![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: between, deriving, einstein, help, relation, ricci, tensors |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
What the subject says. Working through Gravitation(MTW), waited until I
was in mid chap 14 before going back and having another look at this bit, but am still stumped here. (ie, page 326, problem 13.12b) Tried some index jiggerpokery but am still stumped. Any help would be appreciated, thanks. Psy-Kosh |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 24, 1:39 pm, Psy-Kosh wrote: What the subject says. Working through Gravitation(MTW), waited until I was in mid chap 14 before going back and having another look at this bit, but am still stumped here. (ie, page 326, problem 13.12b) Tried some index jiggerpokery but am still stumped. Any help would be appreciated, thanks. Psy-Kosh The Einstein tensor has zero covariant divergence. Ricci doesn't. IIRC, the Einstein tensor is derivable from a contraction on the Bianchi identities of the Riemann Curvature. You should be able to find it in just about any good GR textbook. Doesn't MTW derive this in an understandable way? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 24, 11:11 am, "Igor" wrote:
The Einstein tensor has zero covariant divergence. Ricci doesn't. What does that mean? IIRC, the Einstein tensor is derivable from a contraction on the Bianchi identities of the Riemann Curvature. [...] Bullsh*t! The Einstein tensor can only be derived from the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Einstein tensor has zero covariant divergence. Ricci doesn't. IIRC, the Einstein tensor is derivable from a contraction on the Bianchi identities of the Riemann Curvature. You should be able to find it in just about any good GR textbook. Doesn't MTW derive this in an understandable way? If it derives it, it does so elsewhere in the book that I haven't seen yet. So far what I've seen is it defines the EINSTEIN in terms of a contraction of the double dual of the curvature tensor, then states the equation relating the RICCI tensor to the EINSTEIN tensor and the curvature scalar, and leaves the derivation as an exercise. Specifically, exercise 13.12 Do you happen to know if a solution guide for MTW exists, for that matter? (wait... a comprehensive solutions guide to MTW + MTW itself would probably crush the scale... heck, crush the table they're set on. o_O) Oh, Bianchi identities, while briefly mentioned already, don't really get dealt with until later in the book. (Actually, chap 15, I think.) Thanks anyways. Psy-Kosh |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 24, 3:56 pm, "Koobee Wublee" wrote: On Jan 24, 11:11 am, "Igor" wrote: The Einstein tensor has zero covariant divergence. Ricci doesn't. What does that mean? If you don't know, look it up. IIRC, the Einstein tensor is derivable from a contraction on the Bianchi identities of the Riemann Curvature. [...] Bullsh*t! The Einstein tensor can only be derived from the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian. This is coming from the same guy that doesn't know how to transform a domain. Formal education is often a good cure for ignorance. Stupidity, on the other hand, is incurable. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 24, 6:21 pm, Psy-Kosh wrote: The Einstein tensor has zero covariant divergence. Ricci doesn't. IIRC, the Einstein tensor is derivable from a contraction on the Bianchi identities of the Riemann Curvature. You should be able to find it in just about any good GR textbook. Doesn't MTW derive this in an understandable way?If it derives it, it does so elsewhere in the book that I haven't seen yet. So far what I've seen is it defines the EINSTEIN in terms of a contraction of the double dual of the curvature tensor, then states the equation relating the RICCI tensor to the EINSTEIN tensor and the curvature scalar, and leaves the derivation as an exercise. Specifically, exercise 13.12 Do you happen to know if a solution guide for MTW exists, for that matter? (wait... a comprehensive solutions guide to MTW + MTW itself would probably crush the scale... heck, crush the table they're set on. o_O) I really don't know about that one. If there is, I've never seen it. Oh, Bianchi identities, while briefly mentioned already, don't really get dealt with until later in the book. (Actually, chap 15, I think.) Here's a good link that shows how the Einstein tensor is derivable from the Bianchi identities: http://www.mth.uct.ac.za/omei/gr/chap6/node14.html |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 24, 11:56 am, "Koobee Wublee" wrote: On Jan 24, 11:11 am, "Igor" wrote: The Einstein tensor has zero covariant divergence. Ricci doesn't. What does that mean? The true disciple of Riemannian geometry doesn't know what a covariant derivative is. You can't pay for this kind of comedy, folks. IIRC, the Einstein tensor is derivable from a contraction on the Bianchi identities of the Riemann Curvature. [...] Bullsh*t! The Einstein tensor can only be derived from the Einstein-Hilbert Lagrangian. Only? Section 14.2 of MTW would be illuminating. Hell, I think all of it would be. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 25, 9:36 am, "Igor" wrote:
Here's a good link that shows how the Einstein tensor is derivable from the Bianchi identities: http://www.mth.uct.ac.za/omei/gr/chap6/node14.html You got to be kidding me with that convoluted derivation of the field equations. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 24, 10:39 am, Psy-Kosh wrote:
What the subject says. Working through Gravitation(MTW), waited until I was in mid chap 14 before going back and having another look at this bit, but am still stumped here. (ie, page 326, problem 13.12b) Tried some index jiggerpokery but am still stumped. Any help would be appreciated, thanks. Ugh. It looks like a bit of index gymnastics. The problem is not to derive Einstein's field equation but to verify the usual relationship between G^a_b and R^a_b given the definitions of both as contractions of certain tensors (*Riemann* in the first case and the plain Riemann in the second, where "*" is the Hodge star). I think I'll pass... :-) -- Jan Bielawski |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 25, 1:16 pm, "Koobee Wublee" wrote: On Jan 25, 9:36 am, "Igor" wrote: Here's a good link that shows how the Einstein tensor is derivable from the Bianchi identities: http://www.mth.uct.ac.za/omei/gr/chap6/node14.htmlYou got to be kidding me with that convoluted derivation of the field equations. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 41.1: Scalar Einstein Equation in Probable Causation of Tensors, Matrices, Determinants | OsherD | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | December 2nd 06 08:52 PM |
| Ricci flow | Jan Bielawski | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | May 23rd 05 01:34 AM |
| Ricci and Weyl tensors in GR | Kasper J. Larsen | Mathematical Research (Moderated) | 2 | October 13th 04 09:23 PM |
| Ricci and Weyl tensors in GR | Kasper J. Larsen | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 0 | October 8th 04 12:20 PM |
| Ricci and Weyl tensors in GR | Kasper J. Larsen | The Theory of Relativity | 1 | October 8th 04 01:56 AM |