!
http://larouchepub.com/other/2007/34...ns_hedges.html

did the Apollo astronauts not have helmets
whose glass was coated with reflective stuff,
or was that just light that was more noticably
polarized, as when few clouds?

re quaternions, the half-integer imaginaries
are just included with the units, as well
as the vertices of the lattice ...
what ever shape that is.

thus:
the integral quaternions include those
with all half-integers in the imaginary parts.

--DARFUR CONSISTS OF ARABs & nonARABs;
NEWS-ITEM: there are too kinds of people -- or 3?...
Harry Potter IIX, ?Ordeal @ Oxford//Baghdad ^ Parachute!http://
larouchepub.com/other/2007/3410caymans_hedges.html

incidentally, the retroreflectors are not
dependont on some "reflective material,"
which could just be aluminum or silver, but
on the *arrangement* of the flat mirrors;
just look at any, common reflector,
as on a bicycle, which uses only the property
of the polished plastic -- no "silvering" at all.

did the Apollo astronauts not have helmets
whose glass was coated with reflective stuff,
or was that just light that was more noticably
polarized, as when few clouds?

thus:
I've never seen an explanation from *you*
of what atomtotality is, so how could Wikipedia do it?

then, I realized, you were probably selling the stuff.

another manifestation of your problem
with English, is the fact that you actually did notice,
that one of the best theories about human evolution,
is known as the "aquatic ape theory," originally done
by the guy who made the aqualung, I think, but
best explained by Elaine Morgan (_The Descent
of Woman_ and _The Aquatic Ape_).

of courser, there's no reason, not
to combine that with your little theory
about stone-throwing -- I like it!

thus:
um, yeah;
Borat wants you in Sudan, why, Baby?

the integral quaternions include those
with all half-integers in the imaginary parts.

--DARFUR CONSISTS OF ARABs & nonARABs;
NEWS-ITEM: there are too kinds of people -- or 3?...
Harry Potter IIX, ?Ordeal @ Oxford//Baghdad ^ Parachute!
http://larouchepub.com/other/2007/34...ns_hedges.html

That's the very best infomercial crapolla you've got?

Our moon is simply way hotter than any lethal badlands that are to
behold within our Van Allen belts.

Tuned CCD images as for having been specifically filtered for
recording those hard-X-rays, or especially of whatever's gamma, is
nothing but the sorts of replicated hard scientific numbers proving
how extra TBI hot and downright lethal the surface of our physically
dark and nasty moon actually is.
-
Brad Guth

Our "tj Frazir" has been correct in more ways than not. Our moon is
simply way hotter than any lethal badlands that are to behold within
our Van Allen belts, and our SAA is in fact expanding as it's dropping
like a rock because our magnetosphere is failing us by a good -.05%/
year (the good news being that perhaps soon enough to save us from
ourselves, human and a good many other species of population control
will no longer be an issue).

Tuned CCD images as for having been specifically filtered for
recording those hard-X-rays, or especially of whatever's gamma, is
nothing but the sorts of replicated hard scientific numbers that's
proving how extra TBI hot and downright lethal the surface of our
physically dark and nasty moon actually is.

You simply can't fly-by-rocket land squat upon the moon unless you
intend upon creating an artificial crater. You also don't have
sufficient rad-hard DNA, and even banked bone marrow may not be
sufficient. That moon of ours is worth teravolts of being
electrostatic charged (much worse off than anything Van Allen belt has
to offer), as well as being nearly as sooty dark as coal, and
otherwise offering itself as tens of dusty meters deep in places to
boot.

Our once upon a time icy and still somewhat salty and otherwise
reactive moon is still the great collector, except for having been
losing vast tonnage of sodium and a few other thermal dynamic elements
per day, leaving us with a rather interesting cosmic morgue of heavier
surface debris and contless spores to deal with.
-
Brad Guth

TBI?... SAA?...

it only gets hot on Moon after midday, and
the day lasts for a fortnight, so.... that is why
you don't see many late-afternoon or sunset exposures;
most of the landings were near the middle
of the visible face, some equatorial, so....

stop whining and answer the God-am questions,
Bradley, Junior!

our Van Allen belts, and our SAA is in fact expanding as it's dropping

proving how extra TBI hot and downright lethal the surface of our
physically dark and nasty moon actually is.

sufficient. That moon of ours is worth teravolts of being
electrostatic charged (much worse off than anything Van Allen belt has

thus:
if you'd put more commas into your spiel,
you might get a better reading, or
at least critique from the Wikiistas --
it's "run-on" sentences, although
your "monographical" phase seems to take care
to break it down into conciser paragraphs.

although this is your best thing,
it's still impossibly obtuse, as well
as certainly wrong. I mean,
does that sticky-muno guy have any reason
to use 2/3, other than your sublimely
ridiculous diagram of Coulomb versus Faraday,
from the absurd metaphor?

where are the proofs of these imaginings?

Archimedes Plutoniumwww.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

thus:
.... because AP shares a common Britishism,
the lack of adequate punctuation,
mainly the commas, set out as normative pauses
in one's breathing, but to dysambiguate meaning
of a run-on sentence.

they don't all *talk* like that,
even at Oxbridge, Harry Potter PS#1. it's more
annoying than an abbreviationat the end
of a sentence, with only one space after it,
in the newspapaer.

Deep Comma
Yes, one must avoid dangerous punctuation at all costs...
and, eventually, to death. Fortunately enough, he could be

thus:
um, yeah;
Borat wants you in Sudan, why, Baby?

the UNIT quaternions include those
with all half-integers in the imaginary parts.

--DARFUR CONSISTS OF ARABs & nonARABs;
NEWS-ITEM: there are too kinds of people -- or 3?...
Harry Potter IIX, ?Ordeal @ Oxford//Baghdad ^ Parachute!
http://larouchepub.com/other/2007/34...ns_hedges.html

I believe neil has been assasinated.

On Mar 5, 12:24 am, "Koobee Wublee" wrote:
On Mar 4, 3:55 am, "The_Man" wrote:

On Mar 4, 1:21 am, "Koobee Wublee" wrote:
In 1969, NASA still believed the radiation beyond the Van Allen Belts
was as benign as the low earth orbit.

Which undermines your whole argument. Even if the radiation WERE
dangerous, NASA didn't think so.

Nobody had good data to believe a fatal radiation environment beyond
the Van Allen Belts even with the hints of solar winds and cosmic
particles, and high-energy gamma rays.

IF NASA HAD thought so, there MIGHT
be a rationale for hoaxing the landings.

During the early 70's, the deep space probes started to meet with
early demise.

Which ones?

That prompted investigations to discover a fatal
radiation environment beyond the Van Allen Belts.

Yes, the magnetosphere of Jupiter.

With hardened
electronics payloads, the Voyagers spacecrafts can last decades and
even more. That is why there were no subsequent moon landings after
Apollo.

So, there were no MOON landings after Apollo, because the
magnetosphere oF JUPITER is dangerous?

There were no more moon landings because the Government was spending
too much money on Vietnam and the "War on Poverty"

The technological is just not there yet. shrug

BUt since NASA was convinced
that the radiation WASN'T a problem, why "hoax"?

Now, they do. They are very cautious with their Mars manned program.
shrug

Back then, no one had the
experience of moving through the Van Allen Belts getting their retina
bombarded by high energy particles in which an astronaut with his eyes
closed with still see sparks. Since then, we have designed deep-space
probes to operate in tremendously high-radiation environment. The
highest-altitude shuttle astronauts have reported seeing these sparks
with their eyes closed.

So what? Space travel is DANGEROUS! No ****! Even if there were NO
radiation, it is STILL the most fiucking dangerous thing a human can
do.

I agree, but shrug. This has nothing to do with a hoax or not.

Sure it does, if the argument is that they faked the landings because
they were too dangerous.


The danger is so great that the astronauts are either extremely
brave, extremely crazy or both.

Didn't Sally Ride say that given the engineering short comings that
caused the '86 shuttle disaster, she would never ride it again with
such conditions unresolved. You call her crazy? I say she is 100%
correct. shrug

Sally Ride would NEVER have been one of the Apollo astronauts, not
having a fighter pilot or test pilot background. No offense to Ms.
Ride, but if SHE had been Neil Armostring, she would surely have
aborted the landing. IN fact, she would never have gotten on ANY of
the American or Russian spaceships, and we would have landed on the
moon when Affirmative Action mandated it 5,000 A.D.


The Apollo astronauts still remain the only
ones that have traversed through the Van Allen Belts and into outer
space beyond the Van Allen Belts.

I thought that they DIDN'T go through the belts, since the landings
were "faked"

I don't think any person did. shrug The prize of manned moon
landing is still up for grab. JFK's dream is still unfulfilled. We
need to resuscitate the program, to achieve JFK's dream, and to allow
him to rest in peace. That is the most logical American thing to do
instead of hiding behind the lies.

Yawn. You say it's a fake, though you have not a shred of proof.


It certainly was a giant step in a
phantom leap from the low earth orbit to the moon.

Make up your mind.

Already done after concluding the Apollo hoax. When are you going to
do the same, ben-man?