A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

Debate on Emergent Gravity 6



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 22nd 06 posted to sci.math,sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro,sci.philosophy.tech
Jack Sarfatti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,218
Default Debate on Emergent Gravity 6

"It is true that your suggestion for the introducing the tetrad fields
is based on physical ideas and they are intuitively correct, but this
does not means that you have a correct theory.

Best regards,"

Waldyr

Above statement by Waldyr is a major change and his abstract in the
archive should reflect it.


Yes, and my point about my "derivation of GR" is that:

I. Kibble did it satisfactorily in 1961 from the POV of
locally gauging the 10-parameter Poincare group
for ALL non-gravity source actions in special relativity.

This is fine as far as it goes. However, there are annoying loose ends

II. Discovery of dark energy in ~ 1998 ~ 73% of universe

III. Dramatic observations of dark matter ~ 23% of universe, e.g. in
collisions of galaxies where dark matter CG separates from visible
matter CG.

IV Non-renormalizability of orthodox quantum gravity

V. No evidence of quantum foam in high energy cosmic rays, i.e.
breakdown of Lorentz invariance

VI. No evidence of on-mass-shell dark matter particles - it's an
unwarranted inference in astronomical observations.
I predict LHC will be null like Michelson-Morley and said so in the
archive paper.

VII. No evidence of supersymmetry, disappointing results in both string
theory and loop quantum gravity in terms of contact with experiment and
observation - over-mathematized excess baggage complaints etc.

VIII. Resurgence of interest in retro-causality in orthodox quantum
theory by John Cramer - actual experiments underway - see Martin Gardner
"Magic and Paraphysics" in "Science, Good, Bad and Bogus" on history of
this.

IX. Actual discovery of supersolid helium in lab predicted by me in 1969
in Physics Letters BEFORE Leggett's paper.

X. Hagen Kleinert's "world lattice" model of Einstein's gravity that I
get as an elastic "supersolid" emergence from the vacuum coherence
damping down of zero point energy that explains how and why the
cosmological constant is about 120 powers of ten smaller than random ZPF
quantum field theory predicts (give or take a few powers).

That is, just as in a superfluid the Cartan 1-form superflow 3-vector
field is

v = (Quantum of Circulation)d(Goldstone Phase)

So too in the SUPERSOLID coherent ODLRO vacuum that sucks up random zero
point energy into the condensate

Warped part of the 4 Einstein-Cartan tetrad (SPIN 1 renormalizable)
1-form world 4-vector fields is

C^a^a ~ (Quantum of Area)(1-form from 8 Goldstone phases, Theta^a,
Phi^b, a,b = 0,1,2,3)

Spin connection 1-forms as anti-symmetrized C^a^b possibly with Kiehn's
MACRO SPINORS?

XI. Taking a partial trace down to 2 Goldstone phases with three real
Higgs vacuum ODLRO fields gives

Bekenstein BITS one per monopole point defect

with World Hologram lattice spacing of

&L = Lp^2/3L^1/3

&L ~ 1 fermi

when L ~ 10^28 cm = (Cosmological Dark Energy Constant)^-1/2 in de
Sitter universe model of our pocket universe.

On Nov 21, 2006, at 7:45 PM, Paul Greenberg wrote:

Yes, absolutely right. You need to locally gauge the 10 parameter
*Poincare* group O(1,3) x T4 to get the whole Kibble enchilda.

PG

--- In , Jack Sarfatti
Sarfatti@... wrote:

PPS Paul - also you err below "O(1,3) is 6-parameter not enough.
Utiyama did that and did not get the tetrads that
he had to put in by hand. Only when you locally gauge the 10-
parameter Poincare group T4xO(1,3) do you get
4 tetrad 1-forms with GCTs + 6 spin-connection 1-forms that together
allow you to make
1. An Einstein metric field
2. A connection field for Riemannian geometry parallel transport
3. A geodesic deviation curvature
4. A torsion field coupled to spinning matter beyond Einstein 1915




..

__,_._,___
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Debate on Emergent Gravity 6 Jack Sarfatti Physics - General Discussion 0 November 22nd 06 06:00 AM
Debate on Emergent Gravity 4 Jack Sarfatti Physics - General Discussion 0 November 22nd 06 04:07 AM
Debate on Emergent Gravity 4 Jack Sarfatti The Theory of Relativity 0 November 22nd 06 04:07 AM
Emergent Gravity Jack Sarfatti The Theory of Relativity 0 August 12th 06 11:01 PM
Debate with Zielinski on GR and Quantum Gravity starwars The Theory of Relativity 0 July 5th 04 07:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Myspace Layouts - Sussex Car Club - Car Credit - Auto Loans