A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Inconsistency Queen of Science 1850-2007



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 7th 07 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.physics.cond-matter,sci.philosophy.tech,sci.logic
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,892
Default Inconsistency Queen of Science 1850-2007

When you introduce a falsehood in physical science you cannot remove
the respective truth from your theory. Rather, explicit falsehood and
implicit truth form a powerful couple able to produce virtually any
result you need. The following quotation is based on formal logic and
is an exaggeration with respect to physical theories; nevertheless it
is quite instructive:

W. H. Newton-Smith, The Rationality of Science, Routledge, London,
1981, p. 229: "A theory ought to be internally consistent. The grounds
for including this factor are a priori. For given a realist construal
of theories, our concern is with verisimilitude, and if a theory is
inconsistent it will contain every sentence of the language, as the
following simple argument shows. Let 'q' be an arbitrary sentence
of the language and suppose that the theory is inconsistent. This means
that we can derive the sentence 'p and not-p'. From this 'p'
follows. And from 'p' it follows that 'p or q' (if 'p' is
true then 'p or q' will be true no matter whether 'q' is true
or not). Equally, it follows from 'p and not-p' that 'not-p'.
But 'not-p' together with 'p or q' entails 'q'. Thus once
we admit an inconsistency into our theory we have to admit everything.
And no theory of verisimilitude would be acceptable that did not give
the lowest degree of verisimilitude to a theory which contained each
sentence of the theory's language and its negation."

As soon as you introduce the magic contradictory couple rationality
starts disappearing and you do not need valid arguments anymore.
Invalid arguments increase the power of your theory additionally:
whether "Reversible heat engines working between the same two
temperatures have the same efficiency" does or does not really follow
from "Heat never flows spontaneously from cold to hot" is a question
brothers scientists would never ask.

The falsehood enables you to demonstrate miracles and become a
divinity; the respective truth enables you to predict verifiable
results. Einstein's false principle of constancy of the speed of light
produces miracles such as time dilation, length contraction,
Minkowski's space-time, time travel etc. Einstein's (rather, Newton's)
true principle of variability of the speed of light gives correct
predictions such as the gravitational redshift factor.

Pentcho Valev

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inconsistency Queen of Science 1850-2007 Pentcho Valev Physics - General Discussion 0 January 7th 07 07:55 AM
I don't care if you are the queen of england. gb6724@yahoo.com Physics - New Theories 0 September 28th 06 01:36 PM
Call for Sessions Proposals: The World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science WCECS 2007 imecs___2007@iaeng.org Electromagnetic Theory and Applications 0 September 20th 06 03:47 PM
I don't care if you are Jesus, or the queen of england Geo Incog Physics - New Theories 0 March 18th 05 03:50 AM
The inconsistency method in science Pentcho Valev The Theory of Relativity 13 September 27th 04 06:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mobile Phone - Web Advertising - Mobile Phones - Meeting Rooms - Arlan Designs