![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: debate, emergent, gravity |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"It is true that your suggestion for the introducing the tetrad fields
is based on physical ideas and they are intuitively correct, but this does not means that you have a correct theory. Best regards," Waldyr Above statement by Waldyr is a major change and his abstract in the archive should reflect it. Yes, and my point about my "derivation of GR" is that: I. Kibble did it satisfactorily in 1961 from the POV of locally gauging the 10-parameter Poincare group for ALL non-gravity source actions in special relativity. This is fine as far as it goes. However, there are annoying loose ends II. Discovery of dark energy in ~ 1998 ~ 73% of universe III. Dramatic observations of dark matter ~ 23% of universe, e.g. in collisions of galaxies where dark matter CG separates from visible matter CG. IV Non-renormalizability of orthodox quantum gravity V. No evidence of quantum foam in high energy cosmic rays, i.e. breakdown of Lorentz invariance VI. No evidence of on-mass-shell dark matter particles - it's an unwarranted inference in astronomical observations. I predict LHC will be null like Michelson-Morley and said so in the archive paper. VII. No evidence of supersymmetry, disappointing results in both string theory and loop quantum gravity in terms of contact with experiment and observation - over-mathematized excess baggage complaints etc. VIII. Resurgence of interest in retro-causality in orthodox quantum theory by John Cramer - actual experiments underway - see Martin Gardner "Magic and Paraphysics" in "Science, Good, Bad and Bogus" on history of this. IX. Actual discovery of supersolid helium in lab predicted by me in 1969 in Physics Letters BEFORE Leggett's paper. X. Hagen Kleinert's "world lattice" model of Einstein's gravity that I get as an elastic "supersolid" emergence from the vacuum coherence damping down of zero point energy that explains how and why the cosmological constant is about 120 powers of ten smaller than random ZPF quantum field theory predicts (give or take a few powers). That is, just as in a superfluid the Cartan 1-form superflow 3-vector field is v = (Quantum of Circulation)d(Goldstone Phase) So too in the SUPERSOLID coherent ODLRO vacuum that sucks up random zero point energy into the condensate Warped part of the 4 Einstein-Cartan tetrad (SPIN 1 renormalizable) 1-form world 4-vector fields is C^a^a ~ (Quantum of Area)(1-form from 8 Goldstone phases, Theta^a, Phi^b, a,b = 0,1,2,3) Spin connection 1-forms as anti-symmetrized C^a^b possibly with Kiehn's MACRO SPINORS? XI. Taking a partial trace down to 2 Goldstone phases with three real Higgs vacuum ODLRO fields gives Bekenstein BITS one per monopole point defect with World Hologram lattice spacing of &L = Lp^2/3L^1/3 &L ~ 1 fermi when L ~ 10^28 cm = (Cosmological Dark Energy Constant)^-1/2 in de Sitter universe model of our pocket universe. On Nov 21, 2006, at 7:45 PM, Paul Greenberg wrote: Yes, absolutely right. You need to locally gauge the 10 parameter *Poincare* group O(1,3) x T4 to get the whole Kibble enchilda. PG --- In , Jack Sarfatti Sarfatti@... wrote: PPS Paul - also you err below "O(1,3) is 6-parameter not enough. Utiyama did that and did not get the tetrads that he had to put in by hand. Only when you locally gauge the 10- parameter Poincare group T4xO(1,3) do you get 4 tetrad 1-forms with GCTs + 6 spin-connection 1-forms that together allow you to make 1. An Einstein metric field 2. A connection field for Riemannian geometry parallel transport 3. A geodesic deviation curvature 4. A torsion field coupled to spinning matter beyond Einstein 1915 .. __,_._,___ |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Debate on Emergent Gravity 6 | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 22nd 06 06:00 AM |
| Debate on Emergent Gravity 4 | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 22nd 06 04:07 AM |
| Debate on Emergent Gravity 4 | Jack Sarfatti | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | November 22nd 06 04:07 AM |
| Emergent Gravity | Jack Sarfatti | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | August 12th 06 11:01 PM |
| Debate with Zielinski on GR and Quantum Gravity | starwars | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | July 5th 04 07:50 AM |