The differences between the Newtonian and the
Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON and EINSTEIN respectively.


Vlcek contra NEWTON
Let's have a real coordinates system firmly connected with a real
laboratory
on Earth, where all experiments testing the physical theories are
performed.
We know that this coordinates system moves around the Earth axis during
an
astronomical day i. e. it performs a quasi-circular motion. During the
year
it rotates around the Sun approximately in a quasi-circle together with
the
Earth. During 2.108 years it circulates in the quasi-circle around the
center of the Galaxy. It performs a quasi-uniform motion in a
quasi-circle
together with the Sun. The Galaxy performs a quasi-uniform and
quasi-circle
motion around the center within the framework of metagalaxies of star
clusters and our laboratory coordinates system on Earth together with
it,
etc. From the experimental testing of the law of inertia it is known
that
the body moves along the "plane" stated by a waterlevel, i. e. in fact
it is
not a straight-line uniform motion, but it is the motion in the circle
of
the Earth radius of R=6378 km. The space aeronautics show that space
ships,
Earth satellites and orbital laboratories move quasi-uniformly in
almost a
circle around the Earth.
The atomic theory shows that the electrons and the nucleus circulate
around
the center of gravity of atom in approximate circles. The body rotating

around its own axis (a flywheel) persists in this status. Similarly,
the
planets, stars, galaxies, molecules, nuclei and elementary particles
rotate
around their own axes. Since the uniform straight-line inertial motion
cannot be achieved in a microworld, its place here is exclusively in
the
inertial quasi-circle motion. It is analogous in the macroworld. Each
real
"straight-line" motion can be replaced by a circle of a huge radius.
This
discussion results in the following: "Every mass (atom, molecule,
particle,
body, vacuum) persists in the status of the quasi-rest or quasi-uniform

motion in a quasi-circle as far as it the external forces do not force
it to
change its status. (This notion is called the generalized law of
inertia)."
The inertial rotation of body consists of a quasi-uniform motion (in
the
quasi circles) of body's atoms. The inertial rotation of particle
consists
of a quasi-uniform motion (in the quasi-circles of subparticles -
quarks,
prequarks.
Finally, it is necessary to stress, that since the idea of inertial
straight-line uniform motion has no place in physics, neither the idea
of
the inertial system (in our theory it is replaced by the notion of
equivalent system-see 1.2.4.) nor the notions of Einstein's principle
of
relativity, local time, co-variant equations, nor Lorent'z
transformation
equations physical definition of simultaneity, nor invariant interval
has
any place in physics.
No real motion can be straight-line one. Every motion drawing near the
straight-line one is just a part of curvilinear circular motion with
final
radius. It will never reach the radius .
We have already known that straight-line motion does not really exist,
it is
only possible a hypothetical approximation for large radii of
curvature. On
surface of Earth, the circle with radius is a "straight line" (in light
of
the origin of this term at Newton - laboratory desk - a plane defined
by the
level).
These radii of curvature are even larger for galaxies - they have the
size
of several light years - and they are more similar to the straight
line,
which they will never reach. In reality we have not uniform motion in a

circle, but a non-uniform in ellipse (quasi-uniform motion in a
quasi-circle) or rosette respectively-see Consequences 2, point 20.
Centripetal acceleration forces in the author?s theory are not constant
-
they change: alternatively it is growing and declining. In a "circle"
can be
uniform or a non-uniform motion.
The non-uniform motion has a sequel: a little deformed circle on
ellipse or
rosette respectively and creation of stationary cloud.
Centripetal acceleration is not the acceleration in direction of the
curve
of the circle (tangential one), but in direction perpendicular to this
curve, it has nothing in common with the acceleration in direction of
curve.
It determines the size of curvature of circle line only, and in the
extreme
case, the size of the straight line (for ). However, it is not possible
to
realize these extreme positions in reality. For any "straight-line"
motion
it is valid that . On the surface of the Earth, on an ideal plane
determined
by the water level, normal acceleration on the "straight line", that
lies in
this plane, equals
The standard Newtonian physics is somewhat corrected by Generalized Law
of
Inertia.
Vlcek contra EINSTEIN
Einstein made a serious mistake taking the Galilei's principle of
relativity, valid only for velocities vc, c - velocity of light, as
the
basis of the special (and general) theory of relativity. He excluded
the
Galileian system of coordinates and preserved the validity of law of
inertia. He also generalized its validity for systems moving at
velocity .
Einstein has written: "Prominent theoretical physicists were therefore
more
inclined to reject the principle of relativity, in spite of the fact
that no
empirical data had been found as contradictory to this principle." -
RELATIVITY, THE SPECIAL AND THE GENERAL THEORY BY A. EINSTEIN,
AUTHORIZED
TRANSLATION BY ROBERT W. LANSON, FOURTH EDITION, LONDON 1921. We will
show
the empirical data contradictory to Einstein's principles of
relativity.
In this juncture the question of validity of the idea of space-and-time

frame has become ready to be discussed. The answer to the question may
be
negative. Nevertheless, there are two general facts, initially
favorable to
the validity of the idea of space-and-time frame.
They a
A. The form of the interference field
B. The form of the intensity of the moving charge
In part 2 we will show, that the form of the interference field of the
moving medium is not-linear (it remains to prove by the metrologers
that the
interference field is also non-linear for the medium at rest).
We will also show, that the form of intensity of the moving charge is
asymmetric.
Einstein made a major mistake. The author proves it in revaluation
Kaufmann'
s, Fizeau's and Harres's experiments in light of the new theory
(intensity
of moving charge, non-linear form of the interference field, etc.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*-

----
1.1.1. Einstein's closed vicious circle
Einstein's two axioms:
a) law of propagation of light in all inertial frames
b) laws of physics (i. e. the law of propagation of light), identical
in all
inertial frames, mean that the light is propagated in all inertial
frames at
the speed of c. We can agree with this affirmation only in line with
the
closed coordinates system, with different media firmly connected with
the
frames (i. e. their coordinate axes). Otherwise, if we have the
coordinate
axes (skeletons) of inertial frames with a common medium, then is only
one
frame (skeleton - x, y, z axes) firmly connected to the medium.
Although the
light is propagated at the speed of c, with regard to other inertial
frames,
it is not true! In all inertial frames not firmly connected to the
medium
with regard to the frames (skeletons - x, y, z, axes only) the light
does
not propagate at the speed c, nevertheless the light cannot propagate
in
empty inertial frames (skeletons x, y, z)!
According to Einstein, the expression of vacuum (emptiness) indents to
be
apparently the unitive medium. That is again not correct.
Nevertheless, the vacuum consists of elementary particles, which also
persist in a certain motion. It means that it is possible to connect
firmly
with a given vacuum the only one frame, which "moves at the speed of v
= 0"
with regard to the vacuum (medium). It is evident, that it is possible
to
create the vacuum laboratories on various planets. In all of them, the
light
is propagated at speed c. But with regard to different inertial frames
of
planets the speed is different. There are different vacuums, which move
at
different speed. Einstein had to shelter himself behind the law of
propagation of light "at all times" so that both Einstein's axioms
could be
"valid" simultaneously.
Einstein corrected the real difference of light speeds in different
inertial
frames (skeletons) by "different times" in a fictitious "SPACE-TIME".
He
helped himself with a mixture of "space-time" mathematically expressed
by
the Lorentz transformation equations. Then he helped himself with other
new
expressions, that rescue what is not possible to rescue, whereby those
notions represent the following closed vicious circle:
Lorentz transformation equations
local time
covariant equations
physical definition of simultaneity
invariant interval
Lorentz transformation equations
We have shown that the idea of space-time frames is entirely wrong. All

notions in the closed vicious circle, including "mean proper lifetime
of
particle" calculated on the basis of the Einstein's theory of
relativity
which was not measured experimentally in fact are absolutely wrong.
Physics
is overflown by such anabashed points. It is necessary to clean the
physics.
It is necessary to strictly distinguish the measured values of the
particles
lifetime from the so called proper (shorter) Einstein's doubtful
particle
lifetimes, which takes into consideration velocity and shortens the
real
lifetime to the shorter fictitious (incorrect) proper lifetime, shown
in the
tables. The table proper lifetimes of particles have to be removed from
the
physical literature and be replaced by the measured real lifetimes
simultaneously with the measured velocities of elementary particles.
The
incorrect notions of Einstein's closed vicious circle lead to logical
assumptions for the incorrect notions in physics such as different
times in
different frames, length contraction, energy-momentum tensor, paradox
of
twins, clock paradox, equivalence of mass and energy etc. That's why it
is
necessary to remove this chaos from physics and to bring the results of

classical experiments in the right proportion (the place they belong
to).
It is not possible to reject Einstein's theory of relativity by one or
by a
few experiments. It is necessary to start from vicious circle... The
combination of the time "coordinate" with space coordinates into
space-time
and vicious circle originating from this is a big mathematical mistake.

This is deception of physicists including Einstein.

Allowe me to inform you on new address
http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz
is my book : NEW TRENDS IN PHYSICS absolutely free.
L.Vlcek

vlcek wrote:

1.1.1. Einstein's closed vicious circle
Einstein's two axioms:

a) law of propagation of light in all inertial frames

b) laws of physics (i. e. the law of propagation
of light), identical in all inertial frames, mean that
the light is propagated in all inertial frames at the
speed of c. We can agree with this affirmation
only in line with the closed coordinates system,
with different media firmly connected with the
frames (i. e. their coordinate axes). Otherwise,
if we have the coordinate axes (skeletons) of
inertial frames with a common medium, then is
only one frame (skeleton - x, y, z axes) firmly
connected to the medium. Although the light is
propagated at the speed of c, with regard to other
inertial frames, it is not true! In all inertial frames
not firmly connected to the medium with regard to
the frames (skeletons - x, y, z, axes only) the light
does not propagate at the speed c, nevertheless the
light cannot propagate in empty inertial frames
(skeletons x, y, z)!

According to Einstein, the expression of vacuum
(emptiness) indents to be apparently the unitive
medium. That is again not correct.

The differences between the Newtonian and the
Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON
and EINSTEIN respectively.
http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz

That is another way of saying:
A Lorentz transformation or any other coordinate
transformation will convert electric or magnetic
fields into mixtures of electric and magnetic fields,
but no transformation mixes them with the
gravitational field. --Steven Weinberg
http://www.aip.org/pt/vol-58/iss-11/p31.html

However, I don't see anything that would address
this problem:

Tajmar & de Matos / Tate mass anomaly
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.html

Sue...

"Sue..." wrote in message oups.com...

I've never seen a vandal, have you, aether?

vlcek wrote:
Allowe me to inform you on new address
http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz
is my book : NEW TRENDS IN PHYSICS absolutely free.
L.Vlcek

WARNING: When I visit the above link, I get redirected to a page that
attempts to install malware on my computer. The page contains of a
list a bunch of keywords apparently designed to attract people looking
for child pornography. The problem appears to affect the entire
euweb.cz domain, and whether the virus page or the intended page
appears seems to depend on the referrer. In particular, when there is
no referrer, the intended page comes up, but when I click a link from
Google, I get the virus page.

Jim Black wrote:
vlcek wrote:
Allowe me to inform you on new address
http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz
is my book : NEW TRENDS IN PHYSICS absolutely free.
L.Vlcek

WARNING: When I visit the above link, I get redirected to a page that
attempts to install malware on my computer. The page contains of a
list a bunch of keywords apparently designed to attract people looking
for child pornography. The problem appears to affect the entire
euweb.cz domain, and whether the virus page or the intended page
appears seems to depend on the referrer. In particular, when there is
no referrer, the intended page comes up, but when I click a link from
Google, I get the virus page.

Gee ... I don't think "Sorcerer" aka Androcles, Hexenmeister is
smart enough to do that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped...e_Hexenmeister

....but he does have so website building experience.


New Trends in Physics by Lubomir VlcekPlease feel free to click:; the
Book - for the full online version of the book; Spheres in nuclei -
images of all the spheres in nuclei.
www.vlcek.euweb.cz/ - 4k - Cached - Similar pages

New Trends in Physics by Lubomir VlcekPlease feel free to click:;
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
HTMLHEAD
META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"
META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR
STYLE/STYLE
/HEAD
BODY bgColor=#ffffff
DIVA class=l onmousedown="return clk(this.href,'','','res','8','')"
href="http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz/"FONT color=#551a8bNew Trends in
Physics by
Lubomir Vlcek/FONT/A
TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0
TBODY
TR
TD class=jFONT size=-1Please feel free to
click:;/FONT/TD/TR/TBODY/TABLE/DIV/BODY/HTML
©2006 Google

http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz/
http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz/book.php

It looks and runs normal on my machines.
Maybe you should scan your machine.
http://www.pandasoftware.com/products/ActiveScan.htm

Sue...

"Sue..." wrote in message oups.com...


[...]

I've never seen an aether, Dennis. Have you?

http://tinyurl.com/yndvwx

http://www.quackwatch.org/01Quackery...cs/pseudo.html

Sue... wrote:
Jim Black wrote:
vlcek wrote:
Allowe me to inform you on new address
http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz
is my book : NEW TRENDS IN PHYSICS absolutely free.
L.Vlcek

WARNING: When I visit the above link, I get redirected to a page that
attempts to install malware on my computer. The page contains of a
list a bunch of keywords apparently designed to attract people looking
for child pornography. The problem appears to affect the entire
euweb.cz domain, and whether the virus page or the intended page
appears seems to depend on the referrer. In particular, when there is
no referrer, the intended page comes up, but when I click a link from
Google, I get the virus page.

It looks and runs normal on my machines.
Maybe you should scan your machine.
http://www.pandasoftware.com/products/ActiveScan.htm

Sue...

Since this morning, the redirection problem has stopped, so I can't
tell decisively whether the problem was on my end or not.

Jim Black wrote:
Sue... wrote:
Jim Black wrote:
vlcek wrote:
Allowe me to inform you on new address
http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz
is my book : NEW TRENDS IN PHYSICS absolutely free.
L.Vlcek

WARNING: When I visit the above link, I get redirected to a page that
attempts to install malware on my computer. The page contains of a
list a bunch of keywords apparently designed to attract people looking
for child pornography.

The problem appears to affect the entire
euweb.cz domain, and whether the virus page or the intended page
appears seems to depend on the referrer.

In particular, when there is
no referrer, the intended page comes up, but when I click a link from
Google, I get the virus page.

It looks and runs normal on my machines.
Maybe you should scan your machine.
http://www.pandasoftware.com/products/ActiveScan.htm

Sue...

Since this morning, the redirection problem has stopped, so I can't
tell decisively whether the problem was on my end or not.

If it was as the whole domain you can believe they got on
it in a hurry. Anyway, thanks for the warning.

Sue...

"Sue..." wrote in message ups.com...



[...]

I've never seen an aether, Dennis. Have you?

http://tinyurl.com/yndvwx

http://www.quackwatch.org/01Quackery...cs/pseudo.html


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pf3z935R37E

Sue... napísal(a):
vlcek wrote:

1.1.1. Einstein's closed vicious circle
Einstein's two axioms:

a) law of propagation of light in all inertial frames

b) laws of physics (i. e. the law of propagation
of light), identical in all inertial frames, mean that
the light is propagated in all inertial frames at the
speed of c. We can agree with this affirmation
only in line with the closed coordinates system,
with different media firmly connected with the
frames (i. e. their coordinate axes). Otherwise,
if we have the coordinate axes (skeletons) of
inertial frames with a common medium, then is
only one frame (skeleton - x, y, z axes) firmly
connected to the medium. Although the light is
propagated at the speed of c, with regard to other
inertial frames, it is not true! In all inertial frames
not firmly connected to the medium with regard to
the frames (skeletons - x, y, z, axes only) the light
does not propagate at the speed c, nevertheless the
light cannot propagate in empty inertial frames
(skeletons x, y, z)!
..
Medium is firmly connected with Earth /planets/ - see you
Michelson-Morley Experiment.
Hypotheses stationary aether and Fresnell aether drag hypothesis are
not correct.
Medium is not aether.
1.2.1. New definition of medium, in which the light (wave, intensity)
is propagated
"All mass (standstill and moving) including vacuum, consists of
elementary particles, via which the light (wave or intensity) is
propagated by Huygens principle. This principle states that each point
of wave front (electromagnetic wave front) can be considered as a
source of secondary wavelets (small intensities) propagated in all
directions. Each source of secondary wavelets (small intensities) i. e.
each particle of medium moves at the speed of the medium. In other
words, the drag coefficient equals one (the complete drag).

At any moment the wave front (intensity front) is the envelope of these
wavelets (electromagnetic wavelets)."

The medium is composed of elementary particles oscillating around their
equilibrial positions. It is completely entrained as a whole, e. g. by
Earth gravitation field (considering the Earth, the equilibrial
positions of their elementary particles are at rest).

The medium oscillated around the equilibrial positions of its particles
in microspaces due to the spread of wave motion.

But as a whole, it does not move, while just local medium (elementary
particles) are in micromotion around their equilibrial positions (which
are at rest considering the Earth, however, because the it rotates and
circles around the Sun, the equilibrial positions are also in motion
considering fixed stars or the Sun respectively). An absolute vacuum,
i. e. zero pressure, does not really exist. It is only a certain,
nearly an ideal term, impossible to achieve in any laboratory. Not to
state that ,,one of the great "triumphs" of relativity is that the
medium was declared superfluous - not needed in all coordinate systems"
- this is one of the biggest defects of theory of relativity,
frequently criticized today. The difference between the medium and
ether is substantial. While the ether was defined as penetrating
through the entire matter, at the same time it was firmly connected
with the absolute stationary space and torn off by environment with a
different tearing coefficient = drag coefficient . The medium is an
environment, in which wave motion is spread. If we would endeavor to
compare "tearing coefficient" of medium and the ether respectively,
always for the medium . It is necessary to realize that there is a
large number of media in the Universe, mutually moving, while the
"jump" of wave motion from one moving medium to another one is ensured
by Huygens principle (see 1.2.3).

Ground spheres of air as well as media are completely entrained by
Earth's gravitational field. Considering the Earth, it is difficult
to speak about a relative motion of medium regarding the Earth ("ether
wind").

The stellar aberration is also composed of other media besides the
ground level of the atmosphere (medium immediately around the star-the
source of light, media between the star and the Earth, media around the
Earth and higher levels of the atmosphere). It is not possible to say
that it is one medium in these experiments (Michelson's experiment
and stellar aberration), and put them in contradiction.

The author has a medium, no ether. The author has a theory of a
non-linear form of the interference field - Beckmann [11] has not this
theory.

With own theory of medium and of non-linear form of the interference
field, we can explain Fizeau's experiment, stellar aberration and
Michelson-Morley experiment, at the same time

According to Einstein, the expression of vacuum
(emptiness) indents to be apparently the unitive
medium. That is again not correct.

The differences between the Newtonian and the
Einsteinian Universe or Vlcek contra NEWTON
and EINSTEIN respectively.
http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz

That is another way of saying:
A Lorentz transformation or any other coordinate
transformation will convert electric or magnetic
fields into mixtures of electric and magnetic fields,
but no transformation mixes them with the
gravitational field. --Steven Weinberg
http://www.aip.org/pt/vol-58/iss-11/p31.html


Lorentz transformation is not correct.Not correct is symetrical form
intensity of moving charge.

2.1.1 Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field - A New Theory -
non symetrical form
intensity of moving charge.

Let us have a system of coordinates (x, y, z) connected with the medium
causing propagation of light. Let the electric field intensity in this
medium propagate at speed c in all directions. It is known from
Coulomb's law that intensity of the still standing charge in relation
to the system of coordinates (x, y, z) decreases with the square of
distance from that charge then represented by hyperboles symmetrical to
the charge, illustrated in section as follows:
2.1.1 Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field - A New Theory
Let us have a system of coordinates (x, y, z) connected with the medium
causing propagation of light. Let the electric field intensity in this
medium propagate at speed c in all directions. It is known from
Coulomb's law that intensity of the still standing charge in relation
to the system of coordinates (x, y, z) decreases with the square of
distance from that charge then represented by hyperboles symmetrical to
the charge, illustrated in section as follows:
2.1.1 Intensity of the Moving Charge Electric Field - A New Theory
Let us have a system of coordinates (x, y, z) connected with the medium
causing propagation of light. Let the electric field intensity in this
medium propagate at speed c in all directions. It is known from
Coulomb's law that intensity of the still standing charge in relation
to the system of coordinates (x, y, z) decreases with the square of
distance from that charge then represented by hyperboles symmetrical to
the charge, illustrated in section as follows:

Fig. 2.1. The intensity of the stillstanding charge
r - distance of the hyperbole point from the beginning
Charge q is situated at level yz and in the distance of yq from the
beginning in the direction of axis y.
Let us now examine what would happen with the form of curves
representing the intensity of the electric field, if charge q will move
in a uniform straight line motion in the direction of the axis y at a
constant speed v. Let's thus join firmly the system of coordinates (x',
y', z') with the charge q, see fig. 2.2.
r - distance of the hyperbole point from the beginning

Fig. 2.2. The system of coordinates (x', y', z')
Distance r' is measured in direction of axis y' from the charge (or
from the beginning O' respectively), while it is valid

r'=r-vt (2.1)
At the moment t0=0 both systems become identical.
When , the charge finding itself at the distance of would emit
intensity propagating at speed c, which at the moment of t would come
to point r in time of

(2.2)
thus

(2.3)
The index id means that is the case of propagation of the electric
field intensity in direction of the charge motion.
Let the be the distance between the position of the charge at the
moment of (i.e. when the charge has emitted the intensity to point r)
and position of the charge at the moment t, when the intensity emitted
"has reached" the point r.
At the time of the charge will cover the distance of

(2.4)
This is the distance at which the charge "outrun" the intensity
propagated in direction of the charge motion. Consequently the
intensity of the moving charge in relation to the system of coordinates
(x, y, z) will change its form in the respective of various r: it will
be deformed (see fig. 2.3)

Fig. 2.3. The intensity of the moving charge in the direction of the
motion
It is evident that with increasing distance ri (i = 1,2,3,...) the
respective "retardation of intensity" (ri) also increases, as can be
seen in equation (2.4.). As the intensity of the moving charge in the
direction of the motion at point r' and moment t equals the intensity
of the stillstanding charge at point at the moment of intensity
emittance , then:

(2.5)
From the Coulomb's law:

(2.6)
(2.7)
r are distances of points of hyperbola from the beginning of the
non-dashed system, r' are distances of points of hyperbola from the
beginning 0' in a dashed system, r, r' are variables of the same
function (represented by hyperbolas). In other words, there is
distance r, that numerically equals distance. Such distance r'
numerically equals distance, both being variables of the same function
. For detail refer to (2.6) and (2.7). The issue concerns the same
Coulomb's law.
By substituing of (2.5) and (2.4) we get

(2.8)
Then by utilizing (2.3), (2.6) and (2.7) we calculate

(2.9)
that is

(2.10)
Thus we managed to express the intensity of the moving charge in
direction of motion by means of the intensity of the stillstanding
charge in the given point. Analogically we express the intensity of the
electric field of the moving charge against the direction of motion
(indexes ad), see fig. 2.4.

Fig. 2.4. The distance
The charge moving at the speed of v parallel to the axis y is situated
(at the moment t) in the distance of v.t from the axis z.
At the moment the charge, situated in the distance of will emit the
intensity to the point r.
This intensity will reach at the moment t just the point r in time of

(2.11)
from where

(2.12)
is the distance between the position of the charge at the moment i.e.
when the charge emitted the intensity to the point r and the position
of the charge at the moment t, when the emitted intensity "has reached"
the point r.
The charge will cover the distance

(2.13)
at time , while r'0 and .
This is the distance by which the intensity that propagates in the
direction opposite to the movement of the charge, is shifted against
the intensity of the stillstanding charge in the direction away from
the charge, see fig. 2.5.
Analogically to equations (2.5)-(2.10) we achieve the following:

(2.14)
(2.15)
(2.16)
(2.17)
(2.18)
(2.19)
The form of intensity for v=0.5c see fig. 2.6.

Fig. 2.5. The intensity of the electric field by means of the moving
charge against the direction of motion Ead


Fig. 2.6. The form of intensity for v = 0.5c
The equations (2.10) and (2.19) are placeable by common equation

(2.20)
where is the angle between the direction of the charge motion (the
speed v) and the direction of propagation of intensity.
At level xy, the section of the intensity hyperboloid is, for the
stillstanding charge, the circle with its centre in the charge, for the
moving charge it is the case of all types of Pascal's screw stocks with
the charge at the beginning of the coordinates, see figs. 2.7, 2.8, 2.9
and 2.10.



Fig. 2.7, 2.8. At level (x, y) section of the "hyperoloid" of the
intensity for various speeds of the moving charge have a shape of all
types of Pascal's screw stocks with charge at the beginning of the
coordinates




Fig. 2.9, 2.10. At level (x, y) section of the "hyperoloid" of the
intensity for various speeds of the moving charge have a shape of all
types of Pascal's screw stocks with charge at the beginning of the
coordinates


2.1.2 Kaufmann's Experiment
In the period from 1901 to 1906, Kaufmann wrote a number of works, the
most coherent of them seems to be(1): concerning experimental evidence
of "the changeability of mass with speed". We shall revalue his
experiment and will prove - on the basis of the theory given in the
preceeding section 2.1.1 - the subject is the influence of intensity of
the moving charge on the magnitude of the deviation of influence of
intensity of the moving charge on the magnitude of the deviation of
beta-rays in the crossed electromagnetic field, and not the
changeability of mass with speed.
The attempt is done through a short correct description for sake of
qualitative examination of the experiment, utilising some of the
measured and calculated values given by Kaufmann in (1).
Beta-rays from Ra source, moving at speed are simultaneously deflected
in the crossed electric and magnetic field, see diagram in fig. 2.11.

Fig. 2.11. Kaufmann's Experiment - diagram
The device is situated in the evacuated glass vessel. The rays go out
from the Ra source, pass the electric screen and create a small spot on
a photographic plate.
When the electric field will be created on the condenser plates PP',
the additional stripe in the y- direction will arise apart from the
non-diverting middle spot close to 0 (consisting of gamma and little
diverting ).
When the entire device is situated between the poles of the U-shaped
magnet (with the electric field switched off), the stripe will arise in
the direction of the axis z.
While at the magnetic field we have the movement of electrons along
circles expressed in the following equations

(2.21*)
were
in the electric field we first have the movement along straight line

(2.22*)
- electrons are emitted from the source under the angles then they
move between the condenser plates along the parabola

(2.23*)
then again along the straight line

(2.24*)
The points of intersection of straight lines (2.24*) with the level of
the photographic spot will give us the deviation y.
The values E used in the calculations

(2.25*)
would give, after substitued into (2.23*) and (2.24*) the deviations
which are almost four times bigger as those acquired (yb) by Kaufmann.
Considering out theory on and the values (2.25*) be multiplied by we
achieve deviations identical with the results of Kaufmann's experiment,
see table 1. Thus the theory under 2.1.1 concerning the intensity of
the moving charge of the electric field may be regarded experimentally
confirmed.
Table 1.

1631 V 2603 V 3250 V
yb[cm] 0.1236
0.1119 0.1493
0.1302 0.1664
0.1616

y[cm] 0.23626 0.3873 0.4985
yT[cm] 0.0629 0.09947 0.12557
yT-theoretical value (our new theory):

(1)Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge, Band 19, Leipzig 1906, Verlag von
Johann Ambrosius Barth, page 487-552


Lubo Vlcek