![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: 18502007, inconsistency, queen, science |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
When you introduce a falsehood in physical science you cannot remove
the respective truth from your theory. Rather, explicit falsehood and implicit truth form a powerful couple able to produce virtually any result you need. The following quotation is based on formal logic and is an exaggeration with respect to physical theories; nevertheless it is quite instructive: W. H. Newton-Smith, The Rationality of Science, Routledge, London, 1981, p. 229: "A theory ought to be internally consistent. The grounds for including this factor are a priori. For given a realist construal of theories, our concern is with verisimilitude, and if a theory is inconsistent it will contain every sentence of the language, as the following simple argument shows. Let 'q' be an arbitrary sentence of the language and suppose that the theory is inconsistent. This means that we can derive the sentence 'p and not-p'. From this 'p' follows. And from 'p' it follows that 'p or q' (if 'p' is true then 'p or q' will be true no matter whether 'q' is true or not). Equally, it follows from 'p and not-p' that 'not-p'. But 'not-p' together with 'p or q' entails 'q'. Thus once we admit an inconsistency into our theory we have to admit everything. And no theory of verisimilitude would be acceptable that did not give the lowest degree of verisimilitude to a theory which contained each sentence of the theory's language and its negation." As soon as you introduce the magic contradictory couple rationality starts disappearing and you do not need valid arguments anymore. Invalid arguments increase the power of your theory additionally: whether "Reversible heat engines working between the same two temperatures have the same efficiency" does or does not really follow from "Heat never flows spontaneously from cold to hot" is a question brothers scientists would never ask. The falsehood enables you to demonstrate miracles and become a divinity; the respective truth enables you to predict verifiable results. Einstein's false principle of constancy of the speed of light produces miracles such as time dilation, length contraction, Minkowski's space-time, time travel etc. Einstein's (rather, Newton's) true principle of variability of the speed of light gives correct predictions such as the gravitational redshift factor. Pentcho Valev |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Inconsistency Queen of Science 1850-2007 | Pentcho Valev | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | January 7th 07 07:55 AM |
| I don't care if you are the queen of england. | gb6724@yahoo.com | Physics - New Theories | 0 | September 28th 06 01:36 PM |
| Call for Sessions Proposals: The World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science WCECS 2007 | imecs___2007@iaeng.org | Electromagnetic Theory and Applications | 0 | September 20th 06 03:47 PM |
| I don't care if you are Jesus, or the queen of england | Geo Incog | Physics - New Theories | 0 | March 18th 05 03:50 AM |
| The inconsistency method in science | Pentcho Valev | The Theory of Relativity | 13 | September 27th 04 06:07 PM |