Jet fuel melted engine blocks of cars 6 blocks away?

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html

wrote:
Jet fuel melted engine blocks of cars 6 blocks away?

Why engine compartments burin more
readily thn fuel tanks is simple to explain.
Since that's where they store the halogen
lights, rather than the idiots.






http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html

wrote in message
ps.com...
Jet fuel melted engine blocks of cars 6 blocks away?

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html


Looks just like somone poured burning jet fuel over them. The fuel seems to
have burnt for awhile but didn't really set the car s or interior alight. No
mystery.

wrote:
Jet fuel melted engine blocks of cars 6 blocks away?

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html


I think the aliens did it.

those are very interesting, anomalous effects of the catastrophe,
that could still be explained. maybe the perps have live-actionm video
of some of it.

stretching it is "why is the ruber window gasket
hanging outside?," instead of inside?

beam weapons makes for an interesting hypothesis, if only
because you can extrapolate to the "official scenario,"
without unneccesarily involving Trickier Dick Cheeny
from the Nixon Admin. (quiz: what was he doing, there,
with Don Rumsfled, besdies dicking the goment?) --
we already have too-many impeachable offenses
from 6 years of co-presidency!

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html

thus:
of course, there is an alternative;
it all hinges upon what you mean by "controlled" demolition. now,
as a recent, contracted demolition in Los Angeles,
reported in the LAtribcoTimes, showed,
it takes a very small amount of explosive
"to do it from the inside," much, much smaller than the quantities
taht were needed to fly those planes from coast to caost.

plus, there are "synergies," or what ever is opposite of that, but
I have to note that most ot the WTC7 hapgooders tend
top show only the one side of it, that was barely burning.

There is no account for the free fall collapse of WTC 7 other than
controlled demolition. If you could account for it with physics and
math (as I've done) you would, but you can't, so rather than accept the
empirical, you merely resort to child-like insults and
self-brainwashing.

thus:
I recall reading that, at 500 miles,
the atmosphere is half H2. I wonder,
what the geeforce is at that level, and
for geosynchornous & lunar orbits.

thus quoth:
at an altitude of 250 miles (roughly the height that the space shuttle
flies) gravity is still nearly 90% as strong as at the earth's surface,
and weightlessness actually occurs because orbiting objects are in
free-fall....
If the earth was of perfectly uniform composition then, during a
descent to the centre of the earth, gravity would decrease linearly
with distance, reaching zero at the centre. In reality, the
gravitational field peaks within the Earth at the core-mantle boundary
where it has a value of 10.7 m/s².

thus:
of "to be," or not. at least, Bill Clinton knew,
without schlepping the OED for the etymology
of inhalation. nudge,wink--sayNOmore,kindSIR

to belabor the obvious: a)
Borat's British; b)
he was a student of the Clash of Civs guy,
that is to say retailing the Gibbons or Encycl.Brit. version
of world and USA history; c)
Khazakstan is largely ... y'know ... about that segment
of the market?

*primarily* for the foreign market. so,

thus:
Hollinger began as an arms manufacturer,
sort-of like EMI. so, look forward to the day when
Obnoxico Music Corp. gets into laser pistols.

this just in:
yesterday's (Tues,. Nov.15) *UCLA Daily Bruin* finally noted that
darfur is entirely Muslim, though downplaying it AMAP.

thus:
Dick Cheeny, Don Rumsfeld, Osama bin Latin and HARRY POTTER
-- which is a real, fictional character? -- form a mission
to Darfur, to prevent a war instead of to start one:
if Darfur is "100% Muslim," then
what's really going on, there?
is it just aother British Quag for USA soldiers to get bogged
into, with Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan et al ad vomitorium,
under auspices of the UN and NATO?
why won't the Bruin publish the fact of Islam on the ground,
therein?

thus:
Why doesn't the [UCLA Daily] Bruin report that
Darfur's populace is "100%" Muslim,
according to the DAC's sponsor,
Terry Saunders?...
"99%" was the figure given
by Brian Steidle, when I finally found
him at the Hammer, after everyone else
had left (he, his friend & I were the
very last to leave!)...
What could it possibly mean?

--The Other Side (if it exists ... nah !-)