A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags:

gravity A



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd 06 posted to sci.physics.relativity
xgl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default gravity A

if gravity A exist, why when you put 2 protons in
proxymity together they dont stick together becus
the high gravity?

then how to convert this gravity A to gravity B?

why is relativity only working for gravity B?

are there a gravity C?

Ads
  #2  
Old December 3rd 06 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Tom Roberts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,996
Default gravity A

xgl wrote:
if gravity A exist, why when you put 2 protons in
proxymity together they dont stick together becus
the high gravity?


I have no idea what you mean by "gravity A", "B", or "C".

But I do know that for two protons, _classically_, the attractive force
of gravity is some 10^38 times smaller than the electromagnetic
repulsion between them. So classically, they don't "stick together" by
an enormous factor.

Note, however, that such a classical estimate has no bearing on whether
protons stick together; quantum effects are important. While two protons
do not bind together, add a neutron and they do (He-3).


Tom Roberts
  #3  
Old December 3rd 06 posted to sci.physics.relativity
bone
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 38
Default gravity A


Tom Roberts wrote:
xgl wrote:
if gravity A exist, why when you put 2 protons in
proxymity together they dont stick together becus
the high gravity?


I have no idea what you mean by "gravity A", "B", or "C".

But I do know that for two protons, _classically_, the attractive force
of gravity is some 10^38 times smaller than the electromagnetic
repulsion between them. So classically, they don't "stick together" by
an enormous factor.

Note, however, that such a classical estimate has no bearing on whether
protons stick together; quantum effects are important. While two protons
do not bind together, add a neutron and they do (He-3).


Tom Roberts


dear Mister Tom

thank you for your email

mister lazar bob said that gravity A is a strong gravity
holding the nucleus of the atoms together

does it helps?

  #4  
Old December 3rd 06 posted to sci.physics.relativity
RMDumse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default gravity A


xgl wrote:
then how to convert this gravity A to gravity B?

why is relativity only working for gravity B?

are there a gravity C?


I don't if this might help, but when I hear Gravity B, I assume someone
is talking about Gravity Probe B, the space shots meant to measure some
subte GR effects. There was a Gravity Probe A as well. We expect
results from GP-B to be published early next year.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scout_rocket_experiment

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_Probe_B

Neither would have any obvious connections to sticking protons together
though.

--
Randy M. Dumse

Caution: Objects in mirror are more confused than they appear.

  #5  
Old December 7th 06 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Autymn D. C.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,935
Default gravity A

Tom Roberts wrote:
But I do know that for two protons, _classically_, the attractive force
of gravity is some 10^38 times smaller than the electromagnetic
repulsion between them. So classically, they don't "stick together" by
an enormous factor.

Note, however, that such a classical estimate has no bearing on whether
protons stick together; quantum effects are important. While two protons
do not bind together, add a neutron and they do (He-3).


Hey, here's a thoht: As protòns are composite, there are gaps between
their quarks. So it would be possibil to force two protòns together
with finite ènèrjy so they hit neutral acceleration and make a
hèxaquark.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas? TrekJunky The Theory of Relativity 94 October 29th 06 12:12 PM
Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas? Mike Physics - General Discussion 15 October 21st 06 08:06 PM
Can inverse gravity waves cancel out Earth's gravity in selected areas? Mike Physics - General Discussion 4 October 20th 06 10:54 PM
Gravity NEUTRALIZING Air/ Spacecraft, or ZERO/REDUCED Gravity Chamber REM460 Physics - General Discussion 12 July 7th 04 10:44 PM
Gravity NEUTRALIZING Air/ Spacecraft, or ZERO/REDUCED Gravity Chamber rem61704@aol.com Physics - New Theories 4 July 7th 04 10:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Buy PSP - Bad Credit Loan - Books - Comprar vivienda Denia - Work at Home